According to Provos's blog,
http://www.provos.org/index.php?/archives/34-Evading-System-Sandbox-Containment.html
The initial prototype of Systrace as described in the
paperhttp://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/papers/systrace.pdfavoided
this problem by using a look-aside buffer in the kernel. This
I hope the list can give me any advice or pointers on what is the best
way to access data from a SQL Server 2005 database from OpenBSD
'Best' is subjective.
I myself would say the best way would involve using bsd.rd, fdisk and
newfs.
Note, Postgresql is part of ports:
2009/7/15 Wayne M. Scace k9di_...@k9di.org:
Richard Toohey wrote:
While I'm sure everyone is very happy for you, can I respectfully ask
that your postings are a bit more technical in nature?
Thanks.
Hello Richard,
Sure, I'll bear that in mind in the future.
Wayne
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Anton Karpovtoxah...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Provos's blog,
http://www.provos.org/index.php?/archives/34-Evading-System-Sandbox-Containme
nt.html
The initial prototype of Systrace as described in the paper avoided this
problem by using a look-aside
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:45:28AM -0500, Vijay Sankar wrote:
richardtoo...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
Quoting Vijay Sankar vsan...@foretell.ca:
I am trying to access a database hosted on a Microsoft SQL Server
2005 using FreeTDS and iodbc from OpenBSD 4.5 -stable (also tried
OpenBSD
On 2009-07-13, Federico deepb...@fastwebnet.it wrote:
Federico wrote:
Hi all,
after some disastrous test with OBSD 4.5, i tried to upgrade to -current
via cvs, then to download the latest snapshot of 4.6 release from the ftp.
My goal is to obtain a couple of firewall in active/active
On 2009-07-15, HDC fire...@gmail.com wrote:
I trying to set Exim to use Dovecot SASL authentication, but this
feature is not included on Exim 4.69 on OpenBSD.
I see the sasl (cyrus-sasl) flavor in the ports, but no have this
options in the packages... anyway cyrus-sasl is no the option that i
Specifically for people new to OpenBSD, there is a 'newbies' list, with
subscription information available at
http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-newbies
The post that Wayne sent would definitly be on topic and welcome on the
'newbies' list.
On 2009 Jul 15 (Wed) at 17:45:34 +1200
On 2009-07-14, Vijay Sankar vsan...@foretell.ca wrote:
I am trying to access a database hosted on a Microsoft SQL Server 2005
using FreeTDS and iodbc from OpenBSD 4.5 -stable (also tried OpenBSD
-current as of today). Unfortunately none of the documents I have read
so far or the various
Stuart Henderson wrote:
looks like the same thing as in PR 6084.
Yes, but it's still in open state, noone replied at that ticket.
Besides, dlg worte about active/active in 4.6 introducing the defer
tag, as you can see here:
http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20090619100514
but
hmm, on Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:21:16PM +0200, ropers said that
Please don't require me to submit myself to facefuck in order to see
it's not facefuck.
it's fuckbook.
-f
--
so easy, a child can do it. child sold seperately.
Hi,
I wonder if there is anything else I could do here to find out what might be
the
problem.
I get plenty of errors like this on the console:
psycho0: correctable DMA error AFAR 47b8c200 AFSR 406200ff0080
psycho0: correctable DMA error AFAR 47b90aa8 AFSR 4062ff00a080
psycho0:
Hi,
I am not able to re write the parity for my Raid set.
# raidctl -Sv raid0
raid0 Status:
Reconstruction is 100% complete.
Parity Re-write is 100% complete.
