Re: Predictable network interface numbering

2011-02-04 Thread Gregory Edigarov
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:00:10 -0500 Jean H. Theoret ve...@rac.ca wrote: This one's got me stumped for a few days now... How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment order? Here's my specific case: the box has 2 on-board Ethernet interfaces and a 3rd one on a

Ultimi articoli di COSTUME E SOCIETA'

2011-02-04 Thread NanniMagazine
[IMAGE] Se non sei ancora iscritto alla Newsletter di NanniMagazine clicca QUI /TR Facebook: Facebook Diventa Fan RSS: d Sottoscrivi gli RSS Newsletter Nr. 15 del 2 Febbraio 2011 Le altre rubriche:  Costume  Tech life  Donne  Famiglia [IMAGE] NanniMagazine h un periodico di

Ils prennent l'habitude de ne pas payer

2011-02-04 Thread Marie Call
Si vous ne visualisez pas ce message, suivez ce lien En partenariat avec FRANCE CREANCES Comment iviter l'impayi et encaisser vos factures ` ichiance ? Une journie de formation pour optimiser votre recouvrement et amiliorer votre trisorerie en priservant votre image commerciale La journie

Re: Predictable network interface numbering

2011-02-04 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 01:28:31PM +1100, Rod Whitworth said that So it's easy to remember 0 is for 0utside, 1 is for 1nside and 2 is for 2ervers. that is really nice actually. now i appreciate the blanket numbering more. -f -- has a room temperature iq.

make keep state (no-sync) the default?

2011-02-04 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, from a previous thread on this list I learned that keep state (no-sync) should be added to all rules concerning either a local service or local client running on the gateway itself. Esp. when you do nat this becomes pretty error-prone. Its easy to forget. AFAICS something like

Re: antispoof quick for self

2011-02-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
** moving from misc@ to tech@, reply-to is set to tech@ ** Harald Dunkel harald.dun...@aixigo.de wrote: If I add antispoof quick for self to my pf.conf to enable antispoofing on all interfaces, then I get these additional rules: block drop in quick on ! self inet from __automatic_3df3184e_0

Re: Predictable disk device numbering

2011-02-04 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
Hi, I have a similar problem since I an using softraid to encrypt /var and /home. The softraid device is usually on sd0. But when I have an usb mass storage device plugged in during boot up it gets assigned to sd0 and softraid gets sd1. Still, my fstab tries to mount from /dev/sd0X. This can be

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-04 Thread Pete Vickers
On 3. feb. 2011, at 17.37, Bret S. Lambert wrote: On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 07:31:01AM -0800, Johan Beisser wrote: On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:17, Martin SchrC6der mar...@oneiros.de wrote: 2011/2/3 Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com: Counting my toaster? Your toaster has an IP? Yours

Audio-Video-Iluminacion para tus Eventos

2011-02-04 Thread Fernando Fernandez
Tienes un evento? Necesitas mzsica, pantallas, videos, fiesta, reventsn, etc. BeatBox te ofrece audio, video e iluminacisn para tus eventos corporativos, privados, bodas y de cualquier tipo. Para mayor informacisn por favor visita: http://www.webbcenter.com/audiovideo.html BeatBox Fernando

Re: Predictable disk device numbering

2011-02-04 Thread Matthias Guedemann
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:32:15 +0100, Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de wrote: I have a similar problem since I an using softraid to encrypt /var and /home. The softraid device is usually on sd0. But when I have an usb mass storage device plugged in during boot up it gets assigned to sd0

Re: Predictable disk device numbering

2011-02-04 Thread Nick Holland
On 02/04/2011 08:32 AM, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: Hi, I have a similar problem since I an using softraid to encrypt /var and /home. The softraid device is usually on sd0. But when I have an usb mass storage device plugged in during boot up it gets assigned to sd0 and softraid gets sd1.

