Because Theo uses mail(1) so clearly it's good enough for everyone?
Who knows.
By the way, I wonder what email client Theo uses on a daily basis. There is
no x-mailer/x-user-agent in his email headers...
http://www.pingwales.co.uk/2005/06/03/OpenBSD-mail-server-config.html
/bkw
On 27/07/06, David B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry to bother, can anyone suggest a definitive book I should buy on how to
set up Sendmail on Openbsd 3.8?
I have looked all over the net for a HOWTO or an article that
Someone has written an article under Information Security News,
entitled Linux patch problems: Your distro may vary. As if
OpenBSD
were a Linux distro.
In this article, he compares response times to vulnerabilities and
then
gives various Linux distros and OpenBSD a score. OpenBSD came 2nd
last,
Did I miss something somewhere?
I just updated my system from src, and imagine my surprise when I saw
4.0-beta on bootup.
I can't wait to see what goodies you've been holding back for the 4.0release. ;)
Congrats on the momentum, and thanks for the good work.
--Bryan
Hi,
I haved searched the whole src tree and different codelines but cannot
locate this file (amongst others).
This file is user included from the directory of the source but is not
physically there.
There is another file with a similar name in the same directory (in_gif.h)
and also other
On 2006/07/27 09:46, Michael C wrote:
Can anyone provide information to help me please, another file I can not
find is bridge.h!
Try compiling a kernel. It's generated by config(8).
On 7/27/06, David B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry to bother, can anyone suggest a definitive book I should buy on how to
set up Sendmail on Openbsd 3.8?
I have looked all over the net for a HOWTO or an article that steps me
through how to set up a user account and password, and then how to
If any of you old timers see any errors in my suggestions, please point
them out. I am fairly new myself, and my two mailservers have been
running fine for 6+ months with this setup, but I still have a LOT to learn.
David B. wrote:
sorry to bother, can anyone suggest a definitive book I
It's not a bridge because i can SSH to any of the IPs of the Linux box
(192.168.1.121 ou 192.168.1.122) from the local network (and only one of
the NICs in the box is directly connected no the LAN). From what i know,
bridges have no IP addresses. Or am i wrong?
--
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:43:38PM -0600, David B. wrote:
sorry to bother, can anyone suggest a definitive book I should buy on how
to set up Sendmail on Openbsd 3.8?
You might want to read the O'Reilly sendmail Cookbook as an introduction ,
but there's no substitute for reading and
Hi jlr0i6sg3t,
On 2006-07-27T19:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone has written an article under Information Security News,
entitled Linux patch problems: Your distro may vary. As if
OpenBSD were a Linux distro.
Ok, thats wrong.
In this article, he compares response times to
I'm not looking forward to addressing the router to a different subnet
(and i know that would solve the problem) because our Internet-facing
servers are connected directly to that router in DMZ fashion (the router
forwards ports to them). The firewall is also connected directly to that
router and
On Jul 27, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Pavel Ivanchev wrote:
Hi there!
Is it possible to assign many IP addresses (aliases) on one interface
but each ip address to be in different class and netmask?
For example:
dc0: 192.168.168.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
alias 10.1.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0
Yes.
--
Jason
Hi,
as nobody seems to be interested in this problem, this will be my last
post and then I'll stop digging.
I've tried a _binary_ snapshot from ftp.openbsd.org (from July, 25th)
and it also gives me this short write error while using pkg_add per
ftp. dmesg is attached to this mail (I don't
Hello there
Router (192.168.1.120) - (192.168.1.121)
Firewall PC (192.168.1.122)
- (192.168.1.0/24) LAN
Now, thing is, the Linux firewall has two NICs:
NIC 1: 192.168.1.121
NIC 2: 192.168.1.122
The two NICs on the Linux box are configured with
192.168.1.121 and
On 7/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone has written an article under Information Security News,
entitled Linux patch problems: Your distro may vary. As if
OpenBSD
were a Linux distro.
In this article, he compares response times to vulnerabilities and
then
gives various
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 04:12:45PM +1200, Josh wrote:
Hello...
Say ive got a 15Mbit connection.
Client A starts downloading two files simultaniously, and uses all of the
15Mbit bandwidth. Then client B comes along, and starts downloading just one
file, and gets only 5Mbit per second.
Hi,
Anyone know whether AMD Geode LX-800 CPUs (CS-5536 chipset) are
supported? It is not listed on www.openbsd.org/i386.html
Thanks,
chakl
On 07/27/06 11:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone has written an article under Information Security News,
entitled Linux patch problems: Your distro may vary. As if
OpenBSD were a Linux distro.
Well, OpenBSD gets mentioned, that's the most important.
..
Good job Edmund! This is one of the
Ahmmm. Openbsd gets bad score in patching ?
Well that maybe becuase the os is so good that doesnt need 30 patches a day
like the linux distros.
I have heard the linux 'fans' saying amazing crap about their os'es...
Thank god in this world there are people that know that openbsd rules.
We must all
Webmaster Elaconta wrote:
I'm not looking forward to addressing the router to a different subnet
(and i know that would solve the problem) because our Internet-facing
servers are connected directly to that router in DMZ fashion (the router
forwards ports to them). The firewall is also connected
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 07:04:04AM -0700, Matt Radtke wrote:
Your Linux box is very like running as a real bridge
(set eth0 and eth1 as a brige) or a fake brige
(running proxy-arp).
