Re: spamd-setup fails from cron
> #!/bin/sh > remaining=$1;shift > cmd=$@ > lock=/var/run/$(basename $1).lock > [ -f $lock ] || { > touch $lock > while [ $remaining -gt 0 ]; do > seconds=$(($RANDOM % $remaining)) > echo $(date) $seconds >> $lock > sleep $seconds > $cmd && return || remaining=$(($remaining - $seconds)) > done > rm $lock > } > *groan*.. another mistake.. I'm such an idiot sometimes ;-) I don't recommend running this without checking it first. #!/bin/sh remaining=$1;shift cmd=$@ lock=/var/run/$(basename $1).lock [ -f $lock ] || { touch $lock while [ $remaining -gt 0 ]; do seconds=$(($RANDOM % $remaining)) echo $(date) $seconds >> $lock sleep $seconds $cmd && break || remaining=$(($remaining - $seconds)) done rm $lock }
Re: spamd-setup fails from cron
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 03:47:21PM +1000, David Diggles wrote: [ snip ] > sleep $s [ snip ] Arghh.. ;-) sleep $seconds here Anyway, you get the idea. #!/bin/sh remaining=$1;shift cmd=$@ lock=/var/run/$(basename $1).lock [ -f $lock ] || { touch $lock while [ $remaining -gt 0 ]; do seconds=$(($RANDOM % $remaining)) echo $(date) $seconds >> $lock sleep $seconds $cmd && return || remaining=$(($remaining - $seconds)) done rm $lock }
Re: spamd-setup fails from cron
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:51:54AM +0200, Bret Lambert wrote: > > Please avoid 15 minutes past the hour ;-) > > sleep $(($RANDOM % 2048)) && /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -d Tried something like the above, and found it still fails at peak times, so I am trying something else: I made a wrapper called ss (spamd sync), to keep retrying within a diminishing timeframe. #!/bin/sh remaining=$1;shift cmd=$@ lock=/var/run/$(basename $1).lock [ -f $lock ] || { touch $lock while [ $remaining -gt 0 ]; do seconds=$(($RANDOM % $remaining)) echo $(date) $seconds >> $lock sleep $s $cmd && return || remaining=$(($remaining - $seconds)) done rm $lock } 0 * * * * ss 3600 /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -d The time overhead of running the command creates a small possibility for overlapping of cron events, so I created a lock file. This also seemed a good place to store the sleep value(s). /var/run/spamd-setup.lock spamd-setup(8) does not say how it behaves when daemonized. Maybe this is a better option than running from the cron? .d.d.
Re: Laptop lid closing script
I am favoring this approach, to use idle events to do apm -C and turn off the monitor, and run a locking screensaver when the system suspends. Thanks On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:03 AM, David Coppa wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Jan Stary wrote: > > On May 30 20:15:42, Robert Connolly wrote: > >> Hello. > >> > >> Is there any way to configure an ACPI event, such as closing the lid of > a > >> laptop, to run a script, like 'apm -C' and screensaver? > >> apm(8) and sensorsd(8) don't seem to do anything like this. > > > > Not exactly hooked to a lid close but to a suspend > > (which happens on lid close if machdep.lidsuspend=1) > > - see apm(8) mentioning /etc/apm/suspend. > > I have this in my ~/.xinitrc: > > xidle -area 1 -delay 10800 -program "/usr/X11R6/bin/xlock -mode blank" & > > And then in /etc/apm/suspend: > > ---8<--- > > #!/bin/sh > pkill -30 -x xidle > > ---8<--- > > Cheers! > David
xidle(1) not working well
Hello. I am having problems with xidle(1)... This command does nothing.. xlock doesn't run after 5 seconds, or minutes: xidle -program "/usr/X11R6/bin/xlock" -timeout 5 unless I put my mouse cursor in the NW corner. xidle -delay 5 -sw -program "/usr/X11R6/bin/xlock" -timeout 10 This command also does nothing, unless I put the mouse cursor in the SW corner. For fun I tried using -area 500 and -area 5000, and xlock would work once and only once. I would like xidle to trigger when the cursor and keyboard are idle in any position.
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:15:19PM +1000, Brett wrote: > > I don't have a solution, except to only run the amount of torrents your > machine can handle (5 or 6 is ok for my computer). Since rtorrent is normally > very lightweight it should be able to cope with a lot more than it currently > can. There is a kryptonite. If I run audio/cplay also (sndio?), the system completely freezes. > PS this thread should probably have been on ports@. Maybe, but because it probably exposes something that is system related, I thought it could be posted here. Thank you.
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:47:31 -0300 Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > Hi misc@, > > Running the latest snapshot, there are some issues I'm facing when I run > rtorrent + ~5 downloads. > > The system becomes VERY unresponsive, varying between 5 seconds of activity > and 10 seconds locked. > > Before this, had 2 complete locks, and did a cold reboot. No serial to > try something, nor a second computer atm either. > > Running top, I see that sometimes CPU for rtorrent goes to more than > 200%. Running systat, the interrupts maintain its pace, but at the > boundaries of the 10 sec locks, I can see 'ipi' going to something around > 100 (1 million). > > Didn't find what ipi means. A 'man -k' gives me ipic. > > Thoughts? > Thank you. > Before the version now in ports was committed I noticed that rtorrent would become unresponsive for 5-10 seconds when using the arrow navigation keys, see: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=133531038607123&w=2 Since reporting this, I realised that this only would happen if I had about 9-10 torrents available for seeding and/or downloading at once (it would still happen even if there was no network activity occurring). I didn't notice any undue CPU load. My overall system is fine, just rtorrent that becomes sluggish. The old version could cope with these numbers no problem. I don't have a solution, except to only run the amount of torrents your machine can handle (5 or 6 is ok for my computer). Since rtorrent is normally very lightweight it should be able to cope with a lot more than it currently can. PS this thread should probably have been on ports@.
ipsec routing dinamic ip over adsl
hi folksi have the following problemremote office connect to my vpn server in order to connect to the internals over the ipsec tunnel the office has ip phonesto connect to call manager over the 192.168.0.0/16 the ip phone 192.168.30.2/28 so the ip phone connect correct but thereis another ip client a watch the people wants to excract info from the watch who is over the net 172.1.100.1 th PC that whants to connect to runs over the 10.0.0.89 but i can reach the watch and the watch can not ping over the 172 address space the clientit is a cisco router over ADSL line so DInamic public IP is on172.1.100.1 --X192.168.30.2--OKvpn openbsd server ipsec.confike passive esp from any to {192.168.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/16, 172.1.0.0/16} peer any \main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-128 group modp1024 \quick auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-128 psk 1234ABC3344ike passive from {192.168.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/16, 172.1.0.0/16} to any \main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-128 group modp1024 \quick auth hmac-sha1 enc aes-128 psk 1234ABC3344ipsecctl -sallFLOWS:flow esp in from 192.168.30.0/28 to 192.168.0.0/16 peer 187.131.59.237 srcid x.x.x.x/32 dstid 187.131.59.237/32 type useflow esp out from 192.168.0.0/16 to 192.168.30.0/28 peer 187.131.59.237 srcid x.x.x.x/32 dstid 187.131.59.237/32 type requireSAD:esp tunnel from 187.131.59.237 to x.x.x.x spi 0x4a135abc auth hmac-sha1 enc aesesp tunnel from x.x.x.x to 187.131.59.237 spi 0x96591035 auth hmac-sha1 enc aesifconfigbge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 lladdr 00:11:85:f1:cb:6bpriority: 0groups: egress media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)status: active inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast 148.235.89.255inet6 fe80::211:85ff:fef1:cb6b%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500lladdr 00:22:6b:bd:8a:1epriority: 0media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)status: activeinet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255inet6 fe80::222:6bff:febd:8a1e%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500lladdr 00:50:bf:05:3f:6bpriority: 0media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)status: activeinet 192.168.100.210 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255inet6 fe80::250:bfff:fe05:3f6b%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3enc0: flags=0<> priority: 0groups: encstatus: activenetstat -nf -f encapRouting tablesEncap:Source Port DestinationPort Proto SA(Address/Proto/Type/Direction)192.168.30.0/280 192.168/16 0 0 187.131.59.237/esp/use/in192.168/16 0 192.168.30.0/28 0 0 187.131.59.237/esp/require/outany ideas?
Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
Hi misc@, Running the latest snapshot, there are some issues I'm facing when I run rtorrent + ~5 downloads. The system becomes VERY unresponsive, varying between 5 seconds of activity and 10 seconds locked. Before this, had 2 complete locks, and did a cold reboot. No serial to try something, nor a second computer atm either. Running top, I see that sometimes CPU for rtorrent goes to more than 200%. Running systat, the interrupts maintain its pace, but at the boundaries of the 10 sec locks, I can see 'ipi' going to something around 100 (1 million). Didn't find what ipi means. A 'man -k' gives me ipic. Thoughts? Thank you. OpenBSD 5.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #302: Fri May 25 19:24:55 MDT 2012 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 2110390272 (2012MB) avail mem = 2031915008 (1937MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0xfc480 (33 entries) bios0: vendor American Megatrends Inc. version "200.T02" date 10/26/2010 bios0: POSITIVO POSITIVO MOBILE acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC MCFG SLIC ECDT DBGP BOOT OEMB HPET GSCI ATKG SSDT acpi0: wakeup devices USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB5(S3) EUSB(S3) USB3(S3) USB4(S3) USB6(S3) USBE(S3) HDAC(S3) P0P1(S4) P0P2(S3) P0P3(S3) WLAN(S3) P0P4(S3) P0P7(S4) GLAN(S4) P0P8(S3) SLPB(S4) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4500 @ 2.30GHz, 2300.43 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,XSAVE,NXE,LONG,LAHF cpu0: 1MB 64b/line 4-way L2 cache cpu0: apic clock running at 200MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4500 @ 2.30GHz, 2300.08 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,XSAVE,NXE,LONG,LAHF cpu1: 1MB 64b/line 4-way L2 cache ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255 acpiec0 at acpi0 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz uvm_km_kmem_grow: grown to 0x8001 acpi0: unable to load \\_SB_.PCI0._INI.USBT acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (P0P1) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 1 (P0P2) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 2 (P0P3) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 3 (P0P4) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 5 (P0P7) acpicpu0 at acpi0: C2, C1, PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C2, C1, PSS acpitz0 at acpi0acpitz0: THRM: failed to read _CRT : no critical temperature defined acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit in unknown state acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 not present acpibtn0 at acpi0: SLPB acpibtn1 at acpi0: LID_ acpivideo0 at acpi0: VGA_ acpivout0 at acpivideo0: LCDD acpivideo1 at acpi0: VGA_ cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 2300 MHz: speeds: 2300, 1600, 1200 MHz pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel GM45 Host" rev 0x09 vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel GM45 Video" rev 0x09 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) intagp0 at vga1 agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0xd000, size 0x1000 inteldrm0 at vga1: apic 2 int 16 drm0 at inteldrm0 "Intel GM45 Video" rev 0x09 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 16 uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 17 uhci2 at pci0 dev 26 function 2 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 19 ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 7 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 18 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801I HD Audio" rev 0x03: msi azalia0: codecs: Realtek ALC269, Intel/0x2802, using Realtek ALC269 audio0 at azalia0 ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 82801I PCIE" rev 0x03: msi pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 "Intel 82801I PCIE" rev 0x03: msi pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 athn0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR2427" rev 0x01: apic 2 int 17 athn0: AR9285 rev 2 (1T1R), ROM rev 13, address 48:5d:60:a2:e0:6a ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 2 "Intel 82801I PCIE" rev 0x03: msi pci3 at ppb2 bus 3 ppb3 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 "Intel 82801I PCIE" rev 0x03: msi pci4 at ppb3 bus 5 re0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Realtek 8168" rev 0x03: RTL8168D/8111D (0x2800), apic 2 int 17, address e0:69:95:a1:cb:1b rgephy0 at re0 phy 7: RTL8169S/8110S PHY, rev. 2 uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 23 uhci4 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 19 uhci5 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 18 ehci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 23 usb1 at ehci1: USB revision 2.0 uhub1 at usb1 "Intel EHCI ro
Morto worm seems to be back
Hello ofc off topic but maybe of interest to some. Apparently affecting Windows 2003 and possibly 2008 An old "friend" seems to have made his way back. The worm Morto spreading via RDP http://www.precisesecurity.com/worms/w32-morto Last 2 days I've seen a "huge" increase of probes on my port 3389 coming mostly from Europa. Anyone else noticed ? 23:02:22.730299 rule 4/(match) block in on fxp0: 62.20.45.114.3215 > 83.227.225.121.3389: S 98958501:98958501(0) win 65535 (DF) [tos 0x20] /Hasse
Re: Idea for apmd
On 2012-05-31, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:28, Tomas Bodzar wrote: >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado >> wrote: > >>> This is important because when I open a web page with a lot of >>> javascript, the browser is very slow. Also when I compile something with >>> "make -j1", apmd doesn't raise the speed of my CPU, I need use "make >>> -j4" for raising the cpu speed to 2700Mhz. >> >> What shows top, vmstat, systat about %sys, %usr, %idle during that >> time? Because you can have 800MHz of CPU, but %usr and/or %sys can be >> eg. only 20% so there's no reason to switch to higher frequency. > > apmd scaling works like crap with more than one cpu. This was fixed, > then unfixed, but you can get the code from cvs if you like. > > conflicts. if anyone wants it they could grab it from junkpile.org/apmd.diff
Re: Tuning for pppoe over fibre 30M/1M link
You'll find the atom performance is good. I have an atom 330 with 2 gigs of RAM and dual on board NICs with another PCI NIC and it runs great. I also have openvpn in bridge mode and squid running and no hiccups ar all. Regards, Dain Bentley -Original Message- From: David Diggles [da...@elven.com.au] Received: Thursday, 31 May 2012, 4:51pm To: misc@openbsd.org [misc@openbsd.org] Subject: Re: Tuning for pppoe over fibre 30M/1M link FYI I have now run the same pppoe(4) download test on core2duo with OpenBSD 5.1, on em0 interface. It beats the Mac. Mac G5 dual core 2GHz 3MB/s Intel core2duo 3GHz OpenBSD i386 3.44MB/s I have found on the Geode 300MHz, cleaning up the pf.conf, removing modulate state, and no-df from scrub improves the throughput to: 1.8MB/s. I ordered an Atom with 3 Intel NICs, just arrived! Looking forward to testing it out. The test I am doing is ftp -o /dev/null http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/OpenBSD/5.1/src.tar.gz Internode is my ISP. On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 05:07:01PM +0200, Andre Keller wrote: > Am 28.05.2012 15:26, schrieb David Diggles: > > Maybe I should try some of the kernel tuning suggested on calomel. > > I would not even visit that site... It's mostly a waste of time as most > of the tunings are not up-to-date or just plain wrong. OpenBSD ships > with pretty sane defaults that normally do not need any tweaking unless > you run some unorthodox configuration. If you need to tweak something > look into the faq and the sysctl(3) man page and not to calomel.org > > > Could you please be a bit more specific about your setup? > > Are you using pppoe(4) or pppoe(8)? > > Do you see maxed out mbufs (netstat -m), a very high interrupt load (top > / vmstat -i), ifq drops (sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq.drops), interface errors > (netstat -i)? > > I'm running pppoe(4) on a lot of Geode 500MHz powered boxes and have no > problem getting 30Mbit/s throughput of unencrypted traffic... > > > > g > Andri
Re: (Kinda O.T.) Digital Millennium Copyright Act used to censor hardware specifications
> Very clever. But those who give up their right to link to DCMA'd links > for a little more liberty deserve neither. Or something very close to > that. Most of those falling into that trap are Americans, so they don't know where you are coming from.
