On May 4, 2008, at 1:14 AM, Pieter Verberne wrote:
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 03:38:13AM +0530, debian developer wrote:
[bsd vs. GPL]
Sorry for 'stealing' this thread but I'm not sure if I should make
a new
thread for this.
I'm wondering what OpenBSD people think about BSD (-like) licenses
On Mar 15, 2008, at 14:48, Genadijus Paleckis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://blog.anamazingmind.com/2008/03/real-reason-we-use-linux.html
oh, and before you started to read, to be more comfortable just do s/
linux/openbsd/g
Whoever wrote that needs to discover girls and/ boys and beer. I
I think ISDN is one of
those technologies a significant part of the OpenBSD population would
be very happy to suppress any remaining memories of.
I'm getting flashbacks just reading this.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
On Jan 9, 2008, at 14:24, Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Marco S Hyman wrote:
Yeah, X.25 with a triple-X pad (X.3/X.28/X.29). a Yellow book
version,
none of that fancy new red or blue book stuff.
It scares me that I remember such stuff.
// marc
Where a
On Jan 6, 2008, at 8:07, Benoit Chesneau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008 3:12 PM, V. Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Run make install on that directory (www/opera-flashplugin) and
woohoo!
so _you_ decided to install non-free software. The question is why .
Nothing forced
On Jan 6, 2008, at 9:20, Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008 10:41 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 09:52:18PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
| Perhaps you're *USING* these 4 files to install the adobe flash
player
| on your machine (your
On Jan 6, 2008, at 20:02, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
V. Karthik Kumar wrote:
You see, rms? You were right. OpenBSD has lots of trolls who:
Curious, the contents indicate this is addressed to RMS.
The mail headers indicate otherwise.
This is obviously by one of the trolls.
On Jan 6, 2008, at 22:54, Roberto J. Dohnert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question, do we really need an endorsement from Richard
Stallman and the
FSF for OpenBSD?
Nobody involved in this thread wants this endorsement and it is not
about getting him to change his mind. The point is,
On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:53, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you
On Jan 5, 2008, at 17:15, Joel Wiramu Pauling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main annoyance I have had with bittorrent/p2p apps on openbsd is
the relatively low file open limits. Pumping this is easy enough tho.
rtorrent sorted that for me nicely.
On 06/01/2008, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL
On Jan 4, 2008, at 14:26, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 1:22 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise why should he repeatedly say some thin that is not
proprietary as proprietary even after being informed by tedu and
others?
Because for me it is
On Jan 1, 2008, at 6:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dr Stallman i now see the dogged determination that has made you
effective,
He's not a doctor. In any sense of the word. Honorary degrees don't
give you the right to use the title or to be called by it.
--- Marina Brown
Return-Path:
On Dec 21, 2007, at 7:34, Lars NoodC)n [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The RAM-disk kernel (bsd.rd) seems to be missing an SSH client.
Presumably that's been left out on purpose. Is there any reason
beside
size that it is not included?
Ask google about yaifo.
Regards,
-Lars
On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:07, Mike Erdely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 07:50:03AM -0800, Ray Percival wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007, at 7:34, Lars NoodC)n [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The RAM-disk kernel (bsd.rd) seems to be missing an SSH client.
Presumably that's been left out
On Dec 16, 2007, at 9:29 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 10:56 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bengt Frost wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 12:31:25PM -0700, Darrb
Finally as long as i do not hurt 'someone' (to mutch) then it must
be up
On Dec 16, 2007, at 11:58 AM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
You can use OpenBSD to build a baby mulcher or a nookyoular weapon
and
you have the choice to retain the source code.
You can use the GPL to build a puppy blood drainer or a dirty bomb
provided you deliver the
On Dec 16, 2007, at 2:24 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Ray Percival wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007, at 11:58 AM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
You can use OpenBSD to build a baby mulcher or a nookyoular
weapon and
you have the choice to retain the source code.
You can use
On Dec 16, 2007, at 6:20 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 05:24:48PM -0500, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
That's fine, it is a statement of values and principals, that is
exactly
what I was looking for - something that is conspicuously absent
from
On Dec 16, 2007, at 6:27 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
William Boshuck wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 05:24:48PM -0500, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Ray Percival wrote:
[quoting and excerpt from Theo's log message in (e.g.):
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/Attic/ipf.rules
On Dec 16, 2007, at 5:52 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Ray Percival wrote:
You believe in absolute freedom - freedom to do whatever you damn well
please.
I really fail to see the problem with that but whatever.
