Joel Rees gmail.com> writes:
>
> showkey doesn't seem to be on my machine, but xev is.
>
> Is xev part of the standard X11 install?
>
Yes, xev is part of Xenocara, but I don´t think the keycodes on X correlates
to that on wsconsctl, do they?
Hi Nikolai,
On 26 December 2014 at 16:49, Nikolai Fetissov wrote:
> Looks like openospfd is missing from the list.
>
Would you consider that a companion to openbgpd since the site says:
OpenBGPD's companions, ospfd(8), ospf6d(8), ripd(8), and dvmrpd(8) add
support for the respective protocols. ld
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Eduardo Lopes wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> May someone point to me how do I can obtain, in the console, the keycode of
> any particular key, in OpenBSD?
>
> thanks
>
> Eduardo Lopes.
>
showkey doesn't seem to be on my machine, but xev is.
Is xev part of the standard
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 1:33 AM, andrew fabbro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:02 AM, wrote:
>
>> I live in NJ. Should I be this paranoid, that every file I edit should
> be
>> encrypted?
>> Who has time for this type of craziness?
>
> Well, no one. I encrypt very few files.
I think that's
Looks like openospfd is missing from the list.
> On Dec 26, 2014, at 7:34 PM, jungle Boogie wrote:
>
> Hi Ted,
>> On 26 December 2014 at 13:23, Ted Unangst wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 09:42, jungle Boogie wrote:
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that ope
2014-12-26 18:42 GMT+01:00, jungle Boogie :
> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
opencvs
Best
Martin
Hi Ted,
On 26 December 2014 at 13:23, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 09:42, jungle Boogie wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
>> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
>
> The now deleted gzsig!
Your too
Hi Raf,
On 26 December 2014 at 12:56, Raf wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:36:11PM EST, jungle Boogie wrote:
>
>> Hi Raf,
>
> Hi jungle Boogie,
>
>> Was Tim Miller (guy that created sudo, right?) an openbsd developer
>> before/during/after/never when sudo was put in base in 2009?
>
> As already
No really.. a lot of the basics are applicable to ksh (*sh) but *csh
style shells aren't covered.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 04:54:16PM -0500, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:48:43PM -0500, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> > A good book that I recommend to get started is "From Bash to Zsh". I
arc4random
OpenBSD Cryptographic Framework
W^x
patch's on Xenocara...
[?]
npppd ?
ifstated ?
On 12/26/2014 11:42 AM, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
> openssh (p)
> opensmtpd (p)
> mandoc (p)
> openntpd (p)
> openbgpd
> libressl (p)
>
Apologies, I must've missed something that was mentioned in the man pages,
in OpenBSD it seems that addresses are printed for each attempt rather than
(the other OS' tested, Win, Debian, Android) that seem to take the first
returned name for example
It just seemed odd as both the man pages on the o
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:48:43PM -0500, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> A good book that I recommend to get started is "From Bash to Zsh". I
> found it easier to start with rather the supplied reference
> documentation.
>
Does "From Bash to Zsh" cover ksh, csh, tcsh, etc...?
It sounds like a great book id
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 09:42, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
The now deleted gzsig!
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:36:11PM EST, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hi Raf,
Hi jungle Boogie,
> Was Tim Miller (guy that created sudo, right?) an openbsd developer
> before/during/after/never when sudo was put in base in 2009?
As already pointed out - Todd C. Miller, not Tim.
http://www.sudo.ws/sud
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 9:36 PM, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hi Raf,
> On 26 December 2014 at 12:13, Raf wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 02:11:04PM EST, Carsten Kunze wrote:
>>> jungle Boogie wrote:
>>>
>>> > Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
>>> > that correct? (
Bash and Zsh will already handle your first example without any
tinkering.
As Christian stated the completion systems are quite mature, I tend to
prefer zsh myself.
A good book that I recommend to get started is "From Bash to Zsh". I
found it easier to start with rather the supplied reference
doc
> Was Tim Miller (guy that created sudo, right?) an openbsd developer
> before/during/after/never when sudo was put in base in 2009?
He's Todd Miller, he did not create sudo, and sudo was imported in 1999,
not 2009.
Hi Raf,
On 26 December 2014 at 12:13, Raf wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 02:11:04PM EST, Carsten Kunze wrote:
>> jungle Boogie wrote:
>>
>> > Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
>> > that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
>>
>> How about tmux
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 02:11:04PM EST, Carsten Kunze wrote:
> jungle Boogie wrote:
>
> > Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
> > that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
>
> How about tmux (p)?
Nope - tmux(1), similarly to mandoc(1), has been
Todd wrote:
> Not sure, but what about cwm(1) and mg(1)?
I think cwm had been started as evilwm elsewhere, derived as cwm from evilwm
(outside?) OpenBSD and later imported to the OpenBSD code base.
