Re: route-to not working*resolved*

Lawrence-Sporkton wrote: I have 2 openbsd 4.5 firewalls running, one in colo, one behind residential cable(firewall has a public on it). I am trying to nat on the colo firewall, a box that is behind the cable connection through a tunnel to allow public IPs from the colo to be used on servers whic

Re: New spammers' behaviour pattern

So would it make sense to use the whois system to get the aproval/created dates for the domain as well, and treat them the same way as if the were not MX servers for their tasting time, and greylist them for that period. Real domains you want to talk to can be whitelisted. - Original Mess

Re: route-to/reply-to broken on amd64?

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:23:54 +0400 Vadim Zhukov wrote: > Hello all. > > Can anyone ack that route-to/reply-to rules do not work on amd64? > I have the following rule in pf.conf: > > pass in quick on $limit_if inet proto icmp icmp-type echoreq \ > reply-to ($limit_if $limit_gw) > > It do

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Milan Prihoda wrote: and now, # dd if=/dev/rsd2c of=disk1.img bs=520 works for me :-) Are you sure you are getting all 520 bytes from each sector and not only first 512 bytes? Can you verify it? Regards, David

route-to/reply-to broken on amd64?

Hello all. Can anyone ack that route-to/reply-to rules do not work on amd64? I have the following rule in pf.conf: pass in quick on $limit_if inet proto icmp icmp-type echoreq \ reply-to ($limit_if $limit_gw) It does not work (IPs replaced via corresponding macros by me), see tcpdump(8)

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote: > I would love to get my hands on such a drive :-) > > EMC uses the same magic; they cram stuff in the additional 8 bytes. I inherited a couple of shelves from an old EMC setup, and ended up using Seagate's SeaTools Enterprise Edition to re

Re: Relevant article

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 23:15 +0200, Bernd Siggy Brentrup wrote: > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc] Oops, in general I gpg-sign my mails with a detached signature but if it's this list's policy not to do so I'll refrain fro

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

There are a million spots where 512 is hard coded... On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:03:07PM +0200, Milan Prihoda wrote: >> Line 1423 and following of /usr/src/sys/scsi/sd.c show that we will >> only accept devices with sector sizes that are multiples of 512 >> (DEV_BSIZE). Others will be impossible to

Re: Relevant article

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:09 +, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > Hi, > > since Nick Holland touched on the DESIGN aspect in his e-mail regarding > supporting OpenBSD, I think this article pretty much reflects the > reality here. > http://www.osnews.com/story/22135/The_Problem_with_Design_and_Implem

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:41:08PM +0200, Milan Prihoda wrote: > Brynet wrote: > >Milan Prihoda wrote: > >>These drives have 520KByte sector size instead of 512KByte. > >>Is there any way how to dump raw data from these drives without > >>reformat drive to different sector size ? > > > >Most disks

Relevant article

Hi, since Nick Holland touched on the DESIGN aspect in his e-mail regarding supporting OpenBSD, I think this article pretty much reflects the reality here. http://www.osnews.com/story/22135/The_Problem_with_Design_and_Implementation Just think it's worth reading. Teers, -- Daniel Bolgheroni

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Line 1423 and following of /usr/src/sys/scsi/sd.c show that we will only accept devices with sector sizes that are multiples of 512 (DEV_BSIZE). Others will be impossible to open. Now, if you delete that code you may be able to open the raw device. No idea, but I'd be interested in what happens.

Re: Amanda backup problem on OpenBSD 4.5

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: > It happens at initialization time of libpthread and is undone at exit > and exec. B It applies to all fds. B There is no manpage, as it's not > (supposed to be) application visible. OK, so basically this is an OpenBSD/pthread bug. I'm stil

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Brynet wrote: Hi Milan, I'm glad that it works.. can you post the new attachment message? :) -Brynet Do you mean this :? # dmesg | grep sd2 sd2 at scsibus0 targ 2 lun 0: SCSI2 0/direct fixed sd2: 4173MB, 520 bytes/sec, 8414494 sec total

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Milan Prihoda wrote: Hi Brynet, thank You very much for Your idea. It works :-) Brynet wrote: Hi Milan, David Vasek was on the right track with his message, it seems likely that the driver is bailing out on line 1439 in /usr/src/sys/scsi/sd.c. 1423:/* 1424: * Restrict blksize values t

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Hi Milan, I'm glad that it works.. can you post the new attachment message? :) -Brynet

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Hi Brynet, thank You very much for Your idea. It works :-) Brynet wrote: Hi Milan, David Vasek was on the right track with his message, it seems likely that the driver is bailing out on line 1439 in /usr/src/sys/scsi/sd.c. 1423: /* 1424:* Restrict blksize values to powers of two between

OnlineHotel, 5 years working with you for your success!

