On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, btmarshall wrote:
Thank you,that has solved the problem.
I didn't notice anything in the man page for newfs or the platform notes for
sparc64. Did I miss this in the documentation somewhere?
Thanks again!
this is an MI issue, and not documented afaik. I've always learned
Le 7 ao{t 07 ` 05:23, Frank Bax a icrit :
At 06:26 PM 8/6/07, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On 8/6/07, Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just got a new Lenovo 8744-J2U laptop and installed the Aug.1
snapshot:
1) When I shutdown X, text resolution is messed up. Chars are
bigger, they
are 40 per
Le lundi 06 aoC;t 2007 C 21:21 -0400, Stephan Andre' a C)crit :
On Monday 06 August 2007 18:29:12 Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On 8/6/07, Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just got a new Lenovo 8744-J2U laptop and installed the Aug.1 snapshot:
vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 vendor ATI,
On Monday 06 August 2007, Michael Dexter wrote:
Anything else I should try?
Did you try installing the emulators/freebsd_lib port?
Yes. I failed to mention that in my checklist.
Michael.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:43:21PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
I'm looking for all the needed steps to get firefox debug running in
gdb. It's my first attempt at this and I've failed to the correct find
the mozilla docs (assuming they exist) or details in the misc@, ports@
or tech@ archives.
Hi,
On Wed, 27.06.2007 at 11:08:16 -0600, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://download.intel.com/design/processor/specupdt/31327914.pdf
looks like intel pulled that paper. I'm unable to find it and would
like to receive a private copy.
An easier summary document for some people to
In the First USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies (WOOT07)
there was presentation
by Robert N. M. Watson:
Exploiting Concurrency Vulnerabilities in System Call Wrappers
with exploit code included how to bypass restrictions:
Matthieu, I'm also looking at the Lenovo T60. Is the avivo driver
Get a T60 with the Intel graphics chipset and an XGA display. You won't
have any problems with X Windows.
Hi,
On Tue, 07.08.2007 at 16:22:08 +0200, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27.06.2007 at 11:08:16 -0600, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://download.intel.com/design/processor/specupdt/31327914.pdf
looks like intel pulled that paper. I'm unable to find it and would
On 8/7/07, Stephan Andre' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthieu, I'm also looking at the Lenovo T60. Is the avivo driver
ready for use, and how much effort is there in incorporating it
into Xenocara? I'd really like a new laptop--my A31p is old.
The avivo driver needs X server 1.3 and
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 1:43:21 am J.C. Roberts wrote:
I'm looking for all the needed steps to get firefox debug running in
gdb. It's my first attempt at this and I've failed to the correct find
the mozilla docs (assuming they exist) or details in the misc@, ports@
or tech@ archives.
From
As far as I understand from them, the sysadmin was showing the defer to
his boss using a telnet session, and the boss got pissed off, because
they are actually very diligent about their spam policies.
Anyways, I just wanted to know if it there was another way to change the
250 messages without
I inherited a transparent bridging firewall running OpenBSD 3.8 and
pf. I would like to add two new filter rules without disrupting the
current network traffic. The pfctl man page did not seem to indicate
a way to load a single filter rule to a running configuration.
If I made a new file with
PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 4.4.7
Remote-MTA: dns; thinkage.ca
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 This is hurting you more than it is
hurting me.
__ NOD32 2442 (20070807) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
On 2007/08/07 15:46, Austin Murphy wrote:
If I made a new file with a just the new rules and loaded it with
something like pfctl -f two.pf.rules.conf, would all the existing
filter rules be dropped and would only the two new rules be in effect?
Yes.
Let's say I updated the existing config
Over the last few weeks I've made some important improvements to the
OpenBSD/hppa port. Support for newer B/C/J-class workstations was
added, and basically anything but the C8000 should just work. I've
also fixed a rather critical bug, which makes machines with a PA-7200
CPU usable again (and
I am using sysjail, so I am very interested how to mitigate attacks or
is there anything OpenBSD could change to mitigate these issues?
Until the kernel wrapper issues have been addressed, the sysjail
page has been updated to indicate that it SHOULD NOT be used
(nor should any systrace(4)
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:46:41 -0400
Austin Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I inherited a transparent bridging firewall running
OpenBSD 3.8 and pf. I would like to add two new filter
rules without disrupting the current network traffic. The
pfctl man page did not seem to indicate a way to
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:31:53 -0500, Mike Piety wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:46:41 -0400
Austin Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I inherited a transparent bridging firewall running
OpenBSD 3.8 and pf. I would like to add two new filter
rules without disrupting the current network traffic. The
I have not been able to get an Ethernet bridge over IPsec to work
in OpenBSD 4.1. I have two machines running as NAT gateways with a
gif tunnel between them protected by IPsec ESP. The internal
interfaces are both bridged to the gif tunnel. I can ping either
gateway from the other over the
Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leaving these aside, I just discovered that the i386 compatibility page
does apparently not list _any_ current intel CPUs (eg. Pentium D),
and the question about whether recent Xeons still classify as Xeon in
this list has been raised.
They are all
Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leaving these aside, I just discovered that the i386 compatibility page
does apparently not list _any_ current intel CPUs (eg. Pentium D),
and the question about whether recent Xeons still classify as Xeon in
this list has been
22 matches
Mail list logo
