On 6/7/06, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/7/06, Frank Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:51:28PM +0200, Nikolaus Hiebaum ecrivait :
> >In October of last year, Frank reported that he succeeded in installing
OpenOffice 2.0 on
> >OpenBSD
>
> O
On 6/7/06, Frank Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Le Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:51:28PM +0200, Nikolaus Hiebaum ecrivait :
>In October of last year, Frank reported that he succeeded in installing
OpenOffice 2.0 on
>OpenBSD
Openoffice.org still works fine under OpenBSD.
I don't have a
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:51:28 +0200 (CEST)
Nikolaus Hiebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In October of last year, Frank reported that he succeeded in installing
> OpenOffice 2.0 on
> OpenBSD (cf.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112984281031654&w=2).
> Unfortunately, hi
On 2006.06.07, at 2:42 PM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
Did you actually read and then understand my original post?
Yes. I replied because I just wanted to clarify that memtest86 can be
used to identify bad memory down to a stick, through the use of it
and a thorough testing process.
Telling s
Hi everybody, I installed a Video Streaming server using OpenBSD 3.9 and
VideoLAN, I invite to all to visit my test page at
"http://jbolivar.sytes.net";. All comments are welcome.
Thanks and Regards.
Julian
Shane J Pearson wrote:
I have a faulty DDR2 SODIMM in my laptop which memtest86 shows to fail
in the same place every single time. This machine has 2 SODIMMS. If I
swap their positions in the memory slots in my laptop, memtest86 shows
the errors follow the module to the other slot, while showin
Hi Breen,
On 2006.06.07, at 4:39 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
Of course not. It doesn't even tell you if your memory is bad.
It can if you use it to identify a potentially faulty module and then
move that module to another slot or machine and the problem follows
the module (as reported by m
Eliah Kagan wrote:
>
> On 6/6/06, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Even OpenBSDin my humble opinion, the safest operating system on the
> > planetis crackable, if you allow anyone to come and pound away at its
> > network interface.
> >
> > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1972281
On 6/6/06, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even OpenBSDin my humble opinion, the safest operating system on the
planetis crackable, if you allow anyone to come and pound away at its
network interface.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1972281,00.asp
Construed literally, that woul
Even OpenBSDin my humble opinion, the safest operating system on the
planetis crackable, if you allow anyone to come and pound away at its
network interface.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1972281,00.asp
--
rogern
John 3:16
Hi,
I am using PF with two ISP links and doing load balancing.
Everything works fine, I copied the rules from the FAQ, except for one
issue. I am using samba, my problem appears when I have to Log to samba or
with RDR to my XP ip (192.168.3.22). PF is blocking internal traffic from
Follow these steps, they worked just fine to me in OpenBSD 3.9:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/openoffice_on_openbsd.html
Good luck
On 6/6/06, Nikolaus Hiebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
In October of last year, Frank reported that he succeeded in installing
OpenOffice 2.0 on
Op
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:38:03PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Original message from Frank Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > Openoffice.org still works fine under OpenBSD.
> > I don't have any host with X11 right now, but the basic steps to install
> > it were :
> >
> > - pkg_add redhat_bas
Original message from Frank Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Openoffice.org still works fine under OpenBSD.
> I don't have any host with X11 right now, but the basic steps to install
> it were :
>
> - pkg_add redhat_base
> - get the Openoffice.org RPM
> - /emul/linux/bin/rpm --ignoreos --ignorearc
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:51:28PM +0200, Nikolaus Hiebaum wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In October of last year, Frank reported that he succeeded in installing
> OpenOffice 2.0 on
> OpenBSD (cf.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112984281031654&w=2).
> Unfortunately, his blog where the ste
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/06/06 13:11, Sam Chill wrote:
There is a very handy program called memtest86 which can test your
memory to see if it is bad.
It tells you if it's bad, but it doesn't tell you if it's good.
Of course not. It doesn't even tell you if your memory is bad
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 22:00, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> It's mainly to draw punters into the hotspot area, and have them feel
> a little more comfortable about using a public access point
Hotspot? Public access point?
Enforcing encryption will hurt you and your visitors.
If you must, read:
http://
On 2006/06/06 17:48, Mike Spenard wrote:
> I have a Dell Poweredge 850 with the Dell CERC SATA 1.5/6ch controller.
