Re: OpenBSD 6.1 on Azure

Better with new lines... OpenBSD 6.1 (GENERIC.MP) #20: Sat Apr 1 13:45:56 MDT 2017 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 15015542784 (14319MB) avail mem = 14555783168 (13881MB) mpath0 at root scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets mainbus0 at root bios0 at m

OpenBSD 6.1 on Azure

Wanted to share the dmesg of an Azure VM running OpenBSD 6.1. Great job guys! Special shout out to Mike Belopuhov for the Hyper-V and Xen work. OpenBSD 6.1 (GENERIC.MP) #20: Sat Apr 1 13:45:56 MDT 2017 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 15015542784 (14

Re: OpenBSD 6.1 - bravo

Also from me, big thanks! 2017-04-12 16:45 GMT+08:00 Clément.J : > Thank you OpenBSD team for this new release 6.1 > OpenBSD makes me happy every day for so many usages > so thank you so much everyone for your great work. 2017-04-12 16:45 GMT+08:00 Clément.J : > Thank you OpenBSD team for th

Re: Are mips64 or sparc64 packages for 6.1 released yet?

> I'm missing packages for mips64 (for EdgeRouter Lite/ octeon ) or > sparc64 on official places: mips64le packages are not built. There is no hardware, no build cluster, no pkg builder to do it. BTW, a pkg builder is a real person who cares enough to observe and control this during the entire 6

Re: Are mips64 or sparc64 packages for 6.1 released yet?

> On 12 April 2017 at 12:01, Jan Vlach wrote: > > Is this intentional? (Long build times, lack of time ...) Is there a > > rough guesstimate when things migt be available? > > Have octeon packages ever been built? > > I'm very thankful for the rather regular octeon images. Those must > take a co

Free firmware for AR9285

I'm wondering why does Atheros AR9285 need binary firmware on OpenBSD? According to this wikipedia article [1] it works on Linux and FreeBSD with some free firmware. Is that in theory possible for OpenBSD to use it too? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open-source_wireless_drivers

Re: Are mips64 or sparc64 packages for 6.1 released yet?

On 12 April 2017 at 12:01, Jan Vlach wrote: > Is this intentional? (Long build times, lack of time ...) Is there a > rough guesstimate when things migt be available? Have octeon packages ever been built? I'm very thankful for the rather regular octeon images. Those must take a couple days to bui

Re: ftpsesame package

On 2017-04-12, Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:27:49 +0200, Olivier Regnier wrote: > >> "ftpsesame chroots to "/var/empty" and changes to user "proxy" to drop >> privileges. It does keep a file descriptor to both bpf >> (4)

installing Graphite on OpenBSD 6.0

Hello there, I was struggling yesterday to try to setup Collectd with Graphite on a OpenBSD 6.0 running over Virtualbox but couldn't complete the Graphite part of it. It seems Graphite is not entirely available to OpenBSD (package or ports): I was able to find and use ports for Carbon, but that's

Re: dmesg for Lenovo ThinkPad x200 w/coreboot

I've done it too, without FDE for now. My x200 feels good with coreboot and OpenBSD, there are no random lockups that Scott mentioned. >Thanks Scott, I've followed your instructions and everything seems to be >working well on my x200. I'll let you know if I experience the period >locking you menti

Re: Are mips64 or sparc64 packages for 6.1 released yet?

On 2017-04-12, Jan Vlach wrote: > I'm missing packages for mips64 (for EdgeRouter Lite/ octeon ) or > sparc64 on official places: Packages for alpha, mips64, mips64el, powerpc, and sparc64 are still being built. There's a choice. We can put the release on hold for everybody until the slow arch

Re: ftpsesame package

On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:27:49 +0200, Olivier Regnier wrote: > "ftpsesame chroots to "/var/empty" and changes to user "proxy" to drop > privileges. It does keep a file descriptor to both bpf > (4) and pf >

