On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:43 AM, Lars Noodin wrote:
Marc Espie wrote:
...
You've got a choice of:
Or
4) not up on the OpenBSD projects goals and current licensing
requirements
Some of that is probably due to the low profile of OpenBSD (low-
profile
is good, though) and the yammering of the FreeBSD crowd (which both
includes a lot of MSFTers, and takes it upon itself to represent
all *BSD).
I realize it's good fun in Redmond to poke at RMS, however, that will
not inform the public about the advantages of OpenBSD. The only
purpose
there is to make everyone look bad.
Articles and other means of providing information about OpenBSD will
increase knowledge of OpenBSD.
So a high profile public figure talking out of his ass and
representing things he's not informed about as facts as opposed to
asking questions to get informed is better ... how? That's what we
would expect from a political activist not an engineer.
