Building a new OpenBSD server I am planning to buy a Tyan S3950
mainboard. Has anybody experience with that chipset?
http://tyan.com/products/html/tomcath1000s.html
Thanks,
--
Stephan A. Rickauer
---
Institut f|r Neuroinformatik
Hi Matthew.
On 10/7/06, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream
which had a name of dmesg]
Attachments are stripped on misc@ emails.
Doh!
Second, have you verified that you *need* an xorg.conf? X.org now
auto-detects many
Hi Andreas.
On 10/8/06, Andreas Bihlmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the same problem with a GeForce 7300GT. The problem is these
chips are only supported by X.org 7.x (which is not yet in OpenBSD).
After reading:
http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=2006071016
I guess you
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:02:19AM +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
Building a new OpenBSD server I am planning to buy a Tyan S3950
mainboard. Has anybody experience with that chipset?
http://tyan.com/products/html/tomcath1000s.html
unfortunately lots of boards have prblems w/ interrupts.
Stuart Henderson wrote:
http://www.kernel.org/hg/linux-2.6/?cs=fbcb10423ad8
* Documentation:
* Available under NDA only. Errata info very hard to get.
That's bad. I don't really wanna support those companies. But which
vendor is doing good amd64 chipsets and understands how free software
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Han Boetes
Sent: 07 October 2006 09:02 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Self Restraint (Was: Re: GPL = BSD + DRM [Was: Re:
Intel's
Open Source Policy Doesn't Make Sense])
You know what I can't
Hi all,
i386 / 4.0 (Aug. 28 2006 23:10 snap)
dmesg below.
I am replacing a couple of high-traffic routers in our datacenter and
have just received (among others) a bunch of Syskonnect SK-9X22 dual
Gbit server adapters for the job.
These nic's should be supported by the 'msk' driver from
I have an OpenBSD 3.9 stable and I can't use one of it's network
adapters. The machine got tree adapters, all of them are RTL8139. On
dmesg I had the following lines (related to all adapters):
Oct 7 13:37:36 polluxbsd02 /bsd: rl0 at pci1 dev 4 function 0 Realtek
8139 rev 0x10: irq 12, address
On Oct 9, 2006, at 1:52 AM, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote:
Wees geduldig en dink oor wat jy se.
That could pretty much be applied to most conversationalists in this
list :-)
Now knock it off! This is way too much fun to read and I have work to
do.
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of
Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
http://www.kernel.org/hg/linux-2.6/?cs=fbcb10423ad8
* Documentation:
* Available under NDA only. Errata info very hard to get.
That's bad. I don't really wanna support those companies. But which
vendor is doing good amd64 chipsets and
On 2006/10/09 11:30, Francisco D. Kurpiel wrote:
I know this adapters is working because I had windows working on it
without problems.
Try it with a generic realtek driver on windows, not one supplied
with the board, then you'll know if it's one of the ones mentioned in
the list post I
On Monday 09 October 2006 03:52, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote:
You know what I can't stand... Bullying! That's what's going on
here.
Eh, no doubt you are right. I've not followed the thread, but I know that if
people are not bullied here something is wrong. This is by far the worst
On 10/09/06 17:39, steve szmidt wrote:
Learn to swim with sharks...
=Very= stupid remark.
Let's take shark number one: Theo.
This shark doesn't bite or swallow, gives away the results of lots of
his personal work and thinking, higly dedicated to do things as well
as he can. Is extremely
Hi.
On 10/8/06, Andreas Bihlmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[... snipp ...]
p.s. This xorg.conf section might be of interest to you.
Section Device
Identifier Card0
Driver vesa
#Driver nv
VendorName nVidia Corporation
BoardName Unknown Board
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:41:31PM -0400, stuartv wrote:
Ryan,
Thanks for your input. I have been gently pushing those who make
the decisions here towards sftp for some time now; however,
ultimately that is one decision that is out of my hands.
According to the inspector that is doing
LeVA wrote:
Hi!
I've applied the patches from the errata page, and now I'm trying to
recompile the kernel.
