On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:58:34PM +0200, Pierre Riteau wrote:
> On 9/19/06, Reyk Floeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >hi,
> >
> >i recently enabled support for some newer wireless chipsets from
> >atheros, like the AR2413, AR5413, and AR5424 single chip solutio
hi,
i recently enabled support for some newer wireless chipsets from
atheros, like the AR2413, AR5413, and AR5424 single chip solutions.
please also test it if you have an intel-based mac - the integrated
wireless NIC is based on the pci express AR5424 chipset.
it's not fully working, yet. my AR
hi,
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 12:19:42PM -0700, Tom Bombadil wrote:
> This subject always comes up in the list, but due to the evolving nature
> of the the driver, we (non-developers) always have to keep bugging
> people about it.
>
> How's the status of the broadcom bge(4) drive?
> Is it stable an
> Hi all.
>
> When it comes to auditing wireless networks, I notice that linux users
> lives
> happily with aireplay from aircrack suite. Unfortunately, it seems like
> there is no any tool similar to aireplay in BSD world. In past days, we
> had
> wnet suite, with reinj and dinject, but those days
Now my question is: Is carp supposed to work on trunk interfaces? If yes:
> what trunkproto would be best applied to such a setup? Should it work in
> 3.8 already or do I need to grab 3.9 or even -current?
>
> thx /markus
>
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free software engineer
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://team.vantronix.net/reyk/
*/
o 3D Stereo
> audio0 at auich0
> isa0 at ichpcib0
> isadma0 at isa0
> pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
> pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
> pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
> wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
> pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
> midi0 at pcppi0:
> spkr0
Hi,
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 06:01:21PM -0400, Bryan Chapman wrote:
> I have been trying to get a wireless card that works on openbsd. I bought the
> dwl-g520 (revision B) because it should run under the ath driver.
>
> ath0 at pci1 dev 9 function 0 "Atheros AR5212" rev 0x01: irq 10
> ath0: AR521
Hi,
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
I'm having a hard time understanding _precisely_ the 2 modes for trunk(4).
Can anyone confirm this (using 2 physical interfaces to create a trunk and a
crappy 100Mbs non-manageable switch):
you should use failover mode with the non-manageable switch.
- failover
03df732) at ath_media_change+0x37
> ifmedia_ioctl(d1ce6030,dbc61e78,d1ce69e4,c0206935) at ifmedia_ioctl+0xe4
> ieee80211_ioctl(d1ce6030,c0206935,dbc61e78,d4d4e008) at ieee80211_ioctl+0x284
> ath_ioctl(d1ce6030,c0206935,dbc61e78,d03ee9ed) at ath_ioctl+0x1be
> ifioctl(d4d5819c,c0206935,dbc61e78,d4d4e008) at ifioctl+0x634
> soo_ioctl(d4dd0e70,c0206935,dbc61e78,d4d4e008) at soo_ioctl+0x1dd
> sys_ioctl(d4d4e008,dbc61f58,dbc61f50,0) at sys_ioctl+0x552
> syscall() at syscall+0x2c0
> --- syscall (number 54) ---
> 0xbf869a1:
> End of stack trace.
>
>
> Any clues? Am I missusing the commands?
>
> Best regards,
> Mitja
>
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free software engineer
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://team.vantronix.net/reyk/
*/
ups: pppoe egress
inet6 fe80::203:1dff:fe01:a31f%pppoe0 -> prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa
inet 82.xx.xx.xx --> 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x
---snap---
reyk
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free software engineer
* [EMA
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:56:20PM +0400, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> looking at /var/log/daemon, it seems that hostapd syslog timestamp
> does not take care of local timezone :
>
thanks, just commited the fix using tzset()
reyk
> May 13 16:49:12 puffy test_syslog[6582]: This is just
hi,
some cut'n'paste errors... anyway, it's just an example.
