Re: Macbook on Openbsd
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:50:40AM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: On 2007-07-25 01:13:41 -0500, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm being hold a bit back when it says I can't even use the keyboard on it on OpenBSD, that really sucks. Have you seen my report on my experiences on using the Macbook Pro with OpenBSD? http://www.aaronhsu.com/AaronHsu.com/OpenBSD%20-%20Macbook%20Pro.html I can vouch for an acpi enabled kernel working. I took some shortcuts, but Aaron's instructions are good. -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
Re: Macbook on Openbsd
On 7/28/07, Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007-07-25 01:13:41 -0500, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm being hold a bit back when it says I can't even use the keyboard on it on OpenBSD, that really sucks. Have you seen my report on my experiences on using the Macbook Pro with OpenBSD? http://www.aaronhsu.com/AaronHsu.com/OpenBSD%20-%20Macbook%20Pro.html -- Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little. - Edmund Burke Hello. Yes I have seen your article about if. That one is about Core Duo and a Macbook Pro but I have a Core 2 Duo (that means 64-bit and not 32-bit as the Core Duo is) and a Macbook. I have found some great information on the net and there has happend some on both FreeBSD and NetBSD that has gotten most of the things to work. I haven't got a USB-keyboard but I will probobly get one later today so then I will do a try to install OpenBSD on it (about time because I'm getting nuts on the crappy Mac OS X). Thanks for the point though. br dunceor
Re: About encryption
Hi! On 2007-07-25, Brian Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no prior experience in encryption but wants to figure out how to - as safe as possible - encrypt some files on my computer. I have been looking at both GNUPG and Mcrypt. I am not interested in the KEY part of GNUPG but only encrypting files. Which - if any - would you recommend for the task and using what algorithms? The coolest way is to use vnconfig(8). It allows you to create container for your secret files. You can mount it and work with your files as if they were unencrypted (on-fly encryption). Refer to vnconfig(8) or mount_vnd(8) in -current. -- Alexey Vatchenko http://www.bsdua.org E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64 snapshot 4.1 - 4.2 issues
On 7/27/07, Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This has been corrected and new snaps are being built. -Bob * Adriaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-26 20:39]: The MD5 file of the latest amd64 snapshot contains md5 fingerprints for 4.1 as well as 4.2 versions: [snip MD5 (comp41.tgz) = 68eeb7c497ca46abe79884345ffc841a MD5 (comp42.tgz) = 76f893abf942d7f7cfb66dc611452669 MD5 (etc41.tgz) = e27e0fab14860c1ff85e9a1577fe556c MD5 (etc42.tgz) = 079a6570ac546bab5e0764637fcfe2d4 MD5 (floppy41.fs) = edf9344e54c76825e359b2ea7451da82 MD5 (floppy42.fs) = 4b77ea4557b1948731d8daecad8c60e1 [snip] An install using the floppy42.fs image, where the sets are have to be retrieved from a local ftp server fails to see the *42.tgz install file sets [snip] Thanks, the new snapshot installs fine now OpenBSD 4.2-beta (GENERIC) #1148: Fri Jul 27 10:40:10 MDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC =Adriaan=
Re: Unstable PPPoE
Timothy Wilson wrote: /etc/hostname.pppoe: inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE pppoedev url0 authproto auto authname 'user' authkey 'pass' up dest 0.0.0.1 !/sbin/route/ add default -ifp pppoe0 0.0.0.1 echo up /etc/hostname.url0 Please feel free to give suggetions to my pf.conf etc! Hi Timothy, I'm recently setting up my box to do pppoe as well, and I found your hostname.pppoe not working at all, unless I changed authproto to pap. auto isn't even supposed to work. Here's what man ifconfig says: authproto proto Set the PPP authentication protocol on the specified interface acting as a client. The protocol name can be either `chap', `pap', or `none'. In the latter case, authentication will be turned off. I'm wondering why your box goes online at all? Regards, Dorian
Re: disklabel != /dev content [SOVLED]
Thank you all for your answers.
As some of you suggested, I used newfs(8) on wd0h
since my wd0{h,i} partitions did not contain anything
interesting. It updated the partition layout from the
disklabel and all works fine now.
Thanks again.
