Hi,
"Pierre Riteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2008 10:35 PM, Sebastian Reitenbach
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I run into troubles with getopt(3). the test program below shows the
> > problem. It produces different output on Linux and OpenBSD, when it is
> > called l
GENERIC.MP uses APIC instead of PIC which Microsoft, among others, claims
can handle a much higher interrupt load. I was fussing around to make
APIC work on single processor kernels in my spare time, but I haven't gotten
anywhere yet.
What size packets were you using at 900Mbps? 1500 bytes? Thes
You can tweak this in boot.conf, it's not necessary to alter the kernel
config.
Piotrek Kapczuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> > > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kern
NetOne - Doichin Dokov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know which version of ISC DHCP that OpenBSD 4.2 uses for
>>> dhcpd(8)? I wasn't able to find any clue on the webpage or associated
>>> documentation.
>>>
>>> It feels a lot like a 2.x release based on the options
On Jan 16, 2008, at 3:58 PM, Unix Fan wrote:
I notice a lot of people forward several ports when using
bittorrent
You know, It's not written in stone that you "need" to use more then
a single port...
The standard bittorrent client usually only handles a single port at a
time per ins
On Jan 16, 2008 12:20 PM, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Daemon wrote:
> ...
> > As for others saying 'why re-compile GENERIC', well, GENERIC is awesome
> in
> > itself and there is no need generally. But I think the reason for some
> > people is that they too like tweaking /usr
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run into troubles with getopt(3). the test program below shows the
> problem. It produces different output on Linux and OpenBSD, when it is
> called like this on Linux it looks like this:
>
> ./a.out asdf -n
> option char: 110, n
>
I notice a lot of people forward several ports when using bittorrent
You know, It's not written in stone that you "need" to use more then a single
port...
I never run into any speed problems... Even when nearly maxing up my 20Mbit
home cable line ;)
-Nix Fan.
I just got this output on the console working on it trying to find out
what's going on.
May be this mean something to someone.
dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state
data error type 32 sfsr=0 sfva=500ba000 afsr=8400 afva=1fe02010048
tf=0xe00176d8
panic: data fault: pc=105e4c4 addr=5
Hi,
I always gets error on the network card dc0 on the Sun V100 server where
it doesn't want to use auto negotiation properly and where if I try to
force a duplex mode, it doesn't come up, but the link changed between
up/down all the time.
I get:
dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state
On Jan 16, 2008 2:35 PM, Sebastian Reitenbach
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run into troubles with getopt(3). the test program below shows the
> problem. It produces different output on Linux and OpenBSD, when it is
> called like this on Linux it looks like this:
>
> ./a.out asdf -n
> option char:
-current of course.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:25:04PM +0200, NetOne - Doichin Dokov wrote:
> Is this for -current only, or you need testing on 4.2 too?
>
> Marco Peereboom :
>> Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if you
>> see this in the dmesg: store fro
Source only.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:24:00PM +0100, Nick Nauwelaerts wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:44:02 -0600
> Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if
> > you see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
>
> Is thi
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:44:02 -0600
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if
> you see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
Is this in any recent snapshots or source only?
And I have the same question for the tech@ email wi
On Jan 16, 2008 10:35 PM, Sebastian Reitenbach
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run into troubles with getopt(3). the test program below shows the
> problem. It produces different output on Linux and OpenBSD, when it is
> called like this on Linux it looks like this:
>
> ./a.out asdf -n
> opt
Hi,
I run into troubles with getopt(3). the test program below shows the
problem. It produces different output on Linux and OpenBSD, when it is
called like this on Linux it looks like this:
./a.out asdf -n
option char: 110, n
on OpenBSD, getopt returns -1 and no output is shown.
what would be
Is this for -current only, or you need testing on 4.2 too?
Marco Peereboom P=P0P?P8QP0:
Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if you
see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
If you see this panic or something similar:
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SLIC HPET APIC MCFG TCP
If you see the following panic please email me the acpidump -f
my_machine results.
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf06e0 (53 entries)
bios0: vendor American Megatrends Inc. version "080012" date 07/04/2006
bios0: ASUSTeK Computer INC. A6Tc
acpi0 at mainbus0: rev 0Unknown opcode: 00fd @ 5ba1
On 2008/01/16 10:49, Chris Cameron wrote:
> These aren't recognized by 4.2, and the January 15th Snapshot seems to
> recognize them, but they're marked as "not configured".
