On November 3, 2014 1:41:24 AM CET, Nex6|Bill wrote:
>so, for OpenBSD you would have to get the /etc/passwd for an offline
>attack on
>the password hashes
>and for that they would need a user account to logon to the system. Or
>to have
>compromised the system in such a
>way as they could copy /et
thanks .I will try 5.6 release later.I hope it will be work.
At 2014-10-29 18:16:22, "Jonathan Gray" wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:59:11AM +0800, leeqiand wrote:
>> Any one had ever install openbsd on cubieboard?
>> I tried in this way.
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.arm/915
>>
On 11/02/14 18:15, Mario St-Gelais wrote:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldBinary
> [Quote]
> It is recommended that you install the binary by using the "Upgrade" option
> of the install media. If that is not possible, you can also unpack the
> binaries as described here. Regardless, you m
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 18:49, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> # cd /usr/src/lib/libssl/ssl
>> # make obj
>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/ssl/obj -> /usr/obj/lib/libssl/ssl
>> # make
>> make: don't know how to make /usr/src/lib/libssl/ssl/../src/e_os.h
>> (prerequisite of: s3_meth.o)
>> Stop in /usr/src/lib/libssl/s
Same here. About 3 timeouts a day and I get close to 10% errors on the
input on 2 different athn devices.
On Nov 2, 2014 7:49 PM, "Zé Loff" wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 01:13:40AM +0100, Stefan Krüger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a PC Engines APU board with a Compex WLE200NX miniPCI-e wifi c
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 01:13:40AM +0100, Stefan Krüger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a PC Engines APU board with a Compex WLE200NX miniPCI-e wifi card
> running in hostap mode (11g).
>
> root@apu:/var/log # dmesg | grep athn0
> athn0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR9281" rev 0x01: apic 2 int 19
>
[apologies for the contentless previous message]
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote:
> ...
>> what about kerberos? (windows K5 vs Unix K5?)
There's a bunch of *really good* papers on Kerberos's design which
discuss exactly th
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote:
...
> what about kerberos? (windows K5 vs Unix K5?)
>
>
>>
>>
>>> is OpenBSD, or BSD in general vulnerable to these style attacks?
>>
>> The vulnerability is the authentication protocol/method, independent
>> the operating system.
>> If you used
On Nov 2, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote:
>> I know, that pass the hash is now getting a lot of playtime on windows.
and
>> I have heard in a couple of talks
>> that its directly related to SSO part of the OS, and may be part of
pos
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Nex6|Bill wrote:
> I know, that “pass the hash” is now getting a lot of playtime on windows. and
> I have heard in a couple of talks
> that its directly related to “SSO” part of the OS, and may be part of posix?
Nope. It's just a bad (as in, completely broken) des
Hi,
I have a PC Engines APU board with a Compex WLE200NX miniPCI-e wifi card
running in hostap mode (11g).
root@apu:/var/log # dmesg | grep athn0
athn0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR9281" rev 0x01: apic 2 int 19
athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 22, address xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
root@apu:/var
I see, TCP wrappers has been removed i am assuming using only PF is the
practice for stuff people who where using TCP wrappers for
and, thanks for the hard work
-Nex6
On Nov 1, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> November 1, 2014.
>
> We are pleased to announce the official rele
I know, that pass the hash is now getting a lot of playtime on windows. and
I have heard in a couple of talks
that its directly related to SSO part of the OS, and may be part of posix?
is OpenBSD, or BSD in general vulnerable to these style attacks? or just the
normal unix dump the password /e
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:22, mark hellewell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just upgraded a couple of 5.5 servers to 5.6 and apart from the
> issues I'm about to describe everything went smoothly (thanks!)
>
> As the final step of my upgrade procedure (following upgrade56.html,
> using install kernel as
Hi,
I've just upgraded a couple of 5.5 servers to 5.6 and apart from the
issues I'm about to describe everything went smoothly (thanks!)
As the final step of my upgrade procedure (following upgrade56.html,
using install kernel as usual) it was time to fetch -stable source,
which I did with:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldBinary
[Quote]
It is recommended that you install the binary by using the "Upgrade" option
of the install media. If that is not possible, you can also unpack the
binaries as described here. Regardless, you must do the entire upgrade
process, including creatin
Am 11/02/14 um 07:04 schrieb Ted Unangst:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 20:26, Stefan Wollny wrote:
>> An other case of TL:DR???
>>
>> Please help me with a 'clue-stick' on how to investigate further.
>
> I think so. Your message is a million lines long, but I have no idea
> what the problem is.
>
On 02.11.2014 17:29, Robert Peichaer wrote:
Hi Atanas
As you provided update diffs in the past, would you mind testing
this update for tt-rss from 1.13 to 1.14? I don't have mysql running
here and being lazy I would like to avoid setting one up just to test
this update.
Thanks
Robert
Hi,
I've
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 08:11:51AM +0100, o...@openbsd.se wrote:
> I have tested the driver on both openbsd 5.5 and 5.6, not on current.
>
>
> OpenBSD 5.6-stable (GENERIC.MP) #6: Sat Nov 1 14:02:01 CET 2014
> root@ubook.hagen.hassel:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
> real mem = 415
2014-11-02 16:49 GMT+01:00 :
> Hi,
>
> From what I gather, RBAC / MAC isn't really necessary unless you add people
> to your system that you don't really trust (ref. Nick Holland @
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=139321387226212). But what about FreeBSD's
> Capsicum?
http://www.openbsdfo
Hi,
>From what I gather, RBAC / MAC isn't really necessary unless you add people to
>your system that you don't really trust (ref. Nick Holland @
>http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=139321387226212). But what about FreeBSD's
>Capsicum?
Thanks!
O.D.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 01:24:30AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
> > You could try this (only compile tested) diff:
>
> I tried this diff on 5.5-stable and it appeared to solve my problem! The
> system now boots from sr0a without asking for a passphrase. Overwr
Le 2 nov. 2014 13:52, "Jorge Schrauwen" a écrit :
>
> Hey All,
>
> TL;DR: traffic leaving a bridge over a vlan does
> not get tagged but leaves untagged after upgrade.
> Is this by design?
>
[...]
>
> Anybody else experiencing this? Did it get broken
> by design? (AKA was I doing something stupid
Hey All,
TL;DR: traffic leaving a bridge over a vlan does
not get tagged but leaves untagged after upgrade.
Is this by design?
Longer version:
Lost most of my night trying to figure out why
my setup ended up breaking. I found a solution
but I am not exactly happy with it.
I think this breakage
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 20:26, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> An other case of TL:DR???
>
> Please help me with a 'clue-stick' on how to investigate further.
I think so. Your message is a million lines long, but I have no idea
what the problem is.
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 06:08, ropers wrote:
> When I said I wanted to use a USB-only laptop *as* a serial console,
> what I meant was this:
>
> 1. There is a headless computer that has a physical RS-232. This is
> not the laptop.
So what you want to know is if you can run "cu -l /dev/cuaU0" on
I've not been able to establish a wireless connection lately on urtw0
on a yeeloong. ifconfig keeps showing a status of 'no network' on
urtw0 both for the local wireless network here and another wifi
network I've tried that used to work. The indicator light for the
wireless device is on and 'ifc
27 matches
Mail list logo