_
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
Seeking info for RAID 1 on OpenBSD
I have two spare SATA drives on an OpenBSD 4.1 box and would like to set up RAID level 1. Tips on documentation, HOWTOs or notes of any kind would be great since the search engines are rather useless for technical documentation. Some pages have even disappeared, others are quite old. I found one for 3.7: http://www.eclectica.ca/howto/openbsd-software-raid-howto.php What's the latest documentation? -Lars
Re: Alpha onboard PCI VGA console color issue.
On 7/25/07, Sean Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello 'alpha' / 'misc' Alpha console color question. I got a DS20E 833 uniprocessor Alpha with onboard PCI VGA ( vga0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 3D Labs Oxygen GVX1 rev 0x01 ) Running 4.1-GENERIC and have seen this since oBSD 3.8 when I began running oBSD on the unit. (nearly 2 years ago, wow!) OK my question is: Is there any one else running OpenBSD on an alpha in VGA console mode with wscons, and have when in multi-user mode, the console running with a blue background? The Blue background is present in all wscons displays. From MacPPC, and i386, Kernel Messages show up with Blue Background highlighting, and the background is black with nominal grey test. But on alpha, the background is always Blue, and may be triggered to black when running some utilities like vi. However even with the black background, the blue returns. and other highlights (bold text) do not appear. I would like to know in what direction I can look for the background color settings when wscons sets up the displays. There may be an update for the color palette that can be tested. Any pointers would help. This is a known bug in wscons on alpha with VGA cards that has not been identified yet.
Re: Xorg issues with PowerBook G4 and OpenBSD 4.1
On 7/28/07, Amit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, First post in this mailing list and I would like to take the opportunity to thank all the OpenBSD developers for a wonderful OS. I have recently switched over to running OpenBSD full time on my PowerBook G4 500MHz. OpenBSD has been running great! It seems like all the hardware has ben detected automatically. However, I had some issues with xorg.conf. After some tweaking, I was finally able to get hardware acceleration as well as native resolution. But now, whenever I exit FVWM, X doesn't seem to properly quit. I get flashing white lines and I can't see anything. I am however still able to type 'sudo reboot' so I can get back to my system without hard powering it off. Any one has any ideas or familiarity with this issue? Another Powerbook user out there that has a working xorg.conf? Thanks. **xorg.conf* Section ServerLayout Identifier Sample Config Screen 0 Screen0 0 0 InputDeviceMouse0 CorePointer InputDeviceKeyboard0 CoreKeyboard EndSection Section Files RgbPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/ FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/ FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/ FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/ EndSection Section Module Loadfreetype Loadglx Loadextmod EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Keyboard0 Driver kbd Option Protocolstandard Option XkbRulesxorg Option XkbModelmacintosh Option XkbLayout us EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Mouse0 Driver mouse Option Protocol wsmouse Option Device /dev/wsmouse Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section Monitor Identifier Monitor VendorName Generic ModelNameTwentyOneInches # Adjust those to your monitor before using another device than wsfb # or you can destroy it !! #HorizSync30.0-160.0 # VertRefresh 50.0-160.0 HorizSync31.5-60 VertRefresh 50-70 Modeline 1152x768 78.741 1152 1173 1269 1440 768 769 772 800 +HSync +VSync # Modeline 1152x768 64.995 1152 1213 1349 1472 768 771 777 806 +HSync +VSync EndSection Section Device Identifier Card0 Driver r128 VendorName ATI BusID PCI:0:16:0 Option PanelWidth 1152 Option PanelHeight 768 EndSection Section Screen Identifier Screen0 Device Card0 MonitorMonitor DefaultDepth 24 SubSection Display Depth 8 Modes 1152x768 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 16 Modes 1152x768 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 24 Modes 1152x768 EndSubSection EndSection ***end xorg.conf Known problem, for which I don't have a solution. The r128 driver relies on values found in the BIOS to restore the text mode on exit. The cards found in Macs have OpenFirmware but no BIOS, so the driver has to guess timing values (or find them in OF) and this was never done right afaict.
X11 install packages?
Noticed that the X11 install packages are no longer being built for i386 on a daily basis. Is there another tree that might have these or shold I just use the built ones from 4.1 ? Cheers.
