On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
>
> For the masses:
>
> - NetBSD: Run on any hardware (including toasters)
> - OpenBSD: Be as secure as possible
> - FreeBSD: provide best system for x86-platforms
It's a mistake to make this associ
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:57 PM, patrick keshishian
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishian
wrote:
>>> *aham* ... was this a really stupid question?
>>
>> Well, you elided useful data by only including part of the net
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishian
wrote:
>> *aham* B ... was this a really stupid question?
>
> Well, you elided useful data by only including part of the netstat
> output, you obfuscated it to make it harder to read, you
Hi,
Recently some Linux-based VPS servers that I have hosting on were
cracked, with the servers' kernels removed and the servers rebooted -
some even had the VPS data trashed.
This highlights some of the security vulnerabilities in Linux-based
solutions and the fact that most OpenVZ servers uses
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishian
wrote:
> *aham* ... was this a really stupid question?
Well, you elided useful data by only including part of the netstat
output, you obfuscated it to make it harder to read, you failed to
even mention what version of OpenBSD you're running, *a
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
-I If scripts exist for a given package, do not execute them.
This does not work... I will re-check, but "pkg_add -vvvI" shows that
scripts are executed.
Well, one of my client would like to run any 3rd party script only as
regular user.
Regards,
Ce
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Cem Kayali wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to create some customised packages, and noticed that many ports
> use exec/unexec. I did search through archives and found that, in 2007 Marc
> Espie says;
>
>
> http://www.techtalkz.com/openbsd/79003-post-install-script-ex
Hello!
I'm trying to create some customised packages, and noticed that many
ports use exec/unexec. I did search through archives and found that, in
2007 Marc Espie says;
http://www.techtalkz.com/openbsd/79003-post-install-script-execution-package.html
>But using @exec/@unexec is more or less
Sicuriser votre compte Orange!
Cher client Orange .,
Sont en mesure de sicuriti dans d'autres afin de protiger nos clients des
renseignements sur toute activiti suspecte. Pour garantir votre Optus
compte s'il vous plant visitez le lien ci-dessous:
http://r.orange.fr/r/Oid_identification
Nous no
*aham* ... was this a really stupid question?
Maybe I just wrote too many words. In simple terms, once a new route
has been added to the routing table, all traffic should consider the
new route right? So, is the ppp interface treated differently when it
comes to routing in OpenBSD?
--patrick
O
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Or is scrub max-mss really broken?
This has been resolved.
It has been pointed out to me that tcpdump sees the packets before
pf, so the inbound mss fixup hasn't been applied yet. Looking at
packets routed to another host shows that max-mss scrubbing for v4
works
Hi all
I have sendmail on 4.4 as MX and relay for outgoing mail using smtp
auth. Now some users started using arbitrary from: addresses in their
mail clients. I would like to restrict those sender addresses to the
local domains, i.e. allow them to send mail from u...@my.domain or
u...@my.other.dom
On 2009-06-20, Markus Hennecke wrote:
> Jesus Sanchez schrieb:
>> Jean-Frangois SIMON escribis:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It looks like the max bandwidth of ftp is somehow 350 Kb/s.
>>> Is this normaland if so can it be increased ?
>>
>> ?? it must be your bandwidth limit, there's nothing
>> about a 35
I give up!
I wasn't able to have good looking msfonts without antialias.
So, I activated font antialias in my desktop. In this way the msfonts in
"normal" mode are rendered correctly, that is they appear exactly as
they would under Windows. The problem is with the "bold" texts: they
take up mo
Hello My Good Friend,
I'm happy to inform you about my success in getting those funds transferred
under the cooperation of a new partner from GERMANY.
Presently i'am in GERMANY for investment projects with my own share of the
total sum. meanwhile,i didn't forget your past efforts and atte
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 04:16:02PM +0700, Egbert Krook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just finished upgrading one of our systems from OpenBSD 4.2 to 4.5.
>
> I've run into a small problem with pfctl as it's no longer showing the
> details for each individual IP address in our tables, just the date the
> t
I updated my home gateway from 4.5-stable to -current and consequently
had to update the scrub part of my pf.conf.
Old:
scrub on enc0 inet6 all max-mss 1362
scrub on enc0 inet all max-mss 1398
scrub in all
scrub out on $ext4 all max-mss 1440
New:
match on enc0 inet6 all scrub (max-mss 1
* Egbert Krook [2009-06-21 11:58]:
> I've run into a small problem with pfctl as it's no longer showing the
> details for each individual IP address in our tables, just the date the
> table was last cleared.
really. reading the manpage would solve your confusion.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de
Hi,
I've just finished upgrading one of our systems from OpenBSD 4.2 to 4.5.
I've run into a small problem with pfctl as it's no longer showing the
details for each individual IP address in our tables, just the date the
table was last cleared.
/etc/pf.conf:
=
table { 1.1.1.1/32 1.1
Hi,
Thanks for clarification.
Never said stock ... OBSD's brilliant.
Thnks ;)
2009/6/21 ropers
> 2009/6/21 Jean-Frangois SIMON
> >
> > It looks like filezilla uses several transfert at the same time to reach
> > 1Mo/s
>
> That indeed appears to be the case.
> From
>
http://itmanagement.earthw
2009/6/21 Jean-Frangois SIMON
>
> It looks like filezilla uses several transfert at the same time to reach
> 1Mo/s
That indeed appears to be the case.
From
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/entdev/article.php/3802111/FileZilla-One-Swe
et-Free-FTP-Client.htm
:
> A multiple transfer function for ex
It looks like filezilla uses several transfert at the same time to reach
1Mo/s however each transfert is ~400Ko/s as for OpenBSD's FTP client.
Maybe the bandwith limit per file transfered is limited from the server side
?
Is there any way to make multiple transferts at the same time with mget
sin
22 matches
Mail list logo