announce: C Conference CFP closing June 7th
The first ever "C Conference" is happening August 28th, 2012 in San Diego, CA. The target audience are people who implement systems in C. Whether that be new languages, libraries, kernels, daemons or games. A reverse call for papers is up and closes June 7th. Submit talks you would like to give or talks you want to see given. Either way! Early bird tickets are available for $225. If you plan to attend LinuxCon/CloudOpen the following day you can get a package with C Conf and LinuxCon/CloudOpen for $520 (LinuxCon/CloudOpen are $500 alone). http://cconf.org Hope to see you there. Email me if you have any questions! Brandon
Re: OpenBSD in April's issue of the CACM
2012/5/31 Kostas Zorbadelos : > I would definitely like to write them about it in complain, but I > certainly am not qualified to talk about the issue. The voice of the > main developers or OpenBSD project's representatives is much stronger > and authoritative. Theo is already "discussing" the article in the comments forum - much better than I could. The author did not get elected as treasurer of ACM, but is still an editor of Queue. :-( Best Martin
Re: Tuning for pppoe over fibre 30M/1M link
FYI I have now run the same pppoe(4) download test on core2duo with OpenBSD 5.1, on em0 interface. It beats the Mac. Mac G5 dual core 2GHz 3MB/s Intel core2duo 3GHz OpenBSD i386 3.44MB/s I have found on the Geode 300MHz, cleaning up the pf.conf, removing modulate state, and no-df from scrub improves the throughput to: 1.8MB/s. I ordered an Atom with 3 Intel NICs, just arrived! Looking forward to testing it out. The test I am doing is ftp -o /dev/null http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/OpenBSD/5.1/src.tar.gz Internode is my ISP. On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 05:07:01PM +0200, Andre Keller wrote: > Am 28.05.2012 15:26, schrieb David Diggles: > > Maybe I should try some of the kernel tuning suggested on calomel. > > I would not even visit that site... It's mostly a waste of time as most > of the tunings are not up-to-date or just plain wrong. OpenBSD ships > with pretty sane defaults that normally do not need any tweaking unless > you run some unorthodox configuration. If you need to tweak something > look into the faq and the sysctl(3) man page and not to calomel.org > > > Could you please be a bit more specific about your setup? > > Are you using pppoe(4) or pppoe(8)? > > Do you see maxed out mbufs (netstat -m), a very high interrupt load (top > / vmstat -i), ifq drops (sysctl net.inet.ip.ifq.drops), interface errors > (netstat -i)? > > I'm running pppoe(4) on a lot of Geode 500MHz powered boxes and have no > problem getting 30Mbit/s throughput of unencrypted traffic... > > > > g > Andri
Re: (Kinda O.T.) Digital Millennium Copyright Act used to censor hardware specifications
On Thu, 31 May 2012 21:19:23 +0200, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > On Thu, 31 May 2012 18:25:14 +0200, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > Shame on you. > > > > > > Don't you know that linking to links that link to links that have DCMA'd > > > is a crime? > > > > > > Enjoy the bars. > > > > I'm sure quoting mails that link to links that link to DCMA'd links is a > > felony, too. > > > > Perhaps we'll be sharing a cell. > > Probably. But you'll be serving two terms, and I only one. Very clever. But those who give up their right to link to DCMA'd links for a little more liberty deserve neither. Or something very close to that. > > > > On Thu, 31 May 2012 17:12:58 +0200, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:11, Brett wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Pursuant to a rights owner notice under the Digital Millennium > > > > > > Copyright > > > > > > Act (DMCA), the Wikimedia Foundation acted under the law and took > > > > > > down and > > > > > > restricted the content in question. A copy of the received notice > > > > > > can be > > > > > > > > > > > Reverse engineering necessary to have open source in the brave new > > > > > > world? > > > > > > > > > > PCI spec docs (and many others) are copyrighted. Maybe they should > > > > > be, > > > > > maybe they shouldn't, but they are. > > > > > > > > > > As far as I know, the actual specs cannot be copyrighted (or it's > > > > > murky), but knowing wikipedia, somebody probably copied an entire > > > > > table from the doc and dropped it into the article. that's a no-no, > > > > > and not something I'd find nearly as alarming as "censorship". > > > > > > > > Actually, the crime consisted in linking to a few PDFs located > > > > elsewhere. The last revision of the article to contain the links is: > > > > > > > > [LINK DELETED]
Re: OpenBSD in April's issue of the CACM
Theo de Raadt writes: >> If you are not a member of the ACM, you can read it in ACM >> Queue, in which it >> was published in January: >> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2090149 > > Yes, and people can even comment there, too. Looks like a few already > have. However, it is unlikely that the ACM staff will read those > comments unless this is brought to their attention, My ACM subcription ended a few months ago without renewing. I had seen the article on Queue and fortunately I used the correct link in the comments ;-) If I still had a subscription and saw this article on CACM, I would be really annoyed. Having an article on a personal space on a web site is not (in my opinion) the same as a written article in the official membership magazine of ACM. I would definitely like to write them about it in complain, but I certainly am not qualified to talk about the issue. The voice of the main developers or OpenBSD project's representatives is much stronger and authoritative. Regards, Kostas
Re: (Kinda O.T.) Digital Millennium Copyright Act used to censor hardware specifications
> On Thu, 31 May 2012 18:25:14 +0200, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Shame on you. > > > > Don't you know that linking to links that link to links that have DCMA'd > > is a crime? > > > > Enjoy the bars. > > I'm sure quoting mails that link to links that link to DCMA'd links is a > felony, too. > > Perhaps we'll be sharing a cell. Probably. But you'll be serving two terms, and I only one. > > > On Thu, 31 May 2012 17:12:58 +0200, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:11, Brett wrote: > > > > > > > > > Pursuant to a rights owner notice under the Digital Millennium > > > > > Copyright > > > > > Act (DMCA), the Wikimedia Foundation acted under the law and took > > > > > down and > > > > > restricted the content in question. A copy of the received notice can > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > Reverse engineering necessary to have open source in the brave new > > > > > world? > > > > > > > > PCI spec docs (and many others) are copyrighted. Maybe they should be, > > > > maybe they shouldn't, but they are. > > > > > > > > As far as I know, the actual specs cannot be copyrighted (or it's > > > > murky), but knowing wikipedia, somebody probably copied an entire > > > > table from the doc and dropped it into the article. that's a no-no, > > > > and not something I'd find nearly as alarming as "censorship". > > > > > > Actually, the crime consisted in linking to a few PDFs located > > > elsewhere. The last revision of the article to contain the links is: > > > > > > [LINK DELETED]
