Re: Adding encryption support to vi(1)
I live in NJ. Should I be this paranoid, that every file I edit should be encrypted? Who has time for this type of craziness? Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network. Original Message From: andrew fabbro Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 1:25 AM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Adding encryption support to vi(1) vim (in ports) offers an encryption option ( http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/editing.html#encryption) Invoking vim with -x prompts for a key and then encrypts the file on save. It appears to do the right thing as far as encrypting the .swp (temporary recovery) file as well. If you later edit the file (without the -x option) it will detect the file is encrypted based on a magic it prepends and prompt for a key. Unfortunately, by default vim uses the 'zip' algorithm which is quite insecure, though you can optionally specify blowfish as your preferred algorithm. The nice thing about this versus a gpg decrypt/edit/re-encrypt cycle is that you don't have an unencrypted file temporarily lying around (or an unencrypted vi-recover file for that matter). I'm wondering if there is any interest in adding this feature to vi(1) given OpenBSD's interest in integrated crypto? Unfortunately, as a US citizen/resident, it's not clear to me that I would be able to contribute code (beyond an implementation that uses the zip algorithm) so it is probably a moot point unless one of the devs is interested but...I figured there was no harm in mentioning it. -- andrew fabbro and...@fabbro.org blog: https://raindog308.com
Re: Upgrading issues (i386 on PPro class) 5.4-5.5 leaving system horked
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:04:48PM EST, Damon Getsman wrote: Well, I've never cared much for the holidays... So I figured, while everybody else was busy with them, what a perfect time for me to take down my BBS and other services and upgrade the system at least from 5.4-5.5. I've done multiple upgrades in a day before when I've gotten behind like this, and they've never been much of a problem, though I've run into an issue here and there before. That was before I ran into the removal of packages and reinstallation process that is necessary for this upgrade. [...] Does anybody have any tips? Would an install over the top straight to 5.6 maybe work? I've never had the install process leave me with such a lobotomized system before. Usually it's just something like mediawiki not working with latex math markup any more or wordpress breaking. :( This is my primary server, and it pains me significantly to have it down, and I really love OpenBSD, despite the hiccups at times. Does anybody have any suggestions? Any help or pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. Just checking the obvious, but you have obviously followed the 5.4 - 5.5 upgrade guide[0] and removed all packages BEFORE upgrading and installed them again AFTER you have done everything else? [0] http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade55.html Regards, Raf
nginx how to run first site as open , and second as basic auth .
hi,all .
i use name based virtual host (=server block).
i want to run first site as open and second site as ristricted (basic
auth),
but it is hard to do and there is little information on internet about this
.
it is easy to run only name based virtualhost (=server block) .
nginx.conf is next .
worker_processes 1;
worker_rlimit_nofile 1024;
events {
worker_connections 800;
}
http {
include mime.types;
default_type application/octet-stream;
index index.html index.htm;
keepalive_timeout 65;
server_tokens off;
server {
listen 80;
listen [::]:80;
server_name a.mydns.jp; --- 1st site
root /var/www/htdocs/d1;
}
server {
listen 80;
listen [::]:80;
server_name s.sun.ddns.vc; --- 2nd site
root /var/www/htdocs/d2;
}
}
---
give me some hints .
Re: nginx how to run first site as open , and second as basic auth .
i want to run first site as open and second site as ristricted (basic
auth),
but it is hard to do and there is little information on internet about
this
Just add
auth_basic Test site;
auth_basic_user_file .htpasswd;
to second server { ... } block.
Re: ixgbe_tx_ctx_setup crash
Hi,
Any ideas on this? I'm getting at least one panic every day.
G
On 24/12/14 06:13, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Today I've installed a 10Gb adapter and upgraded to latest snapshot.
I've had a crash...
