Re: core dump files in invalid format on 4.3 (x86)

2009-10-09 Thread openbsd.misc.tmp openbsd.misc.tmp
What I have is application.core, but I cannot read this: /home/me/application.core is not a core dump: File format not recognized (gdb) quit did you check the core size to see if it didn't get truncated because of some ulimit ? Yes, the core file is definitely a lot smaller than what

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-09 Thread patrick keshishian
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:26 PM, patrick keshishian pkesh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Dave Anderson d...@daveanderson.com wrote: The CD set showed up in today's mail (near Boston, Mass.) Dave I received ship notice this morning. So, after all, Oct 1st (-ish)

Re: core dump files in invalid format on 4.3 (x86)

2009-10-09 Thread Vladimir Kirillov
iirc core dump format was changed to elf(5) sometime around when PIE was imported, you probably need older gdb On 20:38 Thu 08 Oct, openbsd.misc.tmp openbsd.misc.tmp wrote: Hi! I have an application that in very seldom cases causes core dumps on about a dotzen machines that are located on

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-09 Thread Lukas Ratajski
On 09.10.2009, at 08:30, patrick keshishian wrote: arrived in burbank, ca (usa) today. thank you all! tiny little puffy shrine: http://sidster.com/gallery/misc/2009/obsd46-32-21-mugs.jpg Oh man, I'd LOVE to give the 2.1 version a boot opportunity on i386. Just for the sake of

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-09 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:30:07AM +0200, Lukas Ratajski wrote: On 09.10.2009, at 08:30, patrick keshishian wrote: arrived in burbank, ca (usa) today. thank you all! tiny little puffy shrine: http://sidster.com/gallery/misc/2009/obsd46-32-21-mugs.jpg Oh man, I'd LOVE to give the

Chuva de preços...

2009-10-09 Thread Brinde Companhia
Se nco conseguir visualizar esta newsletter p.f. clique aqui | Para remover o seu email da n/ base de dados clique aqui Clique na imagem para enviar Pedido de Orgamento Email enviado para: misc@openbsd.org O presente email destina-se znica e exclusivamente a informar clientes ou potenciais

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-09 Thread Peter Kay - Syllopsium
From: Lukas Ratajski l.rataj...@h-s-l.de On 09.10.2009, at 08:30, patrick keshishian wrote: arrived in burbank, ca (usa) today. thank you all! tiny little puffy shrine: http://sidster.com/gallery/misc/2009/obsd46-32-21-mugs.jpg Oh man, I'd LOVE to give the 2.1 version a boot opportunity

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-09 Thread Lukas Ratajski
On 09.10.2009, at 10:52, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: Given that 2.1 is just a *tiny* bit pricey, might I suggest : 1) http://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/2.1/i386/ Oh :) Thank you! 2) A donation I donate monthly, with a standing order.

Re: core dump files in invalid format on 4.3 (x86)

2009-10-09 Thread openbsd.misc.tmp openbsd.misc.tmp
I really appreciate the help I'm getting here, so don't get me wrong, I really don't want to be negative with what you propose, but: /home/me/application.core is not a core dump: File format not recognized iirc core dump format was changed to elf(5) sometime around when PIE was imported, you

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-09 Thread ropers
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:30:07AM +0200, Lukas Ratajski wrote: Oh man, I'd LOVE to give the 2.1 version a boot opportunity on i386. Just for the sake of curiosity. Anyone offering a copy? 2009/10/9 Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com: Yes, but it's a collectible at this point:

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-09 Thread Martin Schröder
2009/10/9 Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com: On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:30:07AM +0200, Lukas Ratajski wrote: Oh man, I'd LOVE to give the 2.1 version a boot opportunity on i386. Just for the sake of curiosity. Anyone offering a copy? Yes, but it's a collectible at this point:

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-09 Thread Eric S Pulley
Got my copy on the 7th here in Utah. Just did my first new install. Have to say I think the new install process is really nice. I think OpenBSD might just be the fastest installing (new)OS out there, I didn't actually time it but it felt less than five minutes to up, configured and running