> Is this controller supported under OpenBSD? During install I get "No
> disks found."
It's probably an aac(4), for which you'll need a custom
kernel - it was taken out of GENERIC fo
Hello,
Le Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:51:28PM +0200, Nikolaus Hiebaum ecrivait :
In October of last year, Frank reported that he succeeded in installing
OpenOffice 2.0 on
OpenBSD
Openoffice.org still works fine under OpenBSD.
I don't have any host with X11 right now, but the basic steps to ins
I have a Dell Poweredge 850 with the Dell CERC SATA 1.5/6ch controller.
Is this controller supported under OpenBSD? During install I get "No
disks found."
Mike Spenard
On 6 Jun 2006, at 21:21, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> No. In the scenario Stuart was describing, there's no decryption to
> occur.
> The originally encrypted traffic is still safe, but when you pop in
> and say
> "hi, I'm such-and-such IP, honest", the WAP happily negotiates a
> new sessio
Hello again.
I am not able to fix the issue, but here is the disklabel, maiby it can help
you figure out a solution.
# disklabel svnd0
# /dev/rsvnd0c:
type: SCSI
isk: vnd device
label: fictitious
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 100
tracks/cylinder: 1
sectors/cylinder: 100
cylinders: 18301
Didier Wiroth wrote:
> 1) Even if it was pretty obvious (yesterday I was bit lazy ... ;-))
> you have to replace the ETHER variable "trunk0" with your own
> network card in /etc/qemu-ifup, for me it was: ETHER=em0
>
> 2) Here is how I'm starting my qemu (with working network):
> sudo qemu -m 1000 q
please try the version from ftp.sernet.de there is also heimdal
for krb support with samba.
Thomas
Am Dienstag, den 06.06.2006, 17:06 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schoeller:
> hi list,
> i try to build the samba ldap port with kerberos support. i have added
> the --with-ads --with-krb5 options to the Mak
i got it :)
i build a patch based on this post:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-ports&m=110659454524366&w=2
if somebody is interested. it is here:
https://tiifp.org/samba_with_ads.patch
maybe it got into the tree.
regards
thomas
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 05:06:54PM +0200, Thomas Schoeller
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I understand. You're not saying anything regarding intercepting an
> > existing
> > session and accessing the data; it's akin to getting an Ethernet
> > cable on a
> > LAN (since you have the PSK for authentication) and
> negotiating a new
> > communication session
On 6 Jun 2006, at 19:37, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> I understand. You're not saying anything regarding intercepting an
> existing
> session and accessing the data; it's akin to getting an Ethernet
> cable on a
> LAN (since you have the PSK for authentication) and negotiating a new
> commun
Hello,
In October of last year, Frank reported that he succeeded in installing
OpenOffice 2.0 on
OpenBSD (cf.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112984281031654&w=2).
Unfortunately, his blog where the steps were listed is off-line
(http://www.00f.net/php/show-article.php/openoffice_o
Thede, Bennett wrote:
Hey all, really odd problem: booting from cd39.iso (to install over
wire, has worked on a generic dell from the same media, but I tried
another blank CD as well.) is freezing on boot on my 1U system
(Supermicro PDSMI MB, http://tinyurl.com/ol4nu , P4 2.8Ghz CPU (dual
core
Take a look at the following links - I use something based on thisthis for
spam filtering and it works better than any other free or commercial product
I've tried. I don't use the antivirus portion (I have a separate system for
that).
Like others have said, this mail scanning should probably be do
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 6/6/06, Ian Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Other than swapping out various bits
of hardware, which would involve buying new bits, are there any other
man pages or useful documents that might help me figure out what the
problem is?
Try running G
On 06/06/06, Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 08:13, Ioan Nemes wrote:
> The above article is a PR exercise, just testing the waters!
No, it's not just a PR exercise. The reason for the sudden retreat is that
they still want to be able to sell to the Taiwanese gov
From: Stuart Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I would challenge that by intercepting WPA-protected traffic
> > you can obtain cleartext so simply.
>
> This is no WPA crack.
>
> A wireless LAN is still susceptible to normal attacks which
> can be mounted from one node on a LAN to another.