Re: Predictable disk device numbering

2011-02-04 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
On 02/04/11 15:10, Matthias Guedemann wrote: On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:32:15 +0100, Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de wrote: I have a similar problem since I an using softraid to encrypt /var and /home. The softraid device is usually on sd0. But when I have an usb mass storage device

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-04 Thread Martin Schröder
2011/2/4 Pete Vickers p...@systemnet.no: He don't appear to 'have' IPv6... DTAG will offer v6 to all it's customers later this year. It's only the largest telco in Germany. :-) Best Martin

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-04 Thread Joakim Aronius
* Ted Unangst (ted.unan...@gmail.com) wrote: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Martin Schrvder mar...@oneiros.de wrote: 2011/2/2 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de: who sez that your made up isp has to hand out network-wide unique IPs to his customers? AFAIK Comcast already has 2^24

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-04 Thread Bret Lambert
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Martin Schrvder mar...@oneiros.de wrote: 2011/2/4 Pete Vickers p...@systemnet.no: He don't appear to 'have' IPv6... DTAG will offer v6 to all it's customers later this year. It's only the largest telco in Germany. :-) The US has been offering freedom to the

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-04 Thread Martin Schröder
2011/2/4 Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com: The US has been offering freedom to the world for a while now. It's only the largest republic in the world :-) No, that's India (people). Or Russia (size). Best Martin

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-04 Thread Daniel Gracia
El 04/02/2011 16:15, Martin Schrvder escribis: 2011/2/4 Bret Lambertbret.lamb...@gmail.com: The US has been offering freedom to the world for a while now. It's only the largest republic in the world :-) No, that's India (people). Or Russia (size). Best Martin Still US (money). Take

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-04 Thread Martin Schröder
2011/2/4 Joakim Aronius joa...@aronius.com: ..dont want to fuel a flame war here but i heard stuff like ATT is using 40 instances of 10/8 indicates that big operators needs to bend themselves backwards to get their stuff together. Carrier grade NAT is less bullshit than ipv6. :-)

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-04 Thread Joakim Aronius
* Joakim Aronius (joa...@aronius.com) wrote: ..dont want to fuel a flame war here but i heard stuff like ATT is using 40 instances of 10/8 indicates that big operators needs to bend themselves backwards to get their stuff together. Need to correct myself there, should be Verizon Wireless,

Re: make keep state (no-sync) the default?

2011-02-04 Thread Henning Brauer
* Harald Dunkel harald.dun...@aixigo.de [2011-02-04 14:31]: Is there some other way to avoid a lot of keep state (no-sync) statements? is there some other way to make people READ the fucking mnapages we put so much effort in? -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web

Re: make keep state (no-sync) the default?

2011-02-04 Thread Daniel Gracia
El 04/02/2011 18:56, Henning Brauer escribis: * Harald Dunkelharald.dun...@aixigo.de [2011-02-04 14:31]: Is there some other way to avoid a lot of keep state (no-sync) statements? is there some other way to make people READ the fucking mnapages we put so much effort in? You're talking

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-04 Thread Joakim Aronius
* Martin Schrvder (mar...@oneiros.de) wrote: Carrier grade NAT is less bullshit than ipv6. :-) Arbor networks just released their new 'Worldwide Infrastructure Report' which was interesting. In particular the rising threat of DDOS and the use of statefull network gear in mobile networks, such as

IPv6 router with static addresses assignment not works

2011-02-04 Thread Evgeniy Sudyr
Hi all: I have problem with my ipv6 router (two NICs) running on 4.8. I have external IP address /64 and routed by ISP /48 network through that IP. I want to use static addressing in my internal network, so I've choose one /64 subnet in my /48 network and assigned xx::1 to my internal router and

Re: make keep state (no-sync) the default?

2011-02-04 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:56:28 +0100 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote: is there some other way to make people READ the fucking mnapages we put so much effort in? laser etcher + contact lens and super glue

Re: make keep state (no-sync) the default?

2011-02-04 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
Kevin Chadwick wrote: On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:56:28 +0100 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote: is there some other way to make people READ the fucking mnapages we put so much effort in? laser etcher + contact lens and super glue I'm positive that that still won't work for some

Re: make keep state (no-sync) the default?

