On 29.11.2014 22:18, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 00:57:18 +0100
Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
Not that I can find, but what you're saying here is what I'm
seeing:
bash _was_ on the system for a short time a while back when it was
needed
to get
Sorry for interrupting..isn't it this?
We are explicitely patching so that it is *not* it...
--
Antoine
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 00:57:18 +0100
Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
Not that I can find, but what you're saying here is what I'm seeing:
bash _was_ on the system for a short time a while back when it was needed
to get grolog to run on OBSD64. Afterward it was removed.
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 17:38:46 +0100
Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 09:23:41AM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:15:26 +0100
Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:54:10PM -0700, Duncan
I only used that to point out that there's bashisms thruout the codebase...
but I'd guess that somewhere Fruitco is conflating apples and oranges into
the round_fruit set (as distinct from long_fruit like bananas and pine
cones).
If I build foomatic from net sources I get
What net
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:34:35 +0100
Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
I only used that to point out that there's bashisms thruout the
codebase...
but I'd guess that somewhere Fruitco is conflating apples and oranges into
the round_fruit set (as distinct from long_fruit like
I'm not running that code.
As I pointed out the official openbsd foomatic packages are NAME/NUMBERED
like
like the openprinting version 4.012, but inside they are something else
branched
from a much older version: version 1.1 is from circa 2002. This is version
1.0.54
# which
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 00:34:17 +0100
Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
I'm not running that code.
As I pointed out the official openbsd foomatic packages are NAME/NUMBERED
like
like the openprinting version 4.012, but inside they are something else
branched
from a
Not that I can find, but what you're saying here is what I'm seeing:
bash _was_ on the system for a short time a while back when it was needed
to get grolog to run on OBSD64. Afterward it was removed. But
cups-foomatic is going out when it gets installed, and finding some bashism,
9 matches
Mail list logo