Re: 3ware 9650SE support
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:32:36AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there plans to support 3ware's 9650SE SATA RAID controller? If so, will it be far off? 9000 controllers require a totally new driver w/ a huge firmware image also that has to be loaded pretty early. meaning it has to be in the kernel which most likely excludes this driver from any ramdisk image thus makes it kinda useless... another example of brilliant hardware engineering. so use something else. cu -- paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
Re: Macbook on Openbsd
I wonder what crap may someone find in mac osx.. besides that all hardware work and it is based on good old mach+freebsd open source codes I personally own powerbook and yes there is info on internet that new mac laptops is crap (talking bout hw).. though definitely mac osx is great piece of software and hey, there're many many featuters that will not be implemented in openbsd in near future (which from the other side live inside mac osx for ages already).. so please don't throw words just to show that you are competent enogh (questionable indeed) and can judge something like crap indeed, openbsd seems to be much more crappy nowadays... don't miss thepoint, im not oposite you guys, just i like to have clear understanding of things On 7/28/07, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/28/07, Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007-07-25 01:13:41 -0500, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm being hold a bit back when it says I can't even use the keyboard on it on OpenBSD, that really sucks. Have you seen my report on my experiences on using the Macbook Pro with OpenBSD? http://www.aaronhsu.com/AaronHsu.com/OpenBSD%20-%20Macbook%20Pro.html -- Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little. - Edmund Burke Hello. Yes I have seen your article about if. That one is about Core Duo and a Macbook Pro but I have a Core 2 Duo (that means 64-bit and not 32-bit as the Core Duo is) and a Macbook. I have found some great information on the net and there has happend some on both FreeBSD and NetBSD that has gotten most of the things to work. I haven't got a USB-keyboard but I will probobly get one later today so then I will do a try to install OpenBSD on it (about time because I'm getting nuts on the crappy Mac OS X). Thanks for the point though. br dunceor
Re: Macbook on Openbsd
If you want an OS-war, go and play on some other maillist, I do not like it and I do not want to have it on my laptop. Easy as that. On 7/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder what crap may someone find in mac osx.. besides that all hardware work and it is based on good old mach+freebsd open source codes I personally own powerbook and yes there is info on internet that new mac laptops is crap (talking bout hw).. though definitely mac osx is great piece of software and hey, there're many many featuters that will not be implemented in openbsd in near future (which from the other side live inside mac osx for ages already).. so please don't throw words just to show that you are competent enogh (questionable indeed) and can judge something like crap indeed, openbsd seems to be much more crappy nowadays... don't miss thepoint, im not oposite you guys, just i like to have clear understanding of things On 7/28/07, Karl SjC6dahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/28/07, Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007-07-25 01:13:41 -0500, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm being hold a bit back when it says I can't even use the keyboard on it on OpenBSD, that really sucks. Have you seen my report on my experiences on using the Macbook Pro with OpenBSD? http://www.aaronhsu.com/AaronHsu.com/OpenBSD%20-%20Macbook%20Pro.html -- Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little. - Edmund Burke Hello. Yes I have seen your article about if. That one is about Core Duo and a Macbook Pro but I have a Core 2 Duo (that means 64-bit and not 32-bit as the Core Duo is) and a Macbook. I have found some great information on the net and there has happend some on both FreeBSD and NetBSD that has gotten most of the things to work. I haven't got a USB-keyboard but I will probobly get one later today so then I will do a try to install OpenBSD on it (about time because I'm getting nuts on the crappy Mac OS X). Thanks for the point though. br dunceor
