On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
> My xfce4 build fails. I have refreshed cvs multiple times, built new
> release packages, and re-attempted with fresh installs from those
> packages. Did I break something?
Probably
> here's what I found relevant:
> Checksumming...Error in packag
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:39:46 + Jacob Meuser
wrote:
> > With this card:
> > FCC ID: IBACT-SB32PNP49
> > Model#: CT3620
> >
> > You patch works perfectly. `aucat -l -m play` runs without a fuss
> > and both `aucat -i track01.wav` and `cdio cdplay` run very well.
>
> excellent.
>
> >
Saludos a todos
My xfce4 build fails. I have refreshed cvs multiple times, built new
release packages, and re-attempted with fresh installs from those
packages. Did I break something?
here's what I found relevant:
Checksumming...Error in package:
/usr/ports/pobj/cairo-1.8.8p0/fake-i386/usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.9
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:57:33PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:12:42 + Jacob Meuser
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:02:44PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >
> > > unfortunately, fixing this is not exactly trivial. I have an idea,
> > > but I really would need
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:12:42 + Jacob Meuser
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:02:44PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > unfortunately, fixing this is not exactly trivial. I have an idea,
> > but I really would need a machine (I have the cards, just nothing
> > that can use them) to work it
Your email client cannot read this email.
To view it online, please go here:
http://pro.mailmarketer.in/display.php?M=8234014&C=d179cccf1a3e844c23c9292e37
59ab00&S=1161&L=929&N=657
PDF READER B. 2010 - PRODUCT LAUNCH
March 29th 2010
-
Valued customers,
We are pleased to up
> Can someone point me to some docs on configuring xvr-1200 accelerated? i am
> running the wildcatfb driver in X11 but limited to 8 bpp.
Since there is no technical documentation available for this device, I'm
afraid the 7bpp unaccelerated wildcatfb driver is the best we can
provide.
Miod
Can someone point me to some docs on configuring xvr-1200 accelerated? i am
running the wildcatfb driver in X11 but limited to 8 bpp.
Sei stato cancellato dalla newsletter, questa e` l'ultima email che
riceverai.
Il tuo indirizzo e` stato inserito nella blacklist, cioe` non puoi essere
riiscritto senza l'intervento di un amministratore.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> df /altroot shows: "Mounted on /"
>> (df -h doesn't show /altroot.)
>
> Thus, /altroot is currently not mounted.
As you said before, it shouldn't be usually mounted as it is used by
dd(1). daily.out's output on the first email shows that th
Hi all,
Since yesterday I noticed a lot of crashes on my laptop (every time I
try to reboot and when my screen is suspended). I follow -current. The
first crash seems related to radeondrm. The second happens when I try
"boot reboot" in ddb.
It's a laptop so I just have pictures of my screen (ps &
>> What does
>> $ df /altroot
>> tell you, in particular, which mount point is it reporting?
>> "Mounted on /" or "Mounted on /altroot"?
> df /altroot shows: "Mounted on /"
> (df -h doesn't show /altroot.)
Thus, /altroot is currently not mounted.
> So i cannot browse the content of /altroot, ev
Andreas Gerdd wrote:
What does
$ df /altroot
tell you, in particular, which mount point is it reporting?
"Mounted on /" or "Mounted on /altroot"?
df /altroot shows: "Mounted on /"
(df -h doesn't show /altroot.)
So i cannot browse the content of /altroot, even though the backup
files are ther
> What does
> $ df /altroot
> tell you, in particular, which mount point is it reporting?
> "Mounted on /" or "Mounted on /altroot"?
df /altroot shows: "Mounted on /"
(df -h doesn't show /altroot.)
So i cannot browse the content of /altroot, even though the backup
files are there?
I'd say RAID 1, 0 and Crypto are good to go. We are currently making
major changes to the metadata which will make upgrading impossible
without a dump/restore cycle. There is unfortunately no way around
this; it is the price to pay for progress.
In a few weeks the softraid metadata changes shoul
Andreas Gerdd wrote on Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 06:01:07PM +0300:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010, Nick Holland wrote:
>> Andreas Gerdd wrote:
>>> I try to have a root backup with /altroot.
>>> I did everything related to the man pages. But i wonder why my
>>> /altroot partition is still empty.
>>>
>>> fstab
ls /altroot
shows nothing inside, other than ./ and ../
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 17:51, Nick Holland wrote:
> Andreas Gerdd wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I try to have a root backup with /altroot.
>> I did everything related to the man pages. But i wonder why my
>> /altroot partition is still empty.
>>
>>
Andreas Gerdd wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I try to have a root backup with /altroot.
> I did everything related to the man pages. But i wonder why my
> /altroot partition is still empty.
>
> fstab file:
>
> /dev/wd0a / ffs rw,softdep 1 1
> /dev/wd0d /altroot ffs xx 0 0
>
> Both / and /altroot partitions a
Hi.
I try to have a root backup with /altroot.
I did everything related to the man pages. But i wonder why my
/altroot partition is still empty.
fstab file:
/dev/wd0a / ffs rw,softdep 1 1
/dev/wd0d /altroot ffs xx 0 0
Both / and /altroot partitions are having the same size,
I also added ROOTBA
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:33 PM, matteo filippetto
wrote:
> 2010/3/26 sonjaya
>
my teamviewer works correctly with
host serverXXX.teamviewer.com and port 5938
You should block also that port.
Thanks Sonjaya and Matteo let me try them :-)
--Siju
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> It's worth trying to disable ichiic(4).
>
Cheers, giving it a go on a few of them.
/Tony
* 01 - 02 P0P?QP5P;Q 2010P3.
*
* P"QP5P=P8P=P3: PRO - PPP"PPP P+P P P P PPPP P
P PP PPP PP P P+
*
P P PPPPP(PP.P"P!P/: P0P:QP8P2P=Q P5 P
P?QP>P4P0P
It's worth trying to disable ichiic(4).
On 28 March 2010 c. 04:25:53 Paul M wrote:
> Is softraid(4) now concidered suitable for use in production
> environments?
>
> I know that many people have used it for a long time with no problems,
> but that is not my question.
>
> I see that the bioctl man page lists the RAID 4 & 5 disciplines as
Is there a way to see where the cpu time is spent when it isn't in userland
?
I took one of our affected systems and killed everything on it as well as
disabling pf.
bmr1.brh# ps aux
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
root 1 0.0 0.0 324 296 ??
26 matches
Mail list logo