Yet you are seeking to deny the same freedom to Richard and everyone
else
On Dec 15, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Marc Balmer wrote:
Richard Stallman wrote:
For personal reasons, I do not browse the web from my computer. (I
also have not net connection much of the time.) To look at page I
send mail to a demon which runs wget and mails the page back to me.
It is very
On Dec 15, 2007, at 8:21 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
After reveiwing the OpenBSD Goals and Polices, it appears to me
that
the intent is that OpenBSD should be a free/Open Source system. But
unless I am missing something that is not actually made clear. The
polices page lists software
On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:18 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
snip
It is completely irrelevant to Stallman whether the OS he endorses is
actually useful. In his world view, his definition of free trumps
functional.
It is always possible to improve the quality of something, it is
may not
be
On Dec 14, 2007, at 5:44 AM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Ray Percival wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:18 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
snip
Just as an example most advertisers choose not to name their
competition. Politicians go out of their way to elicit denials from
their opponents, because
On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:23 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
If you are unwilling to adopt policies consistent with his,
accept that you are not getting his endorsement and shut this
thread
down.
Nobody here asked for or WANTS his endorsement. He started the
thread. We could give a shit
On Dec 10, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
2007/12/10, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From what I have heard, OpenBSD does not contain non-free software
(though I am not sure whether it contains any non-free firmware
blobs). However, its ports system does suggest non-free
On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:43 AM, Lars Noodin wrote:
Marc Espie wrote:
...
You've got a choice of:
Or
4) not up on the OpenBSD projects goals and current licensing
requirements
Some of that is probably due to the low profile of OpenBSD (low-
profile
is good, though) and the yammering of the
On Dec 10, 2007, at 2:14 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:27:33PM -0800, Ray Percival wrote:
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (3B48b)
Fancy X-Mailer, but isn't non-free and full of patents ;)?
Yes, it is. Very much so. Also means I don't have to get off the
couch when I want
So, what Stallman seems to be saying is that preventing users from
running the software they choose is more important than respecting
patents.
Slavery is freedom.
On Dec 7, 2007, at 9:41, Eric Furman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:39:39 -0600, Gregg Reynolds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On 12/7/07, Andris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
First of all, you have to take a look at
On Dec 1, 2007, at 4:10 PM, L wrote:
snip
yaifo.fs or pxe boot if the NICs in question support it. The docs for
that are in the FAQ. I rather doubt your NICs do, the readme that
you'll get when you grab the source explain how to do just what you
want.
http://erdelynet.com/?s=yaifo
On Nov 18, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Siju George wrote:
snip
I know I cannot escape recompiling the kernel because it is necessary
for updates. But as far as possible I would like to stay away from it
on production machines :-)
That's what releases are for.
Thanks a million for all the detailed
On Nov 11, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Barry Miller wrote:
Of course, if a bad guy _does_ get control of wireshark, he OWNS your
network, but at least you're not totally rooted. Take your chances.
How so? Given that all it is a frontend to libpcap. And how does this
not apply to tcpdump?
--Barry
On Nov 4, 2007, at 7:36 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Timo
iD8DBQFHLecDUY3eBSqOgOMRCu7WAKCtwy0qC/TmhZqzIbMKZEPy0+uqAgCffh+C
Yg7jMg1F+EvUiK4xPprWiSI=
=qMJx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Stop fucking signing mails to a public list that is BEYOND fucking
annoying and all by itself proves that
On Nov 2, 2007, at 5:23 AM, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
A very nice startegy from you. I have been looking for how to patch
several machines this way. The kernel is easy since it is just
one file to patch. But the userland is more delicate. Just to
summarize
your script (I want to understand how
On Oct 13, 2007, at 2:43 AM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
I want to make my OS return 127.0.0.1 on google-analytics.com and
ad.doubleclick.net to speed up the work with Sourceforge.
I put
127.0.0.1 google-analytics.com
127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.net
into /etc/hosts
and checked that /etc/resolv.conf
On Mar 18, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Bibby wrote:
hi all:
I use OpenBSD from 3.6, when every release is pre-ordered, i can't
find a
easy way to
own a set.
I live in China, Is it possible to have a OpenBSD store in Asia?
China? Japan? Korean? or other coutries?
Sure. Knock yourself out.
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
snip
Please do make an effort
to find some information yourself before asking, or you will
start getting on people's nerves, even if you do not intend to.
