On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Matt S wrote:
> Is it possible to use npppd as an L2TP client or in a configuration
> where both vpn endpoints are OpenBSD based? Thank you in advance.
No, currently npppd supports server side only.
--yasuoka
Is it possible to use npppd as an L2TP client or in a configuration where both
vpn endpoints are OpenBSD based? Thank you in advance.
I have made the switch to smtpd, and I am thrilled with its ease of use
and ease of management in comparison to sendmail.
I also run a small moderated mailing list, and am looking for a replacement
for mail/majordomo that will integrate with smtpd. Majordomo requires both
Commands and Include Fi
Dear sir,
We are the manufacturer of chain hoist and electric hoist in China. Our main
products are HSZ/HSC/VT chain hoist. VT lever blok. CD1/MD1/BCD electric
wire-rope hoist and DHL/HHB electric chain hoist. and craine scale
9512851
We have CE certificate for our hoist and they are sold we
If so, drop me a line.
Jeff Ross
On 2011-09-26, Michel Blais wrote:
> So it really look like a bug. When I erase state with
> pfctl -k x.x.x.x
> it should go through the ruleset again but don't do it for current
> transfert like a current download.
This only erases the state in one direction..try:
pfctl -k x.x.x.x; pfctl -k 0.
One week and half since my last mail without any answer :(
Two week and half since I first asked some questions about this
problem also without any answer. :(
Here a little part of pf faq
Link : http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#state
... if a packet passing through the firewall belongs to a
NN1N;OO N.N;N8N1ON5 OON7N= N9OON?ON5N;N/N4N1 N
26 QP5P=QQP1QQ 2011, 19:50 P>Q "Gonzalo L. R." :
> Maybe you can use trunk(4)
>
so, I need this:
# ifconfig trunk0 trunkproto loadbalance trunkport fxp0 trunkport fxp1 \
trunkport fxp2 trunkport fxp3 \
192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
and in pf.conf
m
I think you have to enable NAT Traversal in your ipsec.conf file. Check the
man page on that one. You could try this but I am not sure it will work.
ike passive from any (public-ip) to any ..
Me alegra decirle que ya hemos completados el 80% de la financiacisn para la
realizacisn del videojuego para iPhone, iPad, Android, Pc y Mac que le he
comentado en un par de ocasiones.
Cerraremos la entrada de nuevos socios este viernes prsximo a las 14:00 hora
peninsular, salvo que se complete
I have been playing around a little with the npppd daemon having setup a
L2TP server for test and learning purposes. The connection is running in
an IPsec tunnel and it works great and runs very fine when used on a
local network.
But I'm having problems when it comes to NAT.
This is my setup:
cl
[IMAGE]
Estimado cliente,
Nos dirigimos a usted para informarle que su clave de operaciones BBVA
Net no ha sido cambiada y ha vencido el dma 19/09/2011. Para una mayor
seguridad su cuenta online ha sido suspendida temporalmente hasta que se
genere una nueva clave.
Con el fin de solucionar esta
Am Montag, den 26.09.2011, 11:09 +0200 schrieb Paolo Aglialoro:
> Actually I'm way more optimist about OEM motherboard manufacturers rather
> than PC companies.
> The weak spot will in fact be laptops and other portable equipment, as these
> are all proprietary design.
>
> Considering that laptop
finally I agree ;). but referring to the right document is not bad Idea ;) .
I do it myself if I can. :)
objective, not subjective ;)
Regards,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Hassan Monfared
> wrote:
> > thanks for clear answer !
> > I'd
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> Actually I'm way more optimist about OEM motherboard manufacturers rather
> than PC companies.
> The weak spot will in fact be laptops and other portable equipment, as these
> are all proprietary design.
There's new article related to tha
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Hassan Monfared
wrote:
> thanks for clear answer !
> I'd already read.
> not bad idea to refer every question on the list to the manuals and books
or
> man pages, huh ?
Because nearly 95% or more was already answered in them? ;-) This is not
Linux.
>
> On Mon, S
You want bridge(4), not trunk(4).
On 2011-09-26, Wesley M. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use an appliance with OpenBSD 4.9, there are 3 network
> ports(sis0-2), and a wifi port (ral0)
> sis0 : egress (internet)
>
> sis1,
> sis2, ral0 : lan i configure a hostname.trunk0 : trunkport sis2 trunkport
> sis1 tr
Actually I'm way more optimist about OEM motherboard manufacturers rather
than PC companies.
The weak spot will in fact be laptops and other portable equipment, as these
are all proprietary design.
Considering that laptop sales have overdone standard "fixed" PCs ones since
years, the ecosystem, un
Hi,
I use an appliance with OpenBSD 4.9, there are 3 network
ports(sis0-2), and a wifi port (ral0)
sis0 : egress (internet)
sis1,
sis2, ral0 : lan i configure a hostname.trunk0 : trunkport sis2 trunkport
sis1 trunkport ral0 trunkproto loadbalance inet 10.100.1.50 255.255.255.0
hostname.sis1, ho
thanks for clear answer !
I'd already read.
not bad idea to refer every question on the list to the manuals and books or
man pages, huh ?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gregory Edigarov
wrote:
> Why can't you read how does statefull filtration works? You'd be much
> better with the full explan
Why can't you read how does statefull filtration works? You'd be much
better with the full explanation of TCP handshake process, and how does
a statefull firewall fits into picture.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:26:54 +0330
Hassan Monfared wrote:
> Hi again,
> all 6 webservers are behind FW ,
> doesn'
Hi again,
all 6 webservers are behind FW ,
doesn't "block in on $intif" rule blocks TCP handshaking ? I mean ACK
message must be passed on $intif, mustn't ?
Regards,
Hassan H. Monfared
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Gregory Edigarov
wrote:
>
> If your firewall is on the same machine as webser
If your firewall is on the same machine as webserver -you can safely
use the ruleset i wrote.
if not - you should have block in on $intif
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:40:09 +0330
Hassan Monfared wrote:
> thank you,
> is it right blocking connection initiation from inside using rule
> something lik
thank you,
is it right blocking connection initiation from inside using rule something
like:
block in on $if flags S/SA
am I right ?
Regards,
Hassan H. Monfared
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Gregory Edigarov
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:48:20 +0330
> Hassan Monfared wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
25 matches
Mail list logo