Re: Thinkpad T60 "sticky touchpad" (amd64/5.1-stable)
>I have a Lenovo Thinkpad T60 amd64 laptop (dmesg below) running 5.1-stable >(fresh install of -release from the CD set, then CVS update to -stable). >The touchpad > > pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot) > wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0 > wsmouse1 at pms0 mux 0 > pms0: Synaptics touchpad, firmware 6.2 > >has an irritating problem in 5.1 (which was *not* present on this same >machine when running 5.0-{release,stable} with X video acceleration >disabled): When running X (autoconfigured with no xorg.conf), the >pointer will intermittently jump to and "stick" at either the left side >of the screen, the top of the screen, or the top left corner. (snip) > >Has anyone else seen this "sticky touchpad" problem? I've had problems with a synaptics touchpad + USB laser mouse but wasn't using the touchpad at all. It wasn't stick-related, possibly not X-related, the mouse would connect/disconnect randomly but it's an old laptop so it's possible the mouse was just drawing too much power. I haven't investigated the issue further yet. -- p
Re: (Kinda O.T.) Digital Millennium Copyright Act used to censor hardware specifications
>On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:11, Brett wrote: > >> Pursuant to a rights owner notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright >> Act (DMCA), the Wikimedia Foundation acted under the law and took down and >> restricted the content in question. A copy of the received notice can be > >> Reverse engineering necessary to have open source in the brave new world? > >PCI spec docs (and many others) are copyrighted. Maybe they should be, >maybe they shouldn't, but they are. > >As far as I know, the actual specs cannot be copyrighted (or it's >murky), but knowing wikipedia, somebody probably copied an entire >table from the doc and dropped it into the article. that's a no-no, >and not something I'd find nearly as alarming as "censorship". A DCMA notice is an improvement over the furious clean-up happening behind the scenes. For example: search for "CIPSO", a NetLabel protocol with an IETF RFC, the word appears 1263 times in Linux kernel 3.3. No Wikipedia entry but Linux_Security_Modules links to an ex-entry... without deletion log. Try the "Multi ADM" link on the same page: dead again, no deletion log. Hmm, the page was last edited yesterday. Date of its most recent reference? June 2010. Second most recent? 2006. If you're lucky you can come across "time travel" pages: a days-old edit using future tense to refer to events years in the past. Entrusting the very definition of reality to a bunch of LSD-dropping hippies is JUST NOT RESPONSIBLE :) -- p
Re: Large scale DNS anycast setup: OpenBSD performance issues
David Diggles writes: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:44:51PM +0300, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: >> Henning Brauer writes: >> >> > if it is really thread related and not sth small & stupid - try it. > > For testing purposes, do you have pf turned off, or a 1 line pf.conf, like: > pf is disabled during the tests. > pass > > ?
Re: (Kinda O.T.) Digital Millennium Copyright Act used to censor hardware specifications
On Thu, 31 May 2012 18:25:14 +0200, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Shame on you. > > Don't you know that linking to links that link to links that have DCMA'd > is a crime? > > Enjoy the bars. I'm sure quoting mails that link to links that link to DCMA'd links is a felony, too. Perhaps we'll be sharing a cell. > > On Thu, 31 May 2012 17:12:58 +0200, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:11, Brett wrote: > > > > > > > Pursuant to a rights owner notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright > > > > Act (DMCA), the Wikimedia Foundation acted under the law and took down > > > > and > > > > restricted the content in question. A copy of the received notice can be > > > > > > > Reverse engineering necessary to have open source in the brave new > > > > world? > > > > > > PCI spec docs (and many others) are copyrighted. Maybe they should be, > > > maybe they shouldn't, but they are. > > > > > > As far as I know, the actual specs cannot be copyrighted (or it's > > > murky), but knowing wikipedia, somebody probably copied an entire > > > table from the doc and dropped it into the article. that's a no-no, > > > and not something I'd find nearly as alarming as "censorship". > > > > Actually, the crime consisted in linking to a few PDFs located > > elsewhere. The last revision of the article to contain the links is: > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conventional_PCI&oldid=405114605
Re: Idea for apmd
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:28:34AM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > wrote: > > Hi. I've been using OpenBSD on my netbook daily for a few months. I was > > using apmd with the -C setting. My netbook is slow and the battery life > > is important, so 800Mhz (apmd -C) or 1600Mhz (apm -A) is not a big > > difference for me. > > > > Now I have a desktop computer with support for cpu speed scaling. In > > this case the options of apmd are very limited. If I use "-A" my cpu is > > always at 2700Mhz, wasting energy and heating my room (I live in the > > very sunny Extremadura :) ). If I use "-C", apm rarely raises the speed > > and the cpu is almost always at 800Mhz. > > > > This is important because when I open a web page with a lot of > > javascript, the browser is very slow. Also when I compile something with > > "make -j1", apmd doesn't raise the speed of my CPU, I need use "make > > -j4" for raising the cpu speed to 2700Mhz. > > What shows top, vmstat, systat about %sys, %usr, %idle during that > time? Because you can have 800MHz of CPU, but %usr and/or %sys can be > eg. only 20% so there's no reason to switch to higher frequency. I've been using top for to check %idle. The problem is that apmd calculates the average idle. If your system has two cores, the first with 98%idle and the second with 20%idle, apmd doesn't raise the cpu speed. Use limits less strict is the simplest workaround for me. Cheers. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: Idea for apmd
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:15:13AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:28, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > > wrote: > > >> This is important because when I open a web page with a lot of > >> javascript, the browser is very slow. Also when I compile something with > >> "make -j1", apmd doesn't raise the speed of my CPU, I need use "make > >> -j4" for raising the cpu speed to 2700Mhz. > > > > What shows top, vmstat, systat about %sys, %usr, %idle during that > > time? Because you can have 800MHz of CPU, but %usr and/or %sys can be > > eg. only 20% so there's no reason to switch to higher frequency. > > apmd scaling works like crap with more than one cpu. This was fixed, > then unfixed, but you can get the code from cvs if you like. Thanks for the info. I'll take a look. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: ACPI problems on a W500 thinkpad: software or hardware?