2011-02-04 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
Henning Brauer wrote: * Harald Dunkel harald.dun...@aixigo.de [2011-02-04 14:31]: Is there some other way to avoid a lot of keep state (no-sync) statements? is there some other way to make people READ the fucking mnapages we put so much effort in? If you figure that out, I think you'll be a

By default, should `lynx your external IP` work?

2011-02-04 Thread Ezequiel Garzón
Hello! By chance I tried this from my fresh OpenBSD VPS, which I assume has had a default installation. Basically by chance (it didn't make much sense) I tried lynx external IP *from my VPS*, and it didn't work, even though it did work from my desktop PC: -- Looking up

Re: By default, should `lynx your external IP` work?

2011-02-04 Thread Benny Lofgren
On 2011-02-04 21.12, Ezequiel Garzsn wrote: Hello! By chance I tried this from my fresh OpenBSD VPS, which I assume has had a default installation. Basically by chance (it didn't make much sense) I tried lynx external IP *from my VPS*, and it didn't work, even though it did work from my

dell latitude d430 + port replicator -- is okay?

2011-02-04 Thread Sviatoslav Chagaev
Hi, I want to buy a DELL Latitude D430 + a port replicator (for the DVI and LPT ports). Does this laptop work okay with OBSD? How about the port replicator? Does it need any kind of support from the OS (e.g. drivers) or is it just an electromechanical contraption? Thanks.

Re: dell latitude d430 + port replicator -- is okay?

2011-02-04 Thread Ron McDowell
Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote: Hi, I want to buy a DELL Latitude D430 + a port replicator (for the DVI and LPT ports). Does this laptop work okay with OBSD? How about the port replicator? Does it need any kind of support from the OS (e.g. drivers) or is it just an electromechanical contraption?

Re: dell latitude d430 + port replicator -- is okay?

2011-02-04 Thread Martin Schröder
2011/2/5 Sviatoslav Chagaev 0x1...@gmail.com: How about the port replicator? Does it need any kind of support from the OS (e.g. drivers) or is it just an electromechanical contraption? If you mean a PR01X: The latter. It just works. Best Martin

Re: IPv6 router with static addresses assignment not works

2011-02-04 Thread Evgeniy Sudyr
Joakim, I set default gateway and it's present in routes list :). I've sorted out and solved problem!!! Unfortunatelly all of my office clients are Windows OSes which are too USER FRIENDLY and it added Site-local route automatically :) I was wondered to see this: C:\Users\Evgeniy.Sudyrnetsh

Re: By default, should `lynx your external IP` work?

2011-02-04 Thread Ezequiel Garzón
Thank you, Benny. I thought so, but wasn't sure. On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Benny Lofgren bl-li...@lofgren.biz wrote: On 2011-02-04 21.12, Ezequiel Garzsn wrote: Hello! By chance I tried this from my fresh OpenBSD VPS, which I assume has had a default installation. Basically by chance

Re: Relayd -- FQDN length limit?

2011-02-04 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Andrew Klettke aklet...@opticfusion.net wrote: If we define a relay with a hostname that is longer than 32 characters, we get the following: Feb 1 22:14:00 fw02 relayd[22062]: fatal: relay_init: failed to create SSL context: No buffer space available That

Newsletter Suzuki | Poupar está na moda

2011-02-04 Thread Suzuki
? www.suzuki.pt/automoveis http://www.suzuki.pt/automoveis/newsletters/20110204/index.html Para mais informagues acerca da nossa Polmtica de Privacidade, clique aqui http://www.suzuki.pt/automoveis/termosdeuso . Para ser retirado da Newsletter Suzuki, por favor clique aqui http://www.suzuki.pt/automoveis

Re: dell latitude d430 + port replicator -- is okay?

2011-02-04 Thread Marco Peereboom
if i recall it correctly that is a fine machine. make sure you dont get an nvidia one though (not sure they made them but got to avoid them) On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 01:16:04AM +0200, Sviatoslav Chagaev wrote: Hi, I want to buy a DELL Latitude D430 + a port replicator (for the DVI and LPT