Machine is a Fujitsu RX300 S6 and the adapter is an Intel X520 SR1
G
ddb{0} trace
ixgbe_tx_ctx_setup(d4164980,d919df00,f55a0e5c,f55a0e60,4) at
ixgbe_tx_ctx_setup
+0x11a
ixgbe_encap(d4164980,d919df00,0,1000,a) at ixgbe_encap+0x16a
ixgbe_start(d4376030,d424f2c0,1,f55a0ed4,d43ac320) at ixgbe_start+0xa7
nettxintr(0,50,0,f55a0f08,d055e282) at nettxintr+0x47
softintr_dispatch(1) at softintr_dispatch+0x5a
Xsoftnet() at Xsoftnet+0x17
--- interrupt ---
cpu_idle_cycle(d0c54a00) at cpu_idle_cycle+0xf
Bad frame pointer: 0xd0d1ee58
ddb{0} ps
PID PPID PGRPUID S FLAGS WAIT COMMAND
27524 29077 29077 0 30x81 netio tcpdump
29077 7998 29077 76 30x93 bpf tcpdump
7998 5475 7998 0 30x8b pause tcsh
5475 27931 5475 0 30x8b pause ksh
27931 26770 27931 0 30x92 selectsshd
31314 1 31314 0 30x80 poll cron
30894 1 30894 0 30x83 ttyin getty
18970 8424 8424 90 30x90 kqreadospf6d
32570 8424 8424 90 30x90 kqreadospf6d
8424 1 8424 0 30x80 kqreadospf6d
21883 1784 1784 85 30x90 kqreadospfd
912 1784 1784 85 30x90 kqreadospfd
1784 1 1784 0 30x80 kqreadospfd
12595 1 12595 0 30x83 ttyin getty
25497 1 25497 0 30x83 ttyin getty
12975 1 12975 0 30x83 ttyin getty
28159 1 28159 0 30x83 ttyin getty
32715 1 32715 0 30x83 ttyin getty
10193 2540 2540 74 30x90 bpf pflogd
2540 1 2540 0 30x80 netio pflogd
2835 1 14597 0 30x80 selectsnmpd
7479 32707 32707 95 30x90 kqreadsmtpd
20765 32707 32707 95 30x90 kqreadsmtpd
28600 32707 32707 95 30x90 kqreadsmtpd
13782 32707 32707 95 30x90 kqreadsmtpd
12419 32707 32707 95 30x90 kqreadsmtpd
2489 32707 32707103 30x90 kqreadsmtpd
32707 1 32707 0 30x80 kqreadsmtpd
26770 1 26770 0 30x80 selectsshd
7240 19769 3791 83 30x90 poll ntpd
19769 3791 3791 83 30x90 poll ntpd
3791 1 3791 0 30x80 poll ntpd
11125 23743 23743 74 30x90 bpf pflogd
23743 1 23743 0 30x80 netio pflogd
28337 5090 5090 73 20x90syslogd
5090 1 5090 0 30x80 netio syslogd
30111 0 0 0 3 0x14200 pgzero zerothread
14175 0 0 0 3 0x14200 aiodoned aiodoned
14536 0 0 0 3 0x14200 syncerupdate
26108 0 0 0 3 0x14200 cleaner cleaner
25408 0 0 0 3 0x14200 reaperreaper
28179 0 0 0 3 0x14200 pgdaemon pagedaemon
3310 0 0 0 3 0x14200 bored crypto
26495 0 0 0 3 0x14200 pftm pfpurge
7600 0 0 0 3 0x14200 usbtskusbtask
13439 0 0 0 3 0x14200 usbatsk usbatsk
11642 0 0 0 3 0x14200 bored sensors
25436 0 0 0 3 0x40014200 acpi0 acpi0
27440 0 0 0 7 0x40014200idle3
4660 0 0 0 7 0x40014200idle2
27534 0 0 0 7 0x40014200idle1
25518 0 0 0 3 0x14200 bored systqmp
24295 0 0 0 3 0x14200 bored systq
15404 0 0 0 3 0x14200 bored syswq
* 9159 0 0 0 7 0x40014200idle0
26863 0 0 0 3 0x14200 kmalloc kmthread
1 0 1 0 30x82 wait init
0 -1 0 0 3 0x10200 scheduler swapper
ddb{0} dmesg
PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX
,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,NXE,PAGE1GB,LONG,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,V
MX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,POPCNT,AES,LAHF,PERF
,ITSC
real mem = 3210936320 (3062MB)
avail mem = 3146129408 (3000MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 01/19/12,
Re: nginx how to run first site as open , and second
thanks for kind reply .
