Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

Thus said Gilles Chehade on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:48:57 +0100: > > I don't see this as necessarily an argument for or against - vs + > > > > too bad, it means my friend jean-pierre will not be able to be hosted > by you if you already host my other friend jean ;-) This is true, obviously. If on

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

Thus said "Constantine A. Murenin" on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:09:46 -0600: > > The MTA will decide who will get foo-bar@. > > How? A /dev/mind RPC? :-) Because the MTA is configured to handle it? :-) > And what happens if a "conflicting" user gets created after a mail was > sent, but before it was d

Re: uvm fault booting

It happened again. I'm using a laptop with a short power cord and sometimes I recline my recliner and don't notice it fell out. I'm usually only up here in the winter. Anyway I did the drive diagnostics again, saw the end this time and it didn't find anything wrong. Rebooted and it fscked the b

Debugging queues on pf

I'm seeing something very strange when I try to debug queues on pf. I'm simply trying to view queue activity on the net using either: # pfctl -vvsq or # systat queue I'm trying to assign all udp traffic from my iPad to a priority queue with a ruleset in pf like this: ... m

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:02:22PM -0600, Claus wrote: > On 3/3/2016 3:14 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:54:16AM +0100, ropers wrote: > >Won't question your need however this + vs - thing has come up often and > >I'd like to stress out that even though both - and + are vali

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:39:54PM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Gilles Chehade on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:14:48 +0100: > > > Who should get mail for foo-bar@ ? > > The MTA will decide who will get foo-bar@. > How ? > > This just doesn't happen with + because: > > It also doesn't happe

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

On 2 March 2016 at 14:19, Claus Niesen wrote: > Sorry for the off topic question but I'm hoping that maybe some of your > know of or work for an email hosting provider that provides minus/hyphen > ("-") addressing with custom domain. All I can find are provider that > offer plus addressing, which

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

On 3 March 2016 at 14:39, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Gilles Chehade on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:14:48 +0100: > >> Who should get mail for foo-bar@ ? > > The MTA will decide who will get foo-bar@. How? A /dev/mind RPC? :-) >> This just doesn't happen with + because: > > It also doesn't happen w

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

Thus said Gilles Chehade on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:14:48 +0100: > Who should get mail for foo-bar@ ? The MTA will decide who will get foo-bar@. > This just doesn't happen with + because: It also doesn't happen with an MTA that can figure these things out. I don't see this as necessarily an argume

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

On 3/3/2016 3:14 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:54:16AM +0100, ropers wrote: Won't question your need however this + vs - thing has come up often and I'd like to stress out that even though both - and + are valid, use of - introduces ambiguity given that - is allowed in user

Re: What's good safe PPC/MIPS/SPARC networking hardware with open firmware that works well with OpenBSD? Many ethernet plugs and 1U rack mount = bonus.

Tinker [ti...@openmailbox.org] wrote: > On 2016-02-28 05:26, Karel Gardas wrote: > >Open firmware? What do you mean by that precisely? > > Or just as little firmware as possible, just to minimize that as attack > vector. > > >Anyway, while asking such question it would also help if you tell > >so

Re: Question about logo

Thank you all, for answer me. OpenBSD its amazing, thankyou for your work. Happy user since 5.1 =) Yours Leonardo Saludos.- Leonardo Santagostini 2016-03-03 16:09 GMT-03:00 Theo de Raadt : > > There are people selling shirts on Zazzle, CafePress, et

Re: Question about logo

> There are people selling shirts on Zazzle, CafePress, etc. which have the > OpenBSD logo - easy to find via google. I'm assuming those people are not > authorized by OpenBSD nor do they pass on profits, alas. That is correct. There are layers of cheaters and enablers out there. Like playing w

Re: Question about logo

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Janne Johansson wrote: > http://www.openbsd.org/art1.html says: > > Most images provided here are copyright by OpenBSD, by Theo de Raadt, or by > other members or developers of the OpenBSD group. However, it is our intent > that anyone be able to use these images

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

On 3 March 2016 at 10:14, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > - is allowed in usernames: > > $ doas useradd -m foo > $ doas useradd -m foo-bar > > Who should get mail for foo-bar@ ? > > This just doesn't happen with + because: > > $ doas useradd -m bar > $ doas useradd -m bar+baz > useradd: `bar+ba

Re: OT: Looking for email host with qmail like minus-addressing for custom domain

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:54:16AM +0100, ropers wrote: > On 2 March 2016 at 23:59, Jason Barbier wrote: > > > [You're] probably going to have to suck it up at some point and use + > > [delimiters] like most people have moved to doing since according to the > > RFC - is a valid email address char