On Jul 19 11:58:21, David Diggles wrote:
> I am looking for ways to speed up scp over 10GigE.
> With parallel transfer of 4x 8GB files, I get
> the following test results with various ciphers.
>
> These tests maxed out 4 cores with encryption overhead.
>
> SSH Options: []
> 42.1912726115170477378
On Jul 18 22:22:40, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 06:01:37PM -0700, Steve wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am having ongoing problems with X. I have highlighted some past
> > problems with intel drivers on HP. Unable to get a stable platform even
> > after
> > using the vesa driver I ha
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:21:04PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I guess you are talking about mitigation mechanisms.
>
> I am not aware of any stdio protection mechanisms.
well, apart from careful handling of file descriptors everywhere to
make sure fd 0, 1 and 2 remain what they are supposed t
I guess you are talking about mitigation mechanisms.
I am not aware of any stdio protection mechanisms.
However, our atexit has a bizzare quirk, as does our malloc.
These functions protect their own internal data structures by
mprotect()'ing them as non-writeable after updating them.
It isn't w
use mosh or LFTP with pget
i.e lftp -c pget -n10 sftp://someuser@someserver:somefile
mosh is a bit weirder in that it will multiplex transfers via udp
sessions... Try lftp first IMHO it is the best swiss army knife of
filetransfer utils.
-JoelW
@aenertia
Hmmm, ok... hpn-ssh looks like the go.
http://www.psc.edu/index.php/hpn-ssh
http://www.nren.nasa.gov/hpn_ssh.html
http://www.hpsc.csiro.au/userguides/faq/ssh.php#hpn-ssh
Hi folks,
I'm trying to dig up information on the atexit() and stdio()
protection given in the FAQ. I can find lots of statements that this
protection exists, but I can't find any presentations or papers saying
what they are and what they do. The man pages for these functions
don't seem to have an
I am looking for ways to speed up scp over 10GigE.
With parallel transfer of 4x 8GB files, I get
the following test results with various ciphers.
These tests maxed out 4 cores with encryption overhead.
SSH Options: []
42.19127261151704773780 MB/s
41.32435720074992870891 MB/s
41.222553009774490374
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:24:01PM +0400, Alexei Malinin wrote:
>
> But now the patched kernel does not recognize
> the internal CD-ROM of the modem.
This will only have the windows driver, no great loss.
> Also windows (and maybe mac os x) software can:
> - work with the modem as with an ethern
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> Issuing the following:
> # dsocks.sh lynx google.com > /dev/null 2>&1
>
Fixed that for you. Pipe stdout to /dev/null, then pipe stderr to
stdout. If you do it the other way, stderr will still appear on
stdout.
--
Aaron Mason - Progra
OK, thank you all very much for your precious support, I got da job done :)
Also thanks to Nicolai for the DNS hint and to Alex about nc read.
It's nice to share with a wise community!
Wow! Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation!
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:07:48AM +0200, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> So it looks I've been misled by the many people on internet who claim they
> can use firefox establishing a ssh -D connection before.
No, it's just that your first attempt to get this working was not the
right way.
To configure Fi
> @Alex
>
> So it looks I've been misled by the many people on internet who claim they
> can use firefox establishing a ssh -D connection before. Actually I tried
> to configure both firefox and netsurf but just had no results.
>
Firefox:
Preferences - Advanced - Network - Settings - SOCKS Host
@ Abel
thanks, now also firefox works, I just needed to specify *just* socks
server *without* http one. very happy :))
@ Johan
ok, http proxy should forward just http stuff, while socks should forward
any kinda stuff, right? So any should include also http btw, right now
I replicated
with firefox you go to preferences -> use socks proxy 127.0.0.1 port 1080
or something like that.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> @Abel
>
> I've had a look at dsocks page, the "instructions" are kinda criptic but
> just did something this way:
>
> # ssh -D 1080 user@sshd
You're confusing a SOCKS proxy with a HTTP proxy. They are not the same thing.
Sent form my iFoe.
On Jul 18, 2012, at 16:07, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> @Abel
>
> I've had a look at dsocks page, the "instructions" are kinda criptic but
> just did something this way:
>
> # ssh -D 1080 user@sshdhost
@Abel
I've had a look at dsocks page, the "instructions" are kinda criptic but
just did something this way:
# ssh -D 1080 user@sshdhost
# dsocks.sh lynx google.com
it looks like working (yeaah!!! great piece of advice, mate!!!) but
also produces lotsa garbage on the screen bottom like:
"lyn
Hi Paolo,
> http_proxy="http://127.0.0.1:12345/"; lynx google.com
AFAIK, you should test SOCKS proxy, not HTTP.
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use a remote obsd box as a socks proxy through ssh.
> Both local and remote are 5.1-release.
>
> After reading man pages, I specified in local ssh_config:
> Tunnel yes
>
> and, also, in remote sshd_config:
> AllowTc
Hello,
I'm trying to use a remote obsd box as a socks proxy through ssh.
Both local and remote are 5.1-release.
After reading man pages, I specified in local ssh_config:
Tunnel yes
and, also, in remote sshd_config:
AllowTcpForwarding yes
PermitTunnel yes
So, I basically establish a session like
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
391435062178.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
186055462795.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
110587543025.jpg]
[demime 1.01d
> > 2G: fixed 2F without the branch prediction bug. I am told the recent
> > Yeeloong and Fuloong are fit with 2G processors. I am not even sure
> > these can be told apart in software, as 2G supposedly reports itself as
> > a 2F level.