Try adding this to the table near the start of /sys/dev/pci/if_em.c
and build a new kernel:
{ PCI_VENDOR_INTEL, PCI
Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if you
see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
If you see this panic or something similar:
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SLIC HPET APIC MCFG TCPA SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT
SSDT
wrong setbufint type
2ca8 Called: \\_SB_.C003.C098.C155
arg0:
hello,
I'm running OBSD 4.2 on a Axiomtek NA-1531. It's a network appliance
with 3 Intel 100 MB fxp adapters, an Intel PRO/1000CT and an Intel quad
PRO/1000MT.
The problem is with the PRO/1000MT. Other interfaces works fine.
Network traffic on quad 1000MT is slow, very slow, and the followin
* Rolf Sommerhalder wrote:
> To test, I have simpley disabled tickling by the kernel:
> sysctl kern.watchdog.auto=0
> The watchdog bites within 30 seconds which is the default
> kern.watchdog.period=30
>
> Running the userspace tickler watchdogd, which implicitly disables
> kern.watchdog.auto,
Tim Stewart wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone know which version of ISC DHCP that OpenBSD 4.2 uses for
> dhcpd(8)? I wasn't able to find any clue on the webpage or associated
> documentation.
>
> It feels a lot like a 2.x release based on the options available, but
> I just want to make sure.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] P=P0P?P8QP0:
- Original Message - From: "Tim Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:29 AM
Subject: OpenBSD 4.2 dhcpd(8)
Hello all,
Does anyone know which version of ISC DHCP that OpenBSD 4.2 uses for
dhcpd(8)? I wasn't able to find any
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:29 AM
Subject: OpenBSD 4.2 dhcpd(8)
Hello all,
Does anyone know which version of ISC DHCP that OpenBSD 4.2 uses for
dhcpd(8)? I wasn't able to find any clue on the webpage or associa
I made a mistake and bought a couple Dell servers with Intel "VT" NICs.
These aren't recognized by 4.2, and the January 15th Snapshot seems to
recognize them, but they're marked as "not configured".
So, in the most humble way I possibly can, (without any hint of "demand"
I hope) can someone te
Hello everyone. I'm seeing the mclpool limit reached error.
I'm intending on replacing a transparent firewall running OpenBSD3.6 with
one running 4.2, and in the testing phase I've noticed an interesting
problem.
The intention is to have traffic coming in on interface A (trunk0 - bge0 and
bge1 loa
--- Tim Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> uses for dhcpd(8)? I wasn't able to find any clue on the
> webpage or associated documentation.
>
> It feels a lot like a 2.x release based on the options
> available, but I just want to make sure.
I had the same question come up in my office last week
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 18:59]:
> Hi
>
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 15:51]:
> > > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> >
Just a fast followup.
While pulling 133K down via BitTorrent I decided to run some tests
through the 4.1 firewall with hping. Nothing serious, just different
flags.
My queues, from pftop:
qo_tcp_ack priq 7 790K 49M 0 0
0 163 9939
qo_dns
Hi
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 15:51]:
> > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > > > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
>
> 2) Under what circumstances (generally) would one encounter a situation
> where it would strongly desirable to have a custom kernel?
An appletalk router.
-Bryan
Hello all,
Does anyone know which version of ISC DHCP that OpenBSD 4.2 uses for
dhcpd(8)? I wasn't able to find any clue on the webpage or associated
documentation.
It feels a lot like a 2.x release based on the options available, but
I just want to make sure.
Thanks.
--
-TimS
Tim Stewart
Le
Paul de Weerd wrote:
[...]
port in /etc/ttys (see ttys(5) for more info). But yeah, like Henning
said .. absolutely no need to build a new kernel.
Definitely not worth the effort just to change the console speed.
I do custom kernels to build a ramdisk kernel that has some special
application
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 12:05]:
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
* Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
the soekris?
nothing. there is no need to
Richard Daemon wrote:
...