Re: ALIX and PC Engines CompactFlash

2009-10-09 Thread Dominik Meister
Hi Daniel Daniel Melameth [Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:26:28PM -0600]: would you please share the RELEVANT PORTION OF YOUR DMESG for the card (and your opinions if you'd like)? I'm particularly interested in what's reported for x-sector PIO and related. It might be a bit late, but ... $ dmesg |

ifstated delay after state transition

2009-10-09 Thread Steven Surdock
I'm seeing a 35-40 second delay in ifstated after a state transition before jumping into the init {} sequence. In the log below, the detection to isp2l2down occurs at 10:36:19 and the first init run occurs at 10:36:58. Is that normal? (OpenBSD 4.5-stable (GENERIC.MP) #7: Fri Jul 31 09:13:51 EDT

Re: ALIX and PC Engines CompactFlash

2009-10-09 Thread Jan Stary
would you please share the RELEVANT PORTION OF YOUR DMESG for the card (and your opinions if you'd like)? I'm particularly interested in what's reported for x-sector PIO and related. It might be a bit late, but ... $ dmesg | grep wd wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: CF 4GB wd0:

no hostname in mails sent with smtpd in a crontab

2009-10-09 Thread Nicolas Letellier
Hello. I'm on a OPENBSD_4_6. I use smtpd insted of sendmail. All works perfect with it, except one point. When a mail is sent from a crontab, the mail received has this in the header: From: root (Cron Daemon) I have no hostname, no domain, nothing. Just the user in the From part. This case

Re: route-to/reply-to broken?

2009-10-09 Thread Vadim Zhukov
Hello, Stuart. On 8 October 2009 G. 15:03:13 Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009-09-25, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Is it OK if I'll hack it to make possible even crazy rule like this: pass in on $if1 from $a to $b rdr-to $c \ route-to ($if3 $gt3) reply-to ($if2

Re: ALIX and PC Engines CompactFlash

2009-10-09 Thread Maurice Janssen
Jan Stary wrote: would you please share the RELEVANT PORTION OF YOUR DMESG for the card (and your opinions if you'd like)? I'm particularly interested in what's reported for x-sector PIO and related. It might be a bit late, but ... $ dmesg | grep wd wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: CF 4GB

SATA CDROM/DVDROM

2009-10-09 Thread dark knight neo
Hello misc , On OpenBSD 4.4 and 4.5 Installation with SATA CD/DVD after the copy of packages the system it does not continue. I Changed to a IDE CDROM/DVDROM and Success in Instalation I tested it in 3 different computers with different hardware

Re: ALIX and PC Engines CompactFlash

2009-10-09 Thread Emilio Perea
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: Sadly, I have never seen any multi-sector PIO card. And obviuosly, I will be upgrading soon (ALICes, actually). Can people recommend some quality multi-sector PIO CF cards? I've had excellent results with SanDisk cards. This one is on

Re: core dump files in invalid format on 4.3 (x86)

2009-10-09 Thread Philip Guenther
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:00 PM, openbsd.misc.tmp openbsd.misc.tmp openbsd.misc@googlemail.com wrote: What I have is application.core, but I cannot read this: /home/me/application.core is not a core dump: File format not recognized (gdb) quit did you check the core size to see if it

em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting

2009-10-09 Thread Sevan / Venture37
Hi I have a system (Portwell NAR-5071-310) which is having watchdog timeout issues on em0, the system was previously running v4.2 without this issue, the issue is there on v4.5 the latest snapshot, I know the interface is working as I've managed to pxe boot bsd.rd from 4.5 the latest

Re: no hostname in mails sent with smtpd in a crontab

2009-10-09 Thread Gilles Chehade
Nicolas Letellier wrote: Hello. I'm on a OPENBSD_4_6. I use smtpd insted of sendmail. All works perfect with it, except one point. When a mail is sent from a crontab, the mail received has this in the header: From: root (Cron Daemon) I have no hostname, no domain, nothing. Just

