Re: Xen PV DomU with OpenBSD?

2015-02-21 Thread Raimundo Santos
of emulated hardware. Another problem when using Xen: the shutdown. Every OS that can not communicate with xenstore will suffer from that. You will have to edit some scripts in your environment to make it work with ACPI. Best regards, Raimundo Santos

Re: OpenBSD Tablet-ish

2015-02-19 Thread Raimundo Santos
Hello, Lenovo Thinkpad x201 works well for me. On 19 February 2015 at 17:15, Jack Woehr jwo...@softwoehr.com wrote: What's the smallest, most tablet-ish device I can put OpenBSD on? Want to travel and stay connected. -- Jack Woehr # There's too much emphasis on things Box

Re: OpenBSD Tablet-ish

2015-02-19 Thread Raimundo Santos
of it is my 5 hours battery. But it is not that new: a first generation core i5, AFAIK. Besides that, it is a very good hardware and interacts well with OpenBSD. Best regards. Raimundo Santos

Re: unbound problem in 5.6

2014-12-31 Thread Raimundo Santos
Thank you very much, Otto! Almost one day of test after configuring _unbound class, and no more Too many open files. Once more, thank you for your time, and happy new year. Raimundo Santos On 30 December 2014 at 11:14, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote: On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:09:44AM

unbound problem in 5.6

2014-12-30 Thread Raimundo Santos
just for Unbound, how can it keep complaining? Thandk you in advance, and happy new year! Raimundo Santos -- Here are some more info... # systat -B mbufs 1 usersLoad 0.16 0.12 0.09 Tue Dec 30 11:02:00 2014 IFACE LIVELOCKS SIZE ALIVE LWM HWM CWM

Re: NetMap in OpenBSD

2014-10-14 Thread Raimundo Santos
Sorry, replied to fast and to OP only. Below is one use case and a lot o things that Henning have said, put from my point of view. -- Forwarded message -- From: Raimundo Santos rait...@gmail.com Date: 14 October 2014 15:02 Subject: Re: NetMap in OpenBSD To: Mikael mikael.tr

OT: SiLK, libfixbuf and GPLR - Government Purpose License Rights

2014-09-28 Thread Raimundo Santos
Project judgment about GPLR/DFARS? (Do not know exactly how to name it.) 3 - Where can I find more information about GPLR (DFARS?)? Thank you very much for your time on this, Raimundo Santos

Re: OT: SiLK, libfixbuf and GPLR - Government Purpose License Rights

2014-09-28 Thread Raimundo Santos
clear, and scary in the first sight. Once again: thank you for your time, Raimundo Santos

Re: Anyone running Zabbix server/agent with success?

2014-09-22 Thread Raimundo Santos
files needs, I just let it log to /tmp and the problem became more clear. Best regards, Raimundo Santos

Re: Anyone running Zabbix server/agent with success?

2014-09-21 Thread Raimundo Santos
/log/zabbix_server.log, but just when I change the line to this file, otherwise the behaviour is the same, ungracefully exits. In the time of this writing, Zabbix packages are 2.2.1 for OpenBSD 5.5. Best regards, Raimundo Santos

Anyone running Zabbix server/agent with success?

2014-09-20 Thread Raimundo Santos
. Best regards, Raimundo Santos

Re: pf queuing not limiting bandwidth

2014-08-12 Thread Raimundo Santos
-experience.fr wrote: Hi Raimundo, please use max directive: queue root on alc0 bandwidth 600M, max 500M -- Best regards, Loïc BLOT, Engineering UNIX Systems, Security and Network Engineer http://www.unix-experience.fr Le mardi 12 août 2014 à 02:11 -0300, Raimundo Santos a écrit

pf queuing not limiting bandwidth

2014-08-11 Thread Raimundo Santos
controller (poor man's 'net equalizer'). My intent was to not put a very high load over this machine by getting close to my real pps and bps and so make my capacity planing. What am I doing wrong with these queues? Thank you all, Raimundo Santos Here is my dmesgs, first from the physical machine

'ifconfigre bridge add' adding more than 256 ports

2014-08-06 Thread Raimundo Santos
are not filled, like port number 6, in bridge0)? Thank you for your time! Raimundo Santos OpenBSD 5.5 (GENERIC.MP) #315: Wed Mar 5 09:37:46 MST 2014 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 8538095616 (8142MB) avail mem = 8302202880 (7917MB) mainbus0

Re: Are nc -lu /dev/zero /dev/null a good throughput test?