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf $ config GENERIC
Don't forget to run make depend
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf $ cd ../compile/GENERIC
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC $ make clean
Hi list :)
I have OpenBSD 3.8 on a PowerBook G4, an Avaya
wireless card (wi0) and my AP.
My problem is when I active the WEP in the AP
(WEP-Open), my wireless lost connection.
This my card configuration:
wicontrol -e 1 -k abcde123456 -t 6 -n MyName -p1 -f 6
my AP Information is:
ap[0]:
Hi Rafael.
On 10/9/06, Rafael Morales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have OpenBSD 3.8 on a PowerBook G4, an Avaya
wireless card (wi0) and my AP.
My problem is when I active the WEP in the AP
(WEP-Open), my wireless lost connection.
This my card configuration:
wicontrol -e 1 -k abcde123456 -t 6 -n
Hi Stuart.
On 10/9/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ifconfig. In this case it would be:
this is wi(4) on 3.8, ifconfig didn't know how to configure
wireless settings on prism/wavelan cards back then
Doh! I assumed a current 3.9.
I guess (because I don't have any wi cards - just
Hello list,
In the company I work for's ever expanding quest for PCI certification,
I am told that we are required to have in place something to monitor all
system files and log files for changes. Does anyone have any suggestions
on software to do this? I am currently looking at Osiris but
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 04:07:52PM -0400, stuartv wrote:
In the company I work for's ever expanding quest for PCI certification,
I am told that we are required to have in place something to monitor all
system files and log files for changes. Does anyone have any suggestions
on software to do
On 2006/10/09 15:23, Will Maier wrote:
Well, /etc/security already does some of this. See security(8) for
more info; you can extend it pretty easily.
especially, see mtree, which can check system files for changes.
Andreas Maus wrote:
snip
inet 172.16.211.1 255.255.255.0 NONE
!ifconfig $if chan 6 media autoselect mode 11b nwid MyName nwkey
persist:abcde123456
/snip
hostname.if does not need the !ifconfig command, the netstart(8)
script calls ifconfig.
Hence hostname.wi0 would be:
inet 172.16.211.1
On 10/9/06, Fred Crowson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hostname.if does not need the !ifconfig command, the netstart(8)
script calls ifconfig.
Hence hostname.wi0 would be:
inet 172.16.211.1 255.255.255.0 NONE \
chan 6 media autoselect mode 11b \
nwid MyName nwkey persist:abcde123456
Amazing! ;)
http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/2006-August/015771.html
A load of these were donated to a charity I assist. It appears that they are
actually Silan Micro-Electronics SC92031 chips. The dodgy PCI ID's known to
me thus far are:
vendor 0x1904 product 0x2031
vendor 0x1904 product 0x8139
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
I'm using only 1 processor out of 4, and 4 hard drives out of 30 because I
can't hardware raid
my enterprise fiberchannel array, I can't hardware
On 10/7/06, Samurai Chef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/6/06, Jason Mao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Bruno
I think that depends on your definiton for the word free.
Best rgds,
Jason
On 10/6/06, Bruno Carnazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
I was thinking to a
We are accepting diffs.
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:44:37PM -0600, David B. wrote:
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
I'm using only 1 processor out of 4, and 4 hard drives out
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
I'm using only 1 processor out of 4, and 4 hard drives out of 30 because I
can't hardware raid
my enterprise fiberchannel array, I can't
What's really exciting is the work being done with 3d printers and how
the ideals of open source software can be applied in that realm.
-Damian
Yes, yes, yes!
IIRC think Michael Hart mentioned this in his hopenumbersix keynote:
http://www.hopenumbersix.net/mp3/16/hart.mp3
I can't wait!
:)
On 10/9/06, David B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
I'm using only 1 processor out of 4, and 4 hard drives out of 30 because I
can't hardware raid
my
Andreas Maus wrote:
Hi Stuart.
On 10/9/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ifconfig. In this case it would be:
this is wi(4) on 3.8, ifconfig didn't know how to configure
wireless settings on prism/wavelan cards back then
Doh! I assumed a current 3.9.
I guess (because I don't have
On Oct 9, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Thanks at least for a very secure OS. I've been online now for 6
months on
this E450 with
no hacks.