i rewrite /etc/nginx/nginx.conf .
worker_processes 1;
worker_rlimit_nofile 1024;
events {
worker_connections 800;
}
http {
include mime.types;
default_type application/octet-stream;
index index.html index.htm;
keepalive_timeout 65;
server_tokens off;
server {
listen 80;
listen [::]:80;
server_name aoiyuma.mydns.jp;
root /var/apache2/d1;
}
server {
listen 80;
listen [::]:80;
server_name saigyou.sun.ddns.vc;
root /var/apache2/d2;
auth_basic Test site;
auth_basic_user_file /etc/nginx/.htpasswd;
}
}
but by using walking telephone , internal server error happens .
about apache2 , ' Require user XXX ' is needed
in nginx , is it not nessesary ?
---
tuyosi
Re: nginx how to run first site as open , and second
i think , think ,so i try archlinux's nginx .
the following /etc/nginx/nginx.conf goes well.
--
worker_processes 1;
events {
worker_connections 1024;
}
http {
include mime.types;
default_type application/octet-stream;
sendfileon;
keepalive_timeout 65;
server {
listen 80;
server_name a.mydns.jp;
root /srv/http;
index index.html index.htm;
}
server {
listen 80;
server_name s.sun.ddns.vc;
root /srv/http/Fam/;
index index.html index.htm;
auth_basic Restricted; #For Basic
Auth
auth_basic_user_file /etc/nginx/.htpasswd; #For Basic
Auth
}
}
in archlinux
21 nginx -V | tr -- - '\n' | grep _module is next
(see
http://serverfault.com/questions/223509/how-can-i-see-which-flags-nginx-was-compiled-with
)
imap_ssl_module
http_dav_module
http_gunzip_module
http_gzip_static_module
http_realip_module
http_spdy_module
http_ssl_module
http_stub_status_module
http_addition_module
http_degradation_module
http_flv_module
http_mp4_module
http_secure_link_module
http_sub_module
but in openbsd , there are much less modules by security first policy .
so basic auth except ssl is ineffective in openbsd , so i think .
-
tuyosi
Re: Upgrading issues (i386 on PPro class) 5.4-5.5 leaving system horked
On 2014-12-26, Damon Getsman damo.g...@gmail.com wrote: Right off the bat I got issues about 'Can't locate object method filter_obsolete via package OpenBSD::Quirks1 at /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/AddDelete.pm line 351'. This was at the 'final step', and there had been no hiccups during the sysmerging process that I wasn't used to. After this issue, I started having packages that the system was trying to reinstall but totally horked on. I'm not totally sure if this is comprehensive at this point, but here are the packages and what I had to do with them: * apcupsd - had to manually remove from pkg_list_manual * cups - ditto * fedora-base - ditto * ntop - ditto * hylafax smsmail or whatever - ditto I then ran into a bunch that I had to install unsigned, finally just hitting the 'a'll so as to stop having to manually intervene and say 'y'es on each one. These started with metaauto*, autoconf-2.69p0*, bash-4.2.45, beave, and then I lost track of the rest with the 'a'll install specified. The 5.5 packages *are* signed. I think you are trying to update packages from an incorrect source. Check that PKG_PATH in the environment and/or /etc/pkg.conf are valid for 5.5 and do pkg_add -D installed -u to update everything (this will reinstall all packages). Capture the output (e.g. with script) so if it fails you can show the exact output.
