On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:52:24PM -0500, Denny White wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:01:22PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
As always, it is a shame that those types of pages have so many
errors.
[snip: examples]
It
Ted Unangst wrote:
And here I was wondering why NetBSD users can monitor performance with
top and netstat, but OpenBSD users can't.
OpenBSD users can't shut down the system, either...
Theo de Raadt wrote:
http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
As always, it is a shame that those types of pages have so many
errors.
[snip: examples]
It is just sad.
It's better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
# Han
Steve Shockley wrote:
OpenBSD users can't shut down the system, either...
Hmmm... `shutdown -ph now` works OK for me. Is this an inside joke or
something? I don't get it.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rosetta-Stone-for-Unix-tp19890925p19903293.html
Sent from
Right, let me put on my hippie robes so that we can sing koombaya.
Obviously it doesn't matter that website is spewing shit; it is the
thought that counts.
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:01:22PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
As always, it is a
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:01:22PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
As always, it is a shame that those types of pages have so many
errors.
[snip: examples]
It is just sad.
It's better to light a candle than to curse the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thought this was pretty useful and interesting, especially for those
of us who aren't on the same level as developers and gurus. And for
them, there's also a contributions and corrections link.
http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
Found it in the
Thought this was pretty useful and interesting, especially for those
of us who aren't on the same level as developers and gurus. And for
them, there's also a contributions and corrections link.
http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
As always, it is a shame that those types of pages have so many
As always, it is a shame that those types of pages have so many
errors.
For instance, check out the disklabel section. 2 out of 4 answers
being right is still only 50% accurate.
Is that because the information is outdated (it was once correct) or is it
plain wrong (it was never the case)
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought this was pretty useful and interesting, especially for those
of us who aren't on the same level as developers and gurus. And for
them, there's also a contributions and corrections link.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:09:16PM -0600, Theo de Raadt spoke thusly:
Thought this was pretty useful and interesting, especially for those
of us who aren't on the same level as developers and gurus. And for
them, there's also a contributions and corrections link.
11 matches
Mail list logo
