Jeg har en ny e-mail-adresse!Nu kan du e-maile mig pe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Toto Lotto NL
Spadestraat 1,
Oosterhout,
The Netherlands.
Dear Lucky Winner,
We are pleased to announce you as one of the 3 lucky winners in the Toto Mega
Jackpot Lottery
draw held recently. All 3 winning
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:19:28PM -0400, John L. Scarfone wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Joachim Schipper stated:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:20PM +0200, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
So, where do these commits go now ? To OPENBSD_3_9_BASE ?
People say they received CD's.
Hi
2006-04-14, 10:37:47, you wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:19:28PM -0400, John L. Scarfone wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Joachim Schipper stated:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:20PM +0200, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
So, where do these commits go now ? To
Hi all,
I'm having a weird problem with my connection, I switched from cable to
dsl (covad), and they gave me a netopia router to be setup in bridge mode
so that my OpenBSD 3.9 current can acquire the IP address. My 3.9 has 2
NIC, (fxp0 and xl0). My xl0 is my public IP, my fxp0 is 192.168.3.2,
Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
...
It was fixed. First time I've seen it happen before official release
though.
Well, security problems just before releases are not that common. ;-)
If I understand this right. This commit is in OPENBSD_3_9_BASE in cvs but it's
not on CD's. Isn't it ?
n...
On 4/14/06, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/libsm/fflush.c
OPENBSD_3_9_BASE is tagged...and that's it. (well..usually. I'm sure
there's some exception somewhere...)
The patches were put into OPENBSD_3_9 (a.k.a.,
Hi guys
Is there any way of configuring networks in sshd_config's AllowUsers?
You can put in user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no [EMAIL PROTECTED]/mask.
Having networks in AllowUsers would be extremely usefull.
Best regards,
--
Dick Visser
TERENA (IT Support Officer)
Singel 468D 1017AW
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:24:33PM +0200, Dick Visser wrote:
Hi guys
Is there any way of configuring networks in sshd_config's AllowUsers?
You can put in user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no [EMAIL PROTECTED]/mask.
Having networks in AllowUsers would be extremely usefull.
Best regards,
I found myself needing up apply the recent patch for sendmail against
an aging 3.6 stable box.
I took the sendmail patch for the 3.7 stable branch and applied it
against 3.6 stable. It applied cleanly with the exception of a half
dozen hunks in a couple of files. I merged those by hand and
Hi,
I'm trying to connect to a Wifi ISP over PPPoE, with the hardware:
Soekris net4511
Senao NL-2511CD PLUS EXT2 PCMCIA (wi driver)
13dBi Patch antenna
using OBSD 3.8 GENERIC kernel via flashdist.
Using the same PCMCIA and the same antenna, at the same location,
on a Windows98 laptop with
On Friday 14 April 2006 07:45, OS rider wrote:
Hi all , my name is takesima , a japanese .
i can manipulate a windows 2000 machine ( which address is 192.168.1.222
) via internet .
the point is rdr on tun0 inet proto tcp from any to 10.4.0.2 -
192.168.1.22 in pf.conf and vncviewer
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:49:20PM +0200, Lukasz Sztachanski wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:24:33PM +0200, Dick Visser wrote:
Hi guys
Is there any way of configuring networks in sshd_config's AllowUsers?
You can put in user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no [EMAIL PROTECTED]/mask.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:16:17PM +0200, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
On 4/14/06, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/libsm/fflush.c
OPENBSD_3_9_BASE is tagged...and that's it. (well..usually. I'm sure
there's some exception
Michael Flanagan wrote:
I found myself needing up apply the recent patch for sendmail against
an aging 3.6 stable box.
I took the sendmail patch for the 3.7 stable branch and applied it
against 3.6 stable. It applied cleanly with the exception of a half
dozen hunks in a couple of files. I
On 4/14/06, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. All patches past the _BASE tag always go into -STABLE. In this
case, correctly into OPENBSD_3_9. This is not special AFAIK.
*sigh*
HELLO... Topic is WHEN they go in.
3.9 is not official yet. This patch set went into -stable already.
sigh
-Original Message-
From: Ms.KIMAEVE LIOUDMILA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 14 april 2006 12:30
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Thank you my dear GOD bless you.
My Dear.
I have a profiling amount in an excess of US$123M, which I seek your
partnership in accommodating
So you say that the patch should go into OPENBSD_3_9 branch after 3.9
is *officially* released? Well, I wonder how people who pre-orded
their CDs, got them, installed 3.9-RELEASE and run Sendmail are going
to patch their systems?
I got 3.8 almost 2 weeks early, and seem to remember
Hi all,
When I run 'disklabel wd0', it returns:
# /dev/rwd0c:
My question is: why /dev/rwd0c instead of /dev/wd0c?
Thanks..
--
Joco Salvatti
Undergraduating in Computer Science
Federal University of Para - UFPA
web: http://www.openbsd-pa.org
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
When I run 'disklabel wd0', it returns:
# /dev/rwd0c:
My question is: why /dev/rwd0c instead of /dev/wd0c?
