On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:28 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
OTOH, *directing* the muddled masses to HIS machine [even if by mistake]
would give pause, would it not? Doesn't seem like a good policy security
to me, ..
Lee
Uhh. Security through Obscurity is no Security.
Look at the differences between:
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html and
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html
The difference is drastic. Information on www.openbsd.org leads to errors. Why
are these pages different?
stupidmail4me stupidmail...@yahoo.com writes:
The difference is drastic. Information on www.openbsd.org leads to errors.
Why are these pages different?
the first for some reason has an old version, while the www one has
the documentation updated per OpenBSD 4.7, which was released today.
...@holland-consulting.net
Subject: Re: Differences between
www.openbsd.org and openbsd.org
To: stupidmail4me
stupidmail...@yahoo.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Wednesday, May 19,
2010, 3:25 PM
stupidmail4me wrote:
Look at the differences between:
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html
and
http
stupidmail4me wrote:
Look at the differences between: http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html
and http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html
The difference is drastic. Information on www.openbsd.org leads to
errors. Why are these pages different?
what does leads to errors mean?
As for why they are
/OpenBSD/doc directory of your favorite download mirror.
Nick.
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
From: Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.net
Subject: Re: Differences between
www.openbsd.org and openbsd.org
To: stupidmail4me
stupidmail...@yahoo.com
Cc
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote on Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:26:50PM +0200:
some anonymous coward wrote:
Look at the differences between:
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html and
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html
the first for some reason has an old version,
The server openbsd.org is actually
On 2010-05-19, stupidmail4me stupidmail...@yahoo.com wrote:
Still running 4.6. Haven't read the changelog yet and didn't realize syntax
changed. Leads to errors means you type that syntax in and it leads to errors.
Makes sense since I'm still running 4.6.
As with the rest of the FAQ, this set
The server openbsd.org is actually cvs.openbsd.org,
that is the main machine in Theo's basement.
Nobody should ever use that one for anything.
For many many years I've been typing
example.com
without leading www. Back in the 1990s nytimes.com didn't work, and
www.nytimes.com did. But
On 19 May 2010 22:54, Bohdan Tashchuk btashc...@yahoo.com wrote:
The server openbsd.org is actually cvs.openbsd.org,
that is the main machine in Theo's basement.
Nobody should ever use that one for anything.
For many many years I've been typing
example.com
without leading www. Back in
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Bohdan Tashchuk btashc...@yahoo.com wrote:
I suggest that there are many clueless people like me out there. The default
behavior should be changed. opendbsd.org should redirect to www.openbsd.org,
and the people who need to access the machine in Theo's
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Bohdan Tashchuk btashc...@yahoo.com wrote:
I suggest that there are many clueless people like me out there. The
default behavior should be changed. opendbsd.org should redirect to
www.openbsd.org, and the people who
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:16:54PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
[...]
The server openbsd.org is actually cvs.openbsd.org,
that is the main machine in Theo's basement.
Nobody should ever use that one for anything.
It has whatever data Theo sees fit for whatever
purpose, sometimes for testing.
On May 19 13:54:34, Bohdan Tashchuk wrote:
The server openbsd.org is actually cvs.openbsd.org,
that is the main machine in Theo's basement.
Nobody should ever use that one for anything.
For many many years I've been typing
example.com
without leading www. Back in the 1990s
14 matches
Mail list logo
