Yes I read it - many times - trust me.
But how do I get the shared library - I thought that when I
configure/make/ it would generate the shared library - apparently not -
or maybe it needs some special options.
That's the point I don't understand the message
If you have an answer it would be
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 05:54:10PM +0800, Vladan Popovic wrote:
Yes I read it - many times - trust me.
But how do I get the shared library - I thought that when I
configure/make/ it would generate the shared library - apparently not -
or maybe it needs some special options.
run ./configure
Hello, this is what I found about the gnome-panel issue on the bugs page:
Number: 4473
Category: ports
Synopsis: gnome-panel freeze and quits on OpenBSD 3.8 current i386
Confidential: yes
Severity: serious
Priority: medium
Responsible:bugs
State:
[IMAGE]
Bem-vindo ao InCards!
Vocj recebeu um cartco postal virtual de [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Poxa, como i difmcil ficar sozinha aqui, viajar pra um pams tco distante
de vocjs, que sco meus amigos a tanto tempo, eu precisei enviar esse
cartco para vocj, porque ss assim, eu vo me sentir melhor, e
Ramiro Aceves wrote:
...
Yes, WM also works fine here. But again, it is not a solution. GNOME
should not be released in such buggy state.
I don't follow your logic here.
Ok, let's say GNOME was removed from ports by your suggestion.
In that case, you WOULD need to find another solution.
In
test. ignore.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which
had a name of smime.p7s]
Hi,
On 3/8/06, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But financially we are under strain, and it is not letting us grow any
of our bigger plans.
It sounds like you really have big plans. Maybe it is a good idea to
tell about them, maybe that will make the big companies interested in
Hi misc,
I've got a problem with the SCSI read/write speed under 3.8.
It has LSILOGIC HW raid adapter running raid1.
The time dd test shows:
astatine[wooh] time dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/wooh/output bs=1m count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes transferred in 411.637
You're lucky that your RAID1 array even works, since integrated
mirroring (IM) is currently not supported by mpt(4) driver. If it
works, it is slow like hell.
If you want speed, remove the RAID1 array and run with 2 normal disks.
On 3/13/06, Adam Papai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
I've
Srebrenko Sehic said:
You're lucky that your RAID1 array even works, since integrated
mirroring (IM) is currently not supported by mpt(4) driver. If it
works, it is slow like hell.
If you want speed, remove the RAID1 array and run with 2 normal disks.
On 3/13/06, Adam Papai [EMAIL
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:03:21PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Dear folks,
i live in brazil, and it is a common practice for local
corporation/institutions to monitor our phone calls, internet access
and personal email. I would like to be able to access Internet by
means
Raidframe works great, no problems (for me) :)
Adam Papai wrote:
Srebrenko Sehic said:
You're lucky that your RAID1 array even works, since integrated
mirroring (IM) is currently not supported by mpt(4) driver. If it
works, it is slow like hell.
If you want speed, remove the RAID1 array and
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:55:47AM -0800, Bryan Brake wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:03:21PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Dear folks,
i live in brazil, and it is a common practice for local
corporation/institutions to monitor our phone calls, internet access
and
On Monday 13 March 2006 10:55, you wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:03:21PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Dear folks,
i live in brazil, and it is a common practice for local
corporation/institutions to monitor our phone calls, internet access
and personal email.
I doing some performance test with openbsd 3.8 in a PowerEdge 830 with
perc 4/sc board.
'dd if=/dev/sd0c of=/home/test1 count=4000 bs=256k' gives a transfer
rate of 6MByte por second. This is really slow... other operating
systems get a throughput of 45 mbyte por second.
Setting Write-policy to
Dear Misc,
I want to leave the pre-loaded Windows XP on the X40, so I:
a) didn't let it convert to NTFS
b) deleted the IBM/Lenovo utility partition
c) resized part 0 (C)
d) using OpenBSD install fdisk, created an OpenBSD partition (above
cylinder 1024).
Now, after creating slice a, the OpenBSD
Chris Paul wrote:
Now, after creating slice a, the OpenBSD disklabel does not do the math
for me. It give me the same beginning offset as for wd0a. So I then: did
the math (added all the offsets created the partitions), but now it
won't boot (it just goes ahead and boots XP).
Show us
I differ a bit. If the port were removed, there'd be even less incentive
to work to fix it in future. But, if testing shows it doesn't work, it
should be marked as BROKEN for releases, yes. Now, wrt testing, it
applies what others said: Everyone is asked to contribute, even if the
Hello
Helping is done with cash donations and diffs. Being an buttplug is not.
I do not have enough money to make donations, I have contributed
buying a CD set. I think it is insignificant and not too much but it
is the only thing I can afford. I am not capable of sending any diffs.
Not
If you don't mind me chiming in, my disks arn't nearly as slow, but I
expected them to be faster. Can anybody make a recommendation to
improve my disk i/o, or confirm the speeds I get are about right? This
is the first machine I've had thats U320 SCSI-capable.
raid0 is a mirror of two scsi disks:
I have tested it in two very different machines and It fails as soon
as you format a cell.
no, my laptop runs -current.
Oh great, it means that they have fixed it!
It is not every possible combination of program and input, it is a
failure that appears as soon as you format a cell.
Am I missing something? Are snapshot not available anymore?
We've just finished building the 3.9 release, and will soon
start making -current snapshots available again.
Hold on.
On 2006/03/14 00:01, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
When I first discover OpenBSD after some years using Linux, I got in
love with it, I liked its philosophy very much, its correctness, its
documentation, the way the kernel boots, Everything is where you spect
it to be.
Follow the cvs-changes and
Danilo Piazzalunga wrote:
Am I missing something? Are snapshot not available anymore?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#NoSnaps
On 3/13/06, Danilo Piazzalunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to install a snapshot of the upcoming 3.9 release, and I was
expecting to find the relevant files in the /pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386
directory, but that directory is empty (albeit present) on most mirrors
Theo de Raadt wrote:
We've just finished building the 3.9 release, and will soon
start making -current snapshots available again.
Hold on.
All right. Many thanks, especially for the quick reply.
On 3/13/06, Chris Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Misc,
I want to leave the pre-loaded Windows XP on the X40, so I:
a) didn't let it convert to NTFS
b) deleted the IBM/Lenovo utility partition
c) resized part 0 (C)
d) using OpenBSD install fdisk, created an OpenBSD partition (above
Nick Guenther wrote:
Well, like was said, you lack fdisk and disklabel output. However, did
you remember to mark the partition active? Also, you might have just
messed up in disklabelling but I can't see how (unless you somehow put
wd0a onto a part of the disk that gets overwritten for some
I just upated my src tree and built a new kernel. The system works
(I can ssh to my laptop), but X is dead and I can't switch to a text
console. I tried this twice with the same results. Reverting to my
previous kernel of the 7th returned the laptop to normal. So, heads
up.
--STeve Andre'
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:30:46 -0500, STeve Andre' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just upated my src tree and built a new kernel. The system works
(I can ssh to my laptop), but X is dead and I can't switch to a text
console. I tried this twice with the same results. Reverting to my
previous
Anyone else having trouble reading lists or opening www.openbsd.org?
For some reason i cannot even open the web page no matter what pc i try,
from home or work.
If anyone has an idea please email me privately since i cannot see the
list.
Thanks
Marius Van Deventer
Computer Technician
Never mind all.
As I sent this away, everyting suddenly came right.
Who knows?
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
Sent: 14 March 2006 08:07 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: trouble with lists
Anyone else having trouble reading lists or opening
32 matches
Mail list logo
