-- Forwarded message -
From: Angelo Rossi
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023, 23:37
Subject: Re: ln(1): add -v flag
To: Theo de Raadt
notice that:
in /bin
command-v
=
[ no
chgrp no
chmod no
cp
Hi,
Please help, I've got kicad-20100505p11 installed on 6.4 for some reason,
then I forgot it
and upgraded to 6.5. During a pkg_add -v -u I've got an error said that it
cannot
upgrade kicad, so I tried to remove it with pkg_delete:
# pkg_delete -v kicad
Can't locate object method
Sorry,
To fix this problem I changed /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/stand/Makefile.inc
line #45 from
HEAP_LIMIT=0xA
to
HEAP_LIMIT=0xB
Angelo
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:37 PM Angelo Rossi
wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Angelo Rossi
> Date: Tu
-- Forwarded message -
From: Angelo Rossi
Date: Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Boot reboot issue after upgrade to 6.4 on amd64
To:
I agree with you, but it happens, anyway I found a simple trick to override
the problem: recompile boot changing HEAP_SIZE to 1 MB
I agree with you. I already have fixed this crazy partitioning scheme on
other machines. I would never use such configuration on production
machines, but these were merely tests with limited resources PCs (< 500 GB
HDs). So my idea in respect the boot loader is not to add checks since it
is a
-- Forwarded message -
From: Angelo Rossi
Date: Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: heap full during amd64 boot.
To:
First of all you can't endorse me with services I cannot fullfill just
because you're lowly sense of humor told this. Then if the right behaviour
Hello,
When using a=/ and b=swap partitioning scheme on installation or upgrading
from 6.3 with same partitioning scheme the default HEAP_SIZE=0xA
generates heap full error during boot in 6.4 amd64. To solve this I
installed the -stable soiurces from AnonCVS, and changed HEAP_SIZE from
Funny, I live in the West Coast US. Oregon to be specific.
Indeed, I am not qualified, so 50$/hr is quite out of the question. I
thought 10$/hr seemed reasonable given that I'm not sweeping the floors
or mowing his lawn, I'm managing his disorganized mess of a network.
And that job is like a
Quite the april fool's joke. Must have been done someplace close to the
international date line, because where I live, it just turned 1:00 pm
and those posts begin today at 5:00 am and the latest is at 6 pm.
quite a good laugh though. I wonder what Theo thinks of it
Anton Karpov wrote:
In the small business I am working for, I am both.
I administer the firewall and the BSD box which will replace the current
windows file server.
Unfortunately, because I am new, he wants a professional. I think it's
because I constantly remind him that his security needs improvement:
better
do a search of the list archives; I remember somebody asking the same
question a few weeks ago and getting flamed for it.
The answer was also in there too ;)
A
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
I have installed in my machine both firefox web browser and java
plugin (compiled on my own machine).
J,
Read the Samba handbook. All of it. Yes, it was written for linux,
however, it contains some important information regarding your needs.
And if the OpenBSD package doesn't contain the functionality support you
need, you could try the port. I haven't used any ports on OpenBSD but I
think you
Buy it from the OpenBSD site, it supports OpenBSD (as I understand it),
and it gets you your book! it's Win/Win!!
Qwerty wrote:
Hi All, Could anyone please tell me if the book Building firewalls with
OpenBSD and PF (found at Amazon), would still be applicable today, or is
it a bit outdated.
Will H. Backman wrote:
I assume something like a $40 linksys.
Might I suggest that if you have budget for an extra computer or an
older one laying around (not *too* old if you want decent outgoing
internet performance) pop some NICs into it and use pfSense (
www.pfsense.com ) to make it a
snip
modern PC video card architecture containing a large
quantity of PURE EVIL.
This joke has a whole new meaning...
http://ctrlaltdel-online.com/comic.php?d=20021029
As an aside, there are no alternative windows systems that are
functional or secure?
A thought suddenly occurs. Perhaps big companies that use OpenBSD do not
want to disclose their use by donating because they fear that this might
give their competitors an advantage(now their competitors know what OS
they're using), or might help crackers/s-kiddies/etc. attack that
company now
]:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 01:58, A Rossi wrote:
My client didn't really like the idea of just making a windows
partition and disallowing the users from accessing it with
permissions, because then they'd know about something... And some
might complain about it being broken
Thank you all and good night!
Chris Zakelj wrote:
A Rossi wrote:
Hi,
I've been hired by a client to perform a number of network services
for him, most of which are completely unrelated to my topic.
Now, onto my topic:
He asked me if I could partition all of his
I was looking through the man pages on the OBSD site, and I can't seem
to find a page giving the status of polling (whether its supported or
not) on any of the network drivers.
Where could I find this information?
Thanks!
Any particular reason, other than that OBSD focuses on correctness and
security rather than speed?
Or is there a security problem with polling?
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 2/22/06, A Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking through the man pages on the OBSD site, and I can't
seem
I'm adapting a samba config for a domain server from FreeBSD to OpenBSD,
but part of it doesn't appear to be able to work in OpenBSD
The part that needs to be adapted:
add user script = /usr/sbin/pw useradd -n %u -m
#%u is a SMB variable (its the user being added) -m makes a home
#directory
I learn to program, I'll write something that does
explicitly this...
Thanks all!
A Rossi
Steve Shockley wrote:
A Rossi wrote:
I like this idea. But one question: is it possible for the OpenBSD
box to access all these hidden partitions through SMB as one
large storage space possibly
was hoping for. Alas.
But there should be enough storage that I could have a few computers
making up one copy, and a few making up another.
Thanks
A Rossi
Graham Gower wrote:
On 22/02/06, A Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to experiment with hiding the drives through GP,
hidden
A. Ramaley wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 01:58, A Rossi wrote:
My client didn't really like the idea of just making a windows
partition and disallowing the users from accessing it with
permissions, because then they'd know about something... And some
might complain about it being broken
in mind.
Hope this helps
-A Rossi
William Kranec wrote:
Hi,
I have a photo collection which I would like multiple users to be
able to access, and I would like to do this by storing the files in a
central location on my disk and linking /home/$USER/photos to that
directory.
Where is the most
, but I like what
I see.
Thanks,
A Rossi
As I though. That is what I told my client. Thank you for verifying my
knowledge.
Chris Zakelj wrote:
A Rossi wrote:
Hi,
I've been hired by a client to perform a number of network services
for him, most of which are completely unrelated to my topic.
Now, onto my topic:
He asked me if I
a
thought in the right direction (as is the case with me, usually).
A Rossi
P.S.
My apologies to those of you who use console-based mail clients. I'm
still trying to figure out how to get Thunderbird to wrap my text at 72
characters. Yes, I know about the setting under Tools Options, but
that doesn't
28 matches
Mail list logo
