Re: Running OpenBSD on Raspberry Pi

2012-12-31 Thread Brad Smith
- Original message - Excuse me, but isn't it a sadomasochism to run all those stuff on this kind of hardware? Why would you say that? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Re: Running OpenBSD on Raspberry Pi

2012-12-31 Thread Brad Smith
- Original message - Because I don't see it handle pressureā€¦.. Sure arcade and siri proxy are fun, but x86-based hw for those same tasks is probably out thereā€¦. You're making assumptions without knowing what the user is doing with the hardware. -- This message has been scanned for

Re: 5.2 vs 5.1

2012-12-31 Thread Brad Smith
- Original message - On 12/30/12 05:51, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 09:01:41AM +, J Boehm wrote: I have recently tried out 5.2 on a slightly dated hardware (nvidia based, Athlon, 500MB Ram). Working with Seamonkey or Xombrero seems to be slow, pages

Re: rsu problem

2012-12-31 Thread Brad Smith
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:53:07PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:36:02AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On 12/30/12 00:56, Zoran Kolic wrote: Dongle blinks and the system gives a message: rsu0: could not send site survey command This is a known bug in the driver

Re: rsu problem

2012-12-30 Thread Brad Smith
On 12/30/12 00:56, Zoran Kolic wrote: Dongle blinks and the system gives a message: rsu0: could not send site survey command This is a known bug in the driver. It makes the driver essentially unusable. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is

Re: bnx support

2012-05-15 Thread Brad Smith
On 15/05/12 5:44 PM, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote: Hi Looking at the man page for em and bnx drivers On em I can read it supports jumbo frames. But bnx man page says nothing about this. Does it mean it's just missing in the man page or is it the fact that bnx wont support jumbo frames? The

Re: acer aspire one D270

2012-05-05 Thread Brad Smith
On 05/05/12 10:40 AM, Weldon Goree wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 19:26 -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: The only google hit for netbsd ignphy is... your email. ??? My mistake -- I was seeing igphy(4), which is for the ethernet, not the wireless. At any rate, the iwn(4) driver does not need Intel's

Re: ipv6, rtadvd.conf, raflags

2012-04-27 Thread Brad Smith
On 27/04/12 7:46 AM, David Diggles wrote: The man page could use some work especially clarifying the use of raflags and pinfoflags. To set the O flag alone use ``raflags#64''. To set both M and O use ``raflags#192''. Thanks Brad. I still can't get rtadvd to automatically assign dynamic

Re: ipv6, rtadvd.conf, raflags

2012-04-27 Thread Brad Smith
On 27/04/12 10:56 PM, David Diggles wrote: I am just not doing a very good job of explaining. I am not confused about the role of each daemon. I am setting up a router and that is why I am using rtadvd. But you're using rtadvd improperly. I am confused about which daemon gets the address

Re: ipv6, rtadvd.conf, raflags

2012-04-20 Thread Brad Smith
On 20/04/12 8:48 AM, David Diggles wrote: Hi misc, Trying to get stateless autoconf working with rtadvd. The following message is in my log: rtadvd[32332]: O flag inconsistent on pppoe0: ON from fe80::224:14ff:fe9a:bc00, OFF from us The rtadvd.conf(5) man page does not make much sense to me

Re: Does cvsync let ancient patches escape from the attic?

2012-02-10 Thread Brad Smith
On 10/02/12 2:11 AM, Brett wrote: On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:26:22 -0500 Constantine A. Mureninmuren...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/02/2012, Brettbrett.ma...@gmx.com wrote: Somehow patch-apps_unix_ximage_c has gotten in there, even though (according to

Re: Compiling R from source

2012-02-06 Thread Brad Smith
On 06/02/12 5:08 AM, Peter Hessler wrote: Including missing headers is completely the correct fix, please submit the patches to the upstream author. As long as the patches are right. The hack mentioned below is wrong. The broken header file in question has been fixed. Update to -current or

<    1   2