Re: Adding encryption support to vi(1)
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:02 AM, thornton.rich...@gmail.com wrote: I live in NJ. Should I beâ this paranoid, that every file I edit should be encrypted? Who has time for this type of craziness? Well, no one. I encrypt very few files. But keeping one's passwords and related administrivia safe, preventing unencrypted versions/tempfiles from accidentally being captured by running backups, etc. is hardly a rare use case. pwsafe (referring to the nox11 version) is a fine program but comes up a bit short if you want to include notes that are more than a brief comment, or what you want to save is not password/account-related. That's really all I was describing. On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote: So you describe something which is shit. Why would we want to add something shit to vi? It would fool people into bad practices. Who benefits? Exactly. Is there no middle ground between an encrypted partition and plain text? That's an honest question. Short of encrypting a partition, most tools (gpg, etc.) require decrypting a file to plain text and then reencrypting. I was just trying to avoid having to create unencrypted temporary/intermediate/recovery copies of files as part of the editing process. Can I ask what kind of plant are you? Most people have to content themselves with the I Got Flamed By Theo de Raadt http://www.zazzle.com/i_got_flamed_by_theo_de_raadt_t_shirt-2354533488287291 21 shirt, but I seem to have qualified for the new Theo de Raadt Asked if I Was a Spy shirt :-) -- andrew fabbro and...@fabbro.org blog: https://raindog308.com
Re: Adding encryption support to vi(1)
There's already a kitchen sink, it's called emacs.
Re: Adding encryption support to vi(1)
Is there no middle ground between an encrypted partition and plain text? Adding low-grade encrypt-with-password to lots of utilities like this does not make sense.
Re: openiked status
Hi Theo, On 24 December 2014 at 18:02, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote: The website for openiked[0] indicates it's under active development but I'm just curious to know if this is still a developing project or if it has been pretty much met all the goal?. Almost 10K of lines changed in the last year, so quite active. It is /sbin/iked I did not think to check there! Thanks for the pointer. (Would be difficult to make this portable to other systems, because the kernel / system interfaces vary so much in the ipsec area). Perhaps that's why the portal version hasn't been updated in awhile: https://github.com/reyk/openiked/ -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
OpenBSD projects
Hello All, Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? openssh (p) opensmtpd (p) mandoc (p) openntpd (p) openbgpd libressl (p) openiked (p?) pf relayd httpd carp Thanks, Jungle -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: OpenBSD projects
2014-12-26 18:42 GMT+01:00 jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com: Hello All, Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? openssh (p) opensmtpd (p) mandoc (p) openntpd (p) openbgpd libressl (p) openiked (p?) pf relayd httpd carp Thanks, Jungle -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si openiked isn't portable.
Re: OpenBSD projects
Hi Ludovic, On 26 December 2014 at 09:46, ludovic coues cou...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-12-26 18:42 GMT+01:00 jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com: openiked (p?) Thanks, Jungle openiked isn't portable. Thanks for the confirmation, That's pretty much what Theo stated as well but there's this page: https://github.com/reyk/openiked/ Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) daemon - portable version of OpenBSD iked -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: OpenBSD projects
Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? mandoc (p) Mandoc was not initiated by OpenBSD, although it got engulfed very quickly thanks to Ingo's hard work.
Re: OpenBSD projects
Hi Miod, On 26 December 2014 at 10:19, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote: Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? mandoc (p) Mandoc was not initiated by OpenBSD, although it got engulfed very quickly thanks to Ingo's hard work. Very true! http://mdocml.bsd.lv/porthistory.html (2008 Nov 22): start of development 1.7.12 (2009 Apr 6): OpenBSD base (2009 Apr 6, Kristaps Dzonsons) pkgsrc (2009 Apr 9) So about five months after it was created, it was in base! -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: OpenBSD projects
jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? How about tmux (p)?