Start?
snip
iD8DBQFF/AzH5B7p9jYarz8RAm2BAJ9ak/sun5B61mKN/jIF0GqMJbiy0gCfSsbx
On Mar 17, 2007, at 11:50 AM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:53:10AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 03/15/2007 11:55:44 PM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
Security isn't about receiving notifications to your Inbox in a
timely
fashion. It is about being proactive yourself. You should
On Mar 17, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
* Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-17 08:39]:
I don't know what's worse, the junky posts from people who come
out of the
woodwork around release dates or the
Two chick f/cking in wild orgy \
Normalize your Cholesterol \
mature blonde milf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 11:43:47AM +1100, fonkprop wrote:
Yet again, we see that although Theo is willing to beg, wheedle
and threaten
his user community into sending him money when he needs it,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 17, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Bryan Allen wrote:
On Mar 17, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
Hate to tell you this, but Canada is not the United States.
Give us a couple years. Pax Americana, yo.
Actually I'm hoping to get BC to
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
snip
I am not following anything
That's obvious.
- just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD.
What should
I follow, then?
In other operating system the concept of upgrading is
straightforward - Windows
ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux
On Mar 16, 2007, at 5:43 PM, fonkprop wrote:
Yet again, we see that although Theo is willing to beg, wheedle and
threaten
his user community into sending him money when he needs it, he
holds them in
too much contempt to respond to simple, uncontroversial and valid
criticism.
No. This is
On Mar 15, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
snip
I agree. I'm very annoyed that I have to read about this
problem on slashdot. The misc list is not the right place
for this announcement, some low-traffic announce list that
goes right into my inbox is where this stuff belongs.
I rely on
On Mar 3, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Tom Van Looy wrote:
Some people thought the current 4.0 artwork was to childish for a
corporate environment. I created a more simple and clean looking dvd
case. You can download it at http://puffy.ctors.net/
If you have some comments about this, please let me know.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 7, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Nick Guenther wrote:
snip
I would too, but I remember a while back (but cannot find the message
now) Theo saying that WPA gives a false sense of security and that it
would never be implemented. He didn't explain why.
On Jan 7, 2007, at 3:37 PM, vladas wrote:
http://www.openbsd.org/landisk.html mentions that
.. Or you can attempt to build your own serial cable connection
using some Japanese instructions ..
Is there any demand for those instructions to be translated into
English?
You mean like this?
On Jan 5, 2007, at 11:19 PM, Virgil Gheorghiu wrote:
snip
Can anyone confirm such hardware will work to its full ability under
OpenBSD 3.9 or 4.0?
Oddly enough, yes. The docs http://www.openbsd.org/plat.html. And
whatever it says in your dmesg.
I am mostly interested in the RAID status and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 23, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Passeur wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build a live CD based on the official OpenBSD article.
(http://www.openbsd-wiki.org/index.php?title=LiveCD)
Nothing official' about it.
They do not preach that their God will rouse
On Nov 24, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Joel Goguen wrote:
It seems to me that such a license would be too restrictive for many.
The goal of OpenBSD (AFAIK) is not to force or coerce lock-in to a
single OS - that's Microsoft's turf :)
Theo said it best.
But software which OpenBSD uses and redistributes
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:39 PM, David T Harris wrote:
When you say that the GPL is related to DRM,
The point is that like DRM the GPL restricts what you can do and how
you can use the code. The BSD license doesn't.
what do you mean? I mean how is GPL related to DRM?
Generally I try to avoid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 13, 2006, at 7:53 PM, steve szmidt wrote:
Over the years one gets used to some small things that makes life
easier but
is only slowly catching up on OBSD. I'm curious as why this is. Is
it that
real coders don't need some of them, or is
.
I think he was writing about WiFi cards. I've yet to find anything
bad about old-skool ethernet cards. Also the ethernet cards *do* have
free drivers unlike the wifi cards.
snip
Ray Percival
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 3, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 05:00:37PM -0700, Ray Percival wrote:
On Sep 3, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
Theo wrote about em driver in OpenBSD and bad vendor design of
Intel
NICs in general. Exactly the opposite I have
On Jul 8, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Bill Meigs wrote:
Thanks. That fixed the adduser script issue, but I still get
disconnected immediately.
Read the authpf portion of the FAQ. It's in there.
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 06:24:40PM -0700, Bill Meigs wrote:
One other related
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 24, 2005, at 3:50 PM, Edd Barrett wrote:
On 24/12/05, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate to send this Christmas present to misc,
but there is definitely a security hole in Xwindows
One wonders how software that doesn't exist
On Dec 24, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Michael Steinfeld wrote:
Currently, I do not run X on my openbsd box and really would rather
not. I am thinking of a way to have multiple ttys available for
monitoring without switching back and forth between them. It might
seem silly to some, when you have a dual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 27, 2005, at 4:20 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
snip
You're not contributing anything.
if you are sent away right at the beginning, what's the point?
expressing an opinion is still a contribution. without that,
openbsd would be much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 27, 2005, at 7:52 PM, Jeremy David wrote:
On 11/27/05, Simon Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hackers like interesting problems. Pretty HTML and a nice website
layout is not an interesting problem. Stop wasting peoples time
with it. The
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:32:25AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
We are getting ready to recommend an appliance to one of our clients, .. I
know we could build a box (a la Soekris), but I have also heard that
vendors like Lok Technologies are selling pre-built OBSD solutions.