Because disklabel opens the raw device, block devices are normally
only used to access filesystems.
-Otto
On Friday 14 April 2006 10:56, Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
When I run 'disklabel wd0', it returns:
# /dev/rwd0c:
My question is: why /dev/rwd0c instead of /dev/wd0c?
Thanks..
From `man disklabel`:
diskSpecify the disk to operate on. It can be specified either by
I met Nikolay at the BSD booth at Linuxworld Boston and he is interested in
putting together a BSD booth at OpenFest in Sofia, Bulgaria later this year. Do
we have any contacts in that part of the world who can make sure that there is
some OpenBSD swag at the booth? Please cc Nikolay in any
since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine, i've
had a problem with running processes. sometimes i get the following message when
trying to issue shell commands:
ksh: cannot fork - try again
looking at my ulimit output, i see the following:
$ ulimit -a
Thanks folks.
On 4/14/06, Tim Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 April 2006 10:56, Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
When I run 'disklabel wd0', it returns:
# /dev/rwd0c:
My question is: why /dev/rwd0c instead of /dev/wd0c?
Thanks..
From `man disklabel`:
disk
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine, i've
had a problem with running processes. sometimes i get the following message
when
trying to issue shell commands:
ksh: cannot fork - try again
looking at my
2006/4/14, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine, i've
had a problem with running processes. sometimes i get the following message
when
trying to issue shell commands:
ksh: cannot fork - try again
looking at my ulimit
On 4/14/06, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unofficial patch? I never did see anything that said OpenBSD was
affected by the problem, and I'm always hoping that some of the OS level
protections might help in situations like this.
not likely.
since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine,
i've
had a problem with running processes. sometimes i get the following
message when
trying to issue shell commands:
ksh: cannot fork - try again
[rest deleted for brevity]
Are you maybe running out of memory? Is
Original message
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:05:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ksh: cannot fork - try again ??
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine,
i've
had a problem with running
ksh: cannot fork - try again
[rest deleted for brevity]
Are you maybe running out of memory? Is your swap partition big enough?
CU, Sico.
--
i have 730MB of 1GB available and that likely answers your question about
swap.
I suppose.
i am also not running KDE, i use the default fvwm.
i
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:22:00AM +0200, Alex Holst wrote:
I'm trying to find supported GPRS/UMTS modems in stores around here,
which is harder than you might think. According to i386.html, these two
are supported:
# Sony Ericsson GC75 GSM/GPRS modems
# Sony Ericsson GC89 GSM/EGDE modems
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
everybody who replied CC'ed me, so i got 3 duplicate replies
since i'm subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] why the CC fellas?
Add a recipe to your mailfilter; something like this:
# You don't want to miss you are CC-ed after all. You just don't want
# them in your maildir.
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:41:56AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
I have the following gmail servers whitelisted in my /etc/whitelist
#gmail
64.233.162.192/28 # zproxy gmail
64.233.170.192/28 # rproxy gmail
64.233.182.192/28 # nproxy gmail
64.233.184.192/28 # wproxy gmail
# pfctl -F all pfctl -d
# nmap -vv -sP '0.0.0.*'
Starting nmap 3.81 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-04-15 01:58 UCT
sendto in send_ip_packet: sendto(3, packet, 40, 0, 62.201.118.82, 16) =
No buffer space available
Sleeping 15 seconds then retrying
openbsd 3.7 over a pppoe
[IMAGE]
personal business account
Security Alert
Please note that Your Halifax Online Account is about to expire. In order
for it to remain active, please use the link below to proceed and restore
access to Your Account.
Maybe I'm the only one around who still uses it, but there's one
option in mailx from SysV that I miss with OpenBSD: ~a. It would
be simpler to have either ~a to add the -- with newline, and
read in my .signature, or a .mailrc option that automates the
additions, (preferably both). As it is
Hi all,
To increase the security level of my OpenBSD system I have defined at
/etc/fstab that the root partition should be read only. /etc/fstab
follows:
/dev/wd0a / ffs ro,softdep 1 1
/dev/wd0g /home ffs rw,softdep,nodev,nosuid,noexec 1 2
/dev/wd0f /tmp ffs rw,softdep,nodev,nosuid,noexec 1 2
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
To increase the security level of my OpenBSD system I have defined at
/etc/fstab that the root partition should be read only. /etc/fstab
follows:
Me, I just lurk here but:
1) if having / ro would actually improve security,
they would have done so long
On 2006.04.14, at 11:05 PM, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
Well, I wonder how people who pre-orded their CDs, got them,
installed 3.9-RELEASE and run Sendmail are going to patch their
systems?
Use the source code from the CD's themselves and then download the
patch from
On 4/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me, I just lurk here but:
1) if having / ro would actually improve security,
they would have done so long ago.
2) There are probably essential reasons why / cannot be read-only
on a useable system. Involving /etc, maybe.
39 matches
Mail list logo