Re: OpenBSD as a non-routing access point

On Wednesday, 12 April 2017 14:40:28 -04 trondd wrote: > On Wed, April 12, 2017 4:27 am, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2017-04-12, Jordon wrote: > >>> rcctl enable dhcrelay > >>> rcctl set dhcrelay flags -i athn0 192.168.1.1 "assuming that is your > >>> routers > >> > >> address" > >> > >>> rcc

Re: OpenBSD as a non-routing access point

> On Apr 12, 2017, at 3:27 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2017-04-12, Jordon wrote: >>> rcctl enable dhcrelay >>> rcctl set dhcrelay flags -i athn0 192.168.1.1 "assuming that is your routers >> address" >>> rcctl start dhcrelay >>> >>> and possibly add -d (log to stderr) to see what its doing

Re: OpenBSD as a non-routing access point

> On Apr 12, 2017, at 1:47 PM, Mihai Popescu wrote: > > Because of titles like this post there is no clear anymore what > someone is reffering to when one is using words like bridge, switch, > hub, access point, router, ... > Add the IPv6 in the mix and you think you understand the spagetti of int

Re: OpenBSD as a non-routing access point

> On Apr 12, 2017, at 1:54 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:04:45PM -0500, Jordon wrote: >> /ets/hostname.athn0 >> media autoselect mode 11n media opt host ap chan 1 > > Is there actual whitespace between 'media' and 'opt' and between > 'host' and 'ap' in your config f

ftpsesame package

I runs on single laptop with OpenBSD 6.0 and PF. I use ftpsesame installed via package for FTP transactions and it works fine. System was upgraded to 6.1 and ftpsesame don't work anymore. When i run the following command: $ doas ftpsesame -d -i trunk0 I have this error: drop_privs: Undefine

Are mips64 or sparc64 packages for 6.1 released yet?

Hello misc, I'm missing packages for mips64 (for EdgeRouter Lite/ octeon ) or sparc64 on official places: at least: http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.1/packages/ http://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.1/packages/ https://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.1/packages/ I can see only amd64, arm,

Re: Intuos Draw (uwacom) question

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017, at 08:16, Peter J. Philipp wrote: > I'm interested in buying an Wacom Intuos Draw which is supported in > 6.1. However when I go to reichelt.de the model that's available says > CTL-490DW I don't know if DW is supported, can someone let me know? > > https://www.reichelt.de/G

Re: OpenBSD as a non-routing access point

Because of titles like this post there is no clear anymore what someone is reffering to when one is using words like bridge, switch, hub, access point, router, ... Add the IPv6 in the mix and you think you understand the spagetti of internet. Bleah, looking again at "non-routing access point". Wha

Re: OpenBSD as a non-routing access point

On Wed, April 12, 2017 4:27 am, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017-04-12, Jordon wrote: >>> rcctl enable dhcrelay >>> rcctl set dhcrelay flags -i athn0 192.168.1.1 "assuming that is your >>> routers >> address" >>> rcctl start dhcrelay >>> >>> and possibly add -d (log to stderr) to see what its doi

Re: OpenIKED and Windows 10 Client

If you're doing pure certificate auth, not eap I think you need both certs. They do need to be installed under the local computer account. Install the CA cert in the trusted root CA store, put the machine cert in the personal store. I also think it may be necessary to put the full asn1_dn of the

Re: OpenIKED and Windows 10 Client

On 2017-04-12, Markus Rosjat wrote: > Am 12.04.2017 um 11:49 schrieb Martijn van Duren: >> On 04/12/17 11:42, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> On 2017-04-11, Markus Rosjat wrote: I think the problem is with the windows site because it tells me there is no certificate to be found. I added the

Re: OpenIKED and Windows 10 Client

well I put the CA certs in the trusted CA Folder and the cert for the machine in "Eigene Zertifikate" in the local machine store it seems to be a problem on the windows site thought regards markus Am 12.04.2017 um 11:49 schrieb Martijn van Duren: On 04/12/17 11:42, Stuart Henderson wrote: O