Reyk Floeter wrote:
ap# cat /etc/ipsec.conf
flow esp out from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.2 type bypass
ike passive esp from 10.0.0.0/30 to any peer 10.0.0.2 \
dstid peer1.wlan.local
flow esp out from 10.0.0.5 to 10.0.0.6
Damon McMahon wrote:
Perhaps my understanding of ieee80211(9) and isakmpd(8) is awry?
I have a simple WLAN setup, where there is a combined internet
gateway/wireless AP, and several wireless nodes. I want each wireless
node to be able to connect to all others for file sharing, etc and the
connec
Luiz Otavio Souza wrote:
Damon McMahon wrote:
My query is what I should/need to do to enable flows between the two
non-AP peers 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3? Should flows be routed
through the access point at the IP layer (hence the AP acts as a
gateway for all hosts in the WLAN), or should flo
Damon McMahon wrote:
My query is what I should/need to do to enable flows between the two
non-AP peers 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3? Should flows be routed through
the access point at the IP layer (hence the AP acts as a gateway for all
hosts in the WLAN), or should flows through the access poin
HI,
Sky McKinley wrote:
ugen1: Belkin USB2.0 WLAN, rev 2.00/48.10, addr 2
From the archives, the ural driver should be picking this up but it's not.
could you show us the output from
# usbdevs -v
reyk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
having had a gander at the 3.9 song, which is quite amusing, i had an idea that
might be useful and i suspect it is ill-conceived. i have the utmost confidence
that readers of misc@ can quickly elucidate why it is a stupid idea.
if the integrity of closed-source binary b
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:54:04AM +0100, Huzeyfe Onal wrote:
> not bsd-ids.org, try http://www.bro-ids.org/ address.
>
yes, sorry for this typo ;)
reyk
ery powerful, supports
snort rules and is also supported by most of the hybrid IDS frameworks
(like prelude-ids). bro claims that their own context-based rule
language is even more powerful than the snort stuff.
reyk
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floete
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:53:15PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> 3.) The laptops are using /30 subnets in the 172.16.0.0/16 range and
> they're reachable via the VPN. Have a look at ssh_config(5) or the
> src/usr.bin/ssh/README.tun file for details. SSH-VPN can be used
> almost
d it's the ideal solution for
mobile users with temporary connections.
and it just works... :)
Currently, all the ipsec-hosts are running OpenBSD (what else?) and
the Laptops are running OpenBSD, Linux and MacOS X 10.4.
reyk
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & deve
pkr0 at pcppi0
> npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16
> pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
> pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
> biomask ffe5 netmask ffe5 ttymask ffe7
> pctr: 686-class user-level performance counters enabled
> mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
> uhub2 at uhub1 port 2
> uhub2: ALCOR Generic USB Hub, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2
> uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered
> ahc0: target 0 using 16bit transfers
> ahc0: target 0 synchronous at 80.0MHz DT, offset = 0x7f
> dkcsum: sd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
> root on sd0a
> rootdev=0x400 rrootdev=0xd00 rawdev=0xd02
>
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free software engineer
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://team.vantronix.net/reyk/
*/
David Elze wrote:
On the other hand, 'flowd -d' breaks with "chdir(/nonexistent): No such
file or directory" though the only configurable directory seems to be
the one in /etc/flowd.conf which is correct.
looks like the home directory of the unprivileged flowd _user_.
you should try 'usermod
Ted Unangst wrote:
you can use whatever libraries you like. what's the point of a "more
free" distro when the only use for emulation is to run non-free
software?
or non-portable software like OpenOffice
reyk
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 11:37:34AM -0200, Celso Fernandes wrote:
> I would like to know why I can't trunk virtual interfaces on 3.8 realease?
> what is the real reason for this? I took a look at the trunk manual, but I
> found nothing.. thanks in any way.
>
why?
what kind of virtual interface?
0::203:1dff:fe01:a34e%trunk0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9
easy stuff!
i didn't test any other vendors. switch donations are welcome! ;)
i'll eventually add some new trunkprotos after the lock (like MAC
SA/DA, IP SA/DA, IP port) for load balancing issues. and probably
802.3ad/LACP in the fa
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:00:17PM -0500, Axton wrote:
> Is there a capability with pf to send packets to userspace for
> handling/manipulation, whereby they can be returned back to the
> kernel, similar to the queue facilities available in iptables?
