Thanks, that did the trick!
Dave
On 11/9/19, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 08:24:36AM -0700, Raymond, David wrote:
>
>> Hmmm
>>
>> On install of openbsd a second, non-boot 4 TB disk was initialized by
>> fdisk in the usual way. My intention was to create a single partition
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 08:24:36AM -0700, Raymond, David wrote:
> Hmmm
>
> On install of openbsd a second, non-boot 4 TB disk was initialized by
> fdisk in the usual way. My intention was to create a single partition
> and file system for the whole disk. However, disklabel limits me to a
>
Hmmm
On install of openbsd a second, non-boot 4 TB disk was initialized by
fdisk in the usual way. My intention was to create a single partition
and file system for the whole disk. However, disklabel limits me to a
partition size of 2 TB. The c partition automatically covers the full
disk,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 07:01:02AM -0700, Raymond, David wrote:
> Does raid0 allow the creation of file systems bigger than the 2 TB limit of
> ffs?
RAID 0 stripe sizes may be as large as the smallest physical extent.
FFS2 -- see newfs(8) -- supports a filesystem size up to 64 PB.
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 07:01:02AM -0700, Raymond, David wrote:
> Does raid0 allow the creation of file systems bigger than the 2 TB limit of
> ffs?
Yes. And ffs in general does not have that limit. newfs will move to
ffs2 if needed.
-Otto
5 matches
Mail list logo
