Hi John,
jo...@armadilloaerospace.com wrote on Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 04:28:53PM -0700:
> I was considering making a kernel patch that reported it was
> an exFATfilesystem
Sounds like a layering violation. The table of file system IDs
is in userland - /usr/src/sbin/fdisk/part.c - rather than in t
On 8/6/20 5:47 PM, Bryan Steele wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 02:16:11PM -0700, jo...@armadilloaerospace.com wrote:
With Microsoft's release of the [exFAT] spec last year, is the path open for
kernel support now, when someone gets around to it?
I don't know the details, but I believe one issue
I was considering making a kernel patch that reported it was an exFATfilesystem
when the mount failed, which you would see if you were onttyC0, or could
call up with dmesg, as with the kernel messages thathappen when you first
plug a drive in.
Is there a concise "philosophy" of when the kernel shou
Hi all
May be that can help, something like this :
pass in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port $tcp_services
(max-src-conn 50, max-src-conn-rate 5/5, overload flush global)
I use it to black list ip that do to many ssh or other tcp services
simultaneous connections, but in your
On 2020-08-06 13:46, Alan McKay wrote:
So I want to implement rate limiting, and to determine a reasonable
rate based on current traffic patterns I'd like to be able to figure
out which source IPs are generating the most connections and at what
rate.
Is there a way to do that?
There is li
So I want to implement rate limiting, and to determine a reasonable
rate based on current traffic patterns I'd like to be able to figure
out which source IPs are generating the most connections and at what
rate.
Is there a way to do that?
--
"You should sit in nature for 20 minutes a day.
Unle
Den tors 6 aug. 2020 kl 18:40 skrev :
> Hardkernel, a Korean company, make an alternative to the Raspberry Pi, the
> latest being the 'Odroid C4', CPU manufactured by Amlogic (American).
> I owned an ODROID board in the past and was impressed with the hardware.
> However, the software support for
Hardkernel, a Korean company, make an alternative to the Raspberry Pi, the
latest being the 'Odroid C4', CPU manufactured by Amlogic (American).
Unlike the Pi 4 which uses an A72, the C4 uses a CPU without Spectre bugs - the
A55. This is an iteration onwards from the A53 which was used in the Pi
Just to chime in uselessly, I am having no end of trouble with IPv6 on
various machines. I cannot get IPv6 to work either on my PC-ENGINES
APU connected to a FRITZ!box or my VPS at tinykvm.com; but for
whatever reason things work better (although not completely) at
vultr.com. As far as I know the s
Dear Janne,
traceroute6 -I ipv6.google.com
traceroute6 to ipv6.l.google.com (2a00:1450:4001:81b::200e), 64 hops max, 60
byte packets
1 2a03:4000:24::3 (2a03:4000:24::3) 0.384 ms 0.558 ms 0.563 ms
2 2a00:11c0:47:3::20 (2a00:11c0:47:3::20) 0.887 ms 0.545 ms 0.421 ms
3 2a00:11c0:47:1:47::14
No, I think in my case it is Juniper multichassis LAG (link aggregation
groups) getting confused by identical fe80::x for multiple local v6
networks, or something to that effect.
How does the traceroute6's look when it "works"? If you get a "real" v6
there you might (ab)use that as the gw ip?
De
I have a setup where the virtualization (KVM) combined with the networking
does present a IPv6 def-gw as both an fe80:: and
the more normal 2001:a:b:c:d::1/64 and where the 2001-v6 ip works far
better on virtual machines due to redundancy mac sync things on the network
side, and since the ndp list
Hello, misc;
I've been attempting to use OpenBSD libxcb to find the process ID of a window.
The function used to retrieve the PID is as follows:
pid_t
winpid(Window w)
{
pid_t result = 0;
xcb_res_client_id_spec_t spec = {0};
spec.client = w;
spec.mask = XCB_RES_CL
Hello, misc;
I've been attempting to use OpenBSD libxcb to find the process ID of a window.
The function used to retrieve the PID is as follows:
pid_t
winpid(Window w)
{
pid_t result = 0;
xcb_res_client_id_spec_t spec = {0};
spec.client = w;
spec.mask = XCB_RES_CL
Hi,
* kug1977 wrote:
>
> Is this something wrong configured on OpenBSD server or is this something
> the provider has to check on the gateway side?
I also have a VM at the exact same provider (netcup) and face
the same problem. Since all of my VMs at different providers are
identical (base inst
Hi @ all,
I have setup a virtual machine running OpenBSD 6.7 on a hosting
provider with public IPs on the machine. I’m not able to get IPv6
working stable which leads to the situation, that the server is not
usable with IPv6. And now I reached the end of my troubleshooting
skills and hope one of t
16 matches
Mail list logo
