On 14.09-20:43, Nick Holland wrote:
[ ... ]
Speed matters. Almost as much as some things, and nowhere near as
much as others.
beautifully specific and vague, i'd challenge anyone to sum up
benchmarking better. if that's not a quote, it is now; i'm writing
it down and sticking it to my wall.
On 04.05-08:17, Jochem Kossen wrote:
[ ... ]
today i bought a Samsung Laptop Drive, 160GB, Model Number is HM160HC.
It came in a anti-static plastic bag together with a little leaflet.
Usually i don't read those, but today i did, and came across the
following paragraph:
Hybrid
On 02.04-09:49, Alf Schlichting wrote:
[ ... ]
as far as i am concerned (and most likely the majority of OpenBSD
users) there is no need for you to justify yourself (or any other
developer) in public.
The product (OpenBSD) speeks for itself.
+1
On 01.04-17:21, Jay Jesus Amorin wrote:
[ ... ]
I have a firewall rule that allow ssh from computer-1 to computer-2 and deny
ssh from computer-2 to computer-1.
is it possible to a tunnel *ssh **myu...@computer-2*
myu...@computer-2*'svn update svn+ssh://u...@computer-1/svn/data
/home/myuser'
On 08.03-11:13, Lo?=?VAI DC!niel wrote:
[ ... ]
I wish to experiment setting up a PPPoE server (AC) on OpenBSD 4.4.
Although I've read the pppoe(8) man page and googled around, it is not
clear for me how to set up such configuration.
man sppp
On 24.09-09:48, Maximo Pech wrote:
Well I guess I will have to resolve this by coding something. What do you
think about this:
[ ... ]
would you not be better to use ALTQ to limit the bandwidth available
to each user? then if they share their password their only sharing
their own use?
if not
On 17.07-10:26, Jason Dixon wrote:
[ ... ]
I don't have any customers that use Java for client-side image
rendering, so I can't speak as to how it would compare. I suspect that
Java wouldn't be as efficient as flash for passing instructions to the
client, but that's just a hunch.
performance
On 10.04-11:06, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
[ ... ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] [10:59:59]
$ date -u
Thu Apr 10 09:00:01 UTC 2008
presumably the prompt is showing local time which is UTC +2 (+1 for
CET and +1 for summer time). so all is well. as for the sysmon output
you'll probably find (but i
been setting up a repository of various development stuff and finding
subversion to be horrifically slow and very hard on resources.
struggling to find actual comparisons with CVS (lots of opinions and
statements about SVN tagging and branching being better) but hoping
someone here could help with
On 01.03-00:39, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
[ ... ]
No, i don't use same network address for two networks.
then you need to alter you settings to specify the actual networks
that you're using.
for example, you could define the remote network to be
192.168.123.123/32 and then route everything for
On 17.01-22:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
need an education here. created a patchset for this problem and i'm
about to test that against 4.2 GENERIC and have a couple of questions
1. are the results generally intersting? should i post
them somewhere (assuming tests go right)
need an education here. created a patchset for this problem and i'm
about to test that against 4.2 GENERIC and have a couple of questions
1. are the results generally intersting? should i post
them somewhere (assuming tests go right)
assuming above is yes
2.
On 12.12-16:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried using pkgsrc-2007Q3 but it sucks. Updating userland in
production environment with pkgsrc on a non-NetBSD platform is a
nightmare.
i'm working on this. will post when significant progress has been
made. in my opinion having a working pkgsrc
On 11.12-16:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/12/11 16:13, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
I borrowed a HUAWEI modem just to see how it is recognized.
With umass enabled it is recognized as a CD. Disabling umass and it is
found as ugen.
From this thread
two questions relating to the above
1. trying to use 'max-src-conn 1' to limit service to one
connection per host (with overload table) but when i disconnect and
re-reconnect i get blocked. should this state expire when
correctly closed, allowing a second connection, or is the timeout
On 10.11-17:01, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
[ ... ]
PPD files are post script description files that act as a drivers for
post script printers. This seems clear to me.
no. they simply describe the functions available on the printer.
this allows the interface to display those printer options to
On 11.11-06:51, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
[ ... ]
Now I only know what you people seem to be saying about PPD files and
drivers. I have never used CUPS either.
