Hello,
I'm installing -current from snapshots, from time to time. I use to
download the .iso file then burn it and check the files on cdrom
against SHA256 file downloaded together with .iso.
Since some time, the x*.tgz are reported as FAILED in this check. I
send another email to the list, I got
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Mihai Popescu B.S. mihai...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Since some time, the x*.tgz are reported as FAILED in this check. I
send another email to the list, I got one answer but I'm not able yet
to get the idea. So, I ask again, is still this SHA256 used for _all_
I'm installing -current from snapshots, from time to time. I use to
download the .iso file then burn it and check the files on cdrom
against SHA256 file downloaded together with .iso.
Since some time, the x*.tgz are reported as FAILED in this check. I
send another email to the list, I got
On 11/21/09, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
I'm installing -current from snapshots, from time to time. I use to
download the .iso file then burn it and check the files on cdrom
against SHA256 file downloaded together with .iso.
Since some time, the x*.tgz are reported as FAILED
On 11/21/09, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Mihai Popescu B.S. mihai...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
Since some time, the x*.tgz are reported as FAILED in this check. I
send another email to the list, I got one answer but I'm not able yet
to get the idea.
Using cdio I burn a cdrom , mount it and then run inside i386
directory the same command 'cksum -a sha256 -c SHA256', SHA256 being
the file I mentioned first - the one downloaded with the .iso file,
from the same ftp directory. That's how I get FAILED for x*.tgz files.
The X snapshots are not
Searching my favourites I've found these two sites to be up and running
with fresh info and active comunities:
http://openbsdcolombia.org/
http://www.openbsderos.org/
Good luck with the project!
Dani
Chris Bennett escribis:
Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
I also don't like too much
Since 4.6 will run on one machine and not the other, I did run diff
on the dmesg outputs.
The *only* difference was a BIOS line:
Machine that works:
bios0: IBM -[8673000]-
Machine that fails:
bios0: IBM -[867382X]-
They are both 8673-82X machines and I can't see this being an issue,
but I
Just a shot in the dark:
If the problem is with the network, maybe the problem is from the net
(cables, switches, hub, routers, etc.)
You could try to ping the machines from a laptop connected by a
cross-cable...
If the required hardware is at hand and you have access to the machines
this is
Mauro Rezzonico wrote:
Just a shot in the dark:
If the problem is with the network, maybe the problem is from the net
(cables, switches, hub, routers, etc.)
You could try to ping the machines from a laptop connected by a
cross-cable...
If the required hardware is at hand and you have access
Some time ago, when I looked into something similar, all the
supported
cards that I found could only record incomming video at 1/2 res max.
Whether this is a limitation of the bt848 chipset, I didnt bother to
verify.
what do you mean by 1/2 res?
the bt8x8 (also conexant fusion 878)
Hello
Does scan_ffs supports ffs2 (ufs2) ?
--
WBR, Alex V Breger
since it is softraid you use the sd entry.
like bioctl -R /dev/sd3a sd2
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 01:53:50AM +0100, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
Hi
I had to replace one of the drives in a softraid raid level 1 setup.
How do I kick off a rebuild? This is apparently not the correct way, or
Mauro Rezzonico wrote:
Just a shot in the dark:
If the problem is with the network, maybe the problem is from the net
(cables, switches, hub, routers, etc.)
You could try to ping the machines from a laptop connected by a
cross-cable...
If the required hardware is at hand and you have access
Vous vous jtes s{rement posi cette question + Que faire de notre matiriel
obsolhte ?;.
R2DEFI est la solution ` votre problhme.
Le mitier de R2DEFI est le Recyclage et la Revalorisation de matiriel
informatique et bureautique (DEEE).
Le respect de lenvironnement est un enjeu primordial pour
J.D. Bronson wrote:
Seems we are in the same boat. It still makes no sense.
Indeed...
