Hi Henning
you are right I got a bunch of this ones:
neighbor ipv6-address-here (description-here): received
notification: error in UPDATE message, network unacceptable
I see the same type of message for 2 routers and it looks like they are
both Juniper (one for sure the other one at 99%)
Sometimes it matters to be small and sometimes fast. That is a decision
made by the kernel hacker. Joe user does not make these decisions
because he/she does not understand the overall impact.
As someone else who writes code for this fine os would say: removing
drivers is pure masturbation.
On
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 06:05:06PM +0900, Jordi Beltran Creix wrote:
Then what is the meaning of this comment in the kernel's memcpy?
A few kbs don't matter, yet a dozen bytes do?
GENERIC has different constraints than install kernels or boot code.
We use the same memcpy in all three.
Then what is the meaning of this comment in the kernel's memcpy?
A few kbs don't matter, yet a dozen bytes do?
/*
* This is designed to be small, not fast.
*/
2008/6/6, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jon wrote:
I usually name the kernel to the machine hostname, but you can give it
any
On 2008-06-06, Jordi Beltran Creix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then what is the meaning of this comment in the kernel's memcpy?
A few kbs don't matter, yet a dozen bytes do?
It depends where the bytes are. If they're not optional and are
somewhere that needs to fit on *all* install media for *all*
Hello list,
I just wanted to be updated on the very useful option in isakmpd.conf:
Shared-SADB=Define
I am using it successfully since OpenBSD 4.2 on my VPN gateway. It
allows more than one roadwarrior connecting to the VPN gateway from the
same public IP.
Is this option safe to use ? Will
Sometimes it matters to be small and sometimes fast. That is a decision
made by the kernel hacker. Joe user does not make these decisions
because he/she does not understand the overall impact.
As someone else who writes code for this fine os would say: removing
drivers is pure masturbation.
Oh
Update: Qlogic finally managed to donate one iSCSI HBA to the OpenBSD
project.
I'd like to thank everybody who participated in emailing Qlogic - this
step applied the required pressure so they finally kept their promise.
Stephan.
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 20:52 +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
Is vpnc working on the OpenBSD box and just not routing for your
internal network? Your pf.conf looks ok to me for the NAT part. Have
you made sure net.inet.esp.enable=0 is in your sysctl.conf?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Matt Garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at
Hi all,
I'm trying to install OpenBSD on a Transcend TS32GSSD25S-M, a 32GB SSD with
SATA interface. No matter what I set in the BIOS in terms of PIO/DMA/UDMA
modes or what flags I modify in UKC for the wd devices, the drive always get
recognized as PIO mode , UltraDMA mode 5. But it's absolutely
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Matt Garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 03:07:30PM +0200, Almir Karic wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Matt Garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'd like to do is have my OBSD box to NAT on the tun device
(VPN tunnel). I.e., so I
Mitch, Steve: Thanks for your responses...
You're not going to believe what the problem was. I recently attached
a wireless keyboard to my KVM switch, apparently 4.2+ doesn't like it.
I switched back to a wired keyboard (still going through the KVM mind
you) and the installer completed
On 6/6/08 6:52 AM, Geoff Steckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes it matters to be small and sometimes fast. That is a decision
made by the kernel hacker. Joe user does not make these decisions
because he/she does not understand the overall impact.
As someone else who writes code for
On 6/6/08, Jordi Beltran Creix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then what is the meaning of this comment in the kernel's memcpy?
A few kbs don't matter, yet a dozen bytes do?
/*
* This is designed to be small, not fast.
*/
That comment comes from a time when memory cost ten bucks a byte.
On 6/6/08, Geoff Steckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Threats of unspecified system instability are hard to believe.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=109088660014351w=2
For systems which must boot very quickly, removing unused drivers
whose probe routines cause significant timeouts can make a
We are sending you this email because you previously registered on our site.
If you cannot see the email below, click on the link below to view the online
version.
http://dotm1.net/t.aspx?l=1052557i=295105846
beatthatQuote.com - Fighting For Lower Prices
That comment comes from a time when memory cost ten bucks a byte. We
don't necessarily keep all the comments up to date with the current
market prices, though, figuring anybody reading kernel comments is
moderately rational. Apparently not.
