On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Bales, Tracy tracy.ba...@williams.com
wrote:
I'm running 4.8 on an i386 platform. I have snmpd running with 300 custom
MIB's installed via snmpd.conf. I've confirmed that they're installed
using
net-snmp's snmpwalk program. Each of my MIB's is an integer
There is no support for changing the output right now.
You can try to adapt the attached patch, I don't have access to an hppa
machine anymore but it used to work (on a C3000).
- pyr
2010/5/6 Kapetanakis Giannis bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr
Hi,
I have 2 HP J6000 and I want to change the text
This appears to be due to the format of the string being passed to
strtonum(). ap_strtol() was tolerant of it. It's being passed the
string from the Range: header.
For example, the following valid request (taken directly from sniffing a
wget session).
GET /testfile HTTP/1.0
Range:
* Wijnand Wiersma (wijn...@videre.net) wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get ypldap working on a very recent snapshot and I
can't figure out what I am doing wrong.
It seems ypldap is working just fine:
# ypldap -dv
startup [debug mode]
configuration starting
applying configuration
connecting to
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:39:56 +0200
Pieter Verberne pieterverbe...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi,
When I run mutt (or tmux/colorls -G/etc) from xterm, I have fancy
colors=] But when I run:
$ xterm -e mutt
I don't have colors =[ (I'm running dwm and I want xterm to start tmux
automaticly)
$
Who was complaining? There's a difference between suggesting a good
design, such as qmail's and complaining.
So what you mean, is that when developing software we should look at
what already exists and try to do things right by learning from the
strength and weaknesses of other projects.
On Wed, 6 May 2009 18:51:45 +0300
Vasiliy Kiryanov vasiliy.kirya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello community.
I would want to use ypldap with our ldap server that work over ssl.
The problem is how to change ypldap.conf to work with ldaps.
I will appreciate any ideas.
thanks.
Hi,
There is no
* Pascal Lalonde (plalo...@overnet.qc.ca) wrote:
Hello,
I've been playing with relayd lately. There is a behavior which seems
unintuitive and I was wondering if that was a bug or the intended
behavior.
It's the intended behavior but I have been meaning to fix that at some
point.
When I
* Beavis (pfu...@gmail.com) wrote:
Greetings List,
I would like to ask some folks here regarding hoststated is it
still available for OpenBSD? All i got through google is
http://cvs.openbsd.org/papers/eurobsdcon07/pyr-loadbalancing/
I'm looking for a tool that would be able me to setup
* David Caro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
first of all, sorry for my english (it's not my first language, but
i'm trying to learn)
i have two testing firewalls running OpenBSD 4.3 -release (fresh
install), with carp and pfsync configured and working.
I was trying to configure
6. Compile and link:
$ for i in *.c; do gcc -I /usr/include/freetype2 -c $i; done
$ gcc -lXft -lXrender -lX11 -lXau -lXdmcp -lXext -lfontconfig -lexpat
-lfreetype -lz -o cwm *.o
Most linux distributions carry a pmake package which provides the
a bsd.prog.mk and thus support for the
* Ted Unangst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
One would only use sloppy state tracking on the load balancer, right?
The firewall in front of everything still uses normal tracking?
Yes, you use sloppy state only on the host(s) seeing half of the trafic.
+ if (rdr-conf.flags F_STICKY)
+ if (ioctl(env-sc_pf-dev, DIOCCLRSRCNODES, 0) == -1)
+ fatal(sync_table: cannot clear the tree of source
tracking nodes);
+
free(addlist);
log_debug(sync_table: table %s: %d added, %d deleted, %d
* Mark Rolen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At that point, relayd is dead, and won't restart. /var/log/daemon shows:
fatal: flush_table: cannot flush table stats: Operation not supported by
device
This is a bug and has been fixed in -current yesterday, it will be part of
the next snapshot.
Brad Arrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I ran into the same problem you did, I thought it was something I
was doing wrong until I read your email...
Here is the fix I came up with.
--- check_tcp.c-current Mon Feb 25 15:11:40 2008
+++ check_tcp.c Mon Feb 25 23:48:45 2008
@@ -82,6
Brad Arrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pierre-Yves,
I guess we are both wrong...
I used a few different timeout values including 1000 before
changing any code. I just checked relayd(the unpatched version) again
and I get the same results.
These web servers just serve the default
Brad Arrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I ran into the same problem you did, I thought it was something I
was doing wrong until I read your email...
Here is the fix I came up with.
--- check_tcp.c-current Mon Feb 25 15:11:40 2008
+++ check_tcp.c Mon Feb 25 23:48:45 2008
@@ -82,6
[sent to wrong list]
Also hoststatectl reload does not work for me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root# hoststatectl reload
command failed
Expected behavior?
