is due: djbdns isn't.
Without specifics on the issue, I can't tell if OpenBSD's bind is truly
vulnerable, but it certainly does use a fixed source port.
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
problems you report to the
obsd team will probably be ignored.
Just run with generic, unless you find it to be an actual problem.
48M is more than enough for a bsd kernel.
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
for future development.
Also, stripping static libs has ZERO impact on your installed
system, it only affects things you compile from source on that
box. (and, as you mention -- negatively).
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
freezes, you can try getting to a shell (type ! at any of
the install prompts) and run swapctl -a to enable swap.
Obviously OpenBSD is the best choice, would you expect any less from
people on this list?
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
and pilot this
stuff without hosing your users. Also a best practice. :)
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
/share/zoneinfo and replacing that directory on your 3.5 box.
No warranty expressed or implied. YMMV. HTH. HAND.
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
as it sounds.
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:24:24PM -0500, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:20:05AM -0600, David Terrell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 02:43:21PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
I think you would be nuts to write your web applications in C, unless
you are a master
.
That data can come from whatever. C works as well as anything else,
especially if you're doing most of your user-specific data manipulation
on the client.
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
who wrote that was seriously confused and STILL
didn't get that Java and JS are completely different animals, or
Google is doing something that I can only marvel and awe at.
It's real: http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
.
If done well, it's a perfectly fine way to make responsive, useful
webapps.
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
is making an issue of
it now.
One can only hope it's because OpenBSD is getting new customers.
That's good. :)
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
not be able to use exploits against it. Removing the
compiler does not hurt any serious attacker. If you really care about
defending your machine against idiots who can't figure out how to compile
an exploit on another machine, well, congratulations, you're already
running OpenBSD.
--
David Terrell
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:47:32PM -0300, Marcos Marconcini wrote:
Hi
I did an upgrade from 3.8 stable to 3.9 current ( I don't know if this is
the problem )
You didn't read the introduction.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
Read it again.
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, many with non-BSD licenses
(mutt is GPLed, pine is not free at all), and you can't include just
one or two and make every one happy?
Because traditionally BSD didn't ship with anything more complex?
Because Theo uses mail(1) so clearly it's good enough for everyone?
Who knows.
--
David
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:58:57PM -0400, Wade, Daniel wrote:
Buy the CDs, no load on the ftp servers at all.
As soon as you figure out how to get 3G of packages for i386 alone
onto a CD...
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
at all unless I put the device in promiscuous
mode.
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
0x80
wd1: no disk label
dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81
dkcsum: wd2 matches BIOS drive 0x82
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 05:45:30PM +1000, Ash Williams wrote:
what I have is
#./name
#ksh: Operation not permitted
Someone knows what is happenig ?
I've not done any ASM on OpenBSD although i have a bit of experience
with FreeBSD. Have you looked at the syscalls located in
Bob!
And if you need to make a hash, encrypt(1) is your friend.
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
((meatspace)) http://meat.net/
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:51:29PM -0300, Jo?o Salvatti wrote:
P.S. My intention is not starting a flamed discussion or even an
argument. I just want to know your opinion about this issue.
When you ask for opinions, they become heated. Had you done your
basic homework and looked up previous
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 09:13:58PM +0200, chefren wrote:
On 03/26/06 17:35, frantisek holop wrote:
Talking about arrogance:
everybody seems to be happy about Theo's style
..
the problem mr de Raadt fails to see is,
What's his name, Theo or mr de Raadt?
Mr. de Raadt if you're
disclosure: I'm a lapsed
CD buyer who right now placed his first CD order in a couple years).
--
David Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://meat.net/
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:58:27PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Using another distribution (freely downloadable etc) will make it
easier to update the port in case of security issues after Red Hat
stopped fixing bugs in their legacy RPM's.
Not a very strong point, I agree, but a point
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:38:09PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Graham,
You seem to have some contradicting views on the matter. What is the
difference between greylisting and the aforementioned spamtrapping
approach? Isn't it essentially a variation of the very same thing,
namely
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 07:19:18PM -0500, Chris wrote:
Hello. Basic sendmail question.
I want to set up a backup mx server to field incoming mail when my
primary mail server goes down. I understand how to do this from a DNS
standpoint, but what I don't know is what should be in my
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:16:59PM -0600, Graham Toal wrote:
Personally I do believe in Backup MX, as long as it does proper
relay checking. It's nice if it also does spam checking, but
not critical because your primary MX will still do that. However
if you do spam checking *and rejection*
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:19:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once I was watching photos from OpenBSD hackaton and saw there that people
listened mp3's by sending them to the lpt port. How is it possible to do?
Can somebody describe it in details.
Not via the printer port, but via lpd:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:53:59AM -0500, David Higgs wrote:
I managed to run mod_python several years ago and was pulling my hair
out for the better part of a week until I got it working. I never got
the dynamic module to work, but was successful in building it into
apache statically.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:32:59PM -0600, Emilio Perea wrote:
Installing the latest (Feb 13) i386 x*tgz on two different computers
caused the keyboard to lock up. Mouse continued to work, but I was not
able to type anything or switch consoles. The systems involved were a
Dell Precision 330
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:59:28AM -0700, James Couzens wrote:
Mina-san,
This might be a better post for an alternative more focused mailing list
but I felt this might be the best place to start.
I currently develop entirely in a Linux environment using a combination
of vi and gdb and a
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:12:42AM -0600, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
On Wednesday, May 4, Alan Finlay wrote:
I have done significant work with ClearCase and CVS in a software
development team environment, and some minor work with other revision
control tools. Team size for ClearCase was
32 matches
Mail list logo
