-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/17/10 04:49, Jozsi Vadkan wrote:
I want to put my server in a server hotel.
But: I don't trust my server hotel owner.
What can I do?
I wouldn't do business with anyone that I didn't trust.
I don't trust very many people.
So, what I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter HEINER wrote:
Hi all,
I have a home router with 4.6/i386 installed on a 512 MB CF card.
As both disk space and RAM are scarce, I want to minimize logging.
As I don't usually have other machines running, remote logging is not
really a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
J.C. Roberts wrote:
Stop bitching and think.
1.) You do not have a name. You only have an email address.
2.) If your email address really indicates your location, then you are
on a tiny island *EAST* of Madagascar in the Indian ocean.
3.)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Uwe Dippel wrote:
I can't as of now (weekend).
But I can see it reoccurring, kind of:
Aug 21 18:31:25 mybox sshd[31888]: Accepted password for isuser from
XXX.XX.XX.XX port 57519 ssh2
in authlog, reflected pretty well by
isuser ttyp0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hari
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:33 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: DHCP question
fxp0: warning: SCB timed out (x 3)
Is 'SCB' a typo for 'SBC'?
I have SBC DSL, and did have some weirdness
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Yes, I know, it's completely a dumb question; but I'm curious about it.
I'm just learning C applied in networking area and I wonder what editor
is preferred by OpenBSD developers.
At present moment I use vim.
vi/vim.
I use it for most of my editing tasks, not
Shane Harbour wrote:
I beg to differ. It really depends on your ISP and how far you really
want to go. I've run everything (DNS, mail, etc) out of my basement for
3 years now.
Ditto.
I've been running my own OBSD web/mail server in an old 1U SuperMicro
server up my attic for about two
I can't help wonder, why so much software are being developed using C.
C permits the programmer freedom to write code as the programmer sees
fit. How the programmer uses that freedom, is up to the programmer.
Putting 'training wheels' on a programming language not only limits
the mistakes
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Perhaps the best, but not the only. Flash i all over the net.
E.g to see the weather forecasts from the Swedish Meteorology
and Hydrology Institute (SMHI), you need Flash 8. Just a few
months ago you needed Internet Explorer as well, but they
are aware and improving...
Siju George wrote:
I thought by running an amd64 kernel will get me twice the speed than
an i386 on an amd64 machine since one is 64 bit processing and the
other is just 32 bit :-(
64 bit processors (combined with 64 bit capable operating systems) have
the ability to address more RAM than
Paul de Weerd wrote:
wittig wrote:
| 64 bit processors (combined with 64 bit capable operating systems) have
| the ability to address more RAM than 32 bit processors because 64^2 is a
| much larger number than 32^2... lots more RAM addresses).
Oops! that should have read:
2^64 and 2^32
On a machine that dual-boots both Windows 2000 and OpenBSD 4.0, I have
a second data hard drive (wd1) with two primary partitions, FAT32L,
which were created by Windows 2000.
Mount fails because they do not have OBSD disklabels... Device not
configured.
# disklabel wd1
...warns that the
L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 02:40 PM 10/3/2007 -0500, Robert C Wittig wrote:
On a machine that dual-boots both Windows 2000 and OpenBSD 4.0, I have
a second data hard drive (wd1) with two primary partitions, FAT32L,
which were created by Windows 2000.
Mount fails because they do not have OBSD
Joachim Schipper wrote:
You cannot, and should not try to. The automatically constructed
disklabel is fine, mount /dev/wd1i or /dev/wd1j.
Thanks, Joachim... worked perfectly!
--
-wittig http://www.robertwittig.com/
http://robertwittig.net/
http://robertwittig.org/
.
Ioan Nemes wrote:
No problem here.
Ioan
Ikmal Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25 1:18 pm
Hi,
http://www.openbsd.org/
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
Apache/1.3.34 Server at www.openbsd.org Port 80
anything wrong there?
On http://openbsd.org/ was ok.
I
I am running OBSD 3.9, and I finally got around to setting up PF.
Following the instructions at:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/config.html
...I added:
pf=YES # enable PF
...to the file /etc/rc.conf.local.
I had to create the file first, as it was non-existent.
I also added:
Marcus Popp wrote:
I'm sure that you have done more to your system then you told :-)
No too much more... just the usual set-up stuff.
This is a practice box. Once I refine what I am doing on it with PF, I
will use the PF set-up on my web/mail servers.
verify that your /etc/rc.conf
viq wrote:
I read some not-really-nice comments about paypal, and as one of
alternatives listed were moneybookers (.com) Can't say i tried either,
but comments seemed positive.