Online Hotel OnlineHotel, 5 years working with you for your success! Hello Meet one of the best websites of Latin America on online hotel reservations. Having 5 years of experience on the market, OnlineHotel brings out its newest reservation system. OnlineHotel system helps you sell

Re: Amanda backup problem on OpenBSD 4.5

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Michael Burk wrote: >>> Does newer Amanda use threads? With pthread, stdio will be silently >>> changed to _non_ blocking. > > Wait, what?! This is all behind the applications back, between the thread

Re: Amanda backup problem on OpenBSD 4.5

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Michael Burk wrote: >> Does newer Amanda use threads? With pthread, stdio will be silently >> changed to _non_ blocking. Wait, what?! When does this happen? At exec? And does it just apply to fd's 0-2? Can you point me to a manpage? Dustin (michael and stuart

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

I would love to get my hands on such a drive :-) EMC uses the same magic; they cram stuff in the additional 8 bytes. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:41:08PM +0200, Milan Prihoda wrote: > Brynet wrote: >> Milan Prihoda wrote: >> >>> These drives have 520KByte sector size instead of 512KByte. >>> Is

Informacion importante nuevos horarios de atencion

Ofertas Noticias Novedades

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Hi Milan, David Vasek was on the right track with his message, it seems likely that the driver is bailing out on line 1439 in /usr/src/sys/scsi/sd.c. 1423: /* 1424:* Restrict blksize values to powers of two between 512 and 64k. 1425:*/ 1426: switch (dp->blksize) { 1427: case 0x200:

Re: Amanda backup problem on OpenBSD 4.5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Burk wrote the following lines on 09/10/2009 06:58 PM: > If pthreads is the issue, then I have two questions: > 1) is the behavior of changing stdio to non_blocking when using pthreads > unique to OpenBSD? > 2) why would this call fix the probl

Re: Amanda backup problem on OpenBSD 4.5

On 2009-09-10, Michael Burk wrote: > It links with libpthread. > > I am told that on the client side it uses a single thread. > Would that make a difference? That is exactly the problem then. Just linking with libpthread is enough, for userland threading to work it has to use non-blocking FDs and

Re: Amanda backup problem on OpenBSD 4.5

If pthreads is the issue, then I have two questions: 1) is the behavior of changing stdio to non_blocking when using pthreads unique to OpenBSD? 2) why would this call fix the problem: fcntl(datafd, F_GETFL, 0); does that have other side effects? Thanks, Michael On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Brynet wrote: Milan Prihoda wrote: These drives have 520KByte sector size instead of 512KByte. Is there any way how to dump raw data from these drives without reformat drive to different sector size ? Most disks have a sector size of 512 bytes, not kilobytes. -Brynet Hi, i should

Re: Amanda backup problem on OpenBSD 4.5

It links with libpthread. I am told that on the client side it uses a single thread. Would that make a difference? Also, I forgot to include a link to the *very* long thread on the Amanda list discussing this problem: http://archives.zmanda.com/amanda-archives/viewtopic.php?t=4763&sid=f8645198786

Re: Amanda backup problem on OpenBSD 4.5

On 2009-09-10, Michael Burk wrote: > We have been working for a couple weeks with the Amanda developers to get > their latest release working on OpenBSD 4.5. Amanda stopped working with > OpenBSD somewhere around version 2.5.1 (3 years ago). We've been focusing on > a failure in the dump process o

Amanda backup problem on OpenBSD 4.5

Hi All, We have been working for a couple weeks with the Amanda developers to get their latest release working on OpenBSD 4.5. Amanda stopped working with OpenBSD somewhere around version 2.5.1 (3 years ago). We've been focusing on a failure in the dump process on the client. On the client side,

Re: OpenBSD hacking

Thank you all for your suggestions. I will respond by names. Jesus: I sent this email to this list because is the only contact I know to the OBSD developers. Are there other list more appropriate for my question? Claudio: I don't think FS2 assumptions are completely out-dated. If this were true,

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Milan Prihoda wrote: > These drives have 520KByte sector size instead of 512KByte. > Is there any way how to dump raw data from these drives without > reformat drive to different sector size ? Most disks have a sector size of 512 bytes, not kilobytes. -Brynet

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

David Vasek wrote: > The drive is reported as offline. > > As I understand it from sys/scsi/sd.c, "drive offline" means an error was > reported by scsi_test_unit_ready() function call. Possibly the 520 > bytes/sector is not compatible with the controller the OP used or with the > OpenBSD driver/scs

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Joachim Schipper wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:16:27PM +0200, Milan Prihoda wrote: Jan Stary wrote: On Sep 10 10:36:41, Milan Prihoda wrote: Hi, i have few IBM scsi drives from old (risc-based) IBM as/400. These drives have 520KByte sector size instead of 512KByte. I

SOLVED: mutt: xterm_title conf var

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 14:40 +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:43:24AM +0200, Bernd 'Siggy' Brentrup wrote: > I'm fairly certain xterm_* is a Debian/Ubuntu "improvement": at least, > http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html doesn't know about either > option. If it's im

Re: Supporting OpenBSD

On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Nick Holland wrote: > Thanks to those that contribute money and buy CDs. I would like to buy CDs, but in Brazil these kind of products have a high tax fee applied when they hit the harbour. For a $50 CD, I'll probably pay almost $almost $70 to someone I don't want to "contri

Brazilian shop gives 404

Brazilian shop gives 404 for www.temporeal.com.br/openbsd While searching the cds in their system, the last one is 4.4. I was trying to pre order 4.6 from them, but it seems they won't have it ?

