Re: Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-31 Thread ropers
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 07:09:58PM +0100, ropers wrote: >> It says here that one >> should not send dmesg@ mail that's text-flow reformatted (which I >> AFAIK gmail always does, unavoidably). >> >> If (for whatever reasons) the choice is between

Re: Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-31 Thread Erling Westenvik
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 07:09:58PM +0100, ropers wrote: > It says here that one > should not send dmesg@ mail that's text-flow reformatted (which I > AFAIK gmail always does, unavoidably). > > If (for whatever reasons) the choice is between

Re: Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-31 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015-12-30, ropers wrote: > It says here that one > should not send dmesg@ mail that's text-flow reformatted (which I > AFAIK gmail always does, unavoidably). > > If (for whatever reasons) the choice is between gmail-dmesgs or

Re: Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-31 Thread ropers
Cheers man. All the best to you too -- and to everybody else around. On 1 January 2016 at 01:18, Erling Westenvik wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 04:00:50PM +0100, ropers wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 07:09:58PM +0100, ropers wrote: >> >> It says here

Re: Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-31 Thread Erling Westenvik
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 04:00:50PM +0100, ropers wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 07:09:58PM +0100, ropers wrote: > >> It says here that one > >> should not send dmesg@ mail that's text-flow reformatted (which I > >> AFAIK gmail always does,

Re: Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-30 Thread Joel Rees
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Alexey Suslikov > wrote: >> ropers gmail.com> writes: >> >>> It says here that one >>> should not send dmesg

Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-30 Thread ropers
It says here that one should not send dmesg@ mail that's text-flow reformatted (which I AFAIK gmail always does, unavoidably). If (for whatever reasons) the choice is between gmail-dmesgs or no dmesgs, would gmail dmesgs be preferable to none

Re: Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-30 Thread Alexey Suslikov
ropers gmail.com> writes: > It says here that one > should not send dmesg mail that's text-flow reformatted (which I > AFAIK gmail always does, unavoidably). it does, but only if you use web/mobile clients. there is no reformat if you use smtp

Re: Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-30 Thread Kamil Cholewiński
> (not compatible with 2-factor auth). Citation needed? App-specific passwords work.

Re: Is a gmail/text-flow dmesg better than no dmesg?

2015-12-30 Thread Joel Rees
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Alexey Suslikov wrote: > ropers gmail.com> writes: > >> It says here that one >> should not send dmesg mail that's text-flow reformatted (which I >> AFAIK gmail always does,