>
openssl speed -evp works like a charm. Thanks for the info.
Though the manpage on the speed test is a bit misleading:
SPEED
openssl speed [aes] [aes-128-cbc] [aes-192-cbc] [aes-256-cbc] [blowfish]
[bf-cbc] [cast] [cast-cbc] [des] [des-cbc] [des-ede3] [dsa] [dsa512]
[dsa1024] [dsa2048]
On 2006/06/06 09:12, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> > WEP can be sniffed passively, but from what I understand with
> > WPA there are different keys per client (I don't have anything
> > running WPA here to check).
>
> My understanding is that the key shared by the WLAN nodes in WPA-PSK is used
>
Ian Watts wrote:
My 3.9 workstation has started locking up on me several times a day. The
box itself has been in use for months. It may be a coincidence that the
problem started shortly after upgrading from 3.8.
I've set ddb.panic=1 and ddb.log=1, but each lock-up just freezes the
system and
> On 6/6/06, Ian Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Other than swapping out various bits
> >of hardware, which would involve buying new bits, are there any other
> >man pages or useful documents that might help me figure out what the
> >problem is?
Try running GENERIC.MP kernel, on the box I had
On 6/6/06, Ian Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Other than swapping out various bits
of hardware, which would involve buying new bits, are there any other
man pages or useful documents that might help me figure out what the
problem is?
There is a very handy program called memtest86 which can te
On 6 Jun 2006, at 17:12, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> My understanding is that the key shared by the WLAN nodes in WPA-
> PSK is used
> to generate session keys, which are then cycled on a frequent basis
> (by
> TKIP, if configured on WPA1) or another method that escapes me on WPA2
> (802.11i
My 3.9 workstation has started locking up on me several times a day.
The box itself has been in use for months. It may be a coincidence that
the problem started shortly after upgrading from 3.8.
I've set ddb.panic=1 and ddb.log=1, but each lock-up just freezes the
system and leaves no clues i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 2006/06/06 10:40, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> > Isn't there a pre-shared key used as an IV of some sort in
> WEP (and
> > therefore WPA)? Yes, the traffic will be coming to you,
> but it's on
> > a wireless network, so you can sniff if passively if you want, you
>
tony sarendal wrote:
>New ear phones and "vulgar display of power" with Pantera also does
>the trick. My old ultra10's seemed really quiet, and as a bonus my
>manager stopped asking questions across the office.
>
>/Tony
>
>
ROTFL :)
On 06/06/06, Daniel A. Ramaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 04 June 2006 21:43, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> >these machines need Socket A and Socket 370 heatsinks. it's a plus if
> > they're low profile for 1U and 2U rackmount units. all suggestions
> > appreciated.
>
> What i've found w
We are looking for one Sun Blade 1000/2000 in the Washington DC area
for Jason Wright. If anyone can help, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If another can be easily gotten to Mark Kettenis in Assen, the Netherlands,
that would be great. Please cc me on mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
since he is stil
On Sunday 04 June 2006 21:43, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
>these machines need Socket A and Socket 370 heatsinks. it's a plus if
> they're low profile for 1U and 2U rackmount units. all suggestions
> appreciated.
What i've found works well is to buy a fan adapter that will allow you
to use a larger
hi list,
i try to build the samba ldap port with kerberos support. i have added
the --with-ads --with-krb5 options to the Makefile. but the configure
script reported:
checking whether LDAP support is used... yes
checking for Active Directory and krb5 support... no
maybe the missing krb5-config pro
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 17:42, Martin Schrvder wrote:
Hi,
how likely is a no-name 100MBit NIC to just work with 3.9 stable?
In my experience, very. Most are using the same chipsets (ie rl) as the
"brand" NICs anyway.
I cant recall ever having a NIC, brand or non-brand, tha
On 2006/06/06 10:40, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> Isn't there a pre-shared key used as an IV of some sort in WEP (and
> therefore WPA)? Yes, the traffic will be coming to you, but it's on
> a wireless network, so you can sniff if passively if you want, you
> don't need an IP address for that.
WEP
On 2006/06/06 11:42, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> how likely is a no-name 100MBit NIC to just work with 3.9 stable?