> As for others saying 'why re-compile GENERIC', well, GENERIC is awesome in
> itself and there is no need generally. But I think the reason for some
> people is that they too like tweaking /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC &
> /usr/src/sys/arch/$ARCH/conf/GENERIC to remove any un
On 01/16/08 03:41, Richard Stallman wrote:
> If I read and read between the lines you clearly admit you are not
> satisfied with the current GPLvX more restrictions will follow.
>
> We will change the GPL as needed to deal with future threats.
> I'm satisfied with GPL v3 now, but our enemi
Hi
2008/1/16, Richard Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jan 16, 2008 9:42 AM, Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > > > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I fo
On Jan 16, 2008 9:42 AM, Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
> > > flashboot. I'll look more in to other flashb
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 15:51]:
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
> > > flashboot. I'll look more in to other flashboot customi
Are you running the latest bios?
We also need a dmesg from when it boots and when it doesn't.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:53:53PM +0100, Falk Brockerhoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installied OpenBSD 4.2 i386 Release on a Dell Poweredge 2650.
> Install works fine, but the server hangs at boot.
On Jan 12, 2008 9:01 PM, Jan Stary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was testing the watchdog-enabled kernel on my ALIX.1C in October for
> Marc Balmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - he's the guy you want to contact.
> ...
> basically, the timer got correctly detected, but didn't really work
> - both before an
On 2008/01/16 12:33, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> I have lowered holdtime for testing purposes only. With default value
> the behavior is the same. I have just forced local-address to another
> one, with "local-address 201.70.200.2" but still the same.
>
> Here is the tcpdum output
that doesn't look l
Hello,
I just installied OpenBSD 4.2 i386 Release on a Dell Poweredge 2650.
Install works fine, but the server hangs at boot. "enable acpi" on the
UKC fixed this.
After succesfully booting I updated to the latest snapshot (the laste
before the actual from 15.01.2008) with the help of
OpenBS
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:28:53PM +0200, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:27:10PM +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I seem to be getting a fair few of these on my firewall recently,
> > looking like arp cache poisoning. it may be related to me losing
> > service occasionally.
>
hi there,
sorry for the offtopic.
are there any openbsd users in HK willing
to meet, have a chat, (maybe lodge or show
a nice place to) and show around in the city
a confused and lost european on 21st of
january? please answer in private,
thank you.
-f
--
we're born free and taxed to death.
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> > Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
> > flashboot. I'll look more in to other flashboot customisations. Thanks
> > for pointing this out.
>
> flash boot and teh
I've observed that the sf(4) driver sometimes emits "device timeout"
messages every few seconds forever.It appears that after some errors,
the driver resets the chip without resetting the counter which triggers
the timeout message. The following patch clears the "output in progress"
counter in the
On Jan 16, 2008 11:43 AM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008/01/16 11:17, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> > I am setting up OpenBGP for the first time in replacement to Cisco.
> > However, I am having some troubles which I could not realize the
> > reason myself, so I
>
> > holdtime 4
>
>
* Eduardo Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:24]:
> The problem I get is:
>
> neighbor 200.184.196.18 (Intelig): state change Connect -> OpenSent,
> reason: Connection opened
tcp connection has been established and we sent our OPEN message to the
neighbor.
> neighbor 200.184.196.18 (Intel
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 14:18]:
> Didn't know it is exactly the same as options. I found it in
> flashboot. I'll look more in to other flashboot customisations. Thanks
> for pointing this out.
flash boot and teh like are obsolete ways to complicate your life.
--
Henni
Hi all,
This is waaay off-topic, but is the most obviuos way for me to seek this
kind of help. We're currently testing a fax termination system over VoIP
trunks, and need some test from international numbers (we're located in
Bulgaria). All I'm asking is, if you are able to - send a fax to
+3
On 2008/01/16 11:17, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> I am setting up OpenBGP for the first time in replacement to Cisco.
> However, I am having some troubles which I could not realize the
> reason myself, so I
> holdtime 4
can your peers keep up with that? it's rather low.
> Local host: 201.87.
On 2008/01/16 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/01/16 11:17, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> > I am setting up OpenBGP for the first time in replacement to Cisco.
> > However, I am having some troubles which I could not realize the
> > reason myself, so I
>
> > holdtime 4
>
> can your peers keep up
Hello everybody.