Re: Macbook on Openbsd
On 7/28/07, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want an OS-war, go and play on some other maillist, I do not like it and I do not want to have it on my laptop. Easy as that. If you mean that you don't want to run OS X then why didn't you get a Thinkpad? Why did you get a Mac if you want to run only OpenBSD on it? Greg -- http://ticketmastersucks.org/tracker.html Dethink to survive - Mclusky
Re: Macbook on Openbsd
Because I like the design? And I liked the challenge that everything didn't work 100%? On 7/28/07, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/28/07, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want an OS-war, go and play on some other maillist, I do not like it and I do not want to have it on my laptop. Easy as that. If you mean that you don't want to run OS X then why didn't you get a Thinkpad? Why did you get a Mac if you want to run only OpenBSD on it? Greg -- http://ticketmastersucks.org/tracker.html Dethink to survive - Mclusky
Re: Macbook on Openbsd
thus Karl SjC6dahl - dunceor spake: Because I like the design? And I liked the challenge that everything didn't work 100%? That's a standard feature of Apple hardware (at least since Mr. Jobs returned; this said by an ex-ACSE)... On 7/28/07, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/28/07, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want an OS-war, go and play on some other maillist, I do not like it and I do not want to have it on my laptop. Easy as that. If you mean that you don't want to run OS X then why didn't you get a Thinkpad? Why did you get a Mac if you want to run only OpenBSD on it? Greg
Strange dmesg and internal compiler error
I recently purchased 3x 1U rack servers and all of them seem to give me an internal compiler error when compiling (almost anything, but sometimes I can get lucky). I've ran a memtest86 overnight without any problems, so I assume memory is ok. I ran a benchmark program (lmbench) to see if anything funky would happen, and no go. This is a dual processer but I've tried bsd.mp and regular bsd to see if that had anything to do with it, same result on both. Seemingly everything works but compiling, but I really doubt that -- I think I've just been lucky thus far. Does anyone have any ideas on what I should try next? Quick and dirty general info: 1U RACK MOUNT SERVER DUAL 2x800MHz 1GB 1x160GB IDE TYAN ThunderLE (S2510) Dual(2)Socket 370 Motherboard 1GB (2x512) Reg PC100 SDram Memory dmesg: OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC) #1435: Sat Mar 10 19:07:45 MST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium III (GenuineIntel 686-class) 798 MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,SER,MMX,FXSR,SSE real mem = 1073311744 (1048156K) avail mem = 971960320 (949180K) using 4278 buffers containing 53788672 bytes (52528K) of memory mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 10/31/00, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfdba0, SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0640 (54 entries) pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf5200/192 (10 entries) pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:15:0 (ServerWorks OSB4 rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #0 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0x1000 0xc9000/0x1000 cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 ServerWorks CNB20LE Host rev 0x06 pchb1 at pci0 dev 0 function 1 ServerWorks CNB20LE Host rev 0x06 pci1 at pchb1 bus 1 vga1 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 ATI Rage XL rev 0x27 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) fxp0 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 Intel 8255x rev 0x08, i82559: irq 11, address 00:e0:81:01:80:e6 inphy0 at fxp0 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 4 fxp1 