yes, you are zeroing the whole disklabel, which is located in the openbsd area
starting at 32k (or 64 sectors). make sure you do the 'disklabel' AFTER 'dd'.
if you do a 'dd if=/dev/sd0c bs=512 skip=64 count=2 | strings' and you should
see the disk's model number (after the disklabel has been
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 00:53:38 -0500 Brian McCafferty br...@mccafferty.ca wrote:
On 11/03/14 22:33, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
I'm trying to set up 5.6/amd64 on a new-from-the-factory 750GB disk
which I've just had installed in a Thinkpad T60. (This Thinkpad had
previously been running
i just noticed an obvious stupid mistake of mine, the 'dd' should go before
the 'fdisk' as well (for the same reason as 'disklabel').
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 07:04:23 -0500 thev...@openmailbox.org wrote:
yes, you are zeroing the whole disklabel, which is located in the openbsd area
starting at 32k
On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 22:57:41 +0200 Atanas Vladimirov vl...@bsdbg.net wrote:
On 24.10.2014 00:33, Robert Peichaer wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:src
Changes by: r...@cvs.openbsd.org2014/10/23 15:33:21
Modified files:
distrib/miniroot: dot.profile install.sub
as it should.
The question is whether there are any easier steps to make auto_upgrade from
local file, not by using dhcp/tftp/http?
Thanks,
Atanas
The auto_upgrade.conf is searched in the ramdisk partition (which was
into bsd.rd). As thevoid@ wrote, you could rebuild a new bsd.rd image
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:31:27 -0800 Joe S js.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Scott Vanderbilt li...@datagenic.com
wrote:
These changes came after 5.6 was RTM, and are reflected in -current as of
15 September or so.
See http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html.
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:46:43 +0100 Martin Hanson greencopperm...@yandex.com
wrote:
Hi all
I have one gateway and several boxes serving some NFS, Samba and other stuff.
Then I have a public server for some gaming.
I am thinking about two different setups, but I am in serious doubt as to
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 20:10:14 -0800 jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Brad,
On 27 November 2014 at 19:51, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 11/27/14 22:35, jungle Boogie wrote:
Anyone have any objections? I know the NICs are not intel so that will
probably get a strike
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:09:02 +0100 Martin Hanson greencopperm...@yandex.com
wrote:
Hi
So I am looking into authpf and I am wondering about some real world
applications.
I have a bunch of users, but I also have just a bunch of machines.
The machines cannot login via SSH and should not
as long as you have an X server running somewhere (the server is what is
attached to the display), you can run programs (clients) anywhere, local or
remote. so yes, a headless server can run X programs that display elsewhere.
see the faq, section 11.
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:55:16 +0100 Paolo
10 matches
Mail list logo