Re: em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting

2009-10-09 Thread Sevan / Venture37
On 09/10/2009 20:22, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: Hi I have a system (Portwell NAR-5071-310) which is having watchdog timeout issues on em0, the system was previously running v4.2 without this issue, the issue is there on v4.5 the latest snapshot, I know the interface is working as I've managed to

nfe0: tx v2 error 6204UNDERFLOW

2009-10-09 Thread Andres Salazar
Hello all, I have three machines that have a integrated NIC. Dmesg says they are : nfe0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 NVIDIA MCP61 LAN rev 0xa2: apic 2 int 10 (irq 10), address 00:0f:ea:63:41:fd rlphy0 at nfe0 phy 1: RTL8201L 10/100 PHY, rev. 1 However, all of them when a download is initiated

poor tcp performance

2009-10-09 Thread Jose Fragoso
Hi, I am running openbsd 4.2 on a box and I would like help trying to identify networking bottlenecks. While trying to download a file from another obsd box at the network using wget, I get very low rate. # wget http://192.168.1.254/bsd1 --18:03:29-- http://192.168.1.254/bsd1 =

Re: poor tcp performance

2009-10-09 Thread James Records
Jose, I would start with getting tcpdumps of both transactions and running them through tcptrace, and look for differences, that will give you some info to go on. J On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Jose Fragoso inet_use...@samerica.comwrote: Hi, I am running openbsd 4.2 on a box and I would

Re: ALIX and PC Engines CompactFlash

2009-10-09 Thread David Holligan
Some time ago, it was suggested that the 1-sector PIO is what's occasionaly slow about some of these cards (e.g. when untarring a big tgz during an install). Sadly, I have never seen any multi-sector PIO card. And obviuosly, I will be upgrading soon (ALICes, actually). Can people recommend

Re: poor tcp performance

2009-10-09 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Jose Fragoso inet_use...@samerica.com wrote: I am running openbsd 4.2 on a box and I would like help trying to identify networking bottlenecks. You know, there have been a *pile* of performance improvements in the *two years* since 4.2 was released. That version

Re: poor tcp performance

2009-10-09 Thread James Records
Ah yes, to get the disk out of the equsion, do this with your wget: wget -O /dev/null http://192.168.1.254/bsd1 That will tell you if the disk is your bottleneck.. J On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Jose Fragoso inet_use...@samerica.comwrote: Hi, I am running openbsd 4.2 on a box and I

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-10-09 Thread bofh
Really? I do have a copy of 2.4 :) On 10/9/09, Martin Schrvder mar...@oneiros.de wrote: 2009/10/9 Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com: On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:30:07AM +0200, Lukas Ratajski wrote: Oh man, I'd LOVE to give the 2.1 version a boot opportunity on i386. Just for the sake of

Re: ALIX and PC Engines CompactFlash

2009-10-09 Thread nothingness
Daniel Melameth wrote: With the positive response of OpenBSD on this hardware, I'm considering purchasing these in preparation for a proof of concept. As such, if anyone has purchased the 4GB COMPACTFLASH CARDS THAT PC ENGINES SELLS (http://www.pcengines.ch/cf4dp.htm or

Re: ALIX and PC Engines CompactFlash

2009-10-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-10-09, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote: would you please share the RELEVANT PORTION OF YOUR DMESG for the card (and your opinions if you'd like)? I'm particularly interested in what's reported for x-sector PIO and related. It might be a bit late, but ... $ dmesg | grep wd wd0

Re: poor tcp performance

2009-10-09 Thread Steven Surdock
-Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of James Records Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 6:14 PM To: Jose Fragoso Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: poor tcp performance Ah yes, to get the disk out of the equsion, do this with your

mmap'ing to address 0x0

2009-10-09 Thread Luis Useche
Hi Guys, I was reading some information that indicated that letting user process to map to address 0x0 can exploit some kernel NULL-pointer bugs. I checked how different operating systems mitigate this problem and I found information about Linux and FreeBSD. I was trying to find the same

Re: mmap'ing to address 0x0

2009-10-09 Thread Theo de Raadt
I was reading some information that indicated that letting user process to map to address 0x0 can exploit some kernel NULL-pointer bugs. I checked how different operating systems mitigate this problem and I found information about Linux and FreeBSD. I was trying to find the same information