Very - same for no-name 1GBit. The only NIC I've seen
recently that didn't work was ULi M5261/M5263 (a dc-like
10/100 device) mostly (only?) used on motherboards with
a ULi chipset (for
On 2006/06/06 22:13, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> I'm looking at a mobo spec that would suit a POS app a friend needs
> except for one thing (maybe):
> The NIC is described as "an intergrated Realtek (8100) NIC"
8100 is a lan-on-motherboard (LOM) chip, basically the same
as 8139. It should work with r
ok thx working now
On 6/6/06, Nico Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi sonjaya,
> this my php.ini conf = session.save_path /tmp
Read the FAQ:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#httpdchroot
(If you run apache in its default chroot setting, you need to make
sure /var/www/tmp exists and is
I'm looking at a mobo spec that would suit a POS app a friend needs
except for one thing (maybe):
The NIC is described as "an intergrated Realtek (8100) NIC"
Googling for openbsd realtek 8100 finds mostly stuff in foreign
languages but there is a suggestion that it uses the 8139 driver in one
of t
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 19:38, sonjaya wrote:
> [Wed Jun 7 01:35:14 2006] [error] PHP Warning: Unknown: Failed to
> write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of
> session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0
Did you create /var/www/tmp with the right permissi
Hi sonjaya,
> this my php.ini conf = session.save_path /tmp
Read the FAQ:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#httpdchroot
(If you run apache in its default chroot setting, you need to make
sure /var/www/tmp exists and is writable to the apache user (www).)
HTH... Nico
dear all
this my php.ini conf = session.save_path /tmp
and i get error =
"
[Wed Jun 7 01:35:14 2006] [error] PHP Warning: Unknown: Failed to
write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of
session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0
"
i'm install apache using
On 6/6/06, Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 17:42, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> Hi,
> how likely is a no-name 100MBit NIC to just work with 3.9 stable?
Very, in my experience, They almost always use a Realtek 8139 chipset - rl(4).
-- ach
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 17:42, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> Hi,
> how likely is a no-name 100MBit NIC to just work with 3.9 stable?
In my experience, very. Most are using the same chipsets (ie rl) as the
"brand" NICs anyway.
I cant recall ever having a NIC, brand or non-brand, that didnt work.
---
L
Hi,
how likely is a no-name 100MBit NIC to just work with 3.9 stable?
Background: When I recently tried to get a replacement for a
swapped-out FA311v1, I noticed that I can get very cheap (5) no-name
NICs (one even claimed to be NE2000 compatible), but getting brand
cards which OpenBSD supports w
On 6 Jun 2006, at 09:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> You'd be sniffing encrypted traffic at that point, right?
>
> Not if you poison ARP, since the traffic will be directed
> to your MAC address and the AP will send it encrypted with
> your key. It's just an ethernet-type network, remember.
> (You
On 6/6/06, Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I once posted that all the anti-virus checking should be done on the
Windows boxes only. Let the mail server deliver mail, let the firewall
block bad packets, and let Windows find the viruses. Why? Re-read what
Chad stated in the last sentence below.
On 2006/06/05 18:47, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:31:38AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > If it's some hotspot-like setup, you don't need to circumvent
> > anything since you already have access to the network.
>
> You'd be sniffing encrypted traffic at that point, right?
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Rott_En wrote:
>Hello
>
> I had a power failure yesterday morning and because of that my server went
> down because of no battery present.
> When trying to mount the crypto partitions, I have figured out its not
> possible anymore because a set of 2 errors, as follows:
>
On 06/06/2006, at 2:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have been looking high and low for instructions on how to get 3.9
running on an x4100. Not finding any, I decided to play w/ it
myself. I
was able to make it work. While I have included the entire dmesg,
here is
the interesting
Paul,
Actually, all I wanted to do was see if it worked. I'm loading current atm,
and will post a dmesg when I get done...
Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul de Weerd
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 10:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Hello,
1) Even if it was pretty obvious (yesterday I was bit lazy ... ;-)) you have to
replace the ETHER variable "trunk0" with your own network card in
/etc/qemu-ifup, for me it was:
ETHER=em0
2) Here is how I'm starting my qemu (with working network):
sudo qemu -m 1000 qemu-files/xp.hd -net t
65 matches
Mail list logo