Re: OpenBSD projects
Hi Carsten,0 On 26 December 2014 at 11:11, Carsten Kunze carsten.ku...@arcor.de wrote: jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? How about tmux (p)? Damn good one! Apologizes to the developer for omitting that! -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: OpenBSD projects
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 09:42:18AM -0800, jungle Boogie wrote: Hello All, Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? openssh (p) opensmtpd (p) mandoc (p) openntpd (p) openbgpd libressl (p) openiked (p?) pf relayd httpd carp Thanks, Jungle -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si I wrote our dc(1) and bc(1) about eleven years ago, they have been imported into freebsd at least. -Otto
Re: OpenBSD projects
Not sure, but what about cwm(1) and mg(1)? On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:23 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Carsten,0 On 26 December 2014 at 11:11, Carsten Kunze carsten.ku...@arcor.de wrote: jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? How about tmux (p)? Damn good one! Apologizes to the developer for omitting that! -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: OpenBSD projects
Todd norr...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure, but what about cwm(1) and mg(1)? I think cwm had been started as evilwm elsewhere, derived as cwm from evilwm (outside?) OpenBSD and later imported to the OpenBSD code base.
Re: OpenBSD projects
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 02:11:04PM EST, Carsten Kunze wrote: jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? How about tmux (p)? Nope - tmux(1), similarly to mandoc(1), has been started outside of OpenBSD (in 2007) and hadn't made its way to the project's CVS tree until 2009. BTW, some think that sudo(8) is an OpenBSD creation - that's not the case either. Regards, Raf
Re: OpenBSD projects
Hi Raf, On 26 December 2014 at 12:13, Raf r...@devio.us wrote: On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 02:11:04PM EST, Carsten Kunze wrote: jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? How about tmux (p)? Nope - tmux(1), similarly to mandoc(1), has been started outside of OpenBSD (in 2007) and hadn't made its way to the project's CVS tree until 2009. BTW, some think that sudo(8) is an OpenBSD creation - that's not the case either. Was Tim Miller (guy that created sudo, right?) an openbsd developer before/during/after/never when sudo was put in base in 2009? Regards, Raf -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: OpenBSD projects
Was Tim Miller (guy that created sudo, right?) an openbsd developer before/during/after/never when sudo was put in base in 2009? He's Todd Miller, he did not create sudo, and sudo was imported in 1999, not 2009.
Re: interesting question about shells
Bash and Zsh will already handle your first example without any tinkering. As Christian stated the completion systems are quite mature, I tend to prefer zsh myself. A good book that I recommend to get started is From Bash to Zsh. I found it easier to start with rather the supplied reference documentation. Hope that helps, Wayne On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 04:56:02PM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote: Hi, an interesting question has just come to my head: do you know of any shell that could complete from the terminal output of any of the previous command? like for example: i want it to complete from a result of ls, so I give the ls command, look at its output, then for example i type 'cat some prefixTAB' and it completes from the result of ls. now if i want for example ssh to any host, i give command cat .ssh/config, and then ssh some prefixTAB. is that at all possible? -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
Re: OpenBSD projects
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 9:36 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Raf, On 26 December 2014 at 12:13, Raf r...@devio.us wrote: On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 02:11:04PM EST, Carsten Kunze wrote: jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? How about tmux (p)? Nope - tmux(1), similarly to mandoc(1), has been started outside of OpenBSD (in 2007) and hadn't made its way to the project's CVS tree until 2009. BTW, some think that sudo(8) is an OpenBSD creation - that's not the case either. Was Tim Miller (guy that created sudo, right?) an openbsd developer before/during/after/never when sudo was put in base in 2009? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudo
Re: OpenBSD projects
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:36:11PM EST, jungle Boogie wrote: Hi Raf, Hi jungle Boogie, Was Tim Miller (guy that created sudo, right?) an openbsd developer before/during/after/never when sudo was put in base in 2009? As already pointed out - Todd C. Miller, not Tim. http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/history.html Regards, Raf P.S. Doing your own research doesn't hurt - I promise ;^)
Re: OpenBSD projects
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 09:42, jungle Boogie wrote: Hello All, Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? The now deleted gzsig!