Coming to think about it: a few months ago I had the same problem with an old HP nc6210 laptop running 5.0 RELEASE. It would output similar meaningless messages to console, complaining about temperatures close to the surface of the Sun before panicking into deep ddb(4)-space.. At that point I assumed it to be some hardware issue and since the machine just act as a mpd server hooked up to my hi-fi, I "solved" it by taking out the battery and running apmd -C. To be honest I didn't have a clue to why I did either, but the problem vanished. -- Cheers, Erling > > On 2012-05-30 05.19, STeve Andre' wrote: > > > May 29 19:15:36 paladin /bsd: acpithinkpad0: unknown event 0x6022 > > > May 29 19:15:36 paladin /bsd: acpitz1: critical temperature exceeded > > > 100C (3732K), shutting down > >
Re: ifconfig bridge delete
> $ sudo ifconfig bridge0 delete athn0 > ifconfig: athn0: bad value > $ sudo ifconfig bridge0 del athn0 > $ > > Uuhm? This is an error in the manual page. It came about due to the merge of brconfig(8) into ifconfig(8). When brconfig was a seperate program either "delete " or "del " would do the same thing. However in ifconfig, "delete (noargs)" has a different meaning: delete the first IP address on the interface. Hence, the first commandline you entered is parsed as two commands: delete (with no argument), and athn0. athn0 is not a good command... In the new world order where they are merged, the right command to issue regarding the bridge is simply "del ". Index: ifconfig.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.8,v retrieving revision 1.227 diff -u -p -u -r1.227 ifconfig.8 --- ifconfig.8 18 Mar 2012 23:37:08 - 1.227 +++ ifconfig.8 31 May 2012 17:29:45 - @@ -517,18 +517,15 @@ bridge member interfaces. Allow non-IPv4, IPv6, ARP, or Reverse ARP packets through .Ar interface . .It Cm del Ar interface -Alias for -.Cm delete . -.It Cm deladdr Ar address -Delete -.Ar address -from the cache. -.It Cm delete Ar interface Remove .Ar interface from the bridge. Promiscuous mode is turned off for the interface when it is removed from the bridge. +.It Cm deladdr Ar address +Delete +.Ar address +from the cache. .It Cm delspan Ar interface Delete .Ar interface
Re: ifconfig bridge delete
On 31-5-2012 19:01, Pieter Verberne wrote: > $ sudo ifconfig bridge0 delete athn0 > ifconfig: athn0: bad value > $ sudo ifconfig bridge0 del athn0 > $ The manpage is wrong. Only "del" works for the bridge. "delete" is used to remove an address from the interface. Probably a remainder of the brconfig/ifconfig merge. I'll prepare a diff for the manpage if nobody beats me to it.
ifconfig bridge delete
Hi, $ sudo ifconfig bridge0 delete athn0 ifconfig: athn0: bad value $ sudo ifconfig bridge0 del athn0 $ Uuhm? Cheers, Pieter OpenBSD 5.1 (GENERIC) #160: Sun Feb 12 09:46:33 MST 2012 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS ("AuthenticAMD" 586-class) 500 MHz cpu0: FPU,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,CX8,SEP,PGE,CMOV,CFLUSH,MMX,MMXX,3DNOW2,3DNOW real mem = 536408064 (511MB) avail mem = 517537792 (493MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 20/70/03, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfac40 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.0 @ 0xf/0x1 pcibios0: pcibios_get_intr_routing - function not supported pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing information unavailable. pcibios0: PCI bus #0 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc8000/0xa800 cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor) amdmsr0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios) io address conflict 0x6100/0x100 io address conflict 0x6200/0x200 pchb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 "AMD Geode LX" rev 0x33 glxsb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 2 "AMD Geode LX Crypto" rev 0x00: RNG AES vr0 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 "VIA VT6105M RhineIII" rev 0x96: irq 11, address 00:00:24:cd:7d:f8 ukphy0 at vr0 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 3: OUI 0x004063, model 0x0034 vr1 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 "VIA VT6105M RhineIII" rev 0x96: irq 5, address 00:00:24:cd:7d:f9 ukphy1 at vr1 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 3: OUI 0x004063, model 0x0034 vr2 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 "VIA VT6105M RhineIII" rev 0x96: irq 9, address 00:00:24:cd:7d:fa ukphy2 at vr2 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 3: OUI 0x004063, model 0x0034 vr3 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 "VIA VT6105M RhineIII" rev 0x96: irq 12, address 00:00:24:cd:7d:fb ukphy3 at vr3 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 3: OUI 0x004063, model 0x0034 athn0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 "Atheros AR9280" rev 0x01: irq 15 athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 22, address 00:0c:42:66:5a:da glxpcib0 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 "AMD CS5536 ISA" rev 0x03: rev 3, 32-bit 3579545Hz timer, watchdog, gpio gpio0 at glxpcib0: 32 pins pciide0 at pci0 dev 20 function 2 "AMD CS5536 IDE" rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 1: wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 476940MB, 976773168 sectors wd0(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled) ohci0 at pci0 dev 21 function 0 "AMD CS5536 USB" rev 0x02: irq 7, version 1.0, legacy support ehci0 at pci0 dev 21 function 1 "AMD CS5536 USB" rev 0x02: irq 7 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 "AMD EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 isa0 at glxpcib0 isadma0 at isa0 com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo com0: console com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 spkr0 at pcppi0 nsclpcsio0 at isa0 port 0x2e/2: NSC PC87366 rev 9: GPIO VLM TMS gpio1 at nsclpcsio0: 29 pins npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16 usb1 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 "AMD OHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1 mtrr: K6-family MTRR support (2 registers) umass0 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "JMicron USB to ATA/ATAPI Bridge" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 2 umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only scsibus0 at umass0: 2 targets, initiator 0 sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: SCSI2 0/direct fixed serial.152d2338D577A4144203 sd0: 305245MB, 512 bytes/sector, 625142448 sectors vscsi0 at root scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets softraid0 at root scsibus2 at softraid0: 256 targets root on wd0a (8ffb259a89b69646.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
Re: spamd 250 messages
> Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > On Wed, 30 May 2012 13:00:45 -0400 > > Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > >> That's also why spamd in greylisting stutters for the first 10 seconds. > >> Many spammers disconnect now when stuttered at, so they give up before > >> even starting the greylisting process. > > > It might be now. I believe the original reason was to tie up > > more spammers resources than your own. > > That's why the blacklist mode stutters. It's a tarpit. Originally > greylisting didn't stutter. > > http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan05-spamd/ > > In particular, this slide: > > http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan05-spamd/mgp00017.html It was discovered quite early on that spammers were using something like: write a line to the socket (wait up to 5 seconds for the response) (not finished yet? give up -> disconnect) (move on to the next target)
Re: spamd 250 messages
Kevin Chadwick wrote: On Wed, 30 May 2012 13:00:45 -0400 Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: That's also why spamd in greylisting stutters for the first 10 seconds. Many spammers disconnect now when stuttered at, so they give up before even starting the greylisting process. It might be now. I believe the original reason was to tie up more spammers resources than your own. That's why the blacklist mode stutters. It's a tarpit. Originally greylisting didn't stutter. http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan05-spamd/ In particular, this slide: http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan05-spamd/mgp00017.html --Kurt
Re: spamd 250 messages
On Wed, 30 May 2012 13:00:45 -0400 Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > That's also why spamd in greylisting stutters for the first 10 seconds. > Many spammers disconnect now when stuttered at, so they give up before > even starting the greylisting process. It might be now. I believe the original reason was to tie up more spammers resources than your own.
