For example, his Wikipedia article is one sided propaganda:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_stallman
Yeah maybe, but so's the uncyclopedia version! ;)
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman
-B
These messages somehow did not make it to misc@ so I am resending them.
My reply to RMS did make it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I basically asked RMS why he endorses Solaris which is not even remotely
free.
I encourage people to try to understand the FSF reasoning for this
endorsement. I can't come up
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Might it have something to do with money?
http://www.fsf.org/donate/patron/index_html
Thanks, now I know how Barracuda got away with barely paying lip service
to the GPL.
Marco,
I can definitely see another angle:
RMS spoke about OpenSolaris without getting his facts straight. When his
bullshit was exposed he backtracked and had the author of the article
post this correction:
[RMS added this comment later:] Since that interview I've learned that
not all of
4 matches
Mail list logo