We welcome code submissions. I think you have no idea at all how much
effort it takes to support all the things we do, and you are just
On 10/9/06, David B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a $125,000 machine 5 years ago, and I treat it no better than some
crappy i686 box
because security is my primary issue. If I went with another OS, I could
get a lot of the
functionality I want, but what good is it, if some 12 y/o kid in
Would you like some cheese?
Greg
Venezuelan Beaver Cheese?
Hi everybody,
I have a weird problem on a i386 box with OpenBSD 3.8. Im running the
patch branch with the AIDE package installed.
AIDE keeps reporting a change in the SHA1 checksum of /etc/motd. Even
after I run a aide --update and use the updated database for future
checks the checksum
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
I'm using only 1 processor out of 4, and 4 hard drives out of 30 because I
can't hardware raid
my enterprise fiberchannel
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:59:29PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
I'm using only 1 processor out of 4, and 4 hard drives out of 30 because I
On Oct 9, 2006, at 4:36 PM, RedShift wrote:
Asking for code submission if you want feature x or y doesn't
really float my boat.
All good points, Glenn. OpenBSD also accepts hardware gifts and cash
as a means
of accelerating development on a given platform.
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of
A recent upgrade from a Sept 01 to Oct 08 snap disabled one of two NICs
on a Supermicro H8DA8/H8DAR AMD64 system. Rolling back to the Sept 1
kernel resolved the problem.
Specifically:
*There are two onboard NICs, bge0 and bge1, both assigned static
addresses, and bge0 fails to operate.
On 10/9/06, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
I'm using only 1 processor out of 4, and 4 hard drives out of 30 because I
This is a $125,000 machine 5 years ago, and I treat it no better than some
crappy i686 box
I don't want to put words in anyones mouth, but I'm sure Theo and
company could whip something up for you.
Just send another $125,000 check to:
Theo de Raadt
OpenBSD
812 23rd Ave SE
Calgary, Alberta,
On 10/9/06, Damian Wiest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:59:29PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
I'm using only 1
On 10/10/06, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a 5 year old RAID controller is not supported, what can
be expected in the future? Yes I'm sure there isn't enough documentation
available, license disagreements, etc... but come on, it's 5 years old!
it is that easy: if you can't use the os,
On one of my older P2 machines (running 3.9-stable), I seem to have a
very persistent fsck error: BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS. Regardless
of whether or not I choose to salvage these, I keep getting the error
below.
The error occurs on an unmounted file system. After choosing to
salvage, seems to
Sorry about the subject line. The spam filter here flagged the message
and I keep forgetting to check to see if it changed the subject.
-Damian
On 10/9/06, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I agree with David B. here. I know developing an OS is a huge
task and with nothing but security on your mind, building bridges seems
a trivial task compared to it. However having more than one processor is
rapidly becoming a commodity and
On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Bryan Irvine wrote:
[1] I'm pretty sure the 250 and 450 are similar, though I could be
wrong.
Similar, but the 250 is typically half a 450, two procs instead of
four
and less of other resources, otherwise quite similar.
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
I only use OpenBSD nowadays. I'll toy with other operating systems, but I
generally just stick to OpenBSD. It suits all of my needs. I can never
remember speed being a huge issue. I wish there was better SMP support, and
in your situation I'd also be wishing for better RAID support. The work so
On 10/9/06, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 9, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Thanks at least for a very secure OS. I've been online now for 6
months on
this E450 with
no hacks.
We welcome code submissions. I think you have no idea at all how much
effort it takes
David B.([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2006.10.09 15:44:37 -0600:
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
I'm using only 1 processor out of 4, and 4 hard drives out of 30 because I
can't
Hi all,
I have a box I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on. I'm trying to get this box to
function as our office firewall. Here's the catch - we have VOIP phones
that contact an external VOIP server outside of our firewall. I've been
doing some research and found out that VOIP phones don't do NAT
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:33:11AM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have a weird problem on a i386 box with OpenBSD 3.8. Im running the
patch branch with the AIDE package installed.