2014-07-22 Thread Raimundo Santos
could think: why OpenBSD? Well, have you ever tried setting RIPv2 in other OSes? The more general answer: it Just Works for almost all things I need to setup. The only thing that I can not figure out how to do is the WISP's clients contracted bandwidth enforcement. Cheers, Raimundo Santos

Re: Are nc -lu /dev/zero /dev/null a good throughput test?

2014-07-20 Thread Raimundo Santos
On 19 July 2014 21:22, Sean Kamath kam...@moltingpenguin.com wrote: Are you counting all those zeros to make sure they all came through? 'cause TCP is guaranteed delivery, in order. UDP guarantees nothing. Hello Sean! Why counting? My guess, and therefore the start of my reasoning and

Re: Are nc -lu /dev/zero /dev/null a good throughput test?

2014-07-20 Thread Raimundo Santos
On 19 July 2014 21:28, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote: tcpbench(1) - TCP/UDP benchmarking and measurement tool Oh, just beneath my eyes, in the base install. Thank you, Philip. May I loose time comparing tcpbench(1) with iperf?

Re: Are nc -lu /dev/zero /dev/null a good throughput test?

2014-07-20 Thread Raimundo Santos
On 20 July 2014 19:44, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote: No, what he meant was that using nc -u can produce false results. Thank you Adam to point out my misinterpretation. Now I understand that Sean asked about how am I sure that all those zeroes generated in one host are really going

Are nc -lu /dev/zero /dev/null a good throughput test?

2014-07-19 Thread Raimundo Santos
good methods? Thank you for your time, Raimundo Santos [1] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=135336071024634w=2

Re: Problem with icmp state creation on 5.3 PF

2013-06-20 Thread Raimundo Santos
On 20 June 2013 16:53, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2013-06-18, Wiesław Herr hers...@makhleb.net wrote: I suspect you may have an issue where state is not being created where you expect it. It's now recommended (and we've changed the sample pf.conf to match) to start

Re: Problem with icmp state creation on 5.3 PF

2013-06-19 Thread Raimundo Santos
Hello Wieslaw, hello misc@! I run into a similar problem with my 'litle border' gateway here at my ISP. We was experimenting with a regular ADSL connection to put what we call low traffic priority, but our ADSL provider is diferent from our 2x fibber. All of our IPs are from the fibber

Re: PF policy routing route-to rules don’t catch any packet

2013-06-05 Thread Raimundo Santos
I've got the issue solved by disabling states on all rules which deal with the tproxy. On 4 June 2013 11:28, Raimundo Santos rait...@gmail.com wrote: I am guessing that the problem lies with flags S/SA. Changing all rules to flags any, and the packets hits the rules, but things go worse

Re: PF policy routing route-to rules don’t catch any packet

2013-06-05 Thread Raimundo Santos
) Ville, if you have some idea about keeping states with tproxy in mind, it will be very welcomed! Thank you :) Raimundo Santos

Re: PF policy routing route-to rules don’t catch any packet

2013-06-04 Thread Raimundo Santos
I am guessing that the problem lies with flags S/SA. Changing all rules to flags any, and the packets hits the rules, but things go worse: no web navigation... this is driving me mad! On 3 June 2013 13:09, Raimundo Santos rait...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there! I asked, without an answer

PF policy routing route-to rules don’t catch any packet

2013-06-03 Thread Raimundo Santos
to load a page here, youtube gasps there, but overall it seems to work! Tested without multipath routing, without keep state, and the behavior are the same. Will apreciate any kind of help on this, thank you in advance. Raimundo Santos

PANIC when loading pf rules

2013-06-03 Thread Raimundo Santos
Hello! If you are following my debut here in misc@ (if not, please help me to put our OpenBSD to rock this network!), you are somehow familiar with my problems. I was trying to reproduce the panic in another context, but unsuccessful... it only happens in production. Well, this is the ruleset:

PF: nat-to from real IP to real IP is possible?

2013-05-28 Thread Raimundo Santos
Hello folks! I have this PF config (for whom could not see Web things, this config is also at the end of the message): http://pastebin.com/KZgzRJ6B running well in OpenBSD 5.3 over a Core i5 Ivy Bridge, 16GB of RAM, 120GB SSD, one 3Com 10/100 (driver xl), two Agere (driver et) 10/100/1000, one