On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Darren Tucker wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:25:54PM +0800, f5b wrote:
> > the user share can not sftp to the server,
> > but same config in Mar 1 snapshot, sftp is ok.
>
> it's caused by this change (feed it to patch -R to revert it), and it's
> because the uid has alre
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:17:21PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> Auction is over. $1,145 for the Foundation.
>
> http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/1660
>
> ==ml
>
> --
> Michael W. Lucas - mwlu...@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor
> http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blathe
Auction is over. $1,145 for the Foundation.
http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/1660
==ml
--
Michael W. Lucas - mwlu...@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor
http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/
Latest book: Absolute OpenBSD 2/e - http://www.nostarch.com/ope
Hi,
On 04/11/13 13:59, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 00:02 CEST, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
I don't see it in ifconfig, dmesg says:
vendor "Atheros", unknown product 0x0020 (class network subclass
ethernet, rev 0x01) at cardbus0 dev 0 function 0 not configured
take
> Hi,
>
> I inserted the card into a debian laptop which recongizes it. Here
> some output.
>
> dmesg:
> [ 149.244112] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: pccard: PCMCIA card
> inserted into slot 1
> [ 149.244234] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: cs: memory probe
> 0xa000-0xa0ff: excluding 0xa00
Hi,
I inserted the card into a debian laptop which recongizes it. Here some
output.
dmesg:
[ 149.244112] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: pccard: PCMCIA card
inserted into slot 1
[ 149.244234] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: cs: memory probe
0xa000-0xa0ff: excluding 0xa000-0xa00
On 16 April 2013 18:24, Stefan Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:25 PM, f5b wrote:
>
>> server
>> kern.version=OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #71: Sat Apr 13 17:21:57
>> MDT 2013
>> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>>
>> /etc/ssh/sshd_config
>>
John Tate writes:
> I think I understand, can someone give me a look at a pf.conf with queueing
> and nat rules.
With an existing rule set in place, it's probably easier to do the queue
assignment with a block of match rules. That way at least you don't
affect the pass or block decision.
- P
I think I understand, can someone give me a look at a pf.conf with queueing
and nat rules.
It's hard to experiment because I'm logged in via ssh and would lose my
connection every time I make a change. Unfortunately the machine connected
to the firewall via null modem for a serial console has died
as far as i remember in the man page of pf there are places where u can
usually put the queueing rules so nat rules :)
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 03:32:52 +1000
> Subject: pf queueing and nat
> From: j...@johntate.org
> To: misc@openbsd.org
>
> I am adding queueing to my pf based nat for my home net
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 03:32:52 +1000
John Tate wrote:
> I am adding queueing to my pf based nat for my home network. Since
> there isn't a complete example involving nat and queuing I am not
> entirely sure where to put things. I've read the manual and I think I
> put things before the rdr-to rules
Hello list,
I currently have active-active CARP of two nodes with relayd and relayd(pf)
stops forwarding packets if I do a "large file download".
Setup:
two OpenBSD 5.3 connected to a Cisco stack, with 'balancing ip-stealth' on
external and 'balancing arp' on internal.
Both external and intern
I am adding queueing to my pf based nat for my home network. Since there
isn't a complete example involving nat and queuing I am not entirely sure
where to put things. I've read the manual and I think I put things before
the rdr-to rules. I also have a transparent ftp and http proxy. I am not
entir
On 04/16/13 10:07, Zoran Kolic wrote:
inteldrm(4) after KMS changes hangs my computer early at boot, so I have it
turned \
off always. I've upgraded to snapshot of Apr. 8, and noticed that run in
somewhat I \
would call a semi-hangup mode. No, it doesn't freeze a system or something
like, \
i
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:25 PM, f5b wrote:
> server
> kern.version=OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #71: Sat Apr 13 17:21:57
> MDT 2013
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config
> only add after last line
>
> Match Group share
>
> inteldrm(4) after KMS changes hangs my computer early at boot, so I have it
> turned \
> off always. I've upgraded to snapshot of Apr. 8, and noticed that run in
> somewhat I \
> would call a semi-hangup mode. No, it doesn't freeze a system or something
> like, \
> instead it shows nothing bu
I observed the same thing. Adding "UsePrivilegeSeparation no" to my
sshd_config allowed connections. I haven't been able to troubleshoot
this further.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Ville Valkonen wrote:
> On 16 April 2013 07:25, f5b wrote:
>> server
>> kern.version=OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENE
On 04/16/13 06:13, Michał Markowski wrote:
> $ cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`uname -m`/config
> cd: no such file or directory: /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/config
> $ cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`uname -m`/conf
> $
>
>
> --- /cvs/www/faq/current.html Tue Apr 16 11:54:22 2013
> +++ /tmp/current.html Tue Apr 16 12:
$ cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`uname -m`/config
cd: no such file or directory: /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/config
$ cd /usr/src/sys/arch/`uname -m`/conf
$
--- /cvs/www/faq/current.html Tue Apr 16 11:54:22 2013
+++ /tmp/current.html Tue Apr 16 12:10:27 2013
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@
Update entire source tree
On 16 April 2013 07:25, f5b wrote:
> server
> kern.version=OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #71: Sat Apr 13 17:21:57 MDT
> 2013
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config
> only add after last line
>
> Match Group share
> ForceComma
I, too, would appreciate this. I would elaborate more on this issue but I
am under an NDA ( non-disclosure agreement ) at this time.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> Someone gave me this old kiosk machine which works fine with Win2K, but
> it would be much more fun to h
I have worked with clonezilla cloning OpenBSD filesystems using
its UFS support, but there are some problems concerning disklabel
creation, what I did, if I remember correctly was creating a dd
image from the first MB (or so of the disk) which when dumped will
create the partition table and disklab
> I'll try it and let you know.
Well I did a very quick test into memory at first (whilst doing
something else at the same time) and it seemed to talk about ufs
filesystem usage and I was very surprised. I then tried some more
comprehensive tests and only found dd usage.
I'll retry what I did ini
23 matches
Mail list logo