Re: interesting question about shells
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:48:43PM -0500, Wayne Cuddy wrote: A good book that I recommend to get started is From Bash to Zsh. I found it easier to start with rather the supplied reference documentation. Does From Bash to Zsh cover ksh, csh, tcsh, etc...? It sounds like a great book idea, but it looks to me like the book literally just covers Bash and Zsh? Is that the case?
Re: A christmassy related issue with traceroute
Apologies, I must've missed something that was mentioned in the man pages, in OpenBSD it seems that addresses are printed for each attempt rather than (the other OS' tested, Win, Debian, Android) that seem to take the first returned name for example It just seemed odd as both the man pages on the other os' and OpenBSD state that three probes (by default) are sent at each ttl setting and a line is printed showing the ttl, address of the gateway and round trip time. It is just the first time I have seen this as other os that I have had experience of show things differently (as below). I don't understand why this default wrong behaviour is shown for others but figured this may be useful in the archives for others that don't understand the internet. 1072 ms 162 ms 983 ms ae53.edge2.newyork1.level3.net [4.71.230.101] 11 1245 ms 546 ms 2950 ms ae-240-3616.edge6.london1.level3.net [4.69.166.93] 12 127 ms 151 ms 165 ms ae-240-3616.edge6.london1.level3.net [4.69.166.93] 13 678 ms 2879 ms 245 ms high-speed.edge6.london1.level3.net [195.50.90.134] 14 1598 ms 999 ms 140 ms xe-3-4.core00.sov.uk.hso-group.net [46.17.60.173] 15 633 ms 2848 ms 140 ms xe-4-1.core00.tch.uk.hso-group.net [77.75.108.149] 16 3480 ms 572 ms 441 ms xe-4-1.core00.hex.uk.hso-group.net [77.75.108.153] 17 2853 ms 538 ms * xe-4-4.core00.lhc.uk.hso-group.net [77.75.108.158] 18 472 ms 1152 ms 569 ms xe-4-4.core00.tut.uk.hso-group.net [77.75.108.156] 19 2232 ms 574 ms * xe-4-1.core00.gs1.uk.hso-group.net [77.75.108.154] 20 543 ms 1654 ms 562 ms ae0-1203.edge00.sov.uk.hso-group.net [46.17.60.117] 21 1393 ms 198 ms 746 ms xoxoxoxoxoxo.ho.ho.ho.xoxoxoxoxoxo [93.89.84.75] 22 1195 ms 441 ms 173 ms xooxooo.v.ooxx [82.133.91.37] 23 475 ms 522 ms 226 ms ooxoxo.mmm.xxoooxo [82.133.91.18] 24 364 ms 3218 ms 638 ms oooxoxooo.e.oooxox [82.133.91.63] 25 143 ms 1862 ms 238 ms xooxooox.rrr.ooxox [82.133.91.56] 26 886 ms 745 ms 567 ms oxooxoo.r.oooxooxo [82.133.91.55] 27 * 431 ms * xoooxo.yyy.oooxxoo [82.133.91.58] 28 335 ms 118 ms 154 ms ooxoxo.ccc.xoooxoo [82.133.91.96] 29 2462 ms 1113 ms 554 ms oxooo.h.oxooox [82.133.91.23] 30 736 ms 1126 ms 153 ms ooxooxoo.rrr.ooxoooxoo [82.133.91.49] 31 309 ms 2658 ms 850 ms oxoooxo.i.oooxooxo [82.133.91.60] 32 271 ms 957 ms 3498 ms oooxoo.sss.oox [82.133.91.42] 33 934 ms 561 ms 2909 ms oooxoooxoo.ttt.xoo [82.133.91.61] 34 * 491 ms 2098 ms ooxoo.mm.oooxo [82.133.91.34] 35 