Unfortunately, yes.
reload currently does not work for layer7 (relay) configurations.
it should be available before 4.3 though.
n0g0013 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i personally find it quite
disheartening to hear the attitude that prevails here but that's the
community's decision. it certainaly seems to refelect the attitute
of it's leaders (developers).
Instead of doing something useful like reading code, identifying
Boris Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Rogier,
Tuesday, October 23, 2007, 9:01:32 AM, you wrote:
RK On 10/23/07, Boris Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't really need ntpd on all systems. One (timeserver)
runs ntpd, and others use rdate, called from cron (once a day is
I'm wondering how sensitive hoststated is to the certificate (might
check https digest fail because the server certificate and the name
I'm asking for don't match?), or could it be that hoststated computes
the https digest before the html output is decrypted?
Hoststated doesn't check
Rolf Sommerhalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This simple configuration file for hoststated below is syntactically
correct (and semantically, too), however apparently only if its file
mode bits are 600 (which makes sense).
Somehow, I ended up with mode bits being set to 644, upon which
Anyway, my question is, can I use the same tables in multiple service
entries? ( one for each connection )
no problem there.
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:25:44 +1200
Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well after trying it, it appears there _IS_ a problem there. One of
the services was not
working. As soon as I gave it its own separate tables, it worked.
Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Anyway, my question is, can I use
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:08:50 +0200
Pierre-Yves Ritschard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:25:44 +1200
Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well after trying it, it appears there _IS_ a problem there. One of
the services was not
working. As soon as I gave it its own separate
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:22:19 +0200
Luca Corti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:01 +1200, Josh wrote:
What happens if hoststated crashes? Does its latest table entry's
and rdr rules still remain?
Maybe you can try a kill -9 and see what happens.
ciao
Luca
better
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:22:18 +0100
Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 30/08/2007, Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can find it here:
http://hcl-club.lu/svn/development/python/cutleaves
This is useful! Why not write a port?
Why write it in python ?
The package system
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:11:55 +0100
Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/08/07, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're using xdm things are different though. The Xsession script
does not source any global files so you'll have to modify it to
source /etc/profile.
Is there a
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:19:56 +0200
Luca Corti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've setup hoststated for load balancing of some services, and it
works well. If I'm not missing something hoststated actually works
just for TCP. Is there any plan to implement UDP support?
Yes there is, I will
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:49:46 +0200
OBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
thanks for all the suggestions.
With this it works:
cat mail.txt | egrep [EMAIL PROTECTED] | egrep
\.[a-zA-Z]{2,4}$
It is probably possible to avoid the last egrep but I have not find
out how.
Have a look at
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:40:36 +1000
Darren Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to to this the way the IBM eNetwork dispatchers
used to do this? Put all of the machines on the same broadcast
domain, then:
1. add a static published arp entry for the cluster address on the
pass in on $ext_if route-to { $webh1, $webh2 } round-robin proto
tcp \ from any to $virt_ip port http no state
pass out on $int_if from any to $virt_ip port http no state
Wouldn't you need some kind of state here? Otherwise there's no
guarantee of the packets for a given connection
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:05:44 +0200
Reyk Floeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't like the idea about DSR, it sounds like an evil hack to get
some performance at the wrong place. it is better to focus on
improving the pf/network stack performance itself and to be able to do
traffic filtering
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:54:58 +0800
Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linden Varley wrote:
Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
direct-server return? (our load balancers (openbsd boxes) are
co-located and we pay for all data bandwidth).
hoststated?
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:29:42 +0300
Paulius Bulotas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well ;)
probably you will have to wait for 4.2, but fix for similar problem
(try to disable table, then enable it ;)
so probably the same applies for host disabling, enabling...
at least, with this patch it works for
--- src/usr.sbin/hoststated/relay.c.origWed Mar 7 19:40:32
2007 +++ src/usr.sbin/hoststated/relay.c Sun May 13 18:37:48 2007
@@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@
fatalx(relay_dispatch_pfe: invalid
host id); if (host-flags F_DISABLE)
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:09:19 +0200
Jvrg Streckfu_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
First a tribut for the good work to the authors of hoststated.
In the future i plan to use hoststated in production environments
to check for the availability of our webservices.
But before I set it up on my
On Wed, 02 May 2007 11:39:01 +0200
holger glaess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i try to setup the hoststated daemon but it fail to start.
i would to like setup an simple loadbalancer for http with 2 host.
i add also rdr-anchor hoststated/* to my pf.conf after the rdr
rules.
thanks for
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:57:16 +0200
holger glaess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i try to setup the hoststated daemon but it fail to start.
i would to like setup an simple loadbalancer for http with 2 host.
i add also rdr-anchor hoststated/* to my pf.conf after the rdr
rules.
thanks for
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:06:00 +
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, what do you use/recommend in order to manage the webserver
pool? 1 test/min (in cron for instance) is too large a value for many
use cases, so what would be best in your opinion?