I am setting up OpenBGP for the first time in replacement to Cisco.
However, I am having some troubles which I could not realize the
reason myself, so I
#macros
peer_gvt=200.139.89.37
peer_intelig=200.184.196.18
#peer_intelig=201.70.200.1
# Configuracao Global
AS 28660
router-i
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 12:05]:
> > 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> > > > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
>
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, vous pouvez le visualiser en
cliquant ici
Passez ` la vitesse supirieure avec Packshot Creator 3D , le studio photo
connecti ` un simple ordinateur.
Rialisez facilement des photos et animations de tous vos produits en
quelques minutes pour tous vos beso
* Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 13:35]:
> | 2) Under what circumstances (generally) would one encounter a situation
> | where it would strongly desirable to have a custom kernel?
>
> I think the goal is "never". Under no circumstances *should* it be
> 'strongly desirable' to have a
On 1/16/08, Lars NoodC)n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Should anything be done to the GENERIC kernel's run time
> configuration then to improve performance, reduce system requirements or
> otherwise prevent it from making beer go flat?
nope. I've been running a couple of net4501 (100MHz/64MB RAM
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:16:40PM +0200, Lars Nood??n wrote:
| > ... (see ttys(5) for more info). But yeah, like Henning
| > said .. absolutely no need to build a new kernel.
|
| 1) Should anything be done to the GENERIC kernel's run time
| configuration then to improve performance, reduce system
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> ...
> Don't forget to change the speed on the getty running on the serial
> port in /etc/ttys ...
to summarize for the sake of the archives:
/etc/boot.conf:
stty com0 38400
set tty com0
/etc/ttys:
tty00 "/usr/libexec/getty std.38400" vt220on
Si vous ne visualisez pas correctement ce message, suivez ce lien
Vous recherchez des agents commerciaux ?
Ne manquez pas la parution GRATUITE*
de votre offre dans ce numiro unique
envoyi aux 25.000 agents commerciaux
en activiti sur la France !!
* Pour toute diffusion d'offre de mission sur le
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:19PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
| > IMHO every embedded device should have console speed synced between
| > bios and the kernel. These options are very helpful.
I completely agree with the first part here. BIOS, kernel and console
speed should be the same across the
* Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-16 12:05]:
> 2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> > > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
> > > the soekris?
> >
> > nothing. there is no need to c
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:01:28 +0100, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
>2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
>> > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
>> > the soekris?
>>
>> nothing. there is no need to compi
2008/1/16, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> > What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
> > the soekris?
>
> nothing. there is no need to compile a kernel for the soekris. further,
> there is no use in compili
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:27:10PM +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I seem to be getting a fair few of these on my firewall recently,
> looking like arp cache poisoning. it may be related to me losing service
> occasionally.
>
> I can't see how i could get pf to filter on what is effectively a
I should thank you all for the fast response, problem solved
Thanks to Stuart Henderson & Jonathan Gray. you sent me on the correct path
Correct 0x0168 is atheros vender ID (i had not transcribed incorrectly 0x0148
was the dmesg) , seams the system and card config was incompatable
Issue was WPN3
I seem to be getting a fair few of these on my firewall recently,
looking like arp cache poisoning. it may be related to me losing service
occasionally.
I can't see how i could get pf to filter on what is effectively a lower
level protocol.
what other options do i have?
a+
scorch
RECEVEZ vos FORMULAIRES DE CONTACT grbce au concept Centralead
Et PROFITEZ de LâOFFRE DECOUVERTE A 30⬠HT Seulement* :
1
Vous recevrez pendant 3 mois ` compter de votre inscription, tous les
formulaires des personnes qui souhaitent acheter vos produits ou services
avec leurs coordonnies que
* Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 17:42]:
> What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
> the soekris?
nothing. there is no need to compile a kernel for the soekris. further,
there is no use in compiling a !GENERIC kernel for soekris either.
(ok, rare excep
* Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 21:19]:
> Jonathan Steel wrote:
>> Is there any explanation for the speed difference? I have tried tweeking
>> some sysctl values to no avail. Is there something else I can test for on
>> the card? I'd be happy to run these tests again for any change
72 matches
Mail list logo
