Hello..
I just added a rule to allow port 80 traffic into my server and started
noticing some odd blocks occuring.
It seems that some web connections are losing their state and sending an R or
F flag which gets blocked. I am not sure of the time but I think once I was
refreshing the page and it
OK,
I have some update on this one. It's not fix, but I was finally able to
isolate how that problem is trigger. May be fix now, I don't know, but I
am passing the informations in case it's useful and also if someone
could tell me if there was a logic behind it and if yes it would not
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 14:11 -0400, Josh Grosse wrote:
Just a wild guess, but did you forget to include comp41.tgz in your
install/upgrade?
No. I've just reextracted it just to be sure, but I still get the same
error.
ciao
Luca
2007/5/7, Adam Hawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MD5 is proven weak. It's possible to take almost any file and its
MD5 then create an identically sized file with the same hash in a
reasonable time. This can be used to pass out an arbitrary CD
image that completely trashes the contents of your hard
Gordon Willem Klok wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:32:17AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
acpicpu0 at acpi0: CPU0: 866, 667 MHz
apmd -C is your friend, without acpi this is done in SMM by
the bios at least it was on my lattitude before it kicked the
bucket.
$ pgrep -fl apmd
214
I have an ASUS notebook that uses the azalia driver for the sound. The
problem is that I can not adjust the volume with applicaions' volume
control. That includes xfce and xmms too. In xfce's Sound setting panel
there is only one mixer (mixer0) that is set, in xmms there is no mixer
in the
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:57:50AM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
2007/5/7, Adam Hawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MD5 is proven weak. It's possible to take almost any file and its
MD5 then create an identically sized file with the same hash in a
reasonable time. This can be used to pass out an
On Monday, May 7, 2007 at 03:11:41 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Every time, I process the logs with webalizer, no problem what so ever.
Then a few customers wants the awstats version. So, I process that as
well, however it's also processing multiple logs, but when the awstats
PERL stuff kicks
Hi,
Luca Corti schrieb:
No. I've just reextracted it just to be sure, but I still get the same
error.
I got a sparc64 (Sun Ultra 5) running here which I upgraded from
4.0-stable to 4.1-stable. Just recompiled the kernel without any problems.
Michael
OpenBSD 4.1-stable (GENERIC) #1: Mon May
Cool. What I am not sure about is if we want to have a bunch of little
vendor drivers or a big driver that does all the vendor stuff. I need
to think this through. Any comments?
giovanni wrote:
hello,
because I could not change the excessive lcd brightness of my laptop
under openbsd I
On 5/7/07, Tobias Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, pgp requires a working web of trust, it's not secure just because
you can sign something.
Joe Cracker can easily generate a key with Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and provides you with signed filesets. Who steps up to organise key
signing
GIS Weekly Review
May 07, 2007
From: GISCafe
Previous Issues
NAVTEQ
Review Article eMail Article Print Article
Susan Smith - Managing Editor
A subscription change or cancellation request for your email address
misc@openbsd.org was just received on GISCafe. This message is to inform
you of this action and to provide you with a personalized URL that you
can use to make such modifications now or at any time in the future.
If you did not
bdz writes:
I have an ASUS notebook that uses the azalia driver for the
sound. The problem is that I can not adjust the volume with
applicaions' volume control. That includes xfce and xmms
too. In xfce's Sound setting panel there is only one mixer
(mixer0) that is set, in xmms there is no
Maurice Janssen wrote:
On Monday, May 7, 2007 at 03:11:41 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Every time, I process the logs with webalizer, no problem what so ever.
Then a few customers wants the awstats version. So, I process that as
well, however it's also processing multiple logs, but when the
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 09:38:02AM +0200, Little Red Riding Hood marching
through the forest wrote:
Not sent to bugs@ because I'm not sure it could do much there. I'm hoping
someone may be able to give hints on what to check, so I can resolve this
small issue.
Why would you wanna do
have been coding touchscreen-driven applications using visual basic
lately and am sick of VB. i would much rather be using openbsd with
another programming language that allows me to accomplish the same sort
of stuff.
i have no formal CS background so am at a loss for good candidates.
the
I have yet to receive any response to the panics I have
been experiencing. Is there something else I need to provide
that will get me pointed in the right direction?