Copyback is 100% complete.
raidctl: ioctl () failed
# raidctl -sv raid0
raid0 Components:
/dev/wd0d: failed
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:38:23 +0700, bsd...@gmail.com bsd...@gmail.com
wrote:
Presumably this would have been removed from the manual page if the
issue were fixed. OpenBSD is usually good about keeping the
documentation up to date and matching the code it comes with. On the
other hand,
And so I've heard from a very extremely reliable assets not parasites that
the following will also gawk at the gathering:
1. Borat
2. Mr. Bean
3. James Bond
:wq!
hmm, on Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:21:16PM +0200, ropers said that
Please don't require me to submit myself to facefuck in order to
Hello everyone,
This is, I'm sure, a naive question, so bear with me. What is the
purpose of /usr/libexec? I see from hier(7) that it has something to do
with System daemons and utilities (executed by other programs) which
probably means, stuff not normally executed by users. But it's
* Ross Cameron ross.came...@linuxpro.co.za [2009-07-15 03:19]:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Anton Karpovtoxah...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Provos's blog,
http://www.provos.org/index.php?/archives/34-Evading-System-Sandbox-Containme
nt.html
The initial prototype of Systrace as
This is, I'm sure, a naive question, so bear with me. What is the
purpose of /usr/libexec? I see from hier(7) that it has something to do
with System daemons and utilities (executed by other programs) which
probably means, stuff not normally executed by users. But it's unclear
to me
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Theo de Raadt wrote:
It is stuff that isn't on root's path.
Ok-- it turns out I am even more naive than I previously thought. I can
see that /usr/libexec is not in root's path on my machine (maybe that's
why the 'usr' part is in there?).
But why not? /sbin/init is
[please CC me on any replies, as I'm not on m...@openbsd.org]
Siju George writes:
Hi,
I am not able to re write the parity for my Raid set.
# raidctl -Sv raid0
raid0 Status:
Reconstruction is 100% complete.
Parity Re-write is 100% complete.
Copyback is 100% complete.
raidctl: ioctl ()
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Theo de Raadt wrote:
It is stuff that isn't on root's path.
Ok-- it turns out I am even more naive than I previously thought. I can
see that /usr/libexec is not in root's path on my machine (maybe that's
why the 'usr' part is in there?).
But why not?
Becuase
* Daniel Barowy m...@barowy.net [2009-07-15 09:58]:
Hello everyone,
This is, I'm sure, a naive question, so bear with me. What is the
purpose of /usr/libexec? I see from hier(7) that it has something
to do with System daemons and utilities (executed by other
programs) which probably
Daniel Barowy wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Theo de Raadt wrote:
It is stuff that isn't on root's path.
[snip]
But why not?
Because you never have to execute any of those programs
manually. They are just programs which are executed by other
programs. Just like libraries are used by other
As far as I'm aware ADD is on the autistic spectrum, and it is generally
believed that a lot of people in IT are on the spectrum, especially those in
the more technical areas, so in a way, your probably sort of right...in a
way.
Though, have you been tested for Asperger Syndrome?
-Original
Sorry if I asked you that already, I can't remember. Are you using xdm?
If so did you disable the getty(8) attached to the console in /etc/ttys?
So far so good!
Is there a planned fix?
Thanks
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
(Freelance software developer / technical writer / open-source
On Wed Jul 15 2009 12:31:11 GMT-0400 (EDT) , Theo de Raadt
dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Theo de Raadt wrote:
It is stuff that isn't on root's path.
Ok-- it turns out I am even more naive than I previously thought.
I can see that /usr/libexec is not in root's path on my
Michal wrote:
As far as I'm aware ADD is on the autistic spectrum, and it is generally
believed that a lot of people in IT are on the spectrum, especially those in
the more technical areas, so in a way, your probably sort of right...in a
way.
Though, have you been tested for Asperger Syndrome?
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:31:11 -0600
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Does everyone on this list have ADD?
Commit to usr.bin/mg/theo.c please ;-)
* Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info [2009-07-15 11:22]:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:31:11 -0600
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Does everyone on this list have ADD?
Commit to usr.bin/mg/theo.c please ;-)
No, because all of us that read misc@ say this every single day :)
theo.c
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Michalmic...@sharescope.co.uk wrote:
As far as I'm aware ADD is on the autistic spectrum, and it is generally
believed that a lot of people in IT are on the spectrum, especially those in
the more technical areas, so in a way, your probably sort of right...in a
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Insan Praja SWinsan.pr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:38:23 +0700, bsd...@gmail.com bsd...@gmail.com
wrote:
Presumably this would have been removed from the manual page if the
issue were fixed. OpenBSD is usually good about keeping the
Sorry if I asked you that already, I can't remember. Are you using xdm?