>
no.
but for IP-based connections you could
Hallo,
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:04:44PM +0700, Yuri Spirin wrote:
> I have this server to play for a while: IBM x346 (8840-2BG, 2xXeon
> 3.2GHz/2048MB RAM) with ServeRAID 7k controller onboard (equipped with
> BBU it is really fast - checked in Windows). Print on chip says that
> it is Adaptec A
silently changing chipset versions on
> every new release of the same card...
>
!!!
reyk
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free software engineer
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://team.vantronix.net/reyk/
*/
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:17:14PM +0100, Alexandre wrote:
> I have an atheros based card on my OpenBSD 3.8.
> When I activate it, I have this error message
>
> ath0: bogus xmit rate 0x0
>
could you please try it with the following patch for ath again? it
won't fix the problem, it just adds addi
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:17:14PM +0100, Alexandre wrote:
> I have an atheros based card on my OpenBSD 3.8.
> When I activate it, I have this error message
>
> ath0: bogus xmit rate 0x0
>
i recently changed the driver to use rssadapt(9) but there seems to be
a bug under some circumstances. plea
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:13:16AM -0800, Dag Richards wrote:
> Trunking does not yet support link aggregation, or failover.
>
> So, no not yet.
???
you mean, it does not support LACP.
and in 3.8-current it even supports a simple failover mode.
reyk
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:38:22PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> I saw today that freebsd6 supports wpa (actually, I haven't tried it yet).
>
and i don't like the implementation.
> I don't a doubt that ipsec, or other vpn software is more secure.
> But from a feature point of view, are the
x|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free software engineer
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://team.vantronix.net/reyk/
*/
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:51:10AM -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> I am in doubt reading the following paragraph:
>
> "The driver currently supports the trunk protocols roundrobin [default],
> failover, and none for link aggregation and link failover."
>
> Does the part "... and none for link a
hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:48:19AM -0700, Robert N White wrote:
> I just wanted to hear whether you have any comments to
> a mail sent to the m0n0wall development mailing list
> that states the following:
>
> (See http://m0n0.ch/wall/list-dev/showmsg.php?id=12/83
> for the full message.)
>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:51:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it possible to connect to multiple WLANs at the same time with just one
> WLAN-NIC?
supported- no
possible- yes (same channel, not possible with all drivers, probably slow)
it's mostly the same as having multiple "virtual" ac
vision 1.321
date: 2005/06/26 19:23:53; author: deraadt; state: Exp; lines: +28 -14
cpu0: RNG AES AES-CTR SHA1 SHA256 RSA
on fancy new VIA C3 Esther (aka C7) cpus
---snap---
reyk
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free software eng
cure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free software engineer
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://team.vantronix.net/reyk/
*/
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 12:35:10AM +1000, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
> altq on $if cbq bandwidth 100Mb queue { all, local, http, ssh, rsets }
>
use a different name instead of "all", like "std". "all" is a reserved
keyword.
> queue all bandwidth 32Kb proirity 1
> queue local bandwidth 100Mb proiri
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:20:37AM +0200, Fred Crowson wrote:
> ath0: bogus xmit rate 0x0
>
ok, thanks. i think damien just fixed something similar in ral and
it's probably related to the switch to rssadapt(9).
reyk
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 08:51:10PM -0600, Ryan Puckett wrote:
> When using 3com NICs (aka xl's) in a trunk, the trunk interface will not
> be defined after a system reboot.
>
yes, a diff for this issue is already in the queue. good timing ;).
trunk needs to be started before any other virtual in
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 04:02:25PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > "Texas Instruments ACX111" rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 not
> > configured
>
> it looks like netgear changed chipsets without telling anybody about it.
> I had a similar experience with a of D-Link card. D-Link have s
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 09:36:05PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > Is atheros driver supported under Alpha platform on OpenBSD 3.7??
