On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 05:12:20AM +, Roderick wrote:
>
> "-o union" was last in 3.7, disappeared in 3.8. Was there a reason?
It was broken and complicated the filesystem code beyond measure.
-Otto
>
> https://man.openbsd.org/OpenBSD-3.7/mount
>
> Rodrigo
>
> > What also would
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 05:27:52PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019-06-02, Артур Истомин wrote:
> > I'm trying update BIOS on alix2d13 board with flashrom ver 1.0 on OpenBSD
> > 6.5
> >
> > # flashrom -w alix1.bin -p internal
> > flashrom v1.0 on OpenBSD 6.5 (i386)
> > flashrom is free
"-o union" was last in 3.7, disappeared in 3.8. Was there a reason?
https://man.openbsd.org/OpenBSD-3.7/mount
Rodrigo
What also would be practical is a "mount -o union" like in FreeBSD,
but unfortunately I do not see it in OpenBSD.
Then one could mount a mfs system over a normal one, only
What also would be practical is a "mount -o union" like in FreeBSD,
but unfortunately I do not see it in OpenBSD.
Then one could mount a mfs system over a normal one, only to be read.
Rodrigo
Look at -P option in mount_mfs.
Rodrigo
> On Jun 3, 2019, at 6:46 PM, Cord wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have found the following errors on the log:
>
> /bsd: chrome[18585]: pledge "", syscall 289
>
> they appear everytime I start chrome.. they are about 4 or 5, what means?
> It's the first time, yesterday and in the past there aren't any.
>
On 6/4/19 3:30 PM, Mogens Jensen wrote:
I'm going to build a router for use in a remote location, and I have
chosen OpenBSD 6.5 for the task. Unfortunately, it's not possible to
protect the router with an UPS, so it will have to be resilient enough
to survive sudden power outages and still
Mon, 3 Jun 2019 22:32:16 + Josef Pospisil
> Hey, thank you all for this mailing list.
>
> I have a question regarding the security of OpebBSD.
See https://www.openbsd.org/security.html
On 6/4/19 1:29 PM, Mogens Jensen wrote:
> I'm going to build a router for use in a remote location, and I have
> chosen OpenBSD 6.5 for the task. Unfortunately, it's not possible to
> protect the router with an UPS, so it will have to be resilient enough
> to survive sudden power outages and still
On 2019-06-04, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> I'd love to have one as well...
I hadn't intended to buy a new laptop anytime soon, but the Thinkpad
X395 is tempting...
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
there is also an option for setting fsck to approve fixes without a prompt
..
but I cant think of it off the top of my head... and this would be useful
to set on your routers also
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 21:05, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hi Mogens,
>
> there are a number of threads on this if you
Hi Mogens,
there are a number of threads on this if you search the misc archives on
marc.info,
but setting softdep,noatime mount options on /etc/fstab is advisable
for routers I tend to use mfs for partitions that tend to get written to
alot
the following entries (/etc/fstab) show How I use
On 04/06/2019, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Also see Ken Thompson's classic paper, "Reflections on Trusting Trust",
> especially the moral.
That moral brought back memories of The Hacker Crackdown by Bruce
Sterling, which is freely available online and which I'd happily
recommend to anyone remotely
I'm going to build a router for use in a remote location, and I have
chosen OpenBSD 6.5 for the task. Unfortunately, it's not possible to
protect the router with an UPS, so it will have to be resilient enough
to survive sudden power outages and still boot without manual
intervention.
In the past
I tried loading current on the device and the same result:
OpenBSD 6.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #5: Mon Jun 3 07:46:49 MDT 2019
# netstat -in
NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IfailOpkts Ofail Colls
lo0 327680 00 0 0
lo0
There was a crash fixed in bridge(4) a few weeks ago, can you try reproducing
on -current?
On 2019-06-04, Lee Nelson wrote:
> I have twice seen kernel panics in the same situation. It drops to "ddb>"
> but the system is unresponsive. Unfortunately, other than taking a picture
> of the screen
I'd love to have one as well...
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:16:51AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I am hoping to get one also... and as a rule whatever I get my hands on tends
> to work out well.
>
> danieljb...@icloud.com wrote:
>
> > I just ordered some E495s (not 'T', but pretty similar). I
I have twice seen kernel panics in the same situation. It drops to "ddb>"
but the system is unresponsive. Unfortunately, other than taking a picture
of the screen with my cellphone, I do not have any further information from
the system. On both occasions, I was issuing "ifconfig bridge42" without
Hi Russell
I had this issue when bridging vio() interfaces in kvm / proxmox ... but
not with em() interfaces
can you try with a uni-processor kernel ... to see does it crash / dump
? mpi@ had asked me to enable witness in the kernel and send the output
of the dumps
(I haven't gotten around
I began to install resflash (https://stable.rcesoftware.com/resflash/) which is
based on OpenBSD) to build a small firewall on an PC Engines apu2 board. Three
interfaces, two bridged and one with an IP for management.
I found the system would crash and drop down to the debugger interface
On 2019-06-03, Josef Pospisil wrote:
> Hey, thank you all for this mailing list.
>
> I have a question regarding the security of OpebBSD.
You can't really trust an answer to this question. What if somebody put
in a backdoor but they're the person who answers saying everything's fine?
> I am
21 matches
Mail list logo