Well, according to previous answers, the 25 years
o;?
I am referring to the old hardware dumb terminals, which had the vt320
standards etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application
that absolutely requires such an emulator (and is using Accuterm right
now). A Free Software program that emulates these well enough and runs
on GNU or BSD
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:42:08 +0200, Pau wrote
a nice thing to test hardware and get dmesg
http://bsdanywhere.org/
Of course, I guess that booting the obsd installer cd is much faster
and you get also dmesg
but this is an interesting alternative
Yes, I just discovered it this week and had
Jordi Beltran Creix wrote:
Well, according to previous answers, the 25 years old comment was
actually justified, but if it weren't, style(9) would come to mind.
Been eating your own dog food lately?
If we understand that custom kernels are unsupported, that some
kernel options can be modified
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:14:55 -0400
Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 6/6/08, Geoff Steckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For systems which must boot very quickly, removing unused drivers
whose probe routines cause significant timeouts can make a big
difference. Sometimes timeouts are the
On your web site, in your FAQ on your liveCD, you have recommendations that
include disabling the hard drives in bios.
I tried that with the OpenBSD install iso, and it still found my sata drive.
jafyi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
The people reading the faq are not the people who need custom kernels.
Those people *know* what they need and are not deterred. But as
always, when we try to help the userbase by offering the advice they
need, someone needs to chime in and muddy the waters. So now some dude
is going to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quoted from Pau on Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 07:42:08PM +0200,:
a nice thing to test hardware and get dmesg
http://bsdanywhere.org/
Of course, I guess that booting the obsd installer cd is much faster
and you get also dmesg
but this is an
As someone else who writes code for this fine os would say: removing
drivers is pure masturbation.
Hah, perfect.
As a first foray into BSD I stumbled upon FreeBSD. To make it do what
I wanted, step one was to compile a custom kernel. BOOYAH, I got a
geek-on.
A few months later I had
Now I tested wuth very simply topology: just 2 pc's and switch
One OpenBSD another Linux with web server.
Now I have only one line in my pf.conf:
scrub all max-mss 1400 fragment reassemble
This is wget downloading 1K file tcp, and I see mss 1460
in very first packet from my OpenBSD box
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:36:59PM -0600, Anathae Townsend wrote:
On your web site, in your FAQ on your liveCD, you have recommendations that
include disabling the hard drives in bios.
I tried that with the OpenBSD install iso, and it still found my sata drive.
jafyi
Hmmm... if the drive
The people reading the faq are not the people who need custom kernels.
Those people *know* what they need and are not deterred. But as
always, when we try to help the userbase by offering the advice they
need, someone needs to chime in and muddy the waters. So now some dude
is going to
On 2008 Jun 06 (Fri) at 22:35:29 -0400 (-0400), Geoff Steckel wrote:
:The people reading the faq are not the people who need custom kernels.
:Those people *know* what they need and are not deterred. But as
:always, when we try to help the userbase by offering the advice they
:need, someone
Is anybody else seeing cold boot failures on Soekris Net5501-70
with comBIOS v1.33b and OpenBSD 4.3? I asked earlier on the
soekris-tech list, received no replies.
The console shows the following, and then hangs for about five seconds:
1 Seconds to automatic boot. Press Ctrl-P for entering
* Paolo Di Francesco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-06 10:51]:
Hi Henning
you are right I got a bunch of this ones:
neighbor ipv6-address-here (description-here): received notification:
error in UPDATE message, network unacceptable
I see the same type of message for 2 routers and it looks
walt wrote:
Someone else reported this same problem back in 2005 but never got a
response, so I'll try again.
I've been running FreeBSD (userland ppp) on my old i486 firewall machine
for several years and decided to try OpenBSD 4.3 on the same machine.
I have it working well now (pppoe/DSL)
Kevin,
I saw this once last week in the midst of trying some new units I
purchased with 1.33 and then 1.33b.
The CF was a Silicon Drive 1Gb (I don't have the exact model with me
now). I could only get the box to boot
by changing the CF setting in the BIOS to secondary. There is
something in
33 matches
Mail list logo
