2010/9/9, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
And a new flag to struct in6_ifextra?
Nope, it will be part of ifnet-if_xflags.
Actually, it's already in in6_ifextra-nd_ifinfo-flags, named
ND6_IFF_ACCEPT_RTADV and controlled by the ndp -i command. However,
ifconfig autoconfprivacy uses
2010/9/7, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
As soon as you spilt a /64 into something smaler you left IPv6 land end
entered something that looks like IPv6 but isn't. Sure it is possible but
by doing it you make every IPv6 disciple scream in agony (which is
probably a good thing anyway).
* Martin Pelikan (martin.peli...@gmail.com) wrote:
2010/9/7, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
As soon as you spilt a /64 into something smaler you left IPv6 land end
entered something that looks like IPv6 but isn't. Sure it is possible but
by doing it you make every IPv6 disciple
2010/9/6, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
Only if you plan to use NAT in the near future. /64 is like a /32 in IP.
Not enough in most cases.
Why? You can always use DHCPv6 and split the rank further... I haven't
much studied the protocol itself, but in practice the only system that
has
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:23:19AM +0200, Martin Pelikan wrote:
2010/9/6, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
Only if you plan to use NAT in the near future. /64 is like a /32 in IP.
Not enough in most cases.
Why? You can always use DHCPv6 and split the rank further... I haven't
much
I think the number 1 question I have about IPv6 is:
What is wrong with arp?
Nothing is wrong with arp.
As a result of avoiding arp, IPv6 is a duck sitting in a tailing
pond. It isn't dead yet.
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:18:57AM +1000, Olivier Mehani wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:49:43PM -0400, Simon Comeau Martel wrote:
You received a /64 for your router interface ? Or are you in a /64
subnet with other customers ? The setup sounds weird to me. To what
address is your
Hi,
On Mon, 06.09.2010 at 11:18:57 +1000, Olivier Mehani sht...@ssji.net wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:49:43PM -0400, Simon Comeau Martel wrote:
You received a /64 for your router interface ? Or are you in a /64
subnet with other customers ? The setup sounds weird to me. To what
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:14:25AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
ah, great. So we just have 16 bits more then IPv4. Actually ISP can
provide whatever they like to customers. Residential customers will most
probably end up with /64.
exactly, /64 is more than enough
IIRC it is actually forced
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:49:46PM +0200, Martin Pelikan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:14:25AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
ah, great. So we just have 16 bits more then IPv4. Actually ISP can
provide whatever they like to customers. Residential customers will most
probably end up with
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:26:09 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
exactly, /64 is more than enough
Only if you plan to use NAT in the near future. /64 is like a /32 in IP.
Not enough in most cases.
Gee, I thought that 18446744073709551616 addresses was a bit more than
1
;-)
*** NOTE *** Please DO
Hi,
I am trying to figure out why OpenBSD won't let me activate
net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv and net.inet6.ip6.forwarding at the same
time.
My ISP started an IPv6 beta, and I am trying to configure my OpenBSD router
for it. I want to get the IPv6 address of my gateway (the address of my
ISP's
2010/9/5, Simon Comeau Martel si...@comeau.info:
I am trying to figure out why OpenBSD won't let me activate
net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv and net.inet6.ip6.forwarding at the same
time.
/usr/src/sys/netinet6/in6_proto.c:int ip6_accept_rtadv = 0; /*
enabling forwarding and rtadv concurrently
2010/9/5 Martin Pelikan martin.peli...@gmail.com
I can't think of a reason why two ISP's can't configure their routers'
IPs manually. IMO autoconf is for end-users only.
I am an end-user; not an ISP. I need autoconf to find what's my IPv6 default
gateway. And I need to have a router on my
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 02:14:20PM -0400, Simon Comeau Martel wrote:
| 2010/9/5 Martin Pelikan martin.peli...@gmail.com
|
|
| I can't think of a reason why two ISP's can't configure their routers'
| IPs manually. IMO autoconf is for end-users only.
|
|
|
| I am an end-user; not an ISP. I
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl wrote:
You received a /64 for your router interface ? Or are you in a /64
subnet with other customers ? The setup sounds weird to me. To what
address is your ISP forwarding that /56 ?
Yeah, it's a bit strange. But it's their
I'm pretty sure IPv6 forwarding and accepting routing advertisements
will be a necessity going forward. At the current time I don't know of
any other way to dynamically find the default route in IPv6, necessary
for end user gateways on consumer ISPs. Even using DHCPv6 your default
gateway is found
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:49:43PM -0400, Simon Comeau Martel wrote:
You received a /64 for your router interface ? Or are you in a /64
subnet with other customers ? The setup sounds weird to me. To what
address is your ISP forwarding that /56 ?
Yeah, it's a bit strange. But it's their
18 matches
Mail list logo