Re: (Kinda O.T.) Digital Millennium Copyright Act used to censor hardware specifications
Shame on you. Don't you know that linking to links that link to links that have DCMA'd is a crime? Enjoy the bars. > On Thu, 31 May 2012 17:12:58 +0200, Ted Unangst wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:11, Brett wrote: > > > > > Pursuant to a rights owner notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright > > > Act (DMCA), the Wikimedia Foundation acted under the law and took down and > > > restricted the content in question. A copy of the received notice can be > > > > > Reverse engineering necessary to have open source in the brave new world? > > > > PCI spec docs (and many others) are copyrighted. Maybe they should be, > > maybe they shouldn't, but they are. > > > > As far as I know, the actual specs cannot be copyrighted (or it's > > murky), but knowing wikipedia, somebody probably copied an entire > > table from the doc and dropped it into the article. that's a no-no, > > and not something I'd find nearly as alarming as "censorship". > > Actually, the crime consisted in linking to a few PDFs located > elsewhere. The last revision of the article to contain the links is: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conventional_PCI&oldid=405114605
Re: (Kinda O.T.) Digital Millennium Copyright Act used to censor hardware specifications
On Thu, 31 May 2012 17:12:58 +0200, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:11, Brett wrote: > > > Pursuant to a rights owner notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright > > Act (DMCA), the Wikimedia Foundation acted under the law and took down and > > restricted the content in question. A copy of the received notice can be > > > Reverse engineering necessary to have open source in the brave new world? > > PCI spec docs (and many others) are copyrighted. Maybe they should be, > maybe they shouldn't, but they are. > > As far as I know, the actual specs cannot be copyrighted (or it's > murky), but knowing wikipedia, somebody probably copied an entire > table from the doc and dropped it into the article. that's a no-no, > and not something I'd find nearly as alarming as "censorship". Actually, the crime consisted in linking to a few PDFs located elsewhere. The last revision of the article to contain the links is: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conventional_PCI&oldid=405114605
Thinkpad T60 "sticky touchpad" (amd64/5.1-stable)
Hi, I have a Lenovo Thinkpad T60 amd64 laptop (dmesg below) running 5.1-stable (fresh install of -release from the CD set, then CVS update to -stable). The touchpad pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot) wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0 wsmouse1 at pms0 mux 0 pms0: Synaptics touchpad, firmware 6.2 has an irritating problem in 5.1 (which was *not* present on this same machine when running 5.0-{release,stable} with X video acceleration disabled): When running X (autoconfigured with no xorg.conf), the pointer will intermittently jump to and "stick" at either the left side of the screen, the top of the screen, or the top left corner. When stuck to the left side of the screen the pointer will only move up/down, not left/right; when stuck to the top side of the screen the pointer will only move left/right, not up/down; when stuck to the top left corner the pointer won't move at all. The only way I've found to recover from a "stuck" state is to press (any) one of the touchpad buttons; that allows the pointer to be moved in both directions again. The mean occurence rate is on the order of 3-5 "stickings" per hour, but there seems to be clustering, with several pairs or triplets less than 10 seconds apart. I've kept a log of all "stickings" this since I updated to 5.1-stable 8 days ago. In that time, I've had a total of 118 "stickings" (24 top-side, 77 left-side, 17 top-left-corner), including 5 in the time it took me to compose this message. I think (but am not certain) that all the "stickings" have occured when I used the touchpad to move the pointer. That is, I think (but am not certain) that no "sticking" has ever happened *without* my touching the touchpad. One other thing that may be relevant... Moving from 5.0 to 5.1 the touchpad is much more "sensitive", i.e., the ratio (cm pointer movement)/(cm finger movement on touchpad) went up by about an order of magnitude. In 5.0 and before I used 'xset m 2 10' in my .xinitrc; in 5.1 I'm using 'xset m 1/4' to compensate for the higher sensitivity. Has anyone else seen this "sticky touchpad" problem? Is there a known workaround/fix? Are there useful debug options I could enable in the pms driver or elsewhere to gather more information? dmesg: OpenBSD 5.1-stable (GENERIC.MP) #0: Wed May 23 21:13:00 EDT 2012 r...@cobalt.astro.indiana.edu:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 3218931712 (3069MB) avail mem = 3119144960 (2974MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xe0010 (68 entries) bios0: vendor LENOVO version "7IET23WW (1.04 )" date 12/27/2006 bios0: LENOVO 87424GU acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT ECDT TCPA APIC MCFG HPET SLIC BOOT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT acpi0: wakeup devices LID_(S3) SLPB(S3) LURT(S3) DURT(S3) EXP0(S4) EXP1(S4) EXP2(S4) EXP3(S4) PCI1(S4) USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB7(S3) HDEF(S4) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpiec0 at acpi0 acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz, 1995.32 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,NXE,LONG,LAHF cpu0: 4MB 64b/line 16-way L2 cache cpu0: apic clock running at 166MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz, 1995.00 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,NXE,LONG,LAHF cpu1: 4MB 64b/line 16-way L2 cache ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 1 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 2, remapped to apid 1 acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xf000, bus 0-63 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (AGP_) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 2 (EXP0) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 3 (EXP1) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 4 (EXP2) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 12 (EXP3) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 21 (PCI1) acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C2, C1, PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3, C2, C1, PSS acpipwrres0 at acpi0: PUBS acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature is 127 degC acpitz1 at acpi0: critical temperature is 100 degC acpibtn0 at acpi0: LID_ acpibtn1 at acpi0: SLPB acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 model "92P1139" serial 3681 type LION oem "Panasonic" acpibat1 at acpi0: BAT1 not present acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit online acpithinkpad0 at acpi0 acpidock0 at acpi0: GDCK not docked (0) cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1995 MHz: speeds: 2000, 1667, 1333, 1000 MHz pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82945GM Host" rev 0x03 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 "Intel 82945GM PCIE" rev 0x03: msi pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "ATI Radeon Mobility X1400" rev 0x00 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) radeondrm0 at vga1: apic
Re: OpenBSD in April's issue of the CACM
On Tue, 29 May 2012 17:35:40 -0600 Theo de Raadt wrote: > to realize I was talking to "The Right People" (even if they kept > saying they are not). For one of them, check out how the revolving > door works: > > Fred Baker > and > en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Baker_(IETF_chair) > > That is what we are up against. I also did talk a lot to Robert > Barr. None of it was going anywhere. > > So I was there, fighting that patent battle -- and we tried to do it > by going after the *very first network patent* recognized by people who > lied about being about standards. I knew about the protocol refusal. I had no idea Ciscos fell over on deployment however. That's hilarious, they should pay the OpenBSD devs for fixing their firewalls. Would no work get done if members of supposedly independent bodies had to have independent employees. It reminds me a little of Apple having a member on the html5 standards team that vetoed Googles member (the other apparently) as Apple wanted mp4 rather than having ogg as the specified standard. p.s. All the phones in use on the web and their accel chips would have been replaced by now anyway.
Re: using relayd in transparent mode
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:58:45 +0200 Schmurfy wrote: > So there really is something broken in the relayd shipped with OpenBSD 5.0 > at least for transparent mode. I use relayd at securelevel 2 in some cases which works for relaying to or on a single server. I've found relayd on 5.1 now exits due to operation failed creating the table. flush_rulesets: transaction for relayd failed: operation not permitted. Once at the default securelevel I also found the transparent app proxy for dns causes relayd to exit as soon as any dns request is made. Not complaining, thanks for working on relayd. Just thought I'd share in case it triggered anything aside from it's a priv sep improvement and other work in progress at the moment. I notice the examples I'm pretty sure were in the man page? for transparent layer 7 proxy have gone. Is relayd heading away from that? Or just that the main uses were verified to work during the recode.