(maybe the clue is in the Changelog, but I could not find it)
--
Mauro Rezzonico ma...@ch23.org, Como, Italia
Maybe this world is another planet's hell - H.Huxley
De nuestra mayor consideracisn
Tenemos el agrado de dirigirnos a Usted para hacerle saber que nuestra
joven y pujante empresa ha decidido hacer un gran esfuerzo e innovacisn
que redundara en favor de los profesionales-
En tal sentido hemos decidido crear un sistema novedoso que implique un
*bump*
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:51 PM, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:07 PM, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
Cannot really send an acpidump, as it reboots the server...
Here is the acpidump from 4.5 running on the same server:
# acpidump
/*
RSD PTR:
Hello all,
Is it possible to do per-host queueing with OpenBSD ?
Now I have something like this :
altq on dc0 bandwidth 1Mb hfsc queue { employees }
queue employees bandwidth 15% hfsc (default upperlimit 15%)
pass in on dc0 inet proto tcp from 172.16.0.0/24 to any port 80 \
queue
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Doug Milam doug_mi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
NSA also helped Linux with SElinux. As long as OpenBSD remains open source,
I don't see the problem.
Fotosport
Caso nco consiga visualizar este e-mail correctamente por favor clique
aqui.
Esperamos que tenha gostado de receber a Newsletter FOTOSPORT. Contudo,
se preferir deixar de a receber, bastara que clique aqui.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 05:23:05PM +0300, Alex V. Breger wrote:
Hello
Does scan_ffs supports ffs2 (ufs2) ?
No,
-Otto
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Doug Milam doug_mi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
NSA also helped Linux with SElinux. As long as OpenBSD remains open
2009/11/21 AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com:
Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
That's the nice thing about open source software; we don't have to,
because we can verify their code or mathematics ourselves.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:32 PM, AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com wrote:
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Doug Milam doug_mi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
* AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com [2009-11-21 23:41]:
Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
right, of course the NSA gets commit access and peer review rules
don't apply. right.
henn...@cvs:2$ finger nsa
finger: nsa: no such user.
hmm.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de,
On 22/11/2009, at 2:55 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
Some time ago, when I looked into something similar, all the
supported
cards that I found could only record incomming video at 1/2 res
max.
Whether this is a limitation of the bt848 chipset, I didnt bother
to
verify.
...
Seems I am experiencing
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jeff Ross jr...@openvistas.net wrote:
I failed a drive (*NOT* with a nail gun, though, I just removed it ;-) and
bioctl correctly showed the drive as failed and the raid running as
degraded. I re-inserted the same
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:32 PM, AG computing.acco...@googlemail.comwrote:
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Doug Milam doug_mi...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
Doug Milam wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
Only if they Paypal some $$$ to http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html :)
On 11/21/2009 6:01 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
henn...@cvs:2$ finger nsa
finger: nsa: no such user.
hmm.
Perhaps they use a less obvious user name, like 'henning'...
right but with no knowledge whatsoever about its content.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:09:55PM -0701, Jeff Ross wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jeff Ross jr...@openvistas.net wrote:
I failed a drive (*NOT* with a nail gun, though, I just
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 02:55:33PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
What could be the reason the captured video is black-and-white
(the tape is deffinitely in color)?
the device might only support b/w. also check the signal from the
VHS if you haven't already.
or the card could be in an odd color
Doug Milam wrote:
Will OpenBSD be the next to be 'helped'?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html
can we stop these dumb posts about the NSA and windows 7? it's really
not related to openbsd.
spend less time being preoccupied with the fact that
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Marco Peereboom
right but with no knowledge whatsoever about its content.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:09:55PM -0701, Jeff Ross wrote:
In my scenario, in a 1U server with 2 enclosures I do not have a hot spare
online but
When possible use hardware RAID. When going el-cheapo or requiring less
robust RAID softraid is for you.
Running IO is not the hard part of RAID. Not shitting the stack when
something bad happens is the trick. Since softraid does not control the
whole stack it is by definition weaker. If the
aac is dogshit.
You just insulted dog$h!t.
Theodore Wynnychenko wrote:
...
Anyway, I had not considered the possibility of a controller failure.
bad...
I also wondered if it was possible to remove a drive from the mirrored
hardware array, and see if it is recognized by a plain old SATA controller.
So, I did this by shutting the
39 matches
Mail list logo