I've been using Paypal regularly... a couple thousand transactions since
2000... on my website and eBay and for
dilbert wrote:
My question is simple- I'm a relative newbie at BSD so please bear with me.
I'm trying to launch the internet; so I open a terminal and go percent sign
'Internet' at the prompt
ie: %internet
and it doesn't work. What gives??!!
Also percent sign 'Print' doesn't work and
Jon R H wrote:
Dose OpenBSD have a printed manual
like FreeBSD has The complete FreeBSD 4th Ed
and also the The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating
System
In addition to what Josh Grosse has already told you, there is a 'No
Starch Press' book titled 'Absolute OpenBSD'
If any of you old timers see any errors in my suggestions, please point
them out. I am fairly new myself, and my two mailservers have been
running fine for 6+ months with this setup, but I still have a LOT to learn.
David B. wrote:
sorry to bother, can anyone suggest a definitive book I
Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Eric Johnson
I've been using the sendmail (configured for Internet use) that was part
of the OBSD 3.7 install on my two servers for the past 6 months, with
zero
Hello chefren,
Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 8:34:09 AM, you wrote:
c There are lots of dangers, and of course there is need of an operator
c but if guns are around even an child of 2 years old can kill someone.
c Eh: Without the tool (gun): there is definitely no problem. Of course
c it's possible
Hello chefren,
Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 11:37:48 AM, you wrote:
c This has nothing to do with OpenBSD and it's pretty impolite to
c transfer information send to you personally to a mailing list.
c You may wish to live that way but you won't make lots of friends with it.
I have my MUA set so
Hello chefren,
Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 11:37:48 AM, you wrote:
For what it's worth...
Also... I have threading enabled, so a reply of any sort from a
list-mail will cue on the thread. In order to escape the sort rule,
one must begin an entirely new email.
I do not intentionally reply to
Hello Anton,
Tuesday, May 2, 2006, 5:05:10 AM, you wrote:
AK Maybe, because in some cases, it just takes a bit more time to 0wn
AK your box if it has no compiler installed.
It's like saying that a handgun makes your house an inherently more
dangerous place. Handguns and compilers are both
Hello chefren,
Tuesday, May 2, 2006, 7:51:23 AM, you wrote:
c It's quite difficult to shoot yourselves without a gun
Yes, exactly... like I said the danger lies in the user, not in the
tool.
I suppose if a person wants to remain a kludge, and a stumble-bum for
the rest of their life, then they
Hello Johan,
Sunday, April 16, 2006, 5:42:06 AM, you wrote:
JS Due to hard disk crash i decided to migrate the only machine not running
OpenBSD to OpenBSD.
JS But tired hearing here and there than OpenBSD is only useful and reliable
on servers i made
JS few screenshots on my main workstation
Hello frantisek,
Thursday, March 23, 2006, 8:09:08 AM, you wrote:
fh this is what i feel sometimes, and i think sometimes more of you do.
fh unfortunately there is no real community around openbsd. at least
fh i dont see one -- one where there are people without cvs commit.
fh if you don't have
Hello,
I have my 'test' OpenBSD server up and running, and serving pages at:
http://70.142.248.62/ This was pretty easy.
Now I am attempting to set up a 'test' email server using sendmail
8.13.3 (OpenBSD 3.7).
The default installation (localhost.cf) works fine out of the box,
sending mail
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, December 21, 2005, 4:20:28 PM, you wrote:
RCW Would adding the line:
RCW supercede domain-name-servers dns.IP.address.1 dns.IP.address.2;
RCW ...do the job of hardcoding:
RCW nameserver dns.IP.address.1
RCW nameserver dns.IP.address.2
RCW ...into the 'resolv.conf'
I have a fair amount of experience networking in Windows 2000, Linux
Red Hat, and FreeBSD, but I am a relative newbie to OpenBSD, just
setting up my first practice machine, which is still basically a
typical default installation.
I have an SBC DSL connection, non-static IP (Netopia Cayman
Hello Tobias,
Wednesday, December 21, 2005, 1:00:08 PM, you wrote:
TU To fix these values locally, take a look at dhclient.conf(5), especially
TU at the supersede option and domain-name-servers.
Right now 'dhclient.conf' is completely commented out.
Would adding the line:
supercede
Hello Fred,
Wednesday, December 21, 2005, 4:49:51 PM, you wrote:
FC You could put your local changes in /etc/resolv.conf.tail - thus when
FC resolv.conf is overwritten your local changes will be preserved.
Yep, thanks!
Another listmember suggested this to me off-list, and I did it, and it
has
34 matches
Mail list logo