If so did you disable the getty(8) attached to the console in /etc/ttys?
So far so good!
Is there a planned fix?
No.
But there is a better workaround in the works.
Miod
Hi all,
I have tried to download some packages from these mirrors,
http://openbsd.berkeley.edu/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386
http://anga.funkfeuer.at/ftp/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386
http://obsd.cec.mtu.edu/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386
...And am told these packages don't exist. I am
Dear Group Planner,
A group sponsored event can be planned and promoted with very little work and
practically no expense on your part.
We have a large number of co-hosted and private customized group departures for
you to consider. It is good to have guaranteed departures and high commission
Simon Loewen wrote:
Where can I get these from?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvsm=123653096012674w=2
Can't resolve p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib
In base.
Can't resolve p5-IO-Compress-Base
In base.
Can't resolve p5-IO-Compress-Zlib
In base.
Can't resolve p5-Compress-Zlib
In base.
Can't
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 09:57:15PM +0200, Simon Loewen wrote:
...And am told these packages don't exist. I am following an
installation document here to install SpamAssasin:
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/mail/mail6.html
That guide is retarded. It seems to list nearly all dependencies
Hello,
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:57:15 +0200
Simon Loewen si...@simonloewen.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have tried to download some packages from these mirrors,
http://openbsd.berkeley.edu/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386
http://anga.funkfeuer.at/ftp/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386
Simon Loewen wrote:
Hi all,
I have tried to download some packages from these mirrors,
http://openbsd.berkeley.edu/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386
http://anga.funkfeuer.at/ftp/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386
http://obsd.cec.mtu.edu/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386
...And am told these
On 7/15/09, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:56:35 +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Sevan / Venture37 ventur...@gmail.com [2009-07-14 19:50]:
Still some time to go but wondering, who's going?
I'm very much looking forward to attending for the time.
otto, tedu and
En caso de no poder ver correctamente este correo favor de dar clic aqum
Tel.- 01 (755) 555 Fax: 01 (755) 555 0092
Lada sin costo 01 800 718 2189
E-mail: reservacio...@meliazulixtapa.com
Restricciones:
No aplica en puentes ni dmas festivos, Promocisn sujeta a disponibilidad
Este
hi there,
replacing screen with tmux is going fabulously.
the very last thing i can't seem to make to work is
(from man screen)
escape xy
Set the command character to x and the character generat-
ing a literal command character (by triggering the meta
command) to
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:46:44AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
but i can't seem to be able to send a real ^x
to the window. screen's escape command lets me
set that if i press ^x x (control-x, followed by
a single x) the terminal gets sent a sequence of ^x
Add 'bind x send-keys ^x'
hmm, on Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 07:34:13PM -0400, Mike Erdely said that
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:46:44AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
but i can't seem to be able to send a real ^x
to the window. screen's escape command lets me
set that if i press ^x x (control-x, followed by
a single x)
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:17:22PM +0100, Fred Crowson wrote:
I've paid for my ticket - this will be my nearest EuroBSD Conference -
I'll not need a flight to this one :~)
It's tempting, but oh so expensive.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
(Freelance software developer / technical writer /
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Edd Barrettvex...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:17:22PM +0100, Fred Crowson wrote:
I've paid for my ticket - this will be my nearest EuroBSD Conference -
I'll not need a flight to this one :~)
It's tempting, but oh so expensive.
you are right
Il giorno gio, 16/07/2009 alle 01.52 +0100, Edd Barrett ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:17:22PM +0100, Fred Crowson wrote:
I've paid for my ticket - this will be my nearest EuroBSD Conference -
I'll not need a flight to this one :~)
It's tempting, but oh so expensive.
I agree
46 matches
Mail list logo