Are there tools available to test the connection to the
hard drive, or to test the hard drive itself? I used format
when
Hi all,
I have tried to setup a new pflog interface to monitor ipsec traffic and it
works ok. Afterwards I have setup another pflogd daemon to store logs on another
pcap file under /var/log. But I have one question: how do i to configure
newsyslog.conf entry for this new pflogd daemon? If I
Artur,
Have you done forced fsck of the partitions? This sounds like a
problem with the data you have on disk. It would be even nicer if you
could update to a newer fsck because it has been updated to deal with
many new strange corner cases we've been seeing. Although, that might
or might
On 5/7/07, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. What I am not sure about is if we want to have a bunch of little
vendor drivers or a big driver that does all the vendor stuff. I need
to think this through. Any comments?
this could all be taken care of by button, no? even if they
Maurice Janssen wrote:
Now, why PERL would do this, I have no clue, but it does anyway in the
usage done by awstats.
So far I reproduce this 5 times, so it's pretty consistent.
What may cause this, I do not know more, but look like when PERL needs
to process huge amount of data, it end up
This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
This morning I found it totally unresponsive both through network and
at the console. Had to use the power switch to recover.
Where do I start trying to track this down?
The system is running
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 14:42 +0200, Michael wrote:
I got a sparc64 (Sun Ultra 5) running here which I upgraded from
4.0-stable to 4.1-stable. Just recompiled the kernel without any problems.
I've got an Ultra 5 too. I'll retry a fresh source checkout from CVS.
thanks
Luca
On 5/7/07, Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering about whether the Thecus N2100 running OpenBSD/
armish can operate in RAID 1 mode. Maybe this is a stupid question
but I couldn't find anything about it and I am interested to know.
Obviously I would not be running the
On May 7, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Bruce Bauer wrote:
This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
This morning I found it totally unresponsive both through network and
at the console. Had to use the power switch to recover.
Where do I
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:20:00AM -0700, Bruce Bauer wrote:
This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
This morning I found it totally unresponsive both through network and
at the console. Had to use the power switch to recover.
On 5/7/07, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 7, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Bruce Bauer wrote:
This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
This morning I found it totally unresponsive both through network and
at the console. Had to
* * A recent post and a router blowout
today has sparked me to report this * *
Hey all,
We've had a router running openbsd for a while now. A few months ago
we upgraded from 3.8 to 4.0 (upgrade technically was 3.8 - 3.9 -
4.0) and it seemed to go as smooth as possible.
Then we started
* Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
have been coding touchscreen-driven applications using visual basic
lately and am sick of VB. i would much rather be using openbsd with
another programming language that allows me to accomplish the same sort
of stuff.
i have no formal CS background so am at a
Hello,
I have found references to: /pub/OpenBSD/3.6/tools/booteasy suggesting that it
was part of the distribution but I do not see it listed for 3.7 and newer. I do
not see a 3.7 changelist entry for it and I the online man pages to not seem to
refer to it. From the looks however, it was an
On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.
Would ccd(4) be any faster? Also, what sort of RAM does it take?
Thanks for your response.
Bryan
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:09:34 -0500, Michael Dexter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have found references to: /pub/OpenBSD/3.6/tools/booteasy suggesting
that it was part of the distribution but I do not see it listed for 3.7
and newer. I do not see a 3.7 changelist entry for it and I the online
Am I the only one having a difficult time keeping track of which cards
on the Supported hardware list are merely tolerated, and which
vendors/chipsets are truly supported and cooperative?
On 5/5/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/4/07, K K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would be
Don't beat a dead horse.
This should do whatever you need:
http://gag.sourceforge.net/
On 5/7/07, Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:09:34 -0500, Michael Dexter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have found references to: /pub/OpenBSD/3.6/tools/booteasy suggesting
that it
Hello
I've noticed a bit different behaviour with regard to delayed acks on OBSD.
Some other systems (2 linux distros, win2k/xp) I tested, pretty much acted
as I've always seen it - 1 ack per max. 2 segments, but no bigger delay than
some arbitrary value (looking at rfc, no more than 500ms,
* K K [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-07 23:52]:
Am I the only one having a difficult time keeping track of which cards
on the Supported hardware list are merely tolerated, and which
vendors/chipsets are truly supported and cooperative?
On 5/5/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 12:42:55PM -0700, Bruce Bauer wrote:
On 5/7/07, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 7, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Bruce Bauer wrote:
This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
This morning I found it
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:02:19PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.
Would ccd(4) be any faster? Also, what sort of RAM does it take?
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:23:00PM -0500, K K wrote:
Am I the only one having a difficult time keeping track of which cards
on the Supported hardware list are merely tolerated, and which
vendors/chipsets are truly supported and cooperative?