Re: mutt: xterm_title conf var

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:21 -0400, Luis Useche wrote: > I don't know if this solve your problem or you already did this, but > you need to set the xterm in order to have colors for manuals or vim. > Read from FAQ "How do I get color man pages on XTerm?". Not reading the FAQ but trying after your

Re: mutt: xterm_title conf var

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:43:24AM +0200, Bernd 'Siggy' Brentrup wrote: > Hi List, > > I'm absolutely new to openbsd so please bear with me if it's not > the right place to ask my question. The box I installed 4.5 will > be running headless so I'm logged in remotely on a color xterm. > > I rsync

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:16:27PM +0200, Milan Prihoda wrote: > Jan Stary wrote: > >On Sep 10 10:36:41, Milan Prihoda wrote: > >>Hi, > >>i have few IBM scsi drives from old (risc-based) IBM as/400. > >> > >>These drives have 520KByte sector size instead of 512KByte. > >>Is there any way how to dum

Re: mutt: xterm_title conf var

I don't know if this solve your problem or you already did this, but you need to set the xterm in order to have colors for manuals or vim. Read from FAQ "How do I get color man pages on XTerm?". Luis On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Bernd 'Siggy' Brentrup wrote: > Hi List, > > I'm absolutely n

ugly switch problem

hi i have an running 4.4 firewall cluster on sun x2200 m2 boxes with additional PCIe quad card with intel chipset. as switch i use hp 2824 or 3500 procurve witch the latest or close to the latest firmware. so, if i do a reboot of the master box i get trouble at the boot time, the box can't set

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Jan Stary wrote: On Sep 10 10:36:41, Milan Prihoda wrote: Hi, i have few IBM scsi drives from old (risc-based) IBM as/400. These drives have 520KByte sector size instead of 512KByte. Is there any way how to dump raw data from these drives without reformat drive to different sector size ? $

Gov't Fiscal Year End Discounts on SigmaPlot Version 11!

Gov't Fiscal Year End Discounts on SigmaPlot 11! Give our sales team a call and place your order before this offer expires on Sept 30, 2009! Systat Software Government Sales: (800) 797-7401 Or FAX your purchase order to: (800)797-7406 SigmaPlot 11 - The Technical Graphing Standard

IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

Hi, i have few IBM scsi drives from old (risc-based) IBM as/400. These drives have 520KByte sector size instead of 512KByte. Is there any way how to dump raw data from these drives without reformat drive to different sector size ? $ dmesg ... sd2 at scsibus0 targ 3 lun 0: SCSI 2 0/direct fixed

Re: IBM 520KByte sector size scsi drives

On Sep 10 10:36:41, Milan Prihoda wrote: > Hi, > i have few IBM scsi drives from old (risc-based) IBM as/400. > > These drives have 520KByte sector size instead of 512KByte. > Is there any way how to dump raw data from these drives without > reformat drive to different sector size ? > > $ dmesg > .

Re: OpenBSD hacking

Hi, Claudio Jeker a icrit : On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:14:29AM -0400, Luis Useche wrote: Hi Guys, I am having some time free soon and I feel like doing some hacking in the OpenBSD kernel. I would like to work in the I/O stack. I would prefer something easy to do to get introduced to the ker

Re: OpenBSD hacking

Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > I think that the assumptions made by the FS2 paper are outdated. FFS snapshots could be implemented (if not already done). -- Best Regards Edd Barrett (Freelance software developer / technical writer / open-source developer) http://

Re: OpenBSD hacking

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:14:29AM -0400, Luis Useche wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I am having some time free soon and I feel like doing some hacking in > the OpenBSD kernel. I would like to work in the I/O stack. I would > prefer something easy to do to get introduced to the kernel. I was > thinking on

Unete a Productos Neem -Diabetes-Vitiligo-Cancer

Para ser distribuidor solamente tienes que confirmar este correo y podras hacer una compra mmnima de 1000 pesos y enviarnos tus datos completos para mensajerma esta compra de 1000 pesos incluye 25 productos a escoger por ti ademas de que el envis es gratis y entregas en 24 hrs. si enviamos un c