1) Any
These cards don't seem to be ath anymore.
The relevant bits from my dmesg.
rl0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 D-Link Systems 530TX+ rev 0x10: irq 11 address
00:11:95:24:6a:0d
rlphy0 at rl0 phy 0: RTL internal phy
rl1 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 D-Link Systems 530TX+ rev 0x10: irq 5 address
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:22:51PM -0400, stan wrote:
I find myself in the position sometimes when away from home having access
to only M$ machines with a base OS load only.
Things I've learned from travel.
1. Carry a copy of putty on every form of media you can think of. I have one my
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:24:15PM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
Some intelligent scripts look at tcp responses to port scans, ssh
responds with SSH-2.0, which isn't too hard to identify. I don't know if
changing the greeting would break the protocol, but I suspect it might
break certain
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:15:13PM -0400, Adam wrote:
Matthias Herlitzius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO a redesign should use XHTML/CSS. Otherwise it would be hard to
realize proper accessibility for lynx :-)
snip
I just opened it up in lynx and myabe I just have low standards but I'm
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:56:16AM +0200, Martin Schrvder wrote:
On 2005-09-08 08:57:29 +0530, Siju George wrote:
One of my friends sent me this new OpenBSD website design he created.
Please have a look at it :-D
http://mayuresh.freeshell.org/openbsd/
Nice, but wrong:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:52:02AM +0100, ed wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 22:12:03 +0200
Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/ ? :-)
I was taking a look at that, and it seems I am either getting behind
with OpenBSD versions or
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:10:02PM -0700, mojo fms wrote:
I need to get an OpenBSD server to do Authentication on a MS Windows 2k3
network, trying to replace the DNS servers on them and im trying to secure
the network a lot more. Im trying to also learn how about how to make
OpenBSD and
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:22:13PM -0400, Peter Landry wrote:
Hi,
We're going to be doing some network restructuring, splitting our
internal network into 2 separate IP networks (192.168.1.0 and
192.168.2.0). We currently have a Microsoft ISA firewall for our whole
network (since it's just 1
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:44:14PM +0200, Rickard Dahlstrand wrote:
snip
Right now the last line just logs the key to syslog instead of sending
it to a phone. Also not that the otp-key password is hardcoded in the
script. Not really a good idea, but I have no choice. (The file is not
world
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 11:13:52AM -0300, Joco Salvatti wrote:
HI all,
I'd like to know where I could find informations about how to configure bind
to
work under OpenBSD 3.7. I've already made a search in the net, but the
available documents are vacant. I've already looked at FAQ files, but
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:03:04AM -0500, Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido wrote:
2005/8/24, Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This has been discussed before. I think many people here agree this
would be very useful. Some has even volunteered to do it, but I
haven't found
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:15:48AM -0400, Timothy Donahue wrote:
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 11:58 pm, eric wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 16:53:25 -0600, Theo de Raadt proclaimed...
It is plain simple bad advice. And totally ridiculous.
And plus, with ipv6, it's imperative that the
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:56:32PM +0200, Erik Wikstrvm wrote:
On 2005-08-24 20:21, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
Hrm, I was installing the mono port and I ran into an error. The error
was simple and we all know what it means.
Trying 62.243.72.50...
Unimplemented command.
61%
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:57:43PM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Theo de Raadt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 6:53 PM
To: Jason Crawford
Cc: Will H. Backman; j knight; Misc OpenBSD
Subject: Re: /usr/share/pf/ suggestion
snip
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:04:04AM -0500, Joe Szedula wrote:
I've installed the amd64 -current (13 August) on my ASUS K8S-MX system.
snip
The dmesg shows these unknown items:
ppb1 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 vendor SIS, unknown product 0x000a rev
0x00
ppb2 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 vendor
I've been asked to do something a bit silly for work. Let me give you the
background.
