> Am 16.01.2015 um 08:49 schrieb Jonathan Gray :
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:59:49AM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Christer Solskogen
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
I've updated the kernel at
http://jsg.id.a
> Am 16.01.2015 um 08:49 schrieb Jonathan Gray :
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:59:49AM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Christer Solskogen
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
I've updated the kernel at
http://jsg.id.a
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:59:49AM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Christer Solskogen
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >> I've updated the kernel at
> >> http://jsg.id.au/openbsd/bsd.IMX.umg
> >>
> >
> > And we have lift-off!
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Christer Solskogen
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> I've updated the kernel at
>> http://jsg.id.au/openbsd/bsd.IMX.umg
>>
>
> And we have lift-off!
>
Will the changes go in-tree soon? :-)
--
chs
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> I've updated the kernel at
> http://jsg.id.au/openbsd/bsd.IMX.umg
>
And we have lift-off!
## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 1080 ...
Image Name: boot
Created: 2015-01-14 14:13:27 UTC
Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 06:52:00PM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >
> > Your earlier mail had a different load address than what I'd expect.
> > Try 0x1880
>
> Same. I've tried the following staring adresses: 0x1060 -
> 0x188
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
> Your earlier mail had a different load address than what I'd expect.
> Try 0x1880
Same. I've tried the following staring adresses: 0x1060 -
0x1880 - 0x1080
The last one is what I use to boot bitrig.
CM-FX6 # tftp 0x108
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:56:22PM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > Thanks, I've added the missing case for Utilite.
> > A kernel that includes this change can be found here:
> > http://jsg.id.au/openbsd/bsd.IMX.umg
> >
>
> Now I got a b
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Thanks, I've added the missing case for Utilite.
> A kernel that includes this change can be found here:
> http://jsg.id.au/openbsd/bsd.IMX.umg
>
Now I got a bit further:
Starting kernel ...
OpenBSD/imx booting ...
arg0 0x0 arg1 0x10b1 ar
Thanks, I've added the missing case for Utilite.
A kernel that includes this change can be found here:
http://jsg.id.au/openbsd/bsd.IMX.umg
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 07:12:51PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Looks like the Utilite wasn???t added in the console init code:
>
> http://cvsweb.openbsd.or
Looks like the Utilite wasn’t added in the console init code:
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/armv7/imx/imx_machdep.c.diff?r1=1.7&r2=1.8
> Am 12.01.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Christer Solskogen
> :
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
>> The serial cons
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> The serial console output would be a good starting point.
(bsd.umg is really bsd.rd.IMX.umg)
CM-FX6 # tftp 0x1080 bsd.umg
Using FEC device
TFTP from server 192.168.0.4; our IP address is 192.168.0.9
Filename 'bsd.umg'.
Load address: 0x
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> If you could provide some details as to why it doesn't boot perhaps it
> will in future.
>
Sure thing. What do you need?
--
chs
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 02:27:38PM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:31 AM, f5b wrote:
> > according
> > http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/armv7/armv7/armv7.c?rev=1.4
> >
> >
> > Only one board supported in current with two Gigabit ports ,Compulab
>
Also worth a mention is that only one core is enabled(no smp) and that one
core that is active works at 792Mzh and not 1.2 Ghz.
On Jan 11, 2015 5:03 PM, "Patrick Wildt" wrote:
>
> > Am 11.01.2015 um 14:27 schrieb Christer Solskogen <
> christer.solsko...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at
> Am 11.01.2015 um 14:27 schrieb Christer Solskogen
> :
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:31 AM, f5b wrote:
>> according
>> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/armv7/armv7/armv7.c?rev=1.4
>>
>>
>> Only one board supported in current with two Gigabit ports ,Compulab
>> UTILITE
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:31 AM, f5b wrote:
> according
> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/armv7/armv7/armv7.c?rev=1.4
>
>
> Only one board supported in current with two Gigabit ports ,Compulab UTILITE
> box ?
> Anyone can make sure?
OpenBSD still does not boot on that boa
You mean the i.MX6 SoC? Yeah, that one is limited to 540 MBit/s by design.
In comparison to the i.MX series the LayerScape models are supposed to be
network processors. So, even though they have a tendency to fuck things up, I
don't think they also do that on something that already worked with P
Do the 1Gb interfaces support real 1Gb/sec? I know there
was some arm h/w with 1Gb interfaces that would not run
at 1Gb speed.
diana
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Until recently there has not been ARM hardware that actually has more
> than two Gigabit Ethernet ports. As of now th
according
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/armv7/armv7/armv7.c?rev=1.4
Only one board supported in current with two Gigabit ports ,Compulab UTILITE
box ?
Anyone can make sure?
http://www.compulab.co.il/utilite-computer/web/utilite-models
http://www.compulab.co.il/suppo
Until recently there has not been ARM hardware that actually has more
than two Gigabit Ethernet ports. As of now there are two options:
There’s the Banana Pi R1, which basically is a bigger Banana Pi with
5 Gigabit Ports connected to a Broadcom BCM53125 Switch.
The BPI-R1, also called Lamobo R1
I started entertain the idea of getting ARM based hardware for my new
home firewall.
Are there ARM based consumer motherboards with Gigabit lan controller
which can be used for home firewall hobby project? How close is armv7 or
any other OpenBSD version of being fully functional on such hardware?
22 matches
Mail list logo