> >
>
not yet
> no, but i would be really happy about a donated alpha to port ath(4)
> to this platform ;).
>
thanks to another d
hi,
Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> ... just rocks :}
>
openbsd always rocks ;)
> Thanks to the developers. I got some minor problems with one of the
> snapshots (ath0 kernel crash), but this is already fixed in
> -current.
>
> thx
> Waldemar
which crash exactly? and btw., does your thinkpad
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:28:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is atheros driver supported under Alpha platform on OpenBSD 3.7??
>
no, but i would be really happy about a donated alpha to port ath(4)
to this platform ;).
reyk
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:12:35PM +0100, Eric Dillenseger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using a DWL-G520 as an access point with OpenBSD 3.7. Apart
> from not allowing higher modes than 11b, it ran fine.
>
> Today I upgraded to 3.8 form a snapshot I downloaded Friday. The
> upgrade went smooth a
7;s the traditional directory layout of ftp.fu-berlin.de (Freie
Universitaet Berlin). you could send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
ask them about a pub/ directory (at least a symlink to unix/) to fit
other international mirrors... and that's not only for the OpenBSD
mirror.
reyk
--
/*
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:53:57PM +0200, Florian wrote:
> ok, squid, but what about POP and SMTP ?
spamd(8) is something like a SMTP proxy
reyk
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free software engineer
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 11:27:38AM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> Running Aug 24 snapshot, kismet has been running fine many times over
> the past day.
> Now, just ran it and got the following:
>
> Source 0 (dlink): Opening radiotap_bsd_b source interface rtw0...
> Uvm_fault(0xd0598480, 0xd0a2500
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 05:41:15PM +0300, slack _usr wrote:
> First of all, I'm sorry for such stupid question. I know, that I need
> few details, but I can't figure out what are they. I'm plaing with
> Intel(r) PRO/Wireless2200BG wifi card and it's configuration. I have
> found different descripti
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 05:10:08PM +0200, Dimitri Georganas wrote:
> Did you put this atheros card in one week ago? :)
>
> >ath0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "Atheros AR5212" rev 0x01: irq 11
> >ath0: mac 80.9 phy 4.3 radio 3.6, 802.11a/b/g, FCC1A, address
>
btw.: could you also give us the exact p
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:15:45PM +0200, Olivier Mehani wrote:
> The reboot is not that periodic (6 hours as you say): it can be as
> short as 2 hours to 2 days with, once again, no obvious reason.
>
try a ping -f against your accesspoint over the wireless interface and
it will probably reboot/
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:39:13AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You must now stand corrected :-)
>
> In Britain (and probably the rest of Europe), that is precisely how ADSL is
> done - with ATM (rather than PPPoE, which is how it's done in North America).
> There are probably more ATM over
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 06:23:50PM +0200, Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> I am working on an UMTS (via ppp) connection. This connection seems to
> have a very small mtu namely 480 bytes. If found this out using
> different sizes when pinging. To accomodate vor this I have added a
> scrub rule to pf.conf
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:53:30PM +1000, Z L wrote:
> My laptop's wireless network driver is Atheros (ath 4) & is detected
> in boot time (netstat -A).
>
> I bought a D-Link DWL G630 card which is (obviously) not detected by
> OBSD. All the other Netgear cards that are listed in [ath 4] are not
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:36:58AM +0200, Marc Winiger wrote:
> Hi
>
> On wi(4) wlan cards it is possible to get the desired nwid with
> WI_RID_DESIRED_SSID, independent whether the card is associated to an
> access point or not.
>
it's a useless button, you can do it with SIOCG80211NWID as wel
f2111 2.3 (AR5212)
ath0: AR5212 5.9 phy 4.3 rf5112 3.6 (AR5213)
currently unsupported:
ath0: AR5212 7.9 phy 4.5 rf2112 5.6 rf2112 5.6
^
reyk
--
/* .vantronix|secure systems - (research & development)
* reyk floeter - friendly known free softwar
301 - 358 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