Re: AMD Zacate E350 (ASUS E35M1-M) dmesg/experiences?
Please reply on the list. I'm already subscribed and others might find your questions useful. Also, don't send HTML e-mails. Check the lists' guidelines. On Thu (31/05/12), Eugene Yunak wrote: > Thank you very much, this is super helpful! i am going to buy either > this board or the E450 one and dmesg is precisely what i needed. > > One question if i may - do you know if it supports boot from USB and > maybe USB raid 1? (i want to create mirror of usb sticks and install OS > there, and use all the sata ports for data hdds). It boots from USB. I installed OBSD this way. I suppose softraid(4) should support raid 1 with USB drives/sticks. I don't think it's a good idea though. -- Manolis Tzanidakis http://mtzanidakis.com/ mtzanidakis[at]gmail[dot]com
problem SOLVED (was: Re: more Thinkpad T60 X/video woes (5.0-stable amd64))
In a thread back in November 2011, http://marc.info/?t=132173453400070&r=1&w=1 I reported intermittent kernel/X hangs (usually under near-idle loads) on a Thinkpad T60 widescreen laptop (alas I misspelled the name as "Tinkpad" in the Subject: line) running 5.0-stable amd64. My full dmesg is given in the first message in that thread, http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=132105242827683&w=1 along with various other (hopefully-)relevant information. There's also more information on the problem symptoms in my later messages in that thread, http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=132103762123592&w=1 http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=132137790200900&w=1 http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=132813757309520&w=1 I'm pleased to report that as of 5.1/amd64 (either -release or -stable) the problem is solved -- the default autoconfigure-everything X works fine, with no crashes or hangs and full video acceleration. My thanks to all who contributed ideas in the thread (and to all the developers for a *great* 5.1)! ciao, -- -- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]" Dept of Astronomy & IUCSS, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA "Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral." -- quote by Freire / poster by Oxfam
Re: Idea for apmd
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:28, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > wrote: >> This is important because when I open a web page with a lot of >> javascript, the browser is very slow. Also when I compile something with >> "make -j1", apmd doesn't raise the speed of my CPU, I need use "make >> -j4" for raising the cpu speed to 2700Mhz. > > What shows top, vmstat, systat about %sys, %usr, %idle during that > time? Because you can have 800MHz of CPU, but %usr and/or %sys can be > eg. only 20% so there's no reason to switch to higher frequency. apmd scaling works like crap with more than one cpu. This was fixed, then unfixed, but you can get the code from cvs if you like.
Re: (Kinda O.T.) Digital Millennium Copyright Act used to censor hardware specifications
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:11, Brett wrote: > Pursuant to a rights owner notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright > Act (DMCA), the Wikimedia Foundation acted under the law and took down and > restricted the content in question. A copy of the received notice can be > Reverse engineering necessary to have open source in the brave new world? PCI spec docs (and many others) are copyrighted. Maybe they should be, maybe they shouldn't, but they are. As far as I know, the actual specs cannot be copyrighted (or it's murky), but knowing wikipedia, somebody probably copied an entire table from the doc and dropped it into the article. that's a no-no, and not something I'd find nearly as alarming as "censorship".
Re: Idea for apmd
I agree with Juan Francisco, In think it would nice to have a more smoth speed control cpu way, forma example like the proposed oneroso in this thread, similar to netbsd. Andris it would nicer if in a future openbsd implementar the P-states oferta the cpu, to save battery on laptops. Anyway my openbsd laptop (thinkpad R61 2200 Mhz ) has a good performance with apmd -C. BR Jes (from Corunha :) ) El 30/05/2012 20:50, "Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado" escribis: > Hi. I've been using OpenBSD on my netbook daily for a few months. I was > using apmd with the -C setting. My netbook is slow and the battery life > is important, so 800Mhz (apmd -C) or 1600Mhz (apm -A) is not a big > difference for me. > > Now I have a desktop computer with support for cpu speed scaling. In > this case the options of apmd are very limited. If I use "-A" my cpu is > always at 2700Mhz, wasting energy and heating my room (I live in the > very sunny Extremadura :) ). If I use "-C", apm rarely raises the speed > and the cpu is almost always at 800Mhz. > > This is important because when I open a web page with a lot of > javascript, the browser is very slow. Also when I compile something with > "make -j1", apmd doesn't raise the speed of my CPU, I need use "make > -j4" for raising the cpu speed to 2700Mhz. > > I understand the problem with the limits of apmd. The developers can't > generate a limits for each CPU and workflow. I've been playing with the > values of PERFINCTHRES and PERFDECTHRES on usr.sbin/apmd/apmd.c and > "checking" the changes of speed with "while true; do apm | grep cool; > sleep 1; done". I'm using 20 and 60 respectively right now. Probably > this values aren't the best values but are better than the defaults (for > my CPU and workflow). The performance is very good and I can see the cpu > speed raising and lowering. I've tested various values and 20/60 are a > good compromise "performance vs energy consumption". > > In short, I have a suggestion for apmd. Add one option for to set > PERFINCTHRES and other for to set PERFDECTHRES. Each user could to > configure the behavior of "apm -C" on rc.conf.local. Example: > apmd_flags="-C -I 20 -D 60". Obviously, "apm -C" would use the defaults > if both options aren't used. > > The implementation is simple and it will not break any system. > Unfortunately I can't code the idea (despite I've read the code), so I > wanted share this with you. Some developer interested? :) > > Cheers. > > -- > Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Lenceria Erotica | Camara de Fotos Samsung | Test de Alcoholemia | Aromatizador automatico | Pochoclera Automatica | Juego de Cocina | Cuchillo Deli Pro | Cena Gourmet en Brands
Para visualizar correctamente este newsletter ingresa a http://news1.bonuscupon.com.ar/r.html?uid=1.n.29hh.dk.qtd580f6eo
Re: ACPI problems on a W500 thinkpad: software or hardware?
On Wed May 30, 2012 at 03:59:31PM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote: > On 2012-05-30 05.19, STeve Andre' wrote: > > May 29 19:15:36 paladin /bsd: acpithinkpad0: unknown event 0x6022 > > May 29 19:15:36 paladin /bsd: acpitz1: critical temperature exceeded > > 100C (3732K), shutting down > > > It's probably no help to you, but 100B0 C is not 3732 K. It is however > 373.15 K, which if you round it up interestingly enough is 373.2 K, i e > the same number, one magnitude off. > You're right. 3732K --> 3458.85C but I code we see: #define KTOC(k) ((k - 2732) / 10)
Re: ikev2 between openbsd and windows
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:18 +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote: > My iked config looks like this: > > ikev2 "win7" passive esp \ > from 172.16.20.0/24 to 0.0.0.0/0 local any peer any \ > srcid 10.0.0.1 \ > eap "mschap-v2" \ > config address 172.16.20.1 \ > config name-server 212.18.3.5 \ > tag "$name-$id" > i've just realised you made a mistake by exchanging "from" and "to" specifications. the correct way is: from 0.0.0.0/0 to 172.16.20.0/24 local any peer any \ it should always read "i provide access from a network behind MYSELF to a network behind my PEER" regardless of whether you initiate or a respond. in other words just like in ipsec.conf.