I have a bunch of network connections that run our of a non-OpenBSD firewall,
they just happen to be VPN tunnels, for auditing purposes they want to generate
a log when somebody starts a session down one of
I have the following pf.conf and authpf.rules. When I try to load the rules
into the anchor I get
authpfbob# pfctl -a authpf -f /etc/authpf/authpf.rules
/etc/authpf/authpf.rules:3: macro 'user_ip' not defined
/etc/authpf/authpf.rules:3: syntax error
pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:14:52PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
* Ray Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-08 12:17]:
I have the following pf.conf and authpf.rules. When I try to load the
rules into the anchor I get
authpfbob# pfctl -a authpf -f /etc/authpf/authpf.rules
/etc/authpf/authpf.rules
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:37:52AM +0200, Artur Grabowski wrote:
Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
Don't change settings and options unless you really have to. Because
when you get used to the changes and for some reason need to change
environment you'll get surprised and will
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 03:24:06PM -0700, Miles Keaton wrote:
Somewhat-OT, but I figure the PF-friendly OBSD gang would have more
experience with this than anyone:
Working on a webmin-style admin/control-panel service for our
webhosting clients.
Thinking of running it on high ports like
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:35:37PM -0700, edgar mortiz wrote:
I have a 1gb USB Flash Drive and i formatted it on Windows XP so i can
move files from windows to openbsd and vice versa. i plugged the usb
on my bsd box and dmesg shows up as:
** dmesg: **
umass0 at uhub0 port 2 configuration 1
I just upgraded a ftp server that has been running on Debian stable for the
last 3 years, yes I know unsafe and unclean and all that but sadly my only
choice is what to run it on not to make our customers go to sftp.
I just upgraded it to OpenBSD 3.7. Setting it up in a more secure manner than
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:28:17PM -0500, Paul Lussier wrote:
Hi all,
I'm need of a little help setting up a VPN tunnel between my OpenBSD
box and a Cisco VPN concentrator. I have successfully set up a tunnel
with another OpenBSD box, but in trying to change the isakmpd.conf to
then connect
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:23:16PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Aric Gregson wrote:
Hope this is the appropriate list for this. Have tried to upgrade to
3.7 from 3.6 for a while a now. Tried booting from binary 3.7 -release
on a CD (which I burned), but repeatedly received
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:55:31AM +0200, Dominik Epple wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:46:32PM -0500, Chandler May wrote:
I recently posted to this list inquiring how to successfully
initialize the Xorg server on a Mac Mini (With an LCD monitor through
DVI) running OpenBSD 3.7. Now, I
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:43:36AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Ray Percival wrote:
Trying to track -stable according to the FAQ I'm doing the following.
setenv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs #Which seems to take
and
the following cvs commands work and the fingerprints match.
Then
cvs up
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:38:15PM -0700, Winston Williams wrote:
I am just setting up an OpenBSD machine that I am hosting remotely in a
data center. I was configuring qmail on two ssh sessions, when both
sessions suddenly died.
ssh will no longer respond
apache and bind are still
Trying to track -stable according to the FAQ I'm doing the following.
setenv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs #Which seems to take and
the following cvs commands work and the fingerprints match.
Then
cvs up -rOPENBSD_3_7 -Pd
? archivers/w-cabextract-1.1
? archivers/w-unzip-5.51
? archivers/w-faad-2.0p1
Setting up GPG and I thought I enabled encrypted swap with sysctl -w
vm.swapencrypt.enable=1 it threw a message telling me that it was changing it.
I also uncommented it in /etc/sysctl.conf but have not booted since doing
that. Looking thorugh the archives and the faq I thought that should make
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:17:55PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
On 6/20/05, Ray Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setting up GPG and I thought I enabled encrypted swap with sysctl -w
vm.swapencrypt.enable=1
You're already there; only GPG doesn't know about that. I suspect you
misread
I have a nforce mobo with built in sound. Dmesg shows
auich0 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 Nvidia nForce AC-97 Audio rev 0xc2: irq 5,
nForce AC97
audio0 at auich0
So I'm pretty sure the drivers are loaded and the card is supported.
I think the problem is that /dev/sound is
lrwx-- 1 root wheel
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 04:20:50PM -0400, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:36:00AM -0700, Ray Percival wrote:
It would seem that openbox as installed from the package in 3.7 doesn't
have rc.xml or menu.xml files. Is this on purpose or is it a bug or,
very likely, am I
It would seem that openbox as installed from the package in 3.7 doesn't
have rc.xml or menu.xml files. Is this on purpose or is it a bug or,
very likely, am I missing something obvious? I'm going to try importing
the ones I have on my Debian box to see if that solves it.
Also coming from Debian
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:25:39PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote:
Mark Uemura wrote:
Remote access: Windows' built-in Remote Desktop is included with the OS,
you don't need OpenBSD for that. You couldn't do that over your Intel
VPN? Remote Desktop is potentially vulnerable to MITM, but it's
95 matches
Mail list logo
