?
Thanks,
-John
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 07:04:44PM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013, at 03:55 PM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 04:02:58PM -0500, John Hynes wrote
I'm having some trouble figuring out what is causing a systemic performance
issue. By systemic I mean that running even seemingly trivial things
(i.e. 'ls' on a directory with only a few files in it) is accompanied by a
substantial delay before any response, say, of 15-30 seconds. Not *every*
Hi All,
Issue: There is one host to whom I can't send mail from either of my relays
(both OpenBSD 5.3, sendmail). It always fails the TLS handshake. If I
attempt to debug it by hand by running:
openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect mail.dean.edu:25
...from any of my OpenBSD 5.3 hosts, I
Thanks Claus - the option did work, so I'll go with the patch.
-John
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Claus Assmann ca+openbsd_m...@esmtp.orgwrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013, John Hynes wrote:
openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect mail.dean.edu:25
...from any of my OpenBSD 5.3 hosts, I
Nevermind - I mistype the define - it works.
Thanks again,
-John
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:10 PM, John Hynes jephy...@gmail.com wrote:
After applying the patch, and recompiling with SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_2, sendmail
still gives the same error, although the -no-tls1_2 option gets the test
, Sep 12, 2013, John Hynes wrote:
openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect mail.dean.edu:25
...from any of my OpenBSD 5.3 hosts, I get the same response:
CONNECTED(0003)
12556912661392:error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake
failure:/usr/src/lib/libssl/ssl/../src/ssl
Greetings All,
I have a softraid device, sd3, which was created as follows:
bioctl -c 1 -l /dev/sd0a,/dev/sd1a,/dev/sd2a softraid0
The chunk sd2a failed. bioctl shows the RAID1 as degraded, and chunk sd2a
as OFFLINE.
In order to rebuild, I'd need to set up the new sd2. After replacing and
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 07:50:41AM -0400, John Hynes wrote:
Greetings All,
I have a softraid device, sd3, which was created as follows:
bioctl -c 1 -l /dev/sd0a,/dev/sd1a,/dev/sd2a softraid0
The chunk sd2a
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 07:50:41AM -0400, John Hynes wrote:
Greetings All,
I have a softraid device, sd3, which was created as follows:
bioctl -c 1 -l /dev/sd0a,/dev/sd1a,/dev/sd2a softraid0
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:17:27AM -0400, John Hynes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org
wrote:
What commands did you run to copy the disklabel?
Oh - I did a disklabel sd0
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Bret Lambert blamb...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 02:30:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:17:27AM -0400, John Hynes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org
wrote:
What commands
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.netwrote:
On 09/02/13 08:19, John Hynes wrote:
...
The new sd2 is identical to the old, which is identical to the other
disks.
you provide ZERO proof of this, which makes me guess that you buy disks
of the same maker
12 matches
Mail list logo