No, that's why http://www.vendorwatch.org exists. Or
On 5/5/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-03 20:58]:
Any recommendations on running BGP on redundant firewalls to multiple
providers advertising the same network thru both links, and talking iBGP
with the other firewall?
that is
when i do a bgpctl show fib i see the two routes, 1 thru connected provider,
1 to other router's crossover interface - which is connected then to 2nd
provider, so why would i need to redistribute my routes when its already in
the fib? maybe im confused but I dont think i necessarily need ospf in
On 2007/05/07 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when i do a bgpctl show fib i see the two routes, 1 thru connected provider,
1 to other router's crossover interface - which is connected then to 2nd
provider, so why would i need to redistribute my routes when its already in
the fib? maybe im
From: Sebastian Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want deny users the possiblility to smuggle data outside of
their
workplace (or whatever) then don't connect them to the internet.
No, no, no. You must go one step beyond this if you want to
prevent employees from smuggling data. To do this
yah theyre valid, there was a point when i first set this up i remember one
of the nexthops being invalid but this hasnt been the case for sometime.
cool, i think ill stick to the without ospf for now until it becomes a
necessity. thanks.
On 5/7/07, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Guys if you realy care about security why does nobody asks about
using gzsig.
Even useable for the packages...
Kind regards,
Sebastian
On Mon, 07 May 2007 16:51:32 -0500, Bruce Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't beat a dead horse.
This should do whatever you need:
http://gag.sourceforge.net/
Aaah, yes, I remember someone recommending this to me before. It does work
well.
--
Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No one could
On 4/25/07, Allen Theobald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings! Included below is my pf.conf set up to use
dansguardian (proxyport 3128, filterport 8080)
and tinyproxy (listen port 3128) as a transparent
proxy.
What changes do I need to make to keep someone on
int_if/int_net from circumventing
Greetings All.
I will start with my dmesg: See below---
I have tried many ways to get the 300mw Z-COM WLAN PC Card, RP-MMCX,
802.11b Higher Power card to work with the system. I am trying to setup
the first Wlan (wi0) as an access point and the second (wi1) as a
bridge/link to a distant
Bret wrote:
Greetings All.
I will start with my dmesg: See below---
I have tried many ways to get the 300mw Z-COM WLAN PC Card, RP-MMCX,
802.11b Higher Power card to work with the system. I am trying to
setup the first Wlan (wi0) as an access point and the second (wi1) as
a bridge/link
Hi all,
OpenBSD CD(4.1 -release) and T-Shirts arrivaled at China(Shenzhen) this
morning,
It looks really nice.
Thanks to all OpenBSD developers for the hard work, thanks to Wim for the
patience.
^_^
MB
2007.05.08
--
OpenBSD Store in China Mainland: http://shop34421310.taobao.com/
Michael Dexter wrote:
Hello,
I have found references to: /pub/OpenBSD/3.6/tools/booteasy suggesting that
it was part of the distribution but I do not see it listed for 3.7 and newer.
I do not see a 3.7 changelist entry for it and I the online man pages to not
seem to refer to it. From
On 5/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Sebastian Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want deny users the possiblility to smuggle data outside of
their
workplace (or whatever) then don't connect them to the internet.
No, no, no. You must go one step beyond this if you want to
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 11:14 +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Default User [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-05 05:03]:
cbb0 at pci1 dev 4 function 0 ENE CB-1410 CardBus rev
0x01pci_intr_map: no mapping for pin A
: couldn't map interrupt
there's your problem, your cardbus slot is not working
On May 7, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:02:19PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.
Would ccd(4) be any
--- Quoting RW on 2007/04/30 at 16:52 +1000:
Existing setup:
Head Office:
WAN IP=165.x.y.z
LAN = 172.22.22.0/24
Extranet gateway = 10.x.y.1
Branch Office:
WAN IP=150.x.y.z
LAN= 172.22.23.0/24
IPsec endpoints are OpenBSD firewalls and LAN to LAN connectivity is
fine.
My
On Mon, 7 May 2007 23:01:15 -0600, Joel Knight wrote:
--- Quoting RW on 2007/04/30 at 16:52 +1000:
Existing setup:
Head Office:
WAN IP=165.x.y.z
LAN = 172.22.22.0/24
Extranet gateway = 10.x.y.1
Branch Office:
WAN IP=150.x.y.z
LAN= 172.22.23.0/24
IPsec endpoints are OpenBSD
Suppose I setup a wireless network and use authpf to restrict access
to some resource (e.g., Internet access) to registered users. It
seems there's a fairly simple man-in-the-middle attack:
An attacker sets up a system with two wireless NICs: one associated to
my network and another configured
58 matches
Mail list logo