Re: ikev2 between openbsd and windows
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:47 +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > > > My iked config looks like this: > > > > > > > do you have a "user" specification in your iked.conf? > > which user are you trying to authenticate as? > > "user" specification occupies a separate line and looks > > like that: > > > > user "username" "password" > > > > iked can't consult the local password database or radius > > or any other authentication service at the moment except > > this internal "database". > > Yes I do have a user entry, right at the top. I didn't think posting > it was a good idea. > > > also, have you tried w/o mschap? you need to select the > > "Computerzertifikate verwenden" radio button to turn eap off. > > I tried that but it had an error, which made me want to try EAP again. > > > > ikev2 "win7" passive esp \ > > > from 172.16.20.0/24 to 0.0.0.0/0 local any peer any \ > > > srcid 10.0.0.1 \ > > > eap "mschap-v2" \ > > > config address 172.16.20.1 \ > > > config name-server 212.18.3.5 \ > > > tag "$name-$id" > > > > > > > looks fine except of absent of the "user" specification. > > i'd ditch the "tag" though as i didn't test it but it shouldn't > > affect anything. > > Hmm. What to do... Any hint on how to debug this best? > try to verify that certificates are installed correctly on windows and are valid. make sure you didn't install them by doubleclicking (as i initially wrote) but imported them via mmc into the right section (under Komputerkonto). try to change "to 0.0.0.0/0" to something like "to 10.50.0.1", where you can assign 10.50.0.1 to lo1. make sure that certificates were created by commands like: ikectl ca certificate 10.0.0.1 create and host using FQDN. srcid must match that otherwise windows refuses to connect. and at last, please provice output from the iked -dvv. cheers, mike
Re: ikev2 between openbsd and windows
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > > My iked config looks like this: > > > > do you have a "user" specification in your iked.conf? > which user are you trying to authenticate as? > "user" specification occupies a separate line and looks > like that: > > user "username" "password" > > iked can't consult the local password database or radius > or any other authentication service at the moment except > this internal "database". Yes I do have a user entry, right at the top. I didn't think posting it was a good idea. > also, have you tried w/o mschap? you need to select the > "Computerzertifikate verwenden" radio button to turn eap off. I tried that but it had an error, which made me want to try EAP again. > > ikev2 "win7" passive esp \ > > from 172.16.20.0/24 to 0.0.0.0/0 local any peer any \ > > srcid 10.0.0.1 \ > > eap "mschap-v2" \ > > config address 172.16.20.1 \ > > config name-server 212.18.3.5 \ > > tag "$name-$id" > > > > looks fine except of absent of the "user" specification. > i'd ditch the "tag" though as i didn't test it but it shouldn't > affect anything. Hmm. What to do... Any hint on how to debug this best? -peter
Re: ikev2 between openbsd and windows
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:18 +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 17:30 +0400, Pavel Shvagirev wrote: > > > 2. Doesn't work EAP mode - Windows stops on "Checking username and > > > password" error. Then #13803, 1931... > > > > Hi, > > > > Just to mention it for those not following source-changes@ > > that there was a bug in the message ID handling that prevented > > EAP from working correctly. The fix was committed on Friday. > > > > Cheers, > > Mike > > Hi, > > I still can't get it to work. I made two screenshots they are here: > > http://ipv4.goldflipper.net/private/iked-eap1.jpg > > and > > http://ipv4.goldflipper.net/private/iked-eap2.jpg > > My iked config looks like this: > do you have a "user" specification in your iked.conf? which user are you trying to authenticate as? "user" specification occupies a separate line and looks like that: user "username" "password" iked can't consult the local password database or radius or any other authentication service at the moment except this internal "database". also, have you tried w/o mschap? you need to select the "Computerzertifikate verwenden" radio button to turn eap off. > ikev2 "win7" passive esp \ > from 172.16.20.0/24 to 0.0.0.0/0 local any peer any \ > srcid 10.0.0.1 \ > eap "mschap-v2" \ > config address 172.16.20.1 \ > config name-server 212.18.3.5 \ > tag "$name-$id" > looks fine except of absent of the "user" specification. i'd ditch the "tag" though as i didn't test it but it shouldn't affect anything. > I installed the iked from the -current source on top of the 5.0 binary > I believe these are the right ones because I see your recent timestamp > in them: > > ikev2_msg.c:/* $OpenBSD: ikev2_msg.c,v 1.15 2012/05/30 09:18:14 mikeb Exp $ > > Any hint on what I'm doing wrong? Sorry the screenshots are in german, > Fehler 13843 is Error 13843. I googled for that but wasn't any wiser after. > > Regards, > -peter
Re: ikev2 between openbsd and windows
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 17:30 +0400, Pavel Shvagirev wrote: > > 2. Doesn't work EAP mode - Windows stops on "Checking username and > > password" error. Then #13803, 1931... > > Hi, > > Just to mention it for those not following source-changes@ > that there was a bug in the message ID handling that prevented > EAP from working correctly. The fix was committed on Friday. > > Cheers, > Mike Hi, I still can't get it to work. I made two screenshots they are here: http://ipv4.goldflipper.net/private/iked-eap1.jpg and http://ipv4.goldflipper.net/private/iked-eap2.jpg My iked config looks like this: ikev2 "win7" passive esp \ from 172.16.20.0/24 to 0.0.0.0/0 local any peer any \ srcid 10.0.0.1 \ eap "mschap-v2" \ config address 172.16.20.1 \ config name-server 212.18.3.5 \ tag "$name-$id" I installed the iked from the -current source on top of the 5.0 binary I believe these are the right ones because I see your recent timestamp in them: ikev2_msg.c:/* $OpenBSD: ikev2_msg.c,v 1.15 2012/05/30 09:18:14 mikeb Exp $ Any hint on what I'm doing wrong? Sorry the screenshots are in german, Fehler 13843 is Error 13843. I googled for that but wasn't any wiser after. Regards, -peter
Re: Laptop lid closing script
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Jan Stary wrote: > On May 30 20:15:42, Robert Connolly wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Is there any way to configure an ACPI event, such as closing the lid of a >> laptop, to run a script, like 'apm -C' and screensaver? >> apm(8) and sensorsd(8) don't seem to do anything like this. > > Not exactly hooked to a lid close but to a suspend > (which happens on lid close if machdep.lidsuspend=1) > - see apm(8) mentioning /etc/apm/suspend. I have this in my ~/.xinitrc: xidle -area 1 -delay 10800 -program "/usr/X11R6/bin/xlock -mode blank" & And then in /etc/apm/suspend: ---8<--- #!/bin/sh pkill -30 -x xidle ---8<--- Cheers! David
Re: Plan 9 to OpenBSD (Was Re: OpenBSD in April's issue of the CACM)
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 09:27:32PM +0200, Peter Laufenberg wrote: > > The only thing I miss is an X-less framebuffer in OpenBSD even > it'd support just a console and text editor. IMHO X has to die, > it's a huge pile of crap. > A lot of us are dreaming of a framebuffer console (and X), but nobody wrote the code yet. -- Alexandre