Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-14 Thread Theo de Raadt
The problem appears to be here: > wdc2 at pcmcia0 function 0 "TRANSCEND, TS8GCF133, " port 0x340/16: irq 3 > wd1 at wdc2 channel 0 drive 0: > wd1: 1-sector PIO, LBA48, 7647MB, 15662304 sectors > wd1(wdc2:0:0): using BIOS timings > a: 1060.6M 64 4.2BSD 2048 16384

Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-14 Thread Patrick Harper
Hi All, The installation program on my Intel P5/80MB RAM machine works fine up to 'Relinking to create unique kernel...', during which the system either reboots or eventually prints a kernel panic message. If 80MB is not enough under normal circumstances then it's not worth debugging.

Re: CWM+Xterm+Tmux+Vim & Copy/Paste

2021-07-14 Thread Samuel Banya
Hey there, I'll repaste my entire Tmux config to see if you would want to copy and paste a few options that might be useful, again, check out 'gotbletu's videos on Tmux since you might learn a few more things you never knew: `# Set Default Terminal Emulator: set -g default-terminal "urxvt" #

Re: VLANs isolation

2021-07-14 Thread Radek
Thank you Claudio for pointing me in the right direction. My testing pf.conf seems to work as expected: - vlan1002:network can ping vlan1003:network only - vlan1003:network can't ping vlan1002:network - there is no routing between other vlans set block-policy drop set loginterface egress set

ahci_put_err_ccb on resume

2021-07-14 Thread Jan Stary
This is current/amd64 on a PC (dmesg below). Two of my big disks show errors after a resume from zzz. Here is a snippet of the error messages (full log below): ahci_get_err_ccb but SACT 8000 != 0? ahci_get_err_ccb but SACT 0004 != 0? ahci_get_err_ccb but SACT 0020 != 0?

Re: CWM+Xterm+Tmux+Vim & Copy/Paste

2021-07-14 Thread David Anthony
Thank you everyone for your helpful responses. Initially I was trying to synchonize with keyboard shortcuts on my Macbook (i.e., use Vim + Tmux similarly across all operating systems), but it proved unfruitful due to complications around remapping the Command key on MacOS. I was also trying to

Re: Why demotion counter for group carp is set to 33 on boot?

2021-07-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Tom K wrote: > > > > but why? If I reboot the other node, the system become MASTER. > > > > That is because the other system stops sending carp announcements > > when you reboot it. This is unrelated to the demote counter. The demote > > counter only

Re: Why demotion counter for group carp is set to 33 on boot?

2021-07-14 Thread Tom K
but why? If I reboot the other node, the system become MASTER. That is because the other system stops sending carp announcements when you reboot it. This is unrelated to the demote counter. The demote counter only matters as long as another carp MASTER remains visible. A forced failover like

Re: Why demotion counter for group carp is set to 33 on boot?

2021-07-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 08:28:09AM +0200, Tom K wrote: > JP, > > but why? If I reboot the other node, the system become MASTER. That is because the other system stops sending carp announcements when you reboot it. This is unrelated to the demote counter. The demote counter only matters as long

Re: Why demotion counter for group carp is set to 33 on boot?

2021-07-14 Thread Tom K
JP, but why? If I reboot the other node, the system become MASTER. At this time, no other system has more recent rule states and the 2nd system comes back, the 1st will fall to BACKUP although it has no adskew settings and demotecount still on 33. I'm very confused about this issue. Am