112 ms 162 ms 558 ms xxoo..oxoo [82.133.91.80] 36 200 ms 343 ms 1077 ms oxo.ss.ooo [82.133.91.40] 37 1835 ms 471 ms 1073 ms ooxooo.xxx.oxo [82.133.91.35] 38 1418 ms 562 ms 1270 ms ox.xxx.xxo [82.133.91.10] 39 * 491 ms 554 ms oh.the.weather.outside.is.frightful [82.133.91.41] 40 142 ms 441 ms 551 ms but.the.fire.is.so.delightful [82.133.91.19] 41 561 ms * 492 ms and.since.weve.no.place.to.go [82.133.91.77] 42 3204 ms 558 ms 130 ms let.it.snow.let.it.snow.let.it.snow [82.133.91.43] 43 3431 ms 390 ms 698 ms xxx [82.133.91.24] 44 171 ms 1214 ms 118 ms it.doesnt.show.signs.of.stopping [82.133.91.36] 45 566 ms 3458 ms 550 ms and.ive.bought.some.corn.for.popping [82.133.91.73] 46 2168 ms 741 ms 555 ms the.lights.are.turned.way.down.low [82.133.91.76] 47 3315 ms 570 ms * let.it.snow.let.it.snow.let.it.snow [82.133.91.67] 48 124 ms 421 ms 598 ms xxx [82.133.91.38] 49 203 ms 1718 ms 194 ms when.we.finally.kiss.good.night [82.133.91.62] 50 332 ms * 918 ms how.ill.hate.going.out.in.the.storm [82.133.91.45] 51 498 ms 118 ms 116 ms but.if.youll.really.hold.me.tight [82.133.91.78] 52 2269 ms 549 ms * all.the.way.home.ill.be.warm [82.133.91.17] 53 759 ms * 496 ms xxx [82.133.91.70] 54 2375 ms 553 ms 1803 ms the.fire.is.slowly.dying [82.133.91.95] 55 555 ms 717 ms 550 ms and.my.dear.were.still.goodbying [82.133.91.57] 56 1950 ms 550 ms 1898 ms but.as.long.as.you.love.me.so [82.133.91.31] 57 2289 ms 108 ms 122 ms let.it.snow.let.it.snow.let.it.snow [82.133.91.53] 58 2782 ms 269 ms 141 ms ooo [82.133.91.94] 59 180 ms 150 ms 135 ms ho.ho.ho.are.we.having.fun.yet [82.133.91.64] 60 2707 ms 550 ms 570 ms m.e.r.r.y.c.h.r.i.s.t.m.a.s [82.133.91.86] 61 1421 ms 565 ms 455 ms ooo [82.133.91.15] 62 2127 ms 565 ms 519 ms dashing.through.the.snow [82.133.91.14] 63 2969 ms 570 ms 387 ms in.a.one-horse.open.sleigh [82.133.91.83] 64 1181 ms 141 ms
Re: OpenBSD projects
npppd ? ifstated ? On 12/26/2014 11:42 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: Hello All, Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? openssh (p) opensmtpd (p) mandoc (p) openntpd (p) openbgpd libressl (p) openiked (p?) pf relayd httpd carp Thanks, Jungle
Re: OpenBSD projects
arc4random OpenBSD Cryptographic Framework W^x patch's on Xenocara... [?]
Re: interesting question about shells
No really.. a lot of the basics are applicable to ksh (*sh) but *csh style shells aren't covered. On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 04:54:16PM -0500, Jonathon Sisson wrote: On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:48:43PM -0500, Wayne Cuddy wrote: A good book that I recommend to get started is From Bash to Zsh. I found it easier to start with rather the supplied reference documentation. Does From Bash to Zsh cover ksh, csh, tcsh, etc...? It sounds like a great book idea, but it looks to me like the book literally just covers Bash and Zsh? Is that the case?