However long ago I have read that postscript is a PCL - printer command
language.
And most printers these days support printing
On 31.10-08:40, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[ ... ]
Yeah, right.
[ ... ]
I don't understand. Is newbies learning new things a waste to you? Do
you think they won't really learn anything unless the patch is
approved? Or will the patches not be subject to peer review? Or are
you worried at who
On 31.10-08:20, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[ ... ]
They don't need a list. They could already have started coding. Yet
we see how few people actually do start coding. Instead, they choose
to write in english...
on the counter-side we appear to have people who can code but are
unable to
On 02.10-09:56, Marcus Andree wrote:
Theo is the copyright holder of the CD directory structure used by the
install CDs.
If someone wanna sell a CD (or DVD) legally, s/he will have to:
- get a written permission from Theo or
- code an entirely new installation procedure
i find this all
On 02.10-15:43, ?ke Nordin wrote:
[ ... ]
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565
Cool link... Information about an article about privacy, and for
downloading it you need javascript and whatever more... (I didn't manage
to get the full text).
Not to mention no
On 02.10-11:46, Bob Beck wrote:
(though i have to confess, i haven't made a donation since i upgraded
my gateway to 4.1 ... i have an excuse !!! and it was only last week.
and i will)
And this is exactly the problem. Look, you guys can quibble
all you want about awww, we should be
On 30.09-10:03, Anton Karpov wrote:
[ ... ]
The same here. I have wireframe puffy on the back of my car. VERY
attractive:
of course, if you were _really_ security conscious you would have
cropped the license plate no
;-)
On 27.09-08:59, Amit Finkler wrote:
I now use the in-kernel pppoe and pf, but on boot pf loads itself before the
networking is up.
How does one cause the networking to be up before the pf rules?
i tend to load a basic ruleset during boot and then either overwrite
it or update it with
but it allows some users to not have the freedoms you claim to defend.
think you'll struggle to find people here who claim to defend freedom.
personally, i'm a believer and practitioner, i leave the defending
to the mis-guided and the hypocrites.
On 24.09-10:25, Jason Dixon wrote:
[ ... ]
What I'm trying to say is that all the services I listed before make
their own little SELinux layer with appropriate policy built into
them. Better than SELinux though is that the monitor is enabled by
default and generally can't be turned off.
On 24.09-11:49, Can E. Acar wrote:
[ ... ]
The guy can be some stupid binary software with an if(uid!=root) bail();
People running arbitrary binary software requiring root on their systems
deserve what they get. You can not work around this stupidity by ANY policy.
that is not the case and
On 24.09-13:48, Darren Spruell wrote:
[ ... ]
Oh, that sounds like a recipe for success.
- Run _arbitrary_ _binary_ application on system. Intend to use policy
wrapper to restrict to allowed operations.
exactly, if the application cannot run within the defined policies it
will not be allowed
On 24.09-14:28, Luke Bakken wrote:
[ ... ]
Intelligent sysadmins know every setuid binary on their system.
Unintelligent ones get owned.
you'll forgive me if this does not sound intelligent to me. a
consiencous sysadmin looks at the requirements and picks the best
tools to match. in the vast
On 22.09-02:06, Luca Corti wrote:
[ ... ]
We are talking about OpenBSD here, and support for VRF is not there.
That may change faster then you expect
These are great news. If the implementation will allow to assign
interfaces to different VRFs it would solve the virtual router/firewall
On 22.09-16:21, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
[ ... ]
exercise for the reader: find somebody using SELinux. ask them to
describe their policy over the phone. then repeat it back to them.
did you get it right?
[ ... ] In other words, since debian packages, by policy, must
just work on
31 matches
Mail list logo