It's likely I'll
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:20:42 +
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ter, 2007-01-30 `s 14:25 +0100, Pierre-Yves Ritschard escreveu:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:06:00 +
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, what do you use/recommend in order
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:21:13 +0100
Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, one thing is bothering me.
Obviously, my apache access logs on those load balanced machines can
only show the IP address of my load balancer, not the real remote ip
of the request.
Why are you rewriting the
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
the SYN to one of my webservers, and the webserver would send a
SYN-ACK back to me. But my machine, obviously can't do anything with
a SYN-ACK from
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:51 +0100
Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100
Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which would mean, I send a SYN to my load balancer, which forwards
the SYN to one of my webservers
Nick Ryan wrote:
If you haven't already seen it on undeadly.org this might be what you're
after:
http://spootnik.org/hoststated/hoststated_introduction.html
Cheers
This means having a third machine.
If its OK with you you can indeed use hoststated (with 2 tables
containing 1 host each):
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
I was reading about the new hoststated tool in OpenBSD, and wondering
if it would be possible to use rssi as a link health check.
Short answer: not at the moment.
Scripting will soon be enabled and will allow you to specify external
health checkers. Of course with RSSI
PS.: although wrong thread, any chance to use the brand new hoststated in
OpenBSD 4.0 ?
If I get it via CVS, will it build? I don't like the idea to upgrade my
production box to -CURRENT at all ;)
What you can do is get the 4.0 source, then just checkout latest
hoststated and hoststatectl
You might also want to check http://spootnik.org/slbd which is
specifically aimed at your problem. Its a privilege separated daemon
which can perform several types of health checks and has support for
sorry servers.
Another solution would be, once 4.1 gets out to unpack the base41.tgz,
etc41.tgz and comp41.tgz into /usr/somewhere then unpack or checkout
using cvs the 4.1 kernel sources in there as well.
Once you are in this situation you can chroot to this new fake 4.1
system: chroot /usr/somewhere /bin/sh
* Stuart Henderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 2006/11/03 11:34, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Another solution would be, once 4.1 gets out to unpack the base41.tgz,
etc41.tgz and comp41.tgz into /usr/somewhere then unpack or checkout
using cvs the 4.1 kernel sources in there as well
Hi misc@,
We're currently moving some of our routers from linux/quagga to
OpenBSD/OpenOSFPD.
In our topology, we have border routers connected to 2 areas, each
announcing routes from one area into another.
Basically in Quagga/IOS speak this gives (with imaginary networks):
network 10.0.1.0
Hi,
The broadcom 5823 chipset is listed as supported in OpenBSD's supported
hardware list. I found a card from broadcom, the ips500a, has anybody run
that card, I'd like a fast (as in 500mpbs or faster when doing IPSEC) card
that would work with OpenBSD, and its the only one I've found that
Thanks for all the advice.
It's been working well for 3.6 - 3.9.
Hi list,
I have a machine running OpenBSD 3.6 on a remote location that I would
like to upgrade. I only have ssh access unless I buy myself an expensive
plane ticket. I wondered if there's a safe way to upgrade remotely or
should I just wait until I get an opportunity to be in front of the
The second volume of TCP/IP Illustrated is very interesting, it
describes the BSD implementation of the TCP stack, walking you through
the code. Although dated, the code still bears a lot of similarities
with what you'll find in /usr/src.
In case anyone was wondering, they work well with OpenBSD, they show up
as em nics.
em0 at pci5 dev 7 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82546EB) rev 0x01: apic
7 int 2 (irq 11), address 00:11:0a:5c:6b:04
em1 at pci5 dev 7 function 1 Intel PRO/1000MT (82546EB) rev 0x01: apic
7 int 3 (irq 5), address
cycle counter enabled
dkcsum: sd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
root on sd0a
rootdev=0x400 rrootdev=0xd00 rawdev=0xd02
cpu1: AMD Powernow: TS FID VID TTP
--
Pierre-Yves Ritschard
Ingenieur Systemes, Reseaux et Securite
Steria Pour France Telecom - SCR/HDI/DOP/HEBEX
Sophia-Antipolis - France
Hi,
I've been desperately looking for syskonnect 9822 dual port cards but it
seems its sold-out everywhere and syskonnect just told me on the phone
that they won't produce anymore.
I'm left with Intel based dual port cards and since I have access to
cheap nc7170 (Intel 82546EB chipset) I
Sure OpenBSD's modified Apache 1.3 is way more secure than most stuff
out there, and is working great.
However, the Subversion versioning control system (which my project
uses) demands Apache2 in order to do DAV checkouts and commits, better
authentication and more. So, my only choice was
Yes, FastCGI looks really cool.
However, in my particular case, it's not like I am the only one who does
some work on the website, and I'll not be around forever either (it's
volunteer work, basically). Using straight PHP is technically inferior,
but is much more likely to actually be used
60 matches
Mail list logo