Not sure, but what about cwm(1) and mg(1)?
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:23 PM, jungle Boogie
wrote:
> Hi Carsten,0
> On 26 December 2014 at 11:11, Carsten Kunze
> wrote:
> > jungle Boogie wrote:
> >
> >> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
> >> that correct? (p) i
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 09:42:18AM -0800, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
> openssh (p)
> opensmtpd (p)
> mandoc (p)
> openntpd (p)
> openbgpd
> libressl (p)
> o
Hi Carsten,0
On 26 December 2014 at 11:11, Carsten Kunze wrote:
> jungle Boogie wrote:
>
>> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
>> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
>
> How about tmux (p)?
>
Damn good one!
Apologizes to the developer for
jungle Boogie wrote:
> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
How about tmux (p)?
Hi Miod,
On 26 December 2014 at 10:19, Miod Vallat wrote:
>> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
>> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
>
>> mandoc (p)
>
> Mandoc was not initiated by OpenBSD, although it got engulfed very
> quickly thanks to
> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
> mandoc (p)
Mandoc was not initiated by OpenBSD, although it got engulfed very
quickly thanks to Ingo's hard work.
Hi Ludovic,
On 26 December 2014 at 09:46, ludovic coues wrote:
> 2014-12-26 18:42 GMT+01:00 jungle Boogie :
>> openiked (p?)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jungle
>>
>
>
> openiked isn't portable.
Thanks for the confirmation, That's pretty much what Theo stated as
well but there's this page:
https://github.com
2014-12-26 18:42 GMT+01:00 jungle Boogie :
> Hello All,
>
> Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
> that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
> openssh (p)
> opensmtpd (p)
> mandoc (p)
> openntpd (p)
> openbgpd
> libressl (p)
> openiked (p?)
> pf
> re
Hello All,
Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is
that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing?
openssh (p)
opensmtpd (p)
mandoc (p)
openntpd (p)
openbgpd
libressl (p)
openiked (p?)
pf
relayd
httpd
carp
Thanks,
Jungle
--
---
inum: 883510009027723
s
Hi Theo,
On 24 December 2014 at 18:02, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>The website for openiked[0] indicates it's under active development
>>but I'm just curious to know if this is still a developing project or
>>if it has been pretty much met all the goal?.
>
> Almost 10K of lines changed in the last year
> Is there no middle ground between an encrypted partition and plain text?
Adding low-grade encrypt-with-password to lots of utilities like this
does not make sense.
There's already a kitchen sink, it's called emacs.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:02 AM, wrote:
> I live in NJ. Should I beâ this paranoid, that every file I edit should
be
> encrypted?
> Who has time for this type of craziness?
>
Well, no one. I encrypt very few files.
But keeping one's passwords and related administrivia safe, preventing
unenc
On 2014-12-26, Damon Getsman wrote:
> Right off the bat I got issues about 'Can't locate object method
> "filter_obsolete" via package "OpenBSD::Quirks1" at
> /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/AddDelete.pm line 351"'. This was at the 'final
> step', and there had been no hiccups during the sysmerging pr
i think , think ,so i try archlinux's nginx .
the following /etc/nginx/nginx.conf goes well.
--
worker_processes 1;
events {
worker_connections 1024;
}
http {
include mime.types;
default_type application/octet-stream;
sendfileon;
thanks for kind reply .
i rewrite /etc/nginx/nginx.conf .
worker_processes 1;
worker_rlimit_nofile 1024;
events {
worker_connections 800;
}
http {
include mime.types;
default_type application/octet-stream;
index index.html index.htm;
keepalive_timeout 65;
Hi,
Any ideas on this? I'm getting at least one panic every day.
G
On 24/12/14 06:13, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Today I've installed a 10Gb adapter and upgraded to latest snapshot.
I've had a crash...
Machine is a Fujitsu RX300 S6 and the adapter is an Intel X520 SR1
G
ddb{0}> trace
ixgbe_
> i want to run first site as open and second site as ristricted (basic
auth),
> but it is hard to do and there is little information on internet about
this
Just add
auth_basic "Test site";
auth_basic_user_file .htpasswd;
to second server { ... } block.
hi,all .
i use name based virtual host (=server block).
i want to run first site as open and second site as ristricted (basic
auth),
but it is hard to do and there is little information on internet about this
.
it is easy to run only name based virtualhost (=server block) .
nginx.conf is ne
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:04:48PM EST, Damon Getsman wrote:
> Well, I've never cared much for the holidays... So I figured, while
> everybody else was busy with them, what a perfect time for me to take down
> my BBS and other services and upgrade the system at least from 5.4-5.5.
> I've done mul
I live in NJ. Should I be this paranoid, that every file I edit should be
encrypted?
Who has time for this type of craziness?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
Original Message
From: andrew fabbro
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 1:25 AM
To: misc@o
42 matches
Mail list logo