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 Intel 8255x rev 0x08, i82559: irq 9, address 00:e0:81:01:80:e7 inphy1 at fxp1 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 4 piixpm0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 ServerWorks OSB4 rev 0x50: polling iic0 at piixpm0 mtp008 at iic0 addr 0x2c not configured iic0: addr 0x2c 00=2c 01=ac 02=ac 03=ac 04=ac 05=ac 06=ac 07=ac 08=ac 09=ac 0a=ac 0b=ac 0c=ac 0d=ac 0e=ac 0f=ac 10=ac 11=ac 12=ac 13=ac 14=ac 15=ac 16=2c 17=ac 18=ac 19=ac 1a=ac 1b=ac 1c=ac 1d=ac 1e=ac 1f=ac 20=16 22=67 23=b2 24=df 25=32 26=e8 27=20 28=78 29=9a 2a=9e 2b=fd 2c=14 2d=6b 2e=5d 2f=d6 30=2e 31=c2 32=ba 33=ae 34=5f 35=b3 36=e1 37=2b 38=99 39=d5 3a=8f 3b=51 3c=05 3d=8e 3e=92 3f=15 40=08 47=57 48=2c 49=01 4a=2c 4b=01 4c=01 4d=01 4e=92 4f=2c 52=80 56=50 58=ac a0=16 a2=67 a3=b2 a4=df a5=32 a6=e8 a7=20 a8=78 a9=9a aa=9e ab=fd ac=14 ad=6b ae=5d af=d6 b0=2e b1=c2 b2=ba b3=ae b4=5f b5=b3 b6=e1 b7=2b b8=99 b9=d5 ba=8f bb=51 bc=05 bd=8e be=92 bf=15 c0=08 c7=57 c8=2c c9=01 ca=01 cb=01 cc=01 cd=01 ce=01 cf=01 d2=80 d6=50 d8=ac d9=ac da=ac db=ac dc=ac dd=ac de=ac df=ac e0=ac e1=ac e2=ac e3=ac e4=ac e5=ac e6=ac e7=ac e8=ac e9=ac ea=ac eb=ac ec=ac ed=ac ee=ac ef=ac f0=ac f1=ac f2=ac f3=ac f4=ac f5=ac f6=ac f7=ac f8=ac f9=ac fa=ac fb=ac fc=ac fd=ac fe=92 ff=ac: mtp008 mtp008 at iic0 addr 0x2e not configured iic0: addr 0x2e 00=2e 01=ac 02=ac 03=ac 04=2e 05=ac 06=ac 07=ac 08=ac 09=ac 0a=ac 0b=ac 0c=ac 0d=ac 0e=ac 0f=ac 10=ac 11=ac 12=ac 13=ac 14=ac 15=ac 16=2e 17=ac 18=ac 19=ac 1a=ac 1b=ac 1c=ac 1d=ac 1e=ac 1f=ac 20=4e 21=fb 22=75 23=a1 24=1c 25=19 26=8f 27=47 28=74 29=5a 2a=1f 2b=1c 2c=5b 2d=4e 2e=12 2f=05 30=11 31=11 32=b3 33=ea 34=90 35=31 36=4b 37=f5 38=cf 39=4e 3a=a7 3b=3e 3c=1e 3d=d4 3e=97 3f=5c 40=08 47=57 48=2e 49=01 4a=2e 4b=01 4c=01 4d=01 4e=97 4f=2e 52=80 56=50 58=ac a0=4e a1=fb a2=75 a3=a1 a4=1c a5=19 a6=8f a7=47 a8=74 a9=5a aa=1f ab=1c ac=5b ad=4e ae=12 af=05 b0=11 b1=11 b2=b3 b3=ea b4=90 b5=31 b6=4b b7=f5 b8=cf b9=4e ba=a7 bb=3e bc=1e bd=d4 be=97 bf=5c c0=08 c7=57 c8=2e c9=01 ca=01 cb=01 cc=01 cd=01 ce=01 cf=01 d2=80 d6=50 d8=ac d9=ac da=ac db=ac dc=ac dd=ac de=ac df=ac e0=ac e1=ac e2=ac e3=ac e4=ac e5=ac e6=ac e7=ac e8=ac e9=ac ea=ac eb=ac ec=ac ed=ac ee=ac ef=ac f0=ac f1=ac f2=ac f3=ac f4=ac f5=ac f6=ac f7=ac f8=ac f9=ac fa=ac fb=ac fc=ac fd=ac fe=97 ff=ac: mtp008 pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 1 ServerWorks OSB4 IDE rev 0x00: DMA atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: LITEON, CD-ROM LTN486S, YUS6 SCSI0 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 2 wd0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0: SAMSUNG SP1604N wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 152627MB, 312581808 sectors wd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 2 ohci0 at pci0 dev 15 function 2 ServerWorks OSB4/CSB5 USB rev 0x04: irq 10, version 1.0, legacy support usb0 at ohci0: USB
how to confirm i am gaining advantage from floating state-policy
Hallo! I am in the middle of re-reading firewall's pf rules and trying to set them up more like OpenBSD's way but it seems that i cant figure out on my own the meaning of state-policy though i read serveral times manual and searched also list archive. In a test environment i have following setup of three boxes, OpenBSD in the middle as router 10.0.99.2 10.0.99.1 (nfe0) PF 192.168.1.102 (rl0) 192.168.1.254 First, lets start with if-bound state-policy, pf.conf goes like this set state-policy if-bound block all pass in quick on rl0 pass out quick on nfe0 i verified i can connect successfully from right to left ie 192.168.1.254# ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] and at the same time appear two state entries which existance i can cofirm from pfctl -ss's output rl0 tcp 10.0.99.2:22 - 192.168.1.254:37848 ESTABLISHED:ESTABLISHED nfe0 tcp 192.168.1.254:37848 - 10.0.99.2:22 ESTABLISHED:ESTABLISHED # pfctl -sa | grep -i current entries says current entries 2 Secondly, leaving the set policy line out ie setting it effectively on floating i see these two states all tcp 10.0.99.2:22 - 192.168.1.254:22290 ESTABLISHED:ESTABLISHED all tcp 192.168.1.254:22290 - 10.0.99.2:22 