Something else that should be considered is to enter a new term
"option_block" into the syntax specification, so instead of this:
connection option
directory option
hsts [option]
[no] log [option]
request option
tcp option
tls option
We now write the syntax as:
connection option|option_block
dir
httpd uses the configuration processor that relayd uses so I was curious to
see how this block of sub options were explained in relayd.conf(5) and
interestingly enough this is not explained there either but there are
examples of the multiple option block being used. One thing I learned from
relayd.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:17:56AM +0100, David Sastre wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 1:32 AM Mike Larkin wrote:
>
> > For what it's worth, we should probably allocate a real virtio device number
> > from Redhat or whoever controls that. I have an old email in my inbox with a
> > few contact na
On Mar 11, 2019 5:20 PM, Evan Silberman wrote:
>
> Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:29:41PM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote:
> > > Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Index: httpd.conf.5
> > > > ===
> > > > RCS
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:29:41PM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote:
> > Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > >
> > > Index: httpd.conf.5
> > > ===
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/httpd.conf.5,v
> > > retrieving revi
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:29:41PM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote:
> Jason McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > Index: httpd.conf.5
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/httpd.conf.5,v
> > retrieving revision 1.103
> > diff -u -r1.103 httpd.
Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> Index: httpd.conf.5
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/httpd.conf.5,v
> retrieving revision 1.103
> diff -u -r1.103 httpd.conf.5
> --- httpd.conf.5 19 Feb 2019 11:37:26 - 1.103
> +++ htt
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:59:30AM -0700, Evan Silberman wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 10, 2019, at 11:55 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > +Directives which take multiple
> > +.Ar option
> > +values may themselves be grouped in curly brackets.
>
> I think this implies that the directives (which take
On 2019-03-11 16:38, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:34:58AM +, Geir Svalland wrote:
>> On 2019-03-11 09:58, Janne Johansson wrote:
>>> Den fre 8 mars 2019 kl 20:59 skrev Sean Kamath :
> It's a shame good work like this is
> of no use anymore. According to my opinio
> On Mar 10, 2019, at 11:55 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> +Directives which take multiple
> +.Ar option
> +values may themselves be grouped in curly brackets.
I think this implies that the directives (which take multiple option values)
may be grouped in curly brackets rather than implying th
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:34:58AM +, Geir Svalland wrote:
>
> On 2019-03-11 09:58, Janne Johansson wrote:
> > Den fre 8 mars 2019 kl 20:59 skrev Sean Kamath :
> >>> It's a shame good work like this is
> >>> of no use anymore. According to my opinion, it's well written and easy to
> >>> follo
Den mån 11 mars 2019 kl 14:11 skrev Ipsen S Ripsbusker
:
>
> I want a few things to happen as soon as I get an internet connection
> after not having had one.
> It would suffice to add a crontab entry that runs the attachment
> periodically.
ifstated(8) can be taught to watch over an interface and
I want a few things to happen as soon as I get an internet connection
after not having had one. For example, if I am offline during a long bus
trip with a 40-minute transfer but I manage to find a coffee shop
with internet access during the transfer, I want to run the things
the moment I get access
I get this error too.
Alfred Morgan wrote:
> I am on OpenBSD 6.4 amd64 also getting this error message. It seems to be
> caused by my USB serial device. If I plug it into a Windows machine then
> Windows reports that the device is malfunctioning. If I plug into OpenBSD
> 6.4 then I get the usbd_fr
Dear list,
https://thehackernews.com/2019/03/update-google-chrome-hack.html
claims there is a serious vulnerability in chrome.
I run stable 6.4, with the 69.0.3497.100p0 version, while they advice
upgrading to 72.0.3626.121.
What should I do if I want to stay on the stable branch and have a
secu
On 2019-03-11 09:58, Janne Johansson wrote:
> Den fre 8 mars 2019 kl 20:59 skrev Sean Kamath :
>>> It's a shame good work like this is
>>> of no use anymore. According to my opinion, it's well written and easy to
>>> follow.
>>>
>> So, I’ll take issue with the “well written” part of that. It do
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 1:32 AM Mike Larkin wrote:
> For what it's worth, we should probably allocate a real virtio device number
> from Redhat or whoever controls that. I have an old email in my inbox with a
> few contact names, but I never got around to following up. That would fix the
> proble
Den fre 8 mars 2019 kl 20:59 skrev Sean Kamath :
> > It's a shame good work like this is
> > of no use anymore. According to my opinion, it's well written and easy to
> > follow.
> >
>
> So, I’ll take issue with the “well written” part of that. It doesn’t do much
> in the way of explaining anyth
18 matches
Mail list logo