Dear elaconta.com Webmaster,
please post at least the output of 'ifconfig -a' and 'route -n' to
this list.
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:52:15PM +0200, Martin Schrvder wrote:
Start with /usr/share/sendmail/README . It's dense, but has a wealth
of information. And then there is
http://sendmail.org/doc/sendmail-current/doc/op/op.pdf
Or just
At 09:24 PM 7/27/2006 +0100, Alex Stamatis wrote:
Let the linux guys talk. All the can do is talk ... Their os's suck
Well,. . there ARE some Linux distros taking market share from MS, so the
better viewpoint is 'it's a free market - let the cream rise to the top'.
For all those
Alex Stamatis wrote:
Ahmmm. Openbsd gets bad score in patching ?
Well that maybe becuase the os is so good that doesnt need 30 patches a day
like the linux distros.
I have heard the linux 'fans' saying amazing crap about their os'es...
Thank god in this world there are people that know that
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 09:24:54PM +0100, Alex Stamatis wrote:
[...] Their os's suck
http://fun.drno.de/sounds/Every_OS_sucks.mp3
Hello,
I'm a novice too and I have the following book:
O'Reilly: sendmail cookbook
Administrating, Securing Spam-Fighting.
Craig Hunt
ISBN 0-596-00471-0I
See: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/sendmailckbk/
I personnaly think it is a good book, it helped me a lot.
Covers: delivering and forwarding
i think memtest86 can test the cpu cache
burn the iso and boot it up
Xavier Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I boot the old disk (obsd 3.5) it works!?
How can I check if the cache is ok or not?
Xavier
--
Free shell account on www.rootshell.be!
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Steve Shockley
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good job Edmund! This is one of the worst articles on security I
have ever read. Talk about missing the point.
Yep, let's do talk about it since I see you as a blind horse that
misses the point because you cannot read. The title contains the two
words patch
Dag Richards escreveu:
Webmaster Elaconta wrote:
I'm not looking forward to addressing the router to a different subnet
(and i know that would solve the problem) because our Internet-facing
servers are connected directly to that router in DMZ fashion (the router
forwards ports to them). The
From: elaconta.com Webmaster
Thanks for the oppinions and wise advices of everyone on the mailing
list. I've given some deep thought to the subject and i'm
going with an
OpenBSD bridge and a separate box for DNS caching. We're going to have
some work reconfiguring the LAN clients but it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
garbage is third party garbage. One doesn't overlap the others. So if a
third party package runs into a bug (security, stability, or otherwise),
OpenBSD doesn't *have* to scramble to bring
Hello misc@,
Running OpenBSD 3.9 -RELEASE.
I am getting a strange error with pkg_add. It's not fatal but I know I
should be able to do this and have never been able to figure out
what's wrong. I have found very little else about this on the web
(only 3 pages, and all in german at that). I have
On 7/27/06, Sigfred Heversen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Guenther wrote:
# PKG_PATH=ftp://mirror.arcticnetwork.ca/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/
Use following before pkg_add
# export PKG_PATH=ftp://mirror.arcticnetwork.ca/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/
Oh.
Damn. I had this idea that
Why does cat retain the -[etv], -[bn] and -[s] options? I am reading
the paper cited in cat's manpage and saw 'vis' mentioned. vis is in
base, and line numbering and stripping can be done with sed, so why
does cat have those options? Is for history, just for compatibility,
or has no one ever
Good day!
Is there a way to monitor emails going out thru a pf firewall/gateway
server going into an external email server? I have deployed a
firewall/gateway server using 3.9. Pls. point me to pointers how this
can be possible.
Thank you very much!
Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:31:10 -0400
From: Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OpenBSD-Misc misc@openbsd.org
Subject: cat -v
Why does cat retain the -[etv], -[bn] and -[s] options? I am reading
the paper cited in cat's
On 7/27/06, Marcus Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:31:10 -0400
From: Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OpenBSD-Misc misc@openbsd.org
Subject: cat -v
Why does cat retain the -[etv], -[bn] and
Hi,
Trackig the cvs changes I found this
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006/07/26 21:52:56
Modified files:
etc: Makefile
Log message:
remove
Hi Tito,
Is there a way to monitor emails going out thru a pf firewall/gateway
server going into an external email server?
Define monitor.
I use postfix and pflogsumm and if one wanted to, one could get a copy of
every single message going through the system.
Both constitute monitoring, but
Hi,
you can use mailsnarf (from dsniff
[http://www.monkey.org/~dugsong/dsniff]) to sniff all the mails .
DESCRIPTION
mailsnarf outputs e-mail messages sniffed from SMTP and
POP traffic in Berkeley mbox format, suitable for offline
browsing with your favorite mail reader
hi all,
just tried out the new azalia driver on
my presario v3000 notebook.. the dmesg
seems normal.. but i still cannot play any sound
using mpg123 or xmms.. and audioctl cause kernel panic if
executed after i tried to play somefile using mpg123..
not so sure what the actual cause is.. but if i
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:58:49 -0400, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Why does cat retain the -[etv], -[bn] and -[s] options? I am reading
the paper cited in cat's manpage and saw 'vis' mentioned. vis is in
base, and line numbering and stripping can be done with sed, so why
does
43 matches
Mail list logo