ESTABLISHED:ESTABLISHED pftop -a -b also shows on both cases two lines, similar to this tcp I 192.168.1.254:3203 10.0.99.2:22 4:4 1 86399 5 311 tcp O 192.168.1.254:3203 10.0.99.2:22 4:4 1 86399 5 311 and lastly i tried to leave last pass out line out using floating state-policy and cant connect any more. Manual says about these two policies * if-bound - states are bound to the interface they're created on. If traffic matches a state table entry but is not crossing the interface recorded in that state entry, the match is rejected. The packet must then match a filter rule or will be dropped/rejected altogether. * floating - states can match packets on any interface. As long as the packet matches a state entry and is passing in the same direction as it was on the interface when the state was created, it does not matter what interface it's crossing, it will pass. Obviously i must be using the floating state-policy feature incorrectly since in both cases i have the same number of rules and states but from the manual i have an impression that using floating policy pf ruleset gets simplified. I would be most thankful if somebody could give me an example in the light (or should i say darkness) of my tests how using different state-policies makes difference in arranging rules and also of having the number of states. And also, is it correct to think of states as associated with specific interface or to kernel in general? Best regars, Imre Oolberg
Re: X11 install packages?
On 7/28/07, Subcommander l0r3zz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Noticed that the X11 install packages are no longer being built for i386 on a daily basis. I noticed the binary snapshot X installation file sets are absent from the snapshots during the last few days. Do you mean those? But X snapshot file sets were not being built daily. There have been some minor issues with the transition from 4.1-current to 4.2-beta. Maybe the i386 X snapshot file sets suffer the same fate ;) [snip] =Adriaan=
netboot vs pxeboot
am working through a netboot install onto a sparc64 machine and noticed that netboot != pxeboot and want to determine the minimum requirements for netbooting. so with netbooting it requires rarpd, tftp and NFS? not used to the NFS requirement when pxebooting and usually just have dhcpd running. not much of a stretch to add the NFS stuff but am surprised that bsd.rd isn't sufficient to get the system going. clues appreciated. cheers, jake --
arp and dhcp 4.1
I recently moved my PPPoE over and onto my 4100 modem. It is capable of passing my public IP into the openbsd box and then when I reboot, since the modem keeps my connection alive I dont change IPs as often...This works very well...but, however, this has caused a new twist: My modem appears to be at IP 192.168.0.1 My openbsd box has 2 NICs in it: WAN = DHCP (connected to the 4100 modem) LAN = 10.0.0.1 When the openbsd box boots, it asks for a DHCP address and the modem hands it a public one...207.227.122.7 for example. This works well...with one exception: Each so many seconds or so, my dmesg is filled with tons of these: arplookup: unable to enter address for 192.168.0.1 arplookup: unable to enter address for 192.168.0.1 arplookup: unable to enter address for 192.168.0.1 arplookup: unable to enter address for 192.168.0.1 arplookup: unable to enter address for 192.168.0.1 arplookup: unable to enter address for 192.168.0.1 arplookup: unable to enter address for 192.168.0.1 arplookup: unable to enter address for 192.168.0.1 Now I certainly know why, but cant seem to solve this. If I try to add an alias IP on the WAN NIC (after DHCP) this works but seems to kill off dhclient so once it gets a public IP it never asks/updates again. I am looking for a solution either in a NIC or route command... If I can add an alias to the DHCP nic so that it has and maintains a DHCP IP and a static 192.168.x.x IP, it would work excellent. OTOH: I could tell the modem to hand me a private IP but I would prefer to have the openbsd box use a public. Any thoughts? -- J.D. Bronson Information Services Aurora West Allis Memorial Hospital Office: 414.978.8282 Fax: 414.977.5299 http://www.myspace.com/wrqz