Output of netstat -m shows lower value with higher kern.maxclusters

Hi, after i updated from 6.0 to 6.1, i saw that kern.maxclusters was raised and removed our local change to kern.maxclusters. Although the value is now way higher, the output shows a lower number than before: before the upgrade: ~ # sysctl kern.maxclusters kern.maxclusters=24578 ~ # netstat -m

Re: Adding default IPv6 route fails on 6.1

...on Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:12:28AM +0200, Sterling Archer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > > Try this instead: > > !/sbin/route add -inet6 default -ifp pppoe0 fe80::%pppoe0 > That did the trick, dhcpcd is receiving router advertisments from > my ISP no

Re: Adding default IPv6 route fails on 6.1

On 2017-04-12, Sterling Archer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:20:20AM +0200, Sterling Archer wrote: >> > Hello everyone. >> > >> > After upgrading to 6.1 about an hour ago, I noticed that I didn't have an >> > IPv6 connection >> >

Re: OpenIKED and Windows 10 Client

On 04/12/17 11:42, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017-04-11, Markus Rosjat wrote: >> I think the problem is with the windows site because it tells me there >> is no certificate to be found. I added the certificate to local machine >> store -> own certificates (at least in the german UI is no pers

Re: OpenIKED and Windows 10 Client

On 2017-04-11, Markus Rosjat wrote: > I think the problem is with the windows site because it tells me there > is no certificate to be found. I added the certificate to local machine > store -> own certificates (at least in the german UI is no personal folder) I think you're adding this cert to

Re: Blocking outgoing, non-privacy ext. IPv6 addresses' traffic?

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:48:50AM +0200, Florian Ermisch wrote: | Hi everyone, | | is there a way with to identify and filter | automatically generated, MAC-based IPv6 | addresses in pf? | I think there was some bit set or flipped in | the MAC-based or the RFC 4941 privacy | extensions based addr

Re: Adding default IPv6 route fails on 6.1

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > Try this instead: > > !/sbin/route add -inet6 default -ifp pppoe0 fe80::%pppoe0 > That did the trick, dhcpcd is receiving router advertisments from my ISP now. Thanks, Dimitris.

Re: Adding default IPv6 route fails on 6.1

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:20:20AM +0200, Sterling Archer wrote: > > Hello everyone. > > > > After upgrading to 6.1 about an hour ago, I noticed that I didn't have an > > IPv6 connection > > anymore. > > > > I use dhcpcd over a pppoe sessi

OpenBSD 6.1 - bravo

Thank you OpenBSD team for this new release 6.1 OpenBSD makes me happy every day for so many usages so thank you so much everyone for your great work. have a good day vive OpenBSD Le 12-04-2017 10:27, Stuart Henderson a écrit : On 2017-04-12, Jordon wrote: rcctl enable dhcrelay rcctl set dhc

Blocking outgoing, non-privacy ext. IPv6 addresses' traffic?

Hi everyone, is there a way with to identify and filter automatically generated, MAC-based IPv6 addresses in pf? I think there was some bit set or flipped in the MAC-based or the RFC 4941 privacy extensions based addresses. But I then still had to match an address based on a single bit (and the ne

Re: OpenBSD as a non-routing access point

On 2017-04-12, Jordon wrote: >> rcctl enable dhcrelay >> rcctl set dhcrelay flags -i athn0 192.168.1.1 "assuming that is your routers > address" >> rcctl start dhcrelay >> >> and possibly add -d (log to stderr) to see what its doing. >> > > Thank you! That got it working! So why is that necessar

Re: Adding default IPv6 route fails on 6.1

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:20:20AM +0200, Sterling Archer wrote: > Hello everyone. > > After upgrading to 6.1 about an hour ago, I noticed that I didn't have an > IPv6 connection > anymore. > > I use dhcpcd over a pppoe session, which worked fine in 6.0-stable. The > problem seems to > be a failu