>
> Does anybody have a piece of assembly code that triggers
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 06:01:37PM -0700, Steve wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having ongoing problems with X. I have highlighted some past
> problems with intel drivers on HP. Unable to get a stable platform even after
> using the vesa driver I have started testing on the Alix machines and am
> getting si
Hello:
I have encountered a problem with the "Administrator Mode" in the KDE
Control Center.
Whenever I attempt to access the Login Manager or Network Settings, and
click the
"Administrator Mode" button it just hangs. This is a fresh install of
OpenBSD 5.1, using
the K Desktop. Additionally, I wa
Ñðî÷íî ïðîäàåòñÿ ÏÐÅÊÐÀÑÍÎÅ ÌÅÑÒÎ
ÄÎÌ, Êèåâñêàÿ îáëàñòü, Ìèðîíîâñêèé ðàéîí, ñåëî Êèïÿ÷êà.
Äîì + Óñàäüáà îêðóæåíû çàáîðîì, 84 ñîòêè çåìëè, èíòåðåñíûé ëàíäøàôòíûé äèçàéí,
ó÷àñòîê õîëìèñòûé, âîêðóã óñàäüáû ÍÅÒ ÑÎÑÅÄÅÉ( è íèêîãäà íå áóäåò)!
Íà òåððèòîðèè åñòü ñâîé ïðóä( 50 ì äèàìåòð, ãëóáèíà 4 ì
Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:34:08AM +0400, Alexei Malinin wrote:
>> Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 09:24:50PM +0400, Alexei Malinin wrote:
Alexei Malinin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could anybody recommend OpenBSD compatible 4g (LTE) modem?
I tr
[IMAGE]
Se você não estiver visualizando a imagem acesse este link .
header-julho2
CONHEÇA AS ÁREAS DE ATUAÇÃO DO IDC:
Pós-Graduação em Direito
Cursos de Extensão
Seminários
Filosofia
Preparatórios para Concursos
PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO
Especialização em
DIREITO CIVIL E PROCESSUAL CIVIL
On 2012-07-13, Limaunion wrote:
> hi all! I'm running unbound as a caching resolver in an ALIX box running
> OpenBSD 5.1.
>
> For some reason I'm getting many of these kind of errors:
>
> Jul 13 10:56:29 pfire unbound: [11449:0] notice: sendto failed: No
> buffer space available
> Jul 13 10:56:2
On 2012-07-17, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>>Can anyone help with a little amd problem?
>>
>>I have some partitions on SSD and some on HD and would like to use
>>amd(8) so that the HD filesystems are only mounted on-demand, reducing
>>fsck time in a crash.
>>
>>I've got them mounting OK...
>>
>>$ cat
On 2012-07-16, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My new home pc has this card:
> vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel HD Graphics 2000" rev 0x09
>
> is there anything I could try to get the full screen video playback working?
Try VLC which has fairly simple controls over output device (in
prefere
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:41:33PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> 2G: fixed 2F without the branch prediction bug. I am told the recent
> Yeeloong and Fuloong are fit with 2G processors. I am not even sure
> these can be told apart in software, as 2G supposedly reports itself as
> a 2F level.
Does an
When my system comes up with no logged-on users but with syslogd, pflogd,
ntpd, sshd, sendmail, inetd, and sndiod running, top shows 24M of real
memory consumption. When I start emacs server (emacs --daemon) storage
consumption increases to 59M, more than 2x what is required by OpenBSD
itself and s
Hello,
I remember the openbd.com going to a persons page. When did that change?
Thanks
Hi,
I am having ongoing problems with X. I have highlighted some past
problems with intel drivers on HP. Unable to get a stable platform even after
using the vesa driver I have started testing on the Alix machines and am
getting similar problems.
Is X broken ?
I have many of these machines in
pr
misc@openbsd.org
Bogazici Temmuz Son Hafta Genel Katýlýma Açýk Eðitim Seminerleri
20 Temmuz
Taþeron - Alt Ýþveren - Tedarikçi Yönetiminin Hukuksal Boyutu
21-22 Temmuz
Stratejik Satýnalma Yönetimi ve Modern Satýnalma Teknikleri
24 Temmuz
Risk Sermayeleri, Fon Kaynaklarý ve Finansal
###
F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange has processed your message sent to
'thomasphill...@linkam.co.uk'. The following potential security threats have
been found and corresponding actions have been taken.
File name:message.scr
File size:2
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>Would be nice if finally some non-x86 hardware would actually be
> >>available.
> >
> >It has been available for ages, and well-supported by free software as
> >well; and I am not only speaking about loongson-based systems.
> >
>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:50:41AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> well my question wasn't about running x86 code under emulation on
> loongson, but running mips compiled programs on it relatively to x86
> compiled programs on x86.
The answer is "it depends".
It takes a long time to build certai
291936
Formación Integral de un Community Manager & Estratega en Social Media
30 de Julio, Ciudad de México.
Este novedoso taller tiene como objetivo formar profesionales
estrategas, capaces de posicionar de forma eficaz a su empresa en medios
sociales, hacer rentable cada una de sus acciones On
AFAIK the JIT is Qemu's; the extra instructions just help the translation from x86 ->
"tiny code generator" bytecode (similar to LLVM) -> Loongson. I doubt there's much
magic to it other than minimizing host CPU instructions but... I'm talking out of my ass.
On the other hand you're right to qu
In dreamland only.
that's what i think now. project maybe done, maybe produced but...
Here are a few meaningless numbers:
- a 1.8GHz amd64 processor is about 6 times faster than a 900MHz
Loongson 2F doing md5 crypto.
- the same processor is only 3 times faster doing Blowfish crypto.
thank y
42 matches
Mail list logo