AIDE keeps reporting a change in the SHA1 checksum of /etc/motd. Even
after I run a aide
On 10/9/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Get two NICS for the OpenBSD box.
2) Give the first NIC an external routeable IP address, ex.
216.139.44.142 subnet 255.255.255.192
3) Give the second NIC an internal IP address, ex. 10.30.1.1 subnet mask
255.255.255.0
4)
On 10/10/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a box I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on. I'm trying to get this box to
function as our office firewall. Here's the catch - we have VOIP phones
that contact an external VOIP server outside of our firewall. I've been
On 10/10/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a box I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on. I'm trying to get this box to
function as our office firewall. Here's the catch - we have VOIP phones
that contact an
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:36:03AM +0200, RedShift wrote:
Asking for code submission if you want feature x or y doesn't really
float my boat. I only do some high level programming and I know nothing
about kernel internals. I use it where it fits me and equals customer
benefit. If it
On 10/9/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Get two NICS for the OpenBSD box.
2) Give the first NIC an external routeable IP address, ex.
216.139.44.142 subnet 255.255.255.192
3) Give the second NIC an internal IP address, ex. 10.30.1.1 subnet mask
255.255.255.0
4)
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 05:16:09PM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Bryan Irvine wrote:
[1] I'm pretty sure the 250 and 450 are similar, though I could be
wrong.
Similar, but the 250 is typically half a 450, two procs instead of
four
and less of other
On 10/9/06, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have one at work that was retired in 2002. I've never had a chance
to install OpenBSD on it, it's quad processor but probably doesn't
have a RAID controller. I haven't even had a chance to fire it up in
years.
Hands up, yet another person
Quoting Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The willingness to take in code submissions is almost surprising,
really. Surely no person has any right to *gripe*!
I'm really surprised by the attitude of some people.
Generous person: Here, have a free car.
Ungrateful person: Aww, it's RED! I
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 06:36, RedShift wrote:
You would think _somebody_ would at least make an attempt at it.
You would think so but funny how that someone, who is supposed to do this on
their free time and maybe on their own expense, is always someone else.
I can
imagine OpenBSD
On 10/9/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asking for code submission if you want feature x or y doesn't really
float my boat. I only do some high level programming and I know nothing
about kernel internals.
I guess you didn't understand; OpenBSD does not exist for you or me, it
Nevermind the sex toy, what beer is that?
Big Rock Traditional Ale.
http://www.bigrockbeer.com
It's what we normally drink, along with Guinness and Wild Rose Brown.
It usually gives me a headache in large quanitities... but then again, it
might be that it's because I'm usually drinking it with
Hello folks,
I really have a two part question
I work at a Public Library with about 200 PC's available to the public
on a NAT (OpenBSD 3.8). We are connected to the Internet via 1-T1 line.
We have a lot of kids playing the online game Runescape
(www.runescape.com) and needless to say they are
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:52:59 -0600
Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 9, 2006, at 4:36 PM, RedShift wrote:
Asking for code submission if you want feature x or y doesn't
really float my boat.
All good points, Glenn. OpenBSD also accepts hardware gifts and cash
as a means
Hands up, yet another person with a personal E450
that was retired (from a
bank!! 8-))
I should go back and get some hard drives for it.
Remember, the power supply handles are NOT load
bearing! 8-)
Hey all you guys with those 450s and 250s--
If any of you would be willing to part with
I'm trying to find a compiler that supports variable length arrays.
I'm currently taking a computer science class and noticed that gcc's
support for variable lenght arrays is broken [0].
Is there another compiler I can use that ships with OpenBSD?
(I use vi and gcc on OpenBSD for my class).
On 10/9/06, Matt Radtke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all you guys with those 450s and 250s--
If any of you would be willing to part with said
computer and if any devs would find that hardware
useful, I would be more than happy to help pay for,
perhaps even pay for all of, the shipping costs to
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 22:07 -0700, Joe wrote:
I'm trying to find a compiler that supports variable length arrays.
I'm currently taking a computer science class and noticed that gcc's
support for variable lenght arrays is broken [0].
The reason why it is broken is not the reason why you think.
70 matches
Mail list logo