Re: OpenBSD projects
Hi Raf, On 26 December 2014 at 12:56, Raf r...@devio.us wrote: On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:36:11PM EST, jungle Boogie wrote: Hi Raf, Hi jungle Boogie, Was Tim Miller (guy that created sudo, right?) an openbsd developer before/during/after/never when sudo was put in base in 2009? As already pointed out - Todd C. Miller, not Tim. http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/history.html Thanks! This looks really interesting. Regards, Raf P.S. Doing your own research doesn't hurt - I promise ;^) You're right. I had his first name mixed up but I knew he is an openbsd developer and at least maintained sudo. -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: OpenBSD projects
Hi Ted, On 26 December 2014 at 13:23, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 09:42, jungle Boogie wrote: Hello All, Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? The now deleted gzsig! Your too kind way to say that I forgot signigy! http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/signify And it looks like its portable as well. -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: OpenBSD projects
2014-12-26 18:42 GMT+01:00, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com: Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? opencvs Best Martin
Re: OpenBSD projects
Looks like openospfd is missing from the list. On Dec 26, 2014, at 7:34 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ted, On 26 December 2014 at 13:23, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 09:42, jungle Boogie wrote: Hello All, Here's a list of projects that I'm aware of that openBSD created. Is that correct? (p) is for portable. What else am I missing? The now deleted gzsig! Your too kind way to say that I forgot signigy! http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/signify And it looks like its portable as well. -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: Adding encryption support to vi(1)
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 1:33 AM, andrew fabbro and...@fabbro.org wrote: On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:02 AM, thornton.rich...@gmail.com wrote: I live in NJ. Should I be this paranoid, that every file I edit should be encrypted? Who has time for this type of craziness? Well, no one. I encrypt very few files. I think that's relevant. But keeping one's passwords and related administrivia safe, preventing unencrypted versions/tempfiles from accidentally being captured by running backups, etc. is hardly a rare use case. Let's draw a venn diagram of uses of vi and uses of a text editor capable of directly writing encrypted files. (Don't get me wrong. When I first read your original question, I was thinking, yeah, I might want one of those ./) pwsafe (referring to the nox11 version) is a fine program but comes up a bit short if you want to include notes that are more than a brief comment, or what you want to save is not password/account-related. That's really all I was describing. [...] Do one thing, do it well. Otherwise, it becomes difficult to prove correctness. Simple text editors are not hard to write, especially if you decide to not deal with variable width typefaces and such. I'd whip one up for you, but right now I'd probably be writing it in forth. 8-* Of course, gpg reads from standard input, so ... -- Joel Rees Be careful when you look at conspiracy. Look first in your own heart, and ask yourself if you are not your own worst enemy. Arm yourself with knowledge of yourself, as well.
Re: Discovering the keycode of key.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Eduardo Lopes dud...@gmail.com wrote: Hello folks! May someone point to me how do I can obtain, in the console, the keycode of any particular key, in OpenBSD? thanks Eduardo Lopes. showkey doesn't seem to be on my machine, but xev is. Is xev part of the standard X11 install? -- Joel Rees Be careful when you look at conspiracy. Look first in your own heart, and ask yourself if you are not your own worst enemy. Arm yourself with knowledge of yourself, as well.
Re: OpenBSD projects
Hi Nikolai, On 26 December 2014 at 16:49, Nikolai Fetissov niko...@fetissov.org wrote: Looks like openospfd is missing from the list. Would you consider that a companion to openbgpd since the site says: OpenBGPD's companions, ospfd(8), ospf6d(8), ripd(8), and dvmrpd(8) add support for the respective protocols. ldpd(8) and mpe(4) add MPLS support. http://www.openbgpd.org/ -- --- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si
Re: Discovering the keycode of key.
Joel Rees joel.rees at gmail.com writes: showkey doesn't seem to be on my machine, but xev is. Is xev part of the standard X11 install? Yes, xev is part of Xenocara, but I don´t think the keycodes on X correlates